Fabregas Posted February 2, 2009 Extremism is in Lenience Just as it is in Harshness - Shaykh Saalih ibn Fowzaan al-Fowzaan Reference: http://www.alfawzan.ws/AlFawzan/MyArchive/tabid/89 /Default.aspx?new_id=117 Category: Methodology Al Hamdulilaah wa ba'd: There have been increasingly numerous campaigns and refutatieons against extremism in religion lately, and they are with just right, because extremism in religion has been forbidden in the Book, the Sunnah and with the consensus of the scholars. Allaah Ta'aala stated: {Say: "O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Exceed not the limits in your religion (by believing in something) other than the truth} Al Maa-idah: 77 In another Ayah: {O people of the Scripture (Christians)! Do not exceed the limits in your religion, nor say of Allaah aught but the truth} The Prophet - صلى الله عليه وسلم - said: "Beware of extremism, for indeed the only thing that has destroyed those who came before you is extremism." Extremism in religion is to exceed the limits of its legislated boundaries. It could be in worship, such as the three men, one of whom said: 'I will stand the whole night in prayer and not sleep.' The second said: 'I will fast continuously not missing one day without fasting.' The third said: 'I will not marry.' Extremism can also be in rulings; such as making something that is recommended an obligation, or being extreme in the ruling of one who practices a major sin that is less than polytheism by declaring him to be a disbeliever who has left the fold of Islaam. Extremism can be in ordering the good and forbidding the evil, such as the extremism practiced by the Mu'tazillah in the form of revolting against the rulers with the excuse of ordering good and forbidding evil as justification. Extremism is also in declaring something permissible to be impermissible, or declaring something impermissible to be permissible. Extremism in religion in all its forms is prohibited, it may cause the individual to exit the fold of Islaam or cause destruction, as it destroyed those who came before us, and no person who has been given understanding and foresight by Allaah in rulings and in placing things in the rightful place can doubt this. However, there are people whose state is the exact opposite of the extremism of exceeding the limits in the religion, there are those who went to extremes in lenience and indulgence. There is no doubt that our religion is the religion of lenience, ease and justness, but this lenience must be within the legislated boundary, by acting upon the legislated permits when needed, and all the religion, and to Allaah belongs all praise, is free of hardship and restrictions. {Allaah burdens not a person beyond his scope.} Al Baqarah: 286 {And [Allaah] has not laid upon you in religion any hardship} Al Hajj: 78 {Allaah does not want to place you in difficulty} Al Maa-idah: 6 Extremism in leniency is by overstepping the boundaries that Allaah has set, and this is not called lenience, rather this is hardship itself. Nullifying al Walaa and al Baraa in Islaam, equating the believers with the disbelievers with the justification of tolerance, invalidating the implementation of the nullifiers of one's Islaam upon those who have nullified all or some of them, equating religions such as equating Islaam to Judaism or Christianity, rather equating Islaam with all religions including paganism and atheism, claiming that 'there is no diety worthy of worship other than Allaah' does not necessitate the disbelief in Tahqhoot and does not negate false religions other than Islaam - as some columnists have written in some of our local newspapers. All of these are examples of extremism in negligence and indulgence. It is an obligation to refute it, just as it is an obligation to refute the extremism of exceeding the limits in the religion. Rather, extremism in negligence and indulgence is more dangerous than the extremism of exceeding the limits in the religion, because this type of extremism reaches the point of equating the religions of the disbelievers with the religion of truth, and this is a form of disbelief by the consensus of the scholars, in contrast to the extremism of exceeding the limits, as a lot of the scholars consider it to be misguidance but does not reach the level of disbelief. The scholars mentioned that from amongst the nullifiers of a person's Islaam, is not declaring disbelievers to be disbelievers or having doubt in that. Those who made these grave errors must examine their own state and return to the truth, for indeed returning to the truth is a virtue, and returning to the truth is better than remaining upon falsehood. May Allaah grant everyone success in attaining beneficial knowledge, righteous actions, and may the Salaat and Salaam be upon our prophet Muhammad, his family and companions. Translator: Nadir Ahmad, Abu Abdul-Waahid Date Published: Thursday, 24 July 2008 Date Printed: Monday, 02 February 2009 at 08:05:09 Printed From: http://www.madeenah.com/article.cfm?id=1261 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nur Posted February 2, 2009 Baarakallahu Feek, Zaylaci bro. Sheikh Fawzaan's conclusion is indeed the balance of the Deen. Jazaahullahu kheiran for this clarificaction. Balance is the essence of life, " Wa wadacal miizaan" . In all aspects of our faith a state of balance is required between the opposing forces of the extremes. The wisdom is to keep always within the limits of Islam, ( Nawaaqidul Islaam) , like staying in highway lanes, unfortunately, these days, most attention is given to the Takfeer extremism*, which is wrong, but as the Sheikh says, the Fitna of Takfeer is the lesser evil than the Fitnah of dilution of Islam, since the latter can indeed render a person a nonbeliever while the Fitnah of Takfeer does not necessarily expunge a person from Islam. The middles path is the right path, that of the Prophet SAWS , his companions and the Taabiciin followers. -------------------------------------------------- -------------------- * Takfeer in Arabic means believeing and pronouncing that a person or a group of Muslims to be apostates heretics from Islam due to an action or a belief or both. Takfeer is a valid religious activity in which knowledgeable scholars can determine and judge if actions and beliefs of a person or a group is in clear conflict with Islam, for example if a preacher or a layman preaches that worshiping a statue or that Alcohol is halaal like zamzam water, than the scholars have to first discuss with that preacher and prove to him that what he is preaching is contrary to Islam, and that its consequences are grave, thereby encouraging him to repent. If that person rejects their please, than the scholars have to issue a verdict of Takfeer of that person and make it public. The takfeer that is considered extreme is when unqualified people who have no knowledge of the Fiqh use it like sport against anyone they disagree with even considering sins as kufr like the Khawaarij. This Takfeer is the danagerous one. Nur Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fabregas Posted July 23, 2009 Originally posted by Nur: The wisdom is to keep always within the limits of Islam, ( Nawaaqidul Islaam) , like staying in highway lanes, unfortunately, these days, most attention is given to the Takfeer extremism*, which is wrong, but as the Sheikh says, the Fitna of Takfeer is the lesser evil than the Fitnah of dilution of Islam, since the latter can indeed render a person a nonbeliever while the Fitnah of Takfeer does not necessarily expunge a person from Islam. The middles path is the right path, that of the Prophet SAWS , his companions and the Taabiciin followers. Nur Indeed, Sheikh Nurow, this is a great problem facing Somalis. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites