Xaaji Xunjuf Posted February 6, 2013 U.S. urges lifting of U.N. arms embargo on Somalia - envoys Reuters – 19 minutes ago Reuters/Reuters - United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon addresses delegates during the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos January 25, 2013. REUTERS/Pascal Lauener UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States is urging fellow members of the U.N. Security Council to agree to demands by the government in Mogadishu to lift the arms embargo on Somalia, which has been in place for the past 21 years, U.N. diplomats said on Tuesday. The U.S. push comes after U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said last week that the 15-nation council should consider lifting the arms embargo to help rebuild Somalia's security forces and consolidate military gains against al Qaeda-linked al Shabaab militants. The Security Council imposed the embargo in 1992 to cut the flow of arms to feuding warlords, who a year earlier ousted dictator Mohamed Siad Barre and plunged Somalia into civil war. "I think we'll come down in terms of having probably a political lift of the arms embargo but retaining some controls," said a senior Western diplomat on condition of anonymity. "What the Somali government partly wants is a political signal that they are now a sovereign government and we're supporting them, rather than a trusteeship," the diplomat said. "They say the bad guys are getting weapons and the good guys are not." The U.S. mission to the United Nations had no immediate comment. It was not clear what a "political lift" of the embargo would entail, though diplomats said it may involve easing arms import restrictions on Somalia while ensuring that a strict monitoring mechanism remains in place. Diplomats said Britain and France have been reluctant to support ending the arms embargo. The Somalia and Eritrea Monitoring Group, which monitors compliance with the sanctions regime, has also opposed the idea of lifting it, U.N. envoys said. Those who oppose getting rid of the arms embargo say Somalia's security sector still includes elements close to warlords and militants, an allegation the Somali government rejects. "There are no Somali warlords that threaten peace and stability in Somalia," the deputy U.N. ambassador for Somalia, Idd Beddel Mohamed, told Reuters. "They are normal citizens now, members of parliament. The embargo must be lifted." AMENDED REPORT? Somalia wants help strengthening its poorly equipped and ill-disciplined military that is more of a loosely affiliated umbrella group of rival militias than a cohesive fighting force loyal to a single president. There are 17,600 U.N.-mandated African Union peacekeepers helping battle the Islamist rebels in Somalia. The AU mission's mandate is up for renewal in March, which is when the changes under discussion, if approved, would take effect. "There's no guarantee there will be a lifting of the arms embargo but it's something the U.S. wants," an envoy said. Several diplomats noted that Ban's recommendation to end the embargo was so weakly worded it was barely a recommendation at all. The wording was: "the Security Council may wish to consider the repeated request by the (Somali) government for lifting the arms embargo." A diplomatic source said the recommendation did not appear in earlier drafts of Ban's report but was in the final version. It has happened before that secretary-general's reports on various issues have been amended before publication in response to complaints from U.N. member states. AU troops from Uganda, Burundi, Kenya and Ethiopia are battling al Shabaab militants on several fronts in Somalia and have forced them to abandon significant territory in southern and central areas of the Horn of Africa country. The militants, who merged with al Qaeda in February last year, launched their campaign against the government in early 2007, seeking to impose sharia, or strict Islamic law, on the entire country. The U.N. Security Council is also considering a call to permit the export of stocks of charcoal from Somalia. It banned the sale abroad of Somali charcoal last February in an attempt to cut off al Shabaab's funding. Diplomats said the charcoal export ban would likely remain in place. The Security Council's Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea, an independent panel that reports on compliance with U.N. sanctions, said charcoal exports from southern Somalia in 2011 generated over $25 million for al Shabaab. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xiinfaniin Posted February 6, 2013 Misleading title. But I for one agree with the objective of lifting the embargo. Somalia needs to stand on its own feet and rebuild its security capacity. Mistrust among political stakeholders shall never get in the way of acheiving that bigger national interest. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacaylbaro Posted February 6, 2013 Good for Somaliland ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted February 6, 2013 The logic behind it seems to be that since everyone in Somalia has guns the government should be given BIGGER guns to control them all. Allahu al mostacaan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xiinfaniin Posted February 6, 2013 ^^LOL That is classic NGONGE. EDIT: I think you simplify too much Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Abu-wehliye Posted February 6, 2013 Waxey ila tahay al-Shabaab iyo kooxaxa ajnabiga ah ee ka dagaalama Soomaaliya waxey heystaan hub ka heer sareeya kuwa ciidamada dowlada, Sidaas darteed waa war wanaagsan in xukuumada Soomaaliya cunaqabateenka laga qaado si ay ula dagaalanto kooxaxan. Waxaana ciidanka qalabka sida ee soomaaliya ay fursad u siineysaa ineey la qabsadaan hubka cusub ee caalamka ku soo saa'idey inteey saaxada ka maqnaayeen. Waxaanse rajeeynaayaa in Soomaalida ayan markale isku dilin hubkan cusub ee gacanta usoo gali doona sidii ay horey u dhacdey. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khadafi Posted February 6, 2013 Somalia has lots of weapon, the solution to a war-ravaged nation is not more weapons. Xiinfaniin I dont agree with you that the Somali government needs to build it's own security apparatus. But I fail to see where that goes with somali weapons embargo..! You know how corrupt somali officals are. What do you think will happen when a whole lead of ak-47s or heavier weapons come to Somalia? Instead of the somali army those weapons will in some shady way go right into the hands of armed groups. It way to early to lift the embargo. This is very dangerous... qofki dab lee ku dheelo lee gubto... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xiinfaniin Posted February 6, 2013 LOL @qofki dab lee ku dheelo lee gubto... Khadafi, This will come down to the following choice (in my opinion) : Either empower the Somali government and allow it to arm itself, or further empower AMISOM and EGAD countries to develop more leverage militarily in the country. There are clear risks in both; but I chose the first. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites