Jacaylbaro Posted August 3, 2007 What was accepted for Darfur applies to ******. The world hailed the UN Security Council resolution that was adopted the day before yesterday to create a 26,000-strong “hybrid” UN-African Union peacekeeping force. The force will primarily consist of African troops that will be empowered to “take the necessary action” to prevent attacks against and protect the civilian populations in the vast desert region that has been ravaged by violence since 2003. However, we are now in the second half of 2007. Four years delay has a cost; no less than 250000 innocent victims of criminal tyrant Al Bashir’s Janjaweed Pan-Arabist gangsters have died because they were not included in the extremist arabizing agenda of the Khartoum loathsome dictator. The decision – despite the awfully inhuman delay – illustrates a great Victory of the Forces of Humanism and Justice, and consists in a terrible blow against the Arab League, and its barbaric leaders who tyrannically impose Pan-Arabist policies on a great variety and number of African populations that have nothing to do with Arabs. Considering China’s immoral and shameful opposition to this subject, due exclusively to the fact that the Eastern Asiatic giant buys two thirds of Sudan’s Oil, the UN Security Council decision takes a panegyric appeal. After many months of negotiations, whereby the diplomatic weapon of boycotting Beijing 2008 Olympic Games was remarkably used, the UN decision opens the way for the creation of a 26,000-strong “hybrid” UN-African Union peacekeeping force. The resolution determines the setup of a military force of 19,555 troops plus 6,432 civilian police tasked to take over from the overstretched 7,000-strong African Union peacekeeping operation in Darfur by the end of the year. The Darfur crisis deterioration at the level of international relations played a particularly important role in the augur decision making; behind the lines of the UN resolution we do not see the Furi African populations (Darfurian is a wrong term used by ignorant people only) and their Drama, but we certainly distinguish the fear of an escalation and eventually a war between Chad, Central African Republic and Sudan. As a matter of fact, the innocent and mercilessly slaughtered Furis started reacting, formed several groups for self-defense, and political self-determination, and crossing the borders of Chad and Central African Republic to avoid detrimental exposure to the criminal, cannibalistic Janjaweed, caused further involvement among other populations, namely the inhabitants of the bordering regions of the aforementioned two African countries. Sudan’s approval is not an issue anymore; displaying a greater interest and a clearer commitment than his predecessor, the new British premier threatened to seek further sanctions if Sudan failed to co-operate. “This is the world coming together to say that we have a plan now, that we expect the authorities in Sudan to act. We will not tolerate further inaction, and the violence has got to stop now,” he said. He went on: “The plan for Darfur is to achieve a ceasefire, including an end to aerial bombings of civilians; drive forward peace talks starting in Arusha, Tanzania, this weekend on August 3; and as peace is established to offer to and begin to invest in recovery and reconstruction” (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article2176270.ece). Darfur and ******: colonial parallels The crises that both regions have undergone for long are of similar, colonial, origin; it was an aberration to form a ‘country’ like the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, a most disreputable and anachronistic – already in the late 19th century – device absolutely unable to replace the Ottoman rule. Part of the colonial Pan-Arabist plot, the ‘Arabic’ Sudan permanently plunged this great African country in underdevelopment, tyranny, and national – cultural disfigurement of the worst sort. Sudan was never Arabic; not a single Arab arrived in Sudan, which was home to three African Christian states in the north of its present territory, namely Nobatia, Makkuria, and Alodia that fell to the rising African Muslim forces only very ‘late’. Nobatia and Makkuria fell in the 13th – 14th centuries to Fatemid and Mameluk Egypt, and Alodia collapsed in the 16th century to the Central African Funj Islamic state, after having been left without help from the Gondar centered kingdom of Abyssinia that was also facing great challenges at those days. The inclusion of Darfur in the ill-fated colonial entity that was prepared for the Pan-Arabist barbarism was a criminal act that was perpetrated without the indigenous population’s involvement and against its will. Nothing brings together the Furis of Sudan’s West and the Bejas of Sudan’s East, and both are irrelevant to the Nuer and the Dinka in the South, and the Nubians in the North. They all deserve their separate, independent and democratic states. The same occurred to the people of ******; being of Somali origin, and constituting part of a big kingdom that gradually collapsed to the rising colonial powers, mainly Britain and Italy, and to lesser extent France and Germany, the people of ****** were never asked about their choices for nationhood, when disreputable British diplomats, officers and statesmen gradually attributed its parts to the chauvinist, anachronistic and barbaric “kingdom” of Abyssinia. The illegal annexation of ****** by Abyssinia has not terminated until our days, which means that in some of ******’s territories the dictatorial rule has lasted more than 100 years. Darfur and ******: tyrannical parallels Sudan’s arabizing policies match very much its neighbor’s ‘abyssinianizing’ policies; the adoption of the false national name ‘Ethiopia’ that denotes properly speaking the area of the Ancient Sudanese kingdoms of Napata (Kush) and Meroe in today’s Sudanese North consists in a real historical – cultural usurpation. It helps the pseudo-republican Tigray heirs of the monarchical and communist Amhara dictators of Abyssinia to rule over their abode’s outright majority of Ethiopians by pretending the country is ‘Ethiopia’, while the imposed culture is Abyssinian. One of the most typical characteristics relates to the under preparation ‘Ethiopian 3rd millennium’ that starts next month – a purely Semitic Abyssinian cultural issue that is meaningless, unworthy and absolutely loathed by the Kushitic – Ethiopian ******is, Oromos, Sidamas, Afars and others. In a true ‘Ethiopia’ there is no millennium to start in 2007, and only for the Oromos and the Sidamas who accepted Christianity through the preaching of European missionaries the concept of millennium exists. For the majority of the Oromos who believe either their traditional monotheistic religion, Waaqeffanna, or in Islam, the heretic Monophysitic Christian ideas and beliefs of the Abyssinians are alien and false. The same is valid for all the ******is, who are Muslims. Talking about imposed Culture in ****** should not lead us to forget the most dramatic events that have ceaselessly taken place there for many decades, involving tortures, arrests, extrajudicial killings and imprisonment, as well as many other brutal ways by which oppression has been exercised by Haile Selassie’s. Mengistu’s and Meles Zenawi’s tribal soldiers in ******. Darfur and ******: parallel threats of crisis expansion In the same way, the Darfur crisis threatened to expand beyond Sudan’s borders in Chad and Central African Republic, ******’s crisis has impact on Somalia, Somaliland, Puntland, and Kenya, and within Abyssinia in other provinces beyond ******. Worse than Darfur, the ****** crisis risks igniting Islamic irredentism and extremism, making of the famous conqueror Mohammad Gragn the only laudable model for the Somali, the ******i, and generally speaking the Muslim Eastern African youth. Even not for a moment did Darfur threaten to ignite Islamic extremism in Sahara; quite contrarily, the ****** crisis that has terribly deteriorated since last December risks making of the entire Horn of Africa region the preferred home of the world’s Islamists and Jihadists. Darfur and ******: parallel international treatment and pacification In order to avoid the impending deterioration in Somalia and finally pacify the entire Horn of Africa region, the UN Security Council has to adopt a similar resolution as that adopted in the case of Darfur. The world will not have the chance to attest 250000 ******is slaughtered before the UN Security Council members agree on sending a peacekeeping force to terminate the Abyssinian tyranny. And the ONLF and the other ******i political movements, organizations and parties will not be able for long to prevent exasperated ******is from merging with the clandestine Somali Islamic Courts of Justice and get monies and weapons from al Qaeda in order to fight the abysmal Abyssinian pestilence that spread underdevelopment and chaos throughout the countries it illegally annexed. UN-African Union peacekeeping force in ****** now! SOURCE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xargaga Posted August 4, 2007 Its Hightime All Somali clans in The region Join hands to Counter this Threat. Lets Not Leave this task to one clan regardless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites