Somali girl gang attack couple (Video)

[Nin-Yaaban]

Those Xaliimos got their 15 minute of shame, this video is already posted on WSHH. Hahah poor Xalimoos.

[Nin-Yaaban]

Valenteenah.;763972 wrote:

Drunk and disorderly + assault...the judge was too lenient, they deserve a jail sentence.

True, True. But just like with most female offenders, they rarely get a jail time. I dunno why, but that happens often. Hopefully they are prohibited from drinking khamro as part of their probation. ****** Xaliimos.

[Somalia]

Nin Yaaban is still surprised

 

And your right, they are on WSHH, which means they made it, views are over 100.000 already

[Juxa]

lol@ngonge, dadka ha iska weyn indeed!

 

this morning newspaper read, new defence baa soo baxay, muslim, somali and not used to alcohol, would same courtesy be given to a catholic girl who is not used to drinking???another said would they get suspended sentence if they were in Somalia mise waala garaaci lahaa alshabaab style!!! wooohooo we made the editorial pages for being drunk and disorderly

[ElPunto]

Funny video.

 

On a positive note - I see Somali style gobasho is still alive and well.

[Abwaan]

This is really sad. Gabdhahaan waxay tusaale u yihiiin da' yar badan oo Soomaaliyeed oo mustaqbalkoodii looga ciyaaray ama kuwo iskaga ciyaara, karaamadana iska qaaday. Waa meeshii Soomaalidu dhihi jirtey "Inay saqiiraan baa loo qaatey". Markii dalkaagu burburo, mujtamacaagu islaayo, maatadaada la xasuuqo, dadkuna midba meel u cararo waxaan iyo kadaranba waa la fishaa....Ma waxaad moodeysaan in Soomaali sidii hore wada ahaanayso? Taas waa riyo. Wax kale oo la dhaho lama garanayo aan ka ahayn in loo duceeyo in da'yarta Ilaah noo toosiyo,

[Qandalawi]

Pathetic! They can't even fight.

 

As expected the dailymail is making a meal out of this incident.

[Cawaale]

Apparently I know one of the girls, and her sister. They came across like normal, sheesha loving, some what wild Xaliimos. According to the video if this girls were alcohol addicted they would not probably be imbalanced crawling creatures.

 

That been said, they now have story to tell and a reason to gang up. As for the community well Odayga NG ah ha la maqlo dadoow. You can't just mix your good and bad apples, even though the bad ones might be good for specific purpose(ours serve nothing).

 

PS. marriage is not the cure, and certainly NOT sending them the Baadiayah Soomaaliya.

[gooni]

Intee gabdhoodbaa kuu dhooftay? dahabshiil malagaaga yeeray?gabdhihiibaa loo baxsaday sanadkaan?

Hadii dumarkii layska hor mariyay maxaa lagu diidi inay marmar jiinyarka furataan!?

[Bedu4Life]

As.sallam alikum,

 

I have to agree that They are shamefull examples of all thats happend since the Muslims decided to come over rape the benefits system and pretend to be from somalia when mostly unaffected since they were in kenya or elsewhere. I cry for my brothers and sisters living in conditions we wouldn't keep dogs whilst the powers that be play with somalia. I know this will be deemed off topic and unpopular but the truth is that if those who flooded Europe had stayed where they were two things would have happened. Those we cry for whilst watching al jazeerah would have Inshaa'Allah got a chance to get out of harms way and been shining beacons of somalia and Islam in the west and secondly those families who now face drug addiction and broken families would have protected themselves and their children by remaining in a country where though not ruling by Islam allow the families and communities to protect their youth from the dangers of whats been termed the wild side.

[Bedu4Life]

On another note, I know this that had teh roles been reversed and the couple been somalian and the women white and teh man had punched and manhadle the attackers the way that the white man did. Assault and affray would have been two charges he would have faced.

[Prometheus]

I hope the poor victims appeal this feckless decision by the judge. Unless there are facts about this incident to which we are not privy, it is glaringly obvious that it is a case of vicious assault— by thuggish wenches. I'm not familiar with the judiciary system in the UK, but I would be flabbergasted if this unduly lenient sentence was not overturned by an appeals court. I think Nomads residing in the UK should send an official complaint to the crown prosecution office regarding the ridiculously lenient sentence the judge rendered.

 

Bahasha dadku way wada cabaan, oo marmar bay maskaxda yara furtaa, laakiin waxani wax loo dulqaadan karo maaha.

 

والخمر قد يشربها معشر** ليسوا اذا عدوا بأكفائها

[Blessed]

http://fullfact.org/factcheck/Muslim_women_spared_jail_for_attack_because_not_used_to_drinking-3179

 

Did group of Muslim women escape jail for attack because 'not used to alcohol'?

8 December, 2011 - 15:13 -- Amy Sippitt

 

Some newspapers have reported a group of Muslim women avoided stronger sentences for attacking a passer-by after the mitigation was given that they were 'not used to alcohol'. Is this an accurate reflection of the case?

“A gang of Muslim women who attacked a passer-by in a city centre walked free from court after a judge heard they were 'not used to being drunk' because of their religion”. Daily Mail, 7th December 2011.

 

“The judge handed the women suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it”. The Daily Telegraph, 7th December 2011.

 

“A gang of four women who repeatedly kicked a care worker in the head have walked free from court after a judge heard they were 'not used to being drunk'.” The Metro, 7th December 2011.

 

A number of newspapers published articles yesterday about a case which took place at Leicester Crown Court where a group of four women received suspended sentences for actual bodily harm to a female passer-by in the city centre.

The papers all chose to focus their articles on the unusual factor involved in the case which was that the women were not used to drinking alcohol since they were Muslim and therefore their behaviour was somewhat affected by this. The stance taken by the papers was that as a result, the women received lesser sentences than would normally be given for the crime.

Given that this seemed to be quite an unusual case, Full Fact decided to investigate.

Analysis

We contacted the Judicial Office to find out more details about the case and they told us the judgement was given orally and therefore there was no written manuscript available. They did however point us towards an article written in the Leicester Mercury. They also asserted that the reference to alcohol had been made in mitigation of the accused and that the role of the victim's boyfriend was one which impacted on the judgement.

According to the Mercury, the Judge Robert Brown said, “This was ugly and reflects very badly on all four of you. Those who knock someone to the floor and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I'm going to suspend the sentence”.

The paper reported that the Judge accepted the women may have been victims of unreasonable force from the victim's partner, who was walking with her at the time of the attack. The inference by the article, and by our contact with the Judiciary, was that this admission led to the suspended sentence.

The reference to alcohol was made in mitigation by Gary Short, “They're Somalian Muslims and alcohol or drugs isn't something they're used to”, and appears towards the end of the article. It is therefore written as a detail of the case rather than as a factor influencing the judgement.

We contacted Mr Short to confirm whether he felt this statement had impacted on the judgement, but we were told he is not making any comments about the case.

The fact that the Metro's headline claimed the women were freed simply because they were 'not used to being drunk' is an inaccurate reflection of the case. Within the body of the article it did refer to this statement as part of the mitigation. Whilst the other two papers did not report the case inaccurately, the implication that the mitigation directly led to a reduced sentence edges the articles towards a false representation of the case, as reported by the Leicester Mercury.

Conclusion

While most of the papers did accurately report the events of the case, the prominence given to a small detail of the case creates a misleading interpretation of why the women received lesser sentences.

In reality, the article in the Mercury endorsed by the Judicial Office implies this was actually because of unreasonable force exerted by the victim's boyfriend on to the attackers.

It may be that this handling of the story reflects inexperience in reporting legal issues on the part of the journalists concerned. Lawyers and academics have warned about such effects from the decline in court reporting.

Since the papers state the Judge reached his decision 'after' hearing the mitigation about alcohol use, rather than 'because' of it, they are not directly reporting it incorrectly. However, it is important to make sure that this nuance is not lost in future reporting of the case, much like the Metro's headline.

[Nin-Yaaban]

Prometheus;765658 wrote:

 

Bahasha dadku way wada cabaan, oo marmar bay maskaxda yara furtaa, laakiin waxani wax loo dulqaadan karo maaha.

 

والخمر قد يشربها معشر** ليسوا اذا عدوا بأكفائها

Runtaa, Aniga waxaan oron la'haa, Gabdhahaas....halagu xukumo tumitaan (lashes), see mardanbe u cabin alaabtaas.

[Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar]

Nin-Yaaban;765755 wrote:

Runtaa, Aniga waxaan oron la'haa, Gabdhahaas....halagu xukumo tumitaan (lashes), see mardanbe u cabin alaabtaas.

Xaaji, maxaa 'runtaa' ah oo aad ku raacsantahay? In bahasha Soomaalida dhan wada cabto (my interpretation) or inay maskaxda furto according to that dude you quoted?