FIDHIN Posted January 30, 2012 i didnt knw xkeyse's the famous paltalker could write until i saw this http://oodweynenews.com/news/140370-barnaamijkii-silsiladda-taariikhda-somaliland-qaybtii-4aad.html this shows u that the daraawish wasnt from a single clan, but from all somaliland clans, even if it was from a single clan we re awlways pproud of them thts why the darawish history is taught in all somaliland schools together with the snm history Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Somalia Posted January 30, 2012 The Daraawish were mainly made up of one clan. It's one of the reasons why people like him have a huge cuqdad against the people of SSC when looking at it historically. The Sultan of Sultans of Somaliland as he was known was from Sanaag, a man who was respected and known in the West while the Daraawish forces from Sool were respected for the fight they took against the British. They were the only ones fighting colonialism and were revered for it. The British monarchy at least noticed their importance but never gave you any love even though you were the most loyal. Famous UK Magazine 'History Today' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xaaji Xunjuf Posted January 30, 2012 The Dervishes were a group as the modern Alshaabist they used to identify them selves as Xarakata Darawiish Saalxiya it was not a clan or a group. The Sultan there you posted was described by the Mad Mullah as the Dulihi shareerna he was later locked up in Seychelles by the brits. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taleexi Posted January 30, 2012 ahahha... priceless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taleexi Posted January 30, 2012 What about Siilaanyo, ina Egal, Ina Kaahin, Dhegaweyne, Riyaale the list goes on. One can be history revisionist ... but revise all or don't bother. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taleexi Posted January 30, 2012 Hadday saa tahay waxba islama diidanin. provocative, constructive, fair discussions I'm also all for it. I enjoy debates that make me a bit uncomfortable but add value to my life....... So, meel aan dagaal ool waxba ha ka doon doonin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taleexi Posted January 30, 2012 Dee ha iska hantaaticin... U've no clue about my stand with regards to Seyid-ka .... War ninyahow saad u joogto baad isku dhex yaacdaa. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FIDHIN Posted January 30, 2012 oodweyne, caadi ma tihid, waamaxay af igirriisigan waaweeni, waar niyaw aniguna xagaa iyo oodweyne, ceel xume iyo laan mulaaxo ayaan ka imiyi, iskuul af ingiriisiya ma ka furanaaa meesha niyaw Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Somalia Posted January 30, 2012 Xaaji Xunjuf;782538 wrote: The Dervishes were a group as the modern Alshaabist they used to identify them selves as Xarakata Darawiish Saalxiya it was not a clan or a group. The Sultan there you posted was described by the Mad Mullah as the Dulihi shareerna he was later locked up in Seychelles by the brits. See, you are proving my point. "Mad Mullah", a word invented by the British to delegitimize his cause. It's just goes to show my previous point regarding cuqdad against the other clans who fought for the independence of Somaliland. It was the Daraawish, where were you? I always see the secessionists talking about the Somaliland Camel Corps as if it's something you wear as a badge of honour. This is your history. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xaaji Xunjuf Posted January 30, 2012 Oodweyne;782557 wrote: Taleexi , No, Abti , it's the habit of those who were brought up under the Kacaanka, who simply couldn't imagine that history may not been what was been told to them. Hence, my argument, is to say, you may think, that Sadidka was fighting for a particular cuase (as Afweyne's regime had it); but, in all honesty, his was far more complicated than that seemles narrative that many of you were breast-fed on it (or at any rate some of the "ciyaalka kacaanka", in which we have them in here of SOL, were so seductively reared with, indeed). And, therefore, are forever regurgitating to us in here, indeed... :D Neo fqashism was exposed so many times through out the history the *******ization of the Somali history was deliberately done by the Likes of Aw Jamac Ciise hayaag and his buddy idajaa. They can write as much nonsense as they like history is written by the winners:D Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xaaji Xunjuf Posted January 30, 2012 Somalia;782565 wrote: See, you are proving my point. "Mad Mullah", a word invented by the British to delegitimize his cause. It's just goes to show my previous point regarding cuqdad against the other clans who fought for the independence of Somaliland. It was the Daraawish, where were you? I always see the secessionists talking about the Somaliland Camel Corps as if it's something you wear as a badge of honour. This is your history. Wadaadki waalna was coined by Mr Ali dhuux adan gorayo Ashaaday ba gaalki waka af iyo been dhe Abtirsiintadu waxay gasha eyda reer xamar eh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Somalia Posted January 30, 2012 Xaaji Xunjuf;782569 wrote: Wadaadki waalna was coined by Mr Ali dhuux adan gorayo Ashaaday ba gaalki waka af iyo been dhe Abtirsiintadu waxay gasha eyda reer xamar eh The poet? Show me, funny little anecdote, ironic given the history you had before the Sayid showed you the light of Islam. So in reality, you are saying that the poet from the British loving clan made the term to diss the people fighting for their freedom? () Wow Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xaaji Xunjuf Posted January 30, 2012 Somalia;782573 wrote: The poet? Show me, funny little anecdote, ironic given the history you had before the Sayid showed you the light of Islam. So in reality, you are saying that the poet from the British loving clan made the term to diss the people fighting for their freedom? ( ) Wow No the poet was actually related to the Mullah on his Maternal side he called him all kind of names, Islam and the Mullah you do know the so called Sayid was disowned by his own Religious teacher Muhammad bin salih.I don't think he was able teaching any one the fine principles of our beloved religion Islam.. Inaan Bile tagoogada ka xidhay, tebiya oo geeya Inuu xaarka taallada ka dhigay, tebiya oo geeya Inaad gaalo taag daran tihiin, tebiya oo geeya Labamaare inuu tiirsan yahay, tebiya oo geeya Shanle-dheere inuusan wax tarin, tebiya oo geeya Cabdiraxiin inuusan tol helin, tebiya oo geeya Daraawiishi inaysan tureyn, tebiya oo geeya In Ustaadku tiir-dhaadan yahay, tebiya oo geeya Somalia he called you're king Osman a weak infidel ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dervish Posted January 30, 2012 Don't argue with these people, they're mad the great Siyad refused them to convert to Christianity. the darwiish ruined their chances of being gaals. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Hermet Posted January 31, 2012 The sayid wasnt a puritant muslim he was a mystic in other words..he believed by spinning around in circles he could reach God...my little brother believes in spinning around but even he is to smart to say it would lead him to God.....loooool...i think the Sayid and christiens share many common beliefs and values....but as we are also aware the man was a footsoldier for the mahdi in the sudan who fought the British..so he was not motivated by nationalism but extreme hate for the British...i think the siad barre fake history era fooled you into believeing he was something he was not..he was like all his fellow clans men before him and after him crushed by the Somalilanders...hence were the real hate is comming from. ilma siyad barre...exile is sure sweet but ultimately its eventual fate of all losers...but being losers is something not new to you guys..i thought you would have got use to it by now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
