African Wars - A booming business for Western private companies

[NASSIR]

I am not at all opposed to the AU mission in Somalia but the opaque nature of security deals across the continent in general and Somalia in particular is worrisome. Perhaps the unstated and short-term goal expected of the murky actors involved would mean lucrative contracts, assumption of all risks and deflection of responsibility and accountability for any human rights violations during a specific mission.

 

The original titlle of this article

 

U.S Company trains African Troops for Somalia

 

This article is by Jeffrey Gettleman, Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt.

 

MOGADISHU, Somalia - Richard Rouget, *a gun for hire over two decades of bloody African conflict, is the unlikely face of the American campaign against militants in Somalia.

 

A husky former French Army officer, Mr. Rouget, 51, commanded a group of foreign fighters during Ivory Coast's civil war in 2003, was convicted by a South African court of selling his military services and did a stint in the presidential guard of the Comoros Islands, an archipelago plagued by political tumult and coup attempts.

 

Now Mr. Rouget works for Bancroft Global Development, an American private security company that the State Department has indirectly financed to train African troops who have fought a pitched urban battle in the ruins of this city against the Shabab, the Somali militant group allied with Al Qaeda.

 

The company plays a vital part in the conflict now raging inside Somalia, a country that has been effectively ungoverned and mired in chaos for years. The fight against the Shabab, a group that United States officials fear could someday carry out strikes against the West, has mostly been outsourced to African soldiers and private companies out of reluctance to send American troops back into a country they hastily exited nearly two decades ago.

 

"We do not want an American footprint or boot on the ground," said Johnnie Carson, the Obama administration's top State Department official for Africa.

 

A visible United States military presence would be provocative, he said, partly because of Somalia's history as a graveyard for American missions - including the "Black Hawk Down" episode in 1993, when Somali militiamen killed 18 American service members.

 

Still, over the past year, the United States has quietly stepped up operations inside Somalia, American officials acknowledge. The Central Intelligence Agency, which largely finances the country's spy agency, has covertly trained Somali intelligence operatives, helped build a large base at Mogadishu's airport - Somalis call it "the Pink House" for the reddish hue of its buildings or "Guantánamo" for its ties to the United States - and carried out joint interrogations of suspected terrorists with their counterparts in a ramshackle Somali prison.

 

The Pentagon has turned to strikes by armed drone aircraft to kill Shabab militants and recently approved $45 million in arms shipments to African troops fighting in Somalia.

 

But this is a piecemeal approach that many American officials believe will not be enough to suppress the Shabab over the long run. In interviews, more than a dozen current and former United States officials and experts described an overall American strategy in Somalia that has been troubled by a lack of focus and internal battles over the past decade. While the United States has significantly stepped up clandestine operations in Pakistan and Yemen, American officials are deeply worried about Somalia but cannot agree on the risks versus the rewards of escalating military strikes here.

 

"I think that neither the international community in general nor the U.S. government in particular really knows what to do with the failure of the political process in Somalia," said J. Peter Pham, director of the Africa program at the Atlantic Council, a Washington research institution.

 

For months, officials said, the State Department has been at odds with some military and intelligence officials about whether striking sites suspected of being militant camps in Somalia's southern territories or carrying out American commando raids to kill militant leaders would significantly weaken the Shabab - or instead bolster its ranks by allowing the group to present itself as the underdog against a foreign power.

 

Lauren Ploch, an East Africa expert at the Congressional Research Service, said that the Obama administration was confronted with many of the same problems that had vexed its predecessors - "balancing the risks of an on-the-ground presence" against the risks of using "third parties" to carry out the American strategy in Somalia.

[NASSIR]

Read it all here A long NY Times report

[Alderman]

If would be a different story if Africans weren't so violent and tribal.....