SOO MAAL Posted March 1, 2005 Read the following article : A Letter from Somaliland Echoing Reality on the Ground Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SOO MAAL Posted March 1, 2005 WELL WRITTEN!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Suldaanka Posted March 1, 2005 ^^ Give us your opinion, what is she[he] trying to say, in what points do you agree with? As for me, I see a hopeless man trying to impersonate as a Somali lady. What a shame. Is that what some people are resorting to thesedays. cajiib. Anyways, whom is the calaacal addressed to? The UN, EU, Arab League or AU? Not that they can stop or change Somaliland's course, I am just wondering. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SOO MAAL Posted March 1, 2005 SXB, I think you should respect the lady for expressing her views, and describing her valid arguments as “calaacal†shows lack of intelligence, “waxaan u maleynayaa in laga calaacal badanyahay marwadaâ€, and the letter is addressed to the wise people “cida kuwa calaacal kuudii meel laga fariisan karwaayey u calaaacalaanâ€. Saying the work of the respectful lady work is written by “hopeless man trying to impersonate as a Somali lady†is act of cowardice. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Garyaqaan2 Posted March 1, 2005 By Koos Jama Al-Jazeerah, February 25, 2005 Lets Just say these will give you great picture about so called "somaliland" The people of both sides were separated against their free will and the only group that signed the later treaty with the British was the **** clan, the current Secessionist group who are historically situated in Hargaisa, Burco and Barbera. In addition, students of history should note that as soon as the British left, the majority clans living in the North dissolved the artificial boundaries, since non Isaqs neither signed nor recognized the proclaimed treaty that was between the **** clan and the British. Hence, the betrayal of the Secessionists (Isaqs) is nothing new, but tactics that are inherently held values of the enemy of the good people of Somalia (North & South). That treaty divided families of the ****** clans in Sool, Sanaag and Cayn and the ******** and Issa clans of Awdal region who are adamantly against the secession. Therefore, the treaty was nullified in the immediate departure of the British and Italian. this is what I love about media. without hesitation she is speaking her deeply sadden stroy. what poor lady Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xudeedi Posted March 1, 2005 Wiil Duco, What is wrong with that argument? isn't she stating historical fact to warrant her clear message? Exceptionally, she is making a mistake on the treaties, which she has no knowledge of as saying the only clan that signed was people of Hargeisa. HERE IS A GOOD LINK FOR HER POOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE BRITISH TREATY. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LANDER Posted March 1, 2005 Originally posted by wiil_duco: By Koos Jama Al-Jazeerah, February 25, 2005 Lets Just say these will give you great picture about so called "somaliland" quote: The people of both sides were separated against their free will and the only group that signed the later treaty with the British was the **** clan, the current Secessionist group who are historically situated in Hargaisa, Burco and Barbera. In addition, students of history should note that as soon as the British left, the majority clans living in the North dissolved the artificial boundaries, since non Isaqs neither signed nor recognized the proclaimed treaty that was between the **** clan and the British. Hence, the betrayal of the Secessionists (Isaqs) is nothing new, but tactics that are inherently held values of the enemy of the good people of Somalia (North & South). That treaty divided families of the ****** clans in Sool, Sanaag and Cayn and the ******** and Issa clans of Awdal region who are adamantly against the secession. Therefore, the treaty was nullified in the immediate departure of the British and Italian. Either its a poor attempt at revising history, or this person really needs to read up on their history with regard to Somaliland. Rather pathetic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Garyaqaan2 Posted March 1, 2005 Maakhir What is wrong with that argument? isn't she stating historical fact to warrant her clear message? I beilve i didn't said there were something wrong her argument :confused: What is wrong with that argument? isn't she stating historical fact to warrant her clear message? Macalinka I belive you got cofused today's histroy about somliand and yesterday histroy, she knows alot about waqoyland. Don't get twisted about the new meaning so colled "Land" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wind.talker Posted March 1, 2005 Cheap propaganda should be dismissed but with a glance. The tragic story about being separated from her beloved husband because of the political status quo deserves an Oscar for Best Emotional Fabrication. Give us a break with colonial treaties. Enough Somali men and women shed their blood to get rid of them - and we wanna debate as to which ones are accurate? The nerve of some folks.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Suldaanka Posted March 2, 2005 SOO MAAL So, what are you saying? Naagta ninkeeda ha loo sii daayo, or vise versa, which is the case here? I am at a lost. Mise, talaw, ma halkii Zamzam ayay Koos [Mr. Kuus] galaysaa? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sky Posted March 2, 2005 this koos is fake, a fool can see that. a pathetic man who wrote this, not knowing it trashes zamzam with this cheap, lame attempts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites