mantra Posted April 12, 2006 http://www.theonion.com/content/node/47216 now thats jokes.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mantra Posted April 12, 2006 http://www.theonion.com/content/node/47162 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ElPunto Posted April 13, 2006 lol - quite the spoof. Getting back to actual case - I heard the prosecutor is pressing on despite the lack of DNA evidence. My question is: how does that work? If there is no DNA - doesn't that rule out sexual assault - apart from fondling/grabbing etc?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mantra Posted April 13, 2006 Originally posted by ThePoint: lol - quite the spoof. Getting back to actual case - I heard the prosecutor is pressing on despite the lack of DNA evidence. My question is: how does that work? If there is no DNA - doesn't that rule out sexual assault - apart from fondling/grabbing etc?? it does rule out sexual assault, funny thing is the girl claims to have been kicked around a bit.. I think that would've been obvious, cant hide bruises.. they oughta check the horses for DNA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
