Sign in to follow this  
Libaax-Sankataabte

Giant Cisco tells Apple to drop the iphone name or else

Recommended Posts

Cisco Sues Apple Over Use of iPhone Name

 

By JORDAN ROBERTSON

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

 

SAN FRANCISCO - Cisco Systems sued Apple Inc. in federal court Wednesday, saying the computer maker's new iPhone violates its trademark.

 

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, came just a day after Apple CEO Steve Jobs unveiled the Apple iPhone in dramatic fashion at a trade show in San Francisco.

 

But even while Jobs was trumpeting the product during his keynote address to Apple faithful, the matter of the product's naming had not been resolved behind the scenes between two of the biggest names in Silicon Valley.

 

San Jose-based Cisco, the world's largest network-equipment maker, has owned the trademark on the name "iPhone" since 2000, when it acquired InfoGear Technology Corp., which originally registered the name.

 

And three weeks ago, Cisco's Linksys division put the trademark to use, releasing an Internet phone called "iPhone" that uses the increasingly popular Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP.

 

But on Tuesday, Jobs unveiled Apple's own iPhone, a "game-changing" touch-screen-controlled cell phone device that plays music, surfs the Web and delivers voicemail and e-mail.

 

Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris said she could not immediately comment on the lawsuit.

 

Cisco said Tuesday it had been negotiating for several years with Apple over a licensing agreement, but that Apple lawyers had not signed and returned the final contract.

 

"Cisco entered into negotiations with Apple in good faith after Apple repeatedly asked permission to use Cisco's iPhone name," said Mark Chandler, Cisco senior vice president and general counsel, in a statement. "There is no doubt that Apple's new phone is very exciting, but they should not be using our trademark without our permission."

 

Cisco is seeking injunctive relief to prevent Apple from copying Cisco's iPhone trademark.

 

"Today's iPhone is not tomorrow's iPhone. The potential for convergence of the home phone, cell phone, work phone and PC is limitless, which is why it is so important for us to protect our brand," Chandler added.

 

A service of the Associated Press(AP)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Jimcaale:

Just drop the capital P and replace with F. That'll do it unless it's already taken.

No, that wont help at all! It will still be considered as iPhone, thus trademark infringement. I remember back in 1996 in Denmark, Mcdonalds Denmark took to court a guy who was running this shop for ages with the name McAllan's, a sausage & sandwiches hut, because the guy was infringing on their trademark turf by using the "Mc" prefix Mcdonalds took this poor guy to court and ruined his life! icon_razz.gif

 

Court rule

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this