Wadani Posted December 31, 2012 My political views are in line those of Apo. Xabad, u mentioned atrocities committed by ghadafi against his people. If giving them a standard of living among the best in the world is an atrocity, i'd have to concur. There's not a shred of evidence proving ghadafi massacred his ppl, it was nothing more than a heinous lie used as a pretext to invade his oil rich country....a fabrication much like the WMD in Iraq that proved to be a figment of the neocon imagination. U want proof when it comes to relgion, but all of this goes out the window when it comes to intl politics eh? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khadafi Posted December 31, 2012 Wadani;903491 wrote: My political views are in line those of Apo. Xabad, u mentioned atrocities committed by ghadafi against his people. If giving them a standard of living among the best in the world is an atrocity, i'd have to concur. There's not a shred of evidence proving ghadafi massacred his ppl, it was nothing more than a heinous lie used as a pretext to invade his oil rich country....a fabrication much like the WMD in Iraq that proved to be a figment of the neocon imagination. U want proof when it comes to relgion, but all of this goes out the window when it comes to intl politics eh? +1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xabad Posted December 31, 2012 Wadani;903491 wrote: My political views are in line those of Apo. Xabad, u mentioned atrocities committed by ghadafi against his people. If giving them a standard of living among the best in the world is an atrocity, i'd have to concur. There's not a shred of evidence proving ghadafi massacred his ppl, it was nothing more than a heinous lie used as a pretext to invade his oil rich country....a fabrication much like the WMD in Iraq that proved to be a figment of the neocon imagination. U want proof when it comes to relgion, but all of this goes out the window when it comes to intl politics eh? LOOOOL, typical somali response. fortunately no one entrusts you with welfare of libyans. just don't talk for other human beings. I believe most here are so eager to poke the eye of arrogant west they lose all objectivity and fairness. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tutu Posted December 31, 2012 Not sure where I stand on the Syrian conflict, but couldn't overlook the naivety of the bullet-neophyte called Xabad. He's probably of the view that aid contributes to reduction of poverty in 3rd world countries. And have no clue about the impact of Eu's farmers' subsidies on the 3rd world market as well. That how it starts for all johnny-come-lately species. Hope you catch up soon. Didn't you know that Gaddafi was less evil (and killed fewer) than the king of Saudi Arabia? And Fidel Castro's Cuba fares better in health and education than many 'democratic' European countries. That Cuba has a higher life expectancy and lower child mortality than United States? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xabad Posted December 31, 2012 tutu;903825 wrote: Not sure where I stand on the Syrian conflict, but couldn't overlook the naivety of the bullet-neophyte called Xabad. He's probably of the view that aid contributes to reduction of poverty in 3rd world countries. And have no clue about the impact of Eu's farmers' subsidies on the 3rd world market as well. That how it starts for all johnny-come-lately species. Hope you catch up soon. Didn't you know that Gaddafi was less evil (and killed fewer) than the king of Saudi Arabia? And Fidel Castro's Cuba fares better in health and education than many 'democratic' European countries. That Cuba has a higher life expectancy and lower child mortality than United States? I don't support Aid from donors as i believe it distorts the market and incentives for farmers. And what has Gaddafi being less evil go to with issue ?! Libyans have now voted in free democratic elections to choose their leaders instead of being ruled by a dictator and i support that tell me you wanted him to stay on. comparing Cuba and united states is really ****** idea, one is creaking socialist shithole and another is richest nation earth. Heck even Somalia probably has some things it does it better than USA. that does not mean somalia > usa, come on Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tutu Posted December 31, 2012 xabad;903846 wrote: I don't support Aid from donors as i believe it distorts the market and incentives for farmers. And what has Gaddafi being less evil go to with issue ? Couldn't grasp the analogy eh. Isn't that what they (read West) sell you to invade relatively prosperous countries? That so and so is evil while fortifying worse devils.That should've been clear to even the most gullible. The king of Saudi of whom they sugar-coat for you is worse than any surviving despot. Libyans have now voted in free democratic elections to choose their leaders instead of being ruled by a dictator So you say. comparing Cuba and united states is really ****** idea, one is creaking socialist shithole and another is richest nation earth. Heck even Somalia probably has some things it does it better than USA. that does not mean somalia > usa, come on There goes your guilelessness again. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xabad Posted December 31, 2012 Libya was not invaded and the Arab league supported the NATO mission to destroy the madman's war machine when he said threatened to slaughter Benghazi inhabitants. Tell us how the Saudi king is worse the Gaddafi ? and who are those sugar coating him? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tutu Posted December 31, 2012 xabad;903899 wrote: Libya was not invaded and the Arab league supported the NATO mission to destroy the madman's war machine when he said threatened to slaughter Benghazi inhabitants. Tell us how the Saudi king is worse the Gaddafi ? and who are those sugar coating him? So they didn't invade Libya. Waa war cusub, but in the same breath you admit Libya being bombed. What war machine? The hospitals that fell casualty? You've believed too much into their pseudo fabrications. How come the same Benghazi, 'freed by NATO from the claws of Gaddafi' (as you put it), killed the US ambassador? For Saudi's case, what do you know of their political system? 'Democratic', isn't it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tutu Posted December 31, 2012 Read here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16573516 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xabad Posted December 31, 2012 ambassador Stevens was killed by Islamic terrorists, the normal Libyans were even demonstrating days after against the militias and destroyed their bases. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xabad Posted December 31, 2012 invasion entails ground forces and occupation, nothing of which happened in Libya. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites