Safferz Posted September 29, 2013 From Al-Arabiya Saudi women seeking to challenge a de facto ban on driving should realize that this could affect their ovaries and pelvises, Sheikh Saleh bin Saad al-Luhaydan, a judicial and psychological consultant to the Gulf Psychological Association, told Saudi news website sabq.org. Driving “could have a reverse physiological impact. Physiological science and functional medicine studied this side [and found] that it automatically affects ovaries and rolls up the pelvis. This is why we find for women who continuously drive cars their children are born with clinical disorders of varying degrees,” Sheikh al-Luhaydan said. Saudi female activists have launched an online campaign urging women to drive on Oct. 26. More than 11,000 women have signed the oct26driving.com declaration that says: “Since there are no clear justifications for the state to ban adult, capable women from driving. We call for enabling women to have driving tests and for issuing licenses for those who pass.” Sheikh al-Luhaydan urged these women to consider “the mind before the heart and emotion and look at this issue with a realistic eye.” “The result of this is bad and they should wait and consider the negativities,” he said. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar Posted September 29, 2013 Why are recently married women in Western world pressured to take their new husband's name, as though she was a property from one ownership to another? And worse, in this day, she still becomes a Mrs -- Mister's. So, she belongs to the mister. Again, as though she was a property, the way they treated them and still do. Westerners with this kind of subjugating culture cannot and should not tell others how to live. Why did I bring this into this thread? Because Reer Galbeed ayaa buun buuniyo waxaan, qashinkoodana ma arkaan dhaqan ay ka dhigteen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miyir Posted September 29, 2013 lol saffers stop looking excuse, I'm not going to drive you around:mad: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Miyir Posted September 29, 2013 Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar;979825 wrote: Why are recently married women in Western world pressured to take their new husband's name, as though she was a property from one ownership to another? And worse, in this day, she still becomes a Mrs -- Mister's . So, she belongs to the mister. Again, as though she was a property, the way they treated them and still do. Westerners with this kind of subjugating culture cannot and should not tell others how to live. Why did I bring this into this thread? Because Reer Galbeed ayaa buun buuniyo waxaan, qashinkoodana ma arkaan dhaqan ay ka dhigteen. MMA doubting the Sheikh Saleh bin Saad al-Luhaydan, a judicial and psychological consultant to the Gulf Psychological Association? no good bro Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Safferz Posted September 29, 2013 Miyir;979826 wrote: lol saffers stop looking excuse, I'm not going to drive you around:mad: I've been driving since age 16 Miyir Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar;979825 wrote: Why are recently married women in Western world pressured to take their new husband's name, as though she was a property from one ownership to another? And worse, in this day, she still becomes a Mrs -- Mister's . So, she belongs to the mister. Again, as though she was a property, the way they treated them and still do. Westerners with this kind of subjugating culture cannot and should not tell others how to live. Why did I bring this into this thread? Because Reer Galbeed ayaa buun buuniyo waxaan, qashinkoodana ma arkaan dhaqan ay ka dhigteen. There's no logic whatsoever in this post. "Western" women (it's not a monolith, and not all Western cultures have the practice of taking their husband's last name) are neither pressured nor are they legally FORCED to adopt their new husband's name, and women in Western countries have as many rights under the law as their male counterparts. Trying to compare gender issues in the West to those of Saudi women living under a medieval government is a losing argument, and I can't believe your response to this article is to get defensive. There is no reason whatsoever to bar women from driving. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N.O.R.F Posted September 29, 2013 lol had a chuckle at this last night. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
QansaxMeygaag Posted September 29, 2013 He should stick to Islamic jurisprudence and leave obstetrics and gynecology to the experts. Would anyone pay attention to the late Michael Jackson if he gave his opinion on the intricacies of interstellar dust, black holes or quantum mechanics? These sheikhs...Allah save us from their "all-encompassing" knowledge... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
burahadeer Posted September 29, 2013 Safferz;979828 wrote: I've been driving since age 16 Miyir There's no logic whatsoever in this post. "Western" women (it's not a monolith, and not all Western cultures have the practice of taking their husband's last name) are neither pressured nor are they legally FORCED to adopt their new husband's name, and women in Western countries have as many rights under the law as their male counterparts. Trying to compare gender issues in the West to those of Saudi women living under a medieval government is a losing argument, and I can't believe your response to this article is to get defensive. There is no reason whatsoever to bar women from driving. Arabisation of the Somali race has come a full circle and fundamentalists , arab wanabees go great lenghths to excuse the filth of Islamic right wing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tallaabo Posted September 29, 2013 burahadeer;979841 wrote: Arabisation of the Somali race has come a full circle and fundamentalists , arab wanabees go great lenghths to excuse the filth of Islamic right wing. Lol there is no right wing or left wing in Islam:D But there are only two groups in this great religion namely the bearded nutters and the faithful masses. Someone should ask this "sheikh" if camel riding is better than driving for women. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hobbesian_Brute Posted September 29, 2013 To put things simply a woman is regarded as an appendage to a man, her honor being concentrated in the ird, that is her pelvis. It is by the function of that pelvis that her value, her honor is measured, other attributes being either valueless, or plainly dangerous. A man's honor, his face in society, is measured by the virginity, or the control of the ird he has acquired or is related to. "and for them is like what is (a duty) upon them . . . And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but men have a degree over them." The holy Qur'an: The Heifer (2): 228. Protection of that honor is paramount, rather than protection of the woman. A woman's body is not hers, but belongs, for better or for worse, to the men of her family. Therefore incest within the family does not carry a penalty, but the same sister coming in contact with an unapproved man (unapproved for a multiplicity of reasons) is likely to be murdered in a process of "honor killing". ^ islam is just arabic customs and mores made into religion and as mentioned in this piece arabs are obsessed with the pelvis or ird of the woman. Women in are treated islam are like chattel, not different from cows and goats to be used and discarded by men as they please. the quran clearly says " Nisaa'ukum Xarthun lakum Fa'tuu xarthakum annaa shi'tum". women are akin to your farm, to be tilled by men as they wish. its a weird religion, as if men and women are not brothers and sisters related to one another. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kickz Posted September 29, 2013 Good for a chuckle, if they were serious about the deen they would do something about Al-Quds/Jerusalem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nuune Posted September 29, 2013 Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar;979825 wrote: Why are recently married women in Western world pressured to take their new husband's name, as though she was a property from one ownership to another? And worse, in this day, she still becomes a Mrs -- Mister's . So, she belongs to the mister. Again, as though she was a property, the way they treated them and still do. Westerners with this kind of subjugating culture cannot and should not tell others how to live. Why did I bring this into this thread? Because Reer Galbeed ayaa buun buuniyo waxaan, qashinkoodana ma arkaan dhaqan ay ka dhigteen. Well said yaa MMA, the truth is "Maxaa dumarkeena Muslimiinta ah ugu mashquuleesaan kuwiina hadey waa hore xariga gooyeen oo salka ka soo wada dhaceen noo daaya dumarkeena" is a fitting answer to reer galbeedka iyo kuwooda Soomaalida ah ee u daba dhaqayo. About the Sheikh, and Saudi Arabia in general, let every country has its own regulation and rules, people like Hobbtreiston thinks what the Sheikh saying is in fact compatible with Islam and that the Quran teaches people how to drive and who can drive a Land Cruiser GX, go hang yourself waryaa gaalyahow weynaadey, adduunka gaal Soomaali baan ugu necbahey, diintey ka baxeen oy naceen kama hari karaan which shows how much they love it since they can't find a better one! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Zack Posted September 29, 2013 In the west, women are objects. Wax kasta naag qaawan baa lagu xeysiiyaa. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nuune Posted September 29, 2013 ^ Yet they like to talk about dumarkeena dhowrsan ee wanaagsan ee asturan, waxooda waxaa weeyaan dumarkeena ayaa hoosta ka waashee kuwiinana hoosta waa iney ka waashaan, sidey uga waalan lahaayeen falkeeda waa inii lagalaa sidaasna waxaa lagu gaari karaa sidii loo daba dhigan lahaa wax kastoo dumarkaas sameeyaan ama loo ogolyahey iney sameeyaan si contrafershaal ah looga dhigo War maalin dhaweyd xanjo la xayeysiinayey ayaan ka yaabey, at the start of the ad, there was nothing like a xanjo, at the end, there was nothing like a xanjo, there were 3 women oo semi-naked ah, tu kasta qandhuurteeda intaa bey la egtahey, saan u lahaa talaw maxey xayeysiinayaan or waxan waa maxey baa at the exit of the ad baa waxey soo qoreen, refreshingly superior,Wrigleys gum, bal inkaartan daya, refreshingly superior hadeysan naagahaan wada daba-nicista leh xayeysiineyn ma garanayo waxa ay tahey. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maqane Posted September 29, 2013 Y'all Nomads faraha baad ka baxdeen, y'all react off-topic at the same time. The topic is not about the women in west or how they're used or who they 're or what to do with them or how to defend them or whatsoever ma garateen? :mad: These Sheikhs iyo kuwa lamid ka ah oo ka soo horjeeda xuquuqda eey dumarku leeyihiin waxaa mudan in qoorahooda (their balls) xarig inta lagu xero oo laga soo laalaadiyo geed. Malcom X AUN baa hada ka hor wuxuu yiri Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you're a hu-man (woman or man), you take it. Dumarkan iyaga baa isasoo uruuriyey oo isasoo abaabuley, meeshii eey ka yimaadeen ama ka timid fikradooda waloow meey ahaato reer galbeed fikradooda ama reer Miyi, iyaga baa gacantooda ku dhacsanaya xuquuqdooda ee sidaa ulaa socda, ... DUF HA IDIN KU BAXDEE :mad::mad: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites