Breaking News: The Usual Suspects; US, France Britian to bomb Gaddafi to save the people

General Duke · March 19, 2011

You have Denmark, Canada, France & UK all Christain countries wanting to save the lives of those precious Libyans.

Wonderful stuff. The lives of the Bahraini's and Those in Yemen, Somalia and other parts of that world is not so valuable.

Jacaylbaro · March 19, 2011

One dictator at the time dear .......................... Salah will be the next.

Somalina · March 19, 2011

General Duke;703448 wrote:

You have Denmark, Canada, France & UK all Christain countries wanting to save the lives of those precious Libyans.

Wonderful stuff. The lives of the Bahraini's and Those in Yemen, Somalia and other parts of that world is not so valuable.

Jacpher · March 19, 2011

Taa waxaaba ka daran, Saudi Arabia and UAE troops in Bahrain battling with protesters yet they are expected to join the military operations against Gaddafi to ensure safety of the protesters in Libya.

History repeating itself.

NASSIR · March 19, 2011

Jacpher;703455 wrote:

Taa waxaaba ka daran, Saudi Arabia and UAE troops in Bahrain battling with protesters yet they are expected to join the military operations against Gaddafi to ensure safety of the protesters in Libya.

History repeating itself.

It's all about securing the flow of oil to mainly western Europe, but megalomaniac Gaddafi and his arrogant sons have quickened the process of direct intervention. Libya exports 85% of its oil to Europe. And America is returning the favor of its allies though with limited involvement.

NASSIR · March 20, 2011

Check this old Aljazeera News Analysis and how it all started.

Top Powers split over Libya options

http://english.aljazeera.net/video/africa/2011/03/20113115576219900.html

Suldaanka · March 20, 2011

It is just mind boggling that dictators like Gaddaffi would amass so much of the country's richies, only to be frozen by the US and EU. In the US alone, more than 30 Billion dollars belonging to Gaddafi's sons and family was frozen and billions more in the EU.

And today, we learn that it only took 110 missiles to disable his air defence system and military installations. Even Belgrade, Serbia, managed to shoot down a US stealth bomber... It only shows the inept and utter ridiculousness of so many dictators. I feel sorry for anyone that is supporting Gaddaffi today. What a looser.

NASSIR · March 20, 2011

Suldaan, let's not forget this megalomaniac has all along fueled the Somali conflict.

Libaax-Sankataabte · March 20, 2011

It is not so much a support for Gaddafi. It is the ludicrous double standard and the insincere political games that irks most free spirited Somalis on this site. We have been calling for this despot to be ousted by his people, but watching someone like Sarkozy who is unpopular at home masquerade his political posturing as a morally justified act, is beyond sickening. Yes to Arab Revolution and ouster of Gaddaffi , but no to morrran Sarkozy (Hungarian/ Jew) playing neo-con war games with the lives of Libyan citizens just so that he can boost his dwindling poll numbers in France.

Having said that, hopefully madman Gaddafi will face justice for his crimes. He is out to destroy Libya and it seems he will get it.

On another news .... a new scandal may be brewing in France.

Gadhafi's Son Says Libya Funded Sarkozy Campaign

The son of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi says Libya helped finance the campaign of French President Nicolas Sarkozy and now wants the money back.

Saif al-Islam Gadhafi has told France-based Euronews television that Libyan funds were poured into Sarkozy's 2007 campaign so France could help the Libyan people. But he said Sarkozy has disappointed them. Gadhafi said Libya has documentary evidence of the contributions and is ready to reveal everything.

The French president has led the call for a military intervention in Libya, where fighting has broken out between Gadhafi supporters and rebels calling for the end of his four-decade regime.

The Associated Press reports a spokesman for Sarkozy on Wednesday denied the claims by Gadhafi.

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/europe/Gadhafis-Son-Says-Libya-Funded-Sarkozy-Campaign-118080439.html

Naxar Nugaaleed · March 20, 2011

^ for the life of me I don't understand this logic, is the problem too much or too little help to people in Libya ? As for the why are they not helping this or that country, should we not be happy that they are at least helping one or is it a precondition that willing countries attack every other dictator in the middle east simultaneously or not at all?

The reality is this people, far from the portrayal of the west as too eager in helping the Libyan resistance by some of you, there has been an agonizing international effort by the entire world, arab and non arab, muslim and non muslim, to encourage the west to impose this no fly zone. Just as Somalia was the raison d'etre for Clinton's inaction in Rwanda, Iraq and Afghanistan are the reasons why Obama was and is so slow in action in the massacre of the Libyan people by that monster named Qaddafi. Sometimes cynicism is called for but not in this case. good luck to the resistance and all those brave people like Nicolis Sarkozy and Obama and Cameron who want to help them.

LayZie G. · March 20, 2011

Yes to Arab Revolution and ouster of Gaddaffi , but no to morrran Sarkozy (Hungarian/ Jew) playing neo-con war games with the lives of Libyan citizens just so that he can boost his dwindling poll numbers in France.

if not Sarkozy, who? Surely not the Arab league as they turned to the United Nations body for Arab solutions, so who else can spread head the efforts to stop Gaddafi? Not some of the Arab leaders themselves? oh no, where are they? they are nowhere to be found...so who else? do we stand idle and not response to possible genocidal actions by Gaddafi? What do you have the world do?

You dont want Sarkozy and surely, you are disappointed with your main man, Obama, so what else is there to do and who should be in charge?

While Sanka's emotionally charged response addresses only one of many problems, he fails to address the question of HUMAN RIGHTS and protection for the living.

The British, French and United States effort may not even deter Gaddafi but atleast attempts would be made in the right direction and the world will know that Arab leaders can not under any circumstance continue to act on their own without consequence.

Gaddafi is a lose canon and with him gripping to power, it is no where that the UNSC took action, while China and Russia got out of the way of the Americans, British and French administrations to do what is necessary to oust that nutcase.

Gaddafi is the unknown factor and the fact that he is certifiable that makes the Libyan case special interest and I would support similar effort on Iran.

With Egypt, atleast you had faithful obedient soldiers, who knew their place and who could control their society when the call for law and order came knocking on their doorstep. And in the case of Yemen, as long as they allow their airspaces to be used for drone attacks they can pretty much do whatever they want with their population, as that scenario has been proven time in and time out.

If Arab states are cooperating, there will be no invasion but the day they pretend to exercise autonomy, when in fact they are useless arabs as someone mentioned earlier and start threatening the civilized world with death and destruction, it is no wonder that the world will unite to force the nutcases out. Frankly speaking, nothing short of death will be enough where Gaddafi is concerned. No man deserves the world's sympathy if all he does is who use airstrike to wipe out a segment his population and for that Gaddafi will be killed, not captured, but killed.

and as for sanka, calm your nerves eedo. Gather your composure and if you decide to be honest with yourself, you will know your problem is not with Sarkozy.

Sarkozy was never your problem. On the other hand, Obama has been and continuous to be a problem, maybe even a disappointment, so why dont you admit it to yourself? (OBama is after American interest, so what is your interest adeerow?)

LAstly, the so called free-spirited group are emotional basket case. Reactive group. They are what I call, scripted mannequins, incapable of judgement and totally without rational thought. Therefore, it is no wonder that their first objection to invasion was on religious grounds.

Yes, we support the prevention of mass atrocities but for as long as gaalo's are not spread heading the effort...talk about a flawed logic ya mannequins

You should be less concerned with what France, Britain and United States are doing to help prevent genocide in Libya and instead ask yourselves, where do the Arab Leaders stand? Why is the Arab league inactive and ineffective?

What is the role of the Arab league? Isn't the organization build to address the concerns and aspirations of the Arab people? and more importantly, why were the Arab League largely absent in the last 2 and a half months, almost three months? Do they not form as a collective body who can exercises greater power as an autonomous organization, who have the well being of the Arab masses? Are they not more relevant than Sarkozy?

and lastly @sanka, where Sarkozy lacks in height, he makes up in wit.........:cool::cool::cool:

LayZie G. · March 20, 2011

Yes to Arab Revolution and ouster of Gaddaffi , but no to morrran Sarkozy (Hungarian/ Jew) playing neo-con war games with the lives of Libyan citizens just so that he can boost his dwindling poll numbers in France.

if not Sarkozy, who? Surely not the Arab league as they turned to the United Nations body for Arab solutions, so who else can spread head the efforts to stop Gaddafi? Not some of the Arab leaders themselves? oh no, where are they? they are nowhere to be found...so who else? do we stand idle and not response to possible genocidal actions by Gaddafi? What do you have the world do?

You dont want Sarkozy and surely, you are disappointed with your main man, Obama, so what else is there to do and who should be in charge?

While Sanka's emotionally charged response only speaks about one of the problems, he fails to address the question of HUMAN RIGHTS and protection for the living.