SayidSomal Posted December 14, 2011 Home Office's Last Research - "Khat: Social harms and legislation" July 2011 Key findings 1. The review found a general lack of robust evidence on the link between khat use and social harms. 2. Reported social harms associated with khat remain a concern among the UK’s immigrant Somali community, yet beyond often contradictory anecdotal statements, this review found no evidence to show a causal relationship between khat and the various social harms for which its consumption is supposedly responsible. 3. Inferences about khat’s social harms have largely been drawn from the experience of the Somali population, as less research has been undertaken on other communities who are also consumers of khat. 4. As well as khat, many other variables might contribute to the social problems confronting the relevant communities, i.e. the effects of civil war, displacement, gender relations, and problems of integration. These need to be more fully considered in any further research. 5. Legislating against khat in Europe and North America has had little success in curbing demand and has taken place with little consideration of evidence. In those countries where the greatest evidence on khat use has been compiled (the UK, the Netherlands and Australia), import and consumption are still permitted, albeit under the control of a permit system in the case of Australia. READ MORE IN HERE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N.O.R.F Posted December 14, 2011 NGONGE;765069 wrote: ^^ As I already stated on countless times in the past, I only chew on special occassions (mainly Eid and fuenrals). So the banning of Khat would make no difference to my life. Marka taa dhinac dhiga. It saddens me that people of your calibre (and Norf's) are talking in such sensationalist way! I'd expect such nonsense from Alpha (and even Alpha knows he's trolling when he writes such stuff) but I really did not expect it from you (BOTH of you). Fix up. First of all, without even talking about Khat in particular you both should be very wary of any calls for the "ban" of things. It is a free world and people's freedoms should not be toyed with just because someone somewhere took exception to something or other. Secondly, if a call for a ban is genuine - and there are many instances where the curbing of the freedoms of some is beneficial to the lives of most - not with ancedotal evidence or feelings of those calling for a ban but with a proper, well researched argument that shows (and proves) that a ban is the best option for all. Khat is a drug, it's addictive and should not be consumed by a Muslim, as you say. But none of what you or Norf presented so far is reason enough for us to blindly support you in your calls for a ban. Your problem is that your both letting your hearts (as always and is is the Somali custom) rule your heads. My heart too says "ban khat". It reminds me of the three friends who committed suicide as a result of becoming marathon chewers. But I am not a hormonal teenager, I am a grown adult, I don't let my heart make my decisions for me. I will only support a ban when I say a proper, well researched and well presented argument that takes EVERYTHING into account and leaves no room for doubt or worry. The Arabs have a saying which when translated to Somali would go something like: wuxu is yedhi indhakool o maray markaaso isha ka riday (which is what Norf risks doing here). Wax fahma dee. Dee waa sidaan sheegay. You just want to waste our time. You are a grown man. One who has lived in London for over what 20 years? If you’re unable to make your mind up about khat now then no research will change your mind. I believe to ask for evidence is little disingenuous and I’m not going to afford my time to it. You see the ban as knee-jerk but, going by your previous posts, you yourself acknowledge it has caused and continues to cause problems. I’m sure there is no dispute there (with or without research). What you have concentrated on so far is the ramifications a ban might have on the community. You have tried to scare us into thinking bus loads of odayaal baa Belmarsh loo diri. This all implies you wouldn’t be too concerned with a ban but you’re merely afraid of the unknown (and that you want to waste my time). I’m glad Malika brought up the Islamic angle. Is there a better reason for banning it (thus making it illegal)? Would you still need a research document? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SayidSomal Posted December 14, 2011 Ngonge -Here is an actual research that I have been involved in - You might actually like it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SayidSomal Posted December 14, 2011 From my own research: PATTERNS OF KHAT USE • The research sample demonstrated very high levels of regular khat use (77%) amongst Somali men and women of all ages that are not dissimilar to those found in similar London boroughs such as Brent or Haringey. The findings suggest that the Somali community in Lambeth is significantly larger than previously thought. It is likely that the Somali population in the borough is at least as high as 3000+, of whom at least 1000 are regular khat-users. • Although problematic khat use has a significant number of negative impacts on the physical and mental health of users, it is a mistake to attribute the multiple deprivations and barriers to accessing services to khat use alone. In onesense, khat can be seen as a nexus for a broad range of social exclusions that prevent both individuals and the community more broadly from making the most of their lives. • From the data collected, it is clear Somali women are using khat at similar levels to their men-folk. Women in particular are very suspicious of accessing mainstream services around khat use, in part because of the taboo surrounding female khat use, but more substantially due to a perception that many mainstream services are not as appropriate or accessible as they might be. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted December 14, 2011 N.O.R.F;765080 wrote: Dee waa sidaan sheegay. You just want to waste our time. You are a grown man. One who has lived in London for over what 20 years? If you’re unable to make your mind up about khat now then no research will change your mind. I believe to ask for evidence is little disingenuous and I’m not going to afford my time to it. You see the ban as knee-jerk but, going by your previous posts, you yourself acknowledge it has caused and continues to cause problems. I’m sure there is no dispute there (with or without research). What you have concentrated on so far is the ramifications a ban might have on the community. You have tried to scare us into thinking bus loads of odayaal baa Belmarsh loo diri. This all implies you wouldn’t be too concerned with a ban but you’re merely afraid of the unknown (and that you want to waste my time). I’m glad Malika brought up the Islamic angle. Is there a better reason for banning it (thus making it illegal)? Would you still need a research document? Horta ma waxba kuu dhiman, saaxb? Why would I want to "waste your time" when I am asking you to make sure that what you're asking for will be good for you? Norf, this is not about khat. This is about a Somali attitude that I fully despise and which you (sadly) suffer from. You are stubborn and stick to the first thought that crosses your mind (because, seemingly, it is a correct thought). But that's not how the world works waryaa. Waxanaad ogeen aya ka badan waxaad (isleedahay inaad) ogtahay. Here, let me give you a recent example of difference of opinion we had in the past (and not just you); Sheikh Sharif & the great Caravan. Remember how adamant you were that this was a good thing? I don't deny that it looked like a good thing, it smelt like a good thing and (you assumed) it could not be worse than what we had at the time. What happend next saaxib? I know how bad Khat is and how it effects families around me. I do not need anyone to sell that part of the argument to me (right behind you there warya). However, I do not know what happens next nor do I know what the results of a ban will be (your suppositions and guesses do not comfort me much either). Now if you gave me an EDUCATED guess I may be persuaded to leave the safety of the stinking marfash (figure of speech, Malika) and join you in your great quest for ban. Ma fahantay or are you going to hide behind the "moving goal posts" argument? Sayid, I can't open pdf files, saaxib. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SayidSomal Posted December 14, 2011 Continuing... HEALTH, WELL-BEING, AND TREATMENT • Respondents reported a wide range of health impacts from khat use, including sleep disorders, paranoia, constipation, and loss of appetite. Although levels of direct reporting of sexual and mental health issues was low, a number of physical health effects reported can also be considered as symptoms of mental ill-health. This is likely to be, in part at least, a result of how mental ill-health is conceptualised in Somali culture. Stigmas around mental ill-health also mean that somatization of mental health issues can be a problem for treatment providers. • Most Somali clients in mental health services in Lambeth use khat to one degree or another. There is evidence that dual diagnosis is a recurrent issue for these patients and also for the many users who do not access mental health support. Mental health services are usually only accessed at times of acute crisis, making treatment more difficult. • Aside from the still embryonic service delivery strand of the Lambeth Khat Project, there are no treatment services to assist problematic usersin addressing their Khat habit in the borough. Entrenched suspicion of services, the fear of the stigma associated with the term ‘drug’, and a general reluctance to accept that there is a problem are all obstacles to accessing help. Some community members seem to actively distrust Western medical/clinical approaches, especially in areas like mental ill-health. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SayidSomal Posted December 14, 2011 More.... THE KHAT MARKET • There are at least 20 marfeshes (or khathouses) operating in the borough, with particular clusters around Streatham and Stockwell. Marfeshes are a dynamic business and one may close down only to reopen at a different venue. • Khat use has a significant economic impact on users and their families. Approximately 50% of respondents were unemployed, with a further 23% as students. The average amount spent by each user was the equivalent of £780 per year. One implication of this is that any harm reduction strategy must incorporate diversionary activities and job-finding support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted December 14, 2011 ^^ Was it you who posted a picture with the words "don't chew and drive"? Do you have it? p.s. I am stepping out of this discussion now. I can't see what else I could say without having to repeat myself. All yours Norf. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N.O.R.F Posted December 14, 2011 NGONGE;765089 wrote: Horta ma waxba kuu dhiman, saaxb? Why would I want to "waste your time" when I am asking you to make sure that what you're asking for will be good for you? Norf, this is not about khat. This is about a Somali attitude that I fully despise and which you (sadly) suffer from. You are stubborn and stick to the first thought that crosses your mind (because, seemingly, it is a correct thought). But that's not how the world works waryaa. Waxanaad ogeen aya ka badan waxaad (isleedahay inaad) ogtahay. Here, let me give you a recent example of difference of opinion we had in the past (and not just you); Sheikh Sharif & the great Caravan. Remember how adamant you were that this was a good thing? I don't deny that it looked like a good thing, it smelt like a good thing and (you assumed) it could not be worse than what we had at the time. What happend next saaxib? I know how bad Khat is and how it effects families around me. I do not need anyone to sell that part of the argument to me (right behind you there warya). However, I do not know what happens next nor do I know what the results of a ban will be (your suppositions and guesses do not comfort me much either). Now if you gave me an EDUCATED guess I may be persuaded to leave the safety of the stinking marfash (figure of speech, Malika) and join you in your great quest for ban. Ma fahantay or are you going to hide behind the "moving goal posts" argument? Sayid, I can't open pdf files, saaxib. Aar muxu xiiqay Well at least we agree that Khat effects families and is bad for the community [closed]. Have you ever been to Canada saxib? I was offered an urbeeto for $45. An urbeeto! Not many chew and of those that do, not many (if any at all) spend time in jail (at least that what it looked like). Happy now? First hand research right there Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted December 14, 2011 ^^ No I have not been to Canada and doubt I'll ever go. Lakin hada ma waxaad i leedahay reeraha o tag oo waxaad ku tidhaahda: vote for the ban of Khat, Norf said Canada is ok? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N.O.R.F Posted December 14, 2011 Dee haa. Isn't that what you wanted? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OdaySomali Posted December 14, 2011 Send an e-mail to he Daily Mail informaing them of this petition and the rest will sort itself out Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ElPunto Posted December 14, 2011 Ngonge waging a one man jihad! In Canada - it is very expensive - only the older generation chews. In the UK young ppl born or mostly brought up in the UK are taking it up due to the easy availability and habituation. Where it is banned the detrimental effects of khat are experienced at a lower scale than the UK. Let's face it - khat is not cocaine. It's not instantly addictive - habitual and extended chewing does make it so. And that is only possible in circumstances where there are no restrictions to the purchase and consumption of khat. Ban it in the UK. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carafaat Posted December 14, 2011 Norf, I understand your arguments completely. Khat is destroying our community, but its not the real cause of our problems but rather the refuge that leads to more problems. And simply banning Qat and hoping things will change will not work because like Ngonge said those you want to help will seek other alternatives. Therefor I say lets adress the real causes first and then lets look at how to reduce the abuse of Qat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Abu-Salman Posted December 14, 2011 Agreed ElPunto, the powdered form in Canada limits its appeal unlike in my area where you would think Mafrishs are opening in every other building, full of youngsters on fresh potent leaves. What those "studies" fail to mention is that khat is also a gateway for many other things, including heavy drinking, routinely used for "mirqan jabis" or against chewing hangover, to enable continuous chewing (many even alternate between those two plus cannabis etc). With many women now addicted, those khat or drinking places often double as underground brothels too accross Somali communities, TB epidemy incubators and so on and so forth... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites