Yunis Posted September 23, 2012 Jaamac –Since you claim to you‘have read the book and have contacts with the author, can you share some of the evidence used in support of the passage quoted below – try to avoid injecting your own unsubstantiated ‘waxaa la yiri’ and the usual unreliable Somali historic revisions. Just quote the evidence used in the book, surely, you want give SL school children the clear evidence to back up these alleged allegations: ...haween uur leh iyo caruur-ba inuu xasuuqi jiray.....32 dumar ah uu ina Cabdalla Xasan qabi jiray . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Somalia Posted September 23, 2012 No Jaamac1975, you gun f'd up mate, now you are saying he fought against them for greater Somalia, thus contradicting yourself. This is too much for me, I gotta bounce mate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Naxar Nugaaleed Posted September 23, 2012 Qabiil has poisoned certain people so much so that even the dead are not safe from their venom. An ***** after a mirqaan session decides take on a dead shaikh for some tribal ps from a hundred years ago. Any breathing Somali person who in this day and age would fall for some English colonizers propaganda needs to check him or herself into a mental asylum ASAP. As for the rest of you, the Sayid is dead, it does not matter what you think of him, move on with your life's and guard yourself against this poison called clannisn that has become so fashionable among northerners as of late. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaamac1975 Posted September 23, 2012 So he is olny dead when people mention his butchery and evil deeds!! or you telling us he is a alife when Idaajaa pander to him and peddle his history o VOA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Naxar Nugaaleed Posted September 24, 2012 So between the sayid and the English colonizers , are you telling us you would have sided with the English because this is what this argument boils down to? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khadafi Posted September 24, 2012 Jaamac1975;872710 wrote: Let the D-block boys and their daddies worship the fat coward that run all the way to imiey and died in a foxhole. The important thing is that the people of Somaliland realized what this charachter in actuality was, Guri-Barwaaqo isn`t trying to convince the D- clan of anything new these people will worship him regardless to them its all about tribal loyalty. So the book of Guri-Barwaaqo isn`t for that particular clan , the book is for all non-D somalis who were been fed crap by the old regim. This book will be taught in Somaliland schools , kids in somaliland will compare the old `facts`taught in old Somali republic and the new book and argument of Guri-Barwaqo. What the author collected and analysed are the Mullah`s vulgar poems and how the D-clan during their rule of Somali republic `sexied-up`the Mullah`s career of murder and and looting . Maadeeys, Ironically where as the so called `Sayid`of yours son was pro-Ethopian and sided with ethopia during the struggle for great somalia , the grand son of Sheekh Awees Al-Barawaani namely Abdulqadir Saqawdiin Shaikh Aweys one among the founders and the first president of the SYL. In my opinion the father of southern Somalia should have been that grandson of Awees , who died in 1947, not the fat gluttonous libertine. The man who liberated you and you should celebrate is Sheekh Awees al-Barawaani and his decendant , not the camel theifs known as the Maxamed Cabdulle Xasan. But then what a branwashed little kids know. Well said, historical correct revisionism as its best! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taleexi Posted September 24, 2012 Abtigiis;872336 wrote: There is also another book coming out in Nairobi this week. The title is " Ina Cigaal ma wuxuu ahaa wadani mise fat.aal? " Another book to be launched tomorrow in North America. And its title is Siilaanyo ma mujaahid baa mise ..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacaylbaro Posted September 24, 2012 Maaddeey;872533 wrote: Uways iyo dariiqadiisaba inay xiriir dhow la lahaayeen gumeystaha Talyaaniga baa caddaatay. Qabrigiisa cajaaibaa lagu soo arkay!. Haye ,, Maxaa lagu soo arkay ?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacaylbaro Posted September 24, 2012 This "jaamac" guy needs help ,,,, seriously Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maaddeey Posted September 24, 2012 ^ in talyaanku taar (radio) u keeneen, aqbaarta intuu sii ogaado wax samada looga qabro iska dhigi jiray!, sawirro iyo dukumintiyo kalena waa la hayaa. Qaadiriyada waa dariiqo baas oo shirkiga iyo bidcada ka sokow waxa la moodaa in loo abuuray in danaha gumeystaha ilaaliso!. Itobiya waxa ka socda fiiri. ps. Sh. C.qadir barii' buu ka yahay kooxdan baas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacaylbaro Posted September 24, 2012 Radio talyaanigu u keeneen iyo documents baa "QABRIGA" loogu tegey miyaa ?? ,,,,, was he communicating from Aakhiro then ?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maaddeey Posted September 24, 2012 Adiga weligaa siyaaro ma tegin?. Dariix waxay carabtu dhahdo waaye, qabriga iyo areadiisa bay dhisaan oo qolqollo ka sameeyaan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacaylbaro Posted September 24, 2012 Hadii uu dhintayba ,,, why there why such equipments and classified documents are still there ?? ,,,,,,, naga daa dee Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted September 24, 2012 Taleexi;872847 wrote: Another book to be launched tomorrow in North America. And its title is Siilaanyo ma mujaahid baa mise ..... Someone should write that book (and the one A&T is talking about too). As for the topic here, I actually applaud the man for writing such a book and starting a historical debate here. From the little information someone posted in here, it seems that the author is basing his conclusions on the disparging poems of the Sayid and some of his faults. Of course, one must critique the book along two lines; one: are the poems authentic and are the accusations real? Two: when the sum total of the Sayid's actions & history are put in a scale of "good" and "bad", which of the two weighs the most? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BoldNewSomali Posted September 25, 2012 Yunis;872573 wrote: Absolutely nothing here to get excited about in this book, at least from the review summary provided. This can't be the result of 15 years of painstaking, duedilgence 'Baaritaan badan' that reveals wealth of historical evidence, these are eerily familiar fancy clan grievances scribbled down in the middle of Khat sessions that formed the basis of this book. Preach! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites