CidanSultan Posted August 8, 2014 BY NANCY A. YOUSSEF, MCCLATCHY WASHINGTON BUREAU August 7, 2014 | Updated 3 hours ago SHARE Story Comments WASHINGTON — The Islamic State’s push toward the Kurdish city of Irbil on Thursday came as unwelcome news to those who’d believed that the Kurdish peshmerga militia would be the force most capable of halting the militant Islamists’ momentum. The United States had such confidence in the Kurds that, in June, it moved its Joint Operation Center and some embassy staff to Irbil, where roughly 40 U.S. military advisers are now stationed. Until this week, life in Irbil has been relatively normal despite the Islamic State offensive, which began with the fall of Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, in early June. Everyone assumed that the Islamic State was shying away from confronting the peshmerga, with its substantial reputation as a fighting force. But then the Islamic State moved against cities last week that were defended by the peshmerga, and the peshmerga retreated. On Thursday, the Islamic State captured at least four towns on the highway to Irbil and defeated peshmerga forces attempting to break its siege of the Mosul Dam. A near panic took hold in the Kurdish capital as militia forces rushed to set up a defensive line at Kalak, 25 miles northwest of Irbil. It was another victory for the Islamic State, which before the peshmerga had defeated Syrian forces throughout much of eastern Syria, including recent seizures of major Syrian bases in Raqqa and Deir el Zour, and had sent Iraqi army forces fleeing almost to the gates of Baghdad. What has made the Islamic State forces seemingly unstoppable? Observers on the ground and analysts in Washington believe that the latest push was possible because the peshmerga forces are stretched trying to defend a frontier with the Islamic State that is nearly 900 miles long. The Islamic State is also better equipped, with U.S.-supplied weapons that its forces have looted from every Iraqi military based it has seized. It also has recently captured major Syrian arsenals. On Twitter, the Islamic State often posts photos of its bounty from military bases, which include rocket-propelled-grenade launchers, artillery and weapons that are far more sophisticated than those in the peshmerga arsenal. The Islamic State also has the advantage of momentum. According to the Long Wars Journal, citing a tweet by the Islamic State, its forces have taken control of 17 communities in the area around Mosul. Its push stretches all the way to Diyala province in northeast Iraq, which borders Iran. On Thursday, the Islamic State claimed to control the Mosul Dam, the largest water supply source in Iraq _ a claim U.S. and Iraqi sources confirmed. And perhaps most importantly, the Islamic State has very simply put together a smarter offensive plan. Its push toward Irbil is believed by many not to be a move to take that city but to force the peshmerga to defend its capital, allowing the Islamic State to harden its grip on places nearby it’s more interesting in holding. “No one is doing what ISIS is doing,” said Jessica Lewis, a research director at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War, using an acronym for the Islamic State derived from its previous name, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. “ISIS thins out and strategically targets their adversaries. They are more thoughtful about their offense.” In Sunni-dominated Iraqi cities like Mosul and Fallujah, the Islamic State successfully co-opted or intimidated residents, allowing its forces to move in and take over. In Kurdish-defended areas, it’s forced the peshmerga to defend multiple locations along the lengthy frontier. The Kurds have made no secret of their limitations. They have repeatedly asked the United States for help. Many analysts believe that the Islamic State’s current push in northern Iraq, seizing cities such as Sinjar and Bartella that lie east of Mosul, is intended to create a buffer between the Kurdish region and the self-declared Islamic caliphate. For the Islamic State, cities like Sinjar potentially form the outer border of a contiguous state. “They are trying to carve out the territorial integrity of their Islamic State,” Lewis said. Against this backdrop, Kurdish Regional Government President Masoud Barzani reportedly issued a statement this week, condemning the Islamic State for attacking Christians, thousands of whom fled to the Kurdish region. Lewis said there was another reason to doubt that the Islamic State wants to seize Irbil. Unlike Mosul, where the Islamic State had operated for years and had built a support network, Irbil is a Kurdish city of 1.5 million people committed to keeping the Islamic State out. Moreover, Irbil does not border the proposed Islamic caliphate. Rather, Lewis believes the Islamic State wants to lock peshmerga forces into defending the capital, which would leave other places that it seeks to control vulnerable. It allows the Islamic State to decide the terms of battle _ something it has been able to do since early June. “ISIS is maintaining the initiative,” she said. Email: nyoussef@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @nancyayoussef Read more here: http://www.modbee.com/2014/08/07/3477148/why-cant-islamic-state-be-stopped.html#storylink=cpy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johnny B Posted August 8, 2014 People who can not think rationally fall often in romance with Failure, be it the failed secession of Somaliland, the failed identity face-lift of your clan to an Arab clan and now the soon to fail ISIS sham. tragic indeed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
galbeedi Posted August 8, 2014 CiidanSuldaan, ISIS is carving their territory between Iraq and Syria. Even Obama seems to leave them alone in that area. he will be protecting only Erbil and Baghdad, the rest is left for ISIs. I do believe there is agreement between them and America. They were left alone to expand, and the only reason Obama intervening is to keep the war from the big cities of Iraq and kurdistan, to avoid big clash and bloodshed. It looks like ISIS is here to stay for a long time. Americans have no appetite for another war, and no one is capable of defeating them so far. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CidanSultan Posted August 9, 2014 Galbeedi remember how you said ISIS was a Zionist instrument and that Albaghdadi was actually Simon Elliot. This is Edward Snowdens official website http://edward-snowden.net Type in Simon Elliot or Albaghdadi and you get nothing.... Debunked Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CidanSultan Posted August 9, 2014 http://edward-snowden.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CidanSultan Posted August 9, 2014 Your myth has been muster galbeedi...nothing about Simon Elliot or Baghdadi on Edward snowden own offical website http://edward-snowden.net Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CidanSultan Posted August 9, 2014 This is a given galbeedi the United States spent 3 trillion dollars in Iraq the overall GDP of the United States per year is like 7 trillion or something. It lost thousands of American lives and more to injuries and mental problems. Does anyone really think the American will come back to Iraq. On the hand your Mossad myth has been busted Saxib. This is the official website of Edward snowden. www.edward-snowden.net This is were he publishes all his releases in the search bar type in simon Elliot or baghdadi and nothing Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites