Sign in to follow this  
Jacaylbaro

SOMALILANDERS WILL NEVER AGREE TO TURN BACK THE CLOCK

Recommended Posts

Smokin' on Somalia: Somalilanders will never agree to turn back the clock and reenter into a union with the rest of the country.

 

 

 

 

 

 

by J. Peter Pham, Ph.D.

 

 

Last week, my colleague at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), Andrew McCarthy – the former Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York who led the prosecution of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman as well as the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and who now heads FDD's Center for Law and Counterterrorism – forwarded to me some interesting material on Operation Somali Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration's 18-month nationwide attempt to crack down on the traffic in qat (also known as khat).

 

The flowering shrub indigenous to the Horn of Africa yields masses of ubiquitous evergreen leaves which are chewed by the peoples of the region, especially the Somalis, for its naturally occurring alkaloid cathinone, an amphetamine-like stimulant whose affects on its users vary from manic hyperactivity characterized by unrealism and emotion instability to drowsy hallucinations marked by depression and lethargy. Following developments in U.S. policy towards the geopolitically sensitive subregion of the Horn, one might be tempted to wonder if most of the 25 tons of qat which the traffickers – 44 were charged in the Southern District Court of New York while 18 others were indicted in Seattle – were accused of smuggling into the American might not have been delivered (and consumed) in government offices inside the Washington Beltway.

 

 

 

Dr. Pham testifying before two Congressional subcommittees on U.S. policy in the Horn of Africa on May 10, 2007.

 

On May 10, I testified before the U.S. House of Representatives. At a joint hearing held under the aegis of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health examined American relations with the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. While I used the opportunity to speak on "Responsible U.S. Policy Toward Ethiopia: Context, Challenges, and Opportunities of a Strategically Vital Relationship," it was pretty clear that I was rather alone in taking the view that the government of Prime Minister Meles Zenawi was one "with which we can work" and, its flaws notwithstanding, remains a reliable partner who has not only "advanced our interests in the Horn of Africa in recent months" but also, with the exception of Uganda, been the only country to put forward resources to support international efforts at stabilization in Somalia.

 

I took my share of hits for my politically incorrect assessment both at the hearing from congressmen of both parties and subsequently as a torrent of correspondence poured in from critics of the Ethiopian government. In the end, I did not even have to wait one week for vindication of my point. On May 15, Prime Minister Meles gave an interview in which, citing the "onerous financial burden" of operations, he stated he was withdrawing his troops from Somalia where they had intervened in December to drive the al-Qaeda-linked Islamic Courts Union from power and have remained ever since to prop up the internationally-recognized but utterly ineffectual "Transitional Federal Government" (TFG). The chair of the African Union Commission, Alpha Oumar Konaré, quickly declared that "if Ethiopia withdrew from Somalia today, it would be a catastrophe," while U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Jendayi E. Frazier said it would be a "mistake" for Ethiopia to pull out and all but begged the Ethiopians to stay put.

 

Two days later, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice announced the appointment of a retired career diplomat, Ambassador John M. Yates, as special envoy to Somalia with a mandate to "represent the United States with the Transitional Federal Institutions" in order to "contribute to the peace and stability of the Horn of Africa." Rice characterized the appointment as being in support of an effort by the people of Somalia to use the TFG as the vehicle to develop their national institutions and overcome the legacy of violence and disorder of the past." Unfortunately, someone neglected to tell the warring Somali clans in Mogadishu: a car bomb killed four Ugandan soldiers taking part in the woefully undermanned African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) "peacekeeping" operation just one day before Dr. Rice named her envoy and, at almost the very same time the appointment was being made in Washington, TFG "Prime Minister" Ali Mohammed Ghedi narrowly escaped another bomb as he escorted the bodies of the Ugandans to the airport; a few days earlier, United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs John Holmes cut short his visit to the former Somali capital after yet another bomb went off 300 meters from the UN building, killing three Somalis.

 

The supreme irony of Secretary Rice in dispatching an envoy to the TFG on a permanent basis – last month Dr. Frazier visited Baidoa, the provincial outback where the rump "regime" pretends to rule Somalia, but only stayed for a few hours – is that, for all the Bush administration's emphasis on democracy promotion and antiterrorism efforts, the TFG is, as I have repeatedly demonstrated in this column space (see, most recently, my April 12 column, "Peacekeepers with No Peace to Keep"), a motley collection of self-appointed warlords who enjoy little support and even less political legitimacy among their long-suffering countrymen – and that is putting it charitably. An article by a veteran U.S. diplomat published in the American Foreign Service Association's influential Foreign Service Journal recently described the TFG in unusually candid terms as "impotent and corrupt." The sending a retired ambassador to treat with the phantasmal TFG "government" in order to promote "peace and stability" crosses the line between the farcical and tragic, however, when it privileges a pointless mission while simultaneously perpetuating the Department of State's pusillanimous non-engagement with the one part of the former Somalia which not has a democratically elected government but also a secular polity that is a beacon of stability in the region, the Republic of Somaliland, which even hailed in the title of aforementioned Foreign Service Journal article as a "democracy under threat."

 

Two months ago, I outlined three essential points for realistic policy with respect to Somalia. These remain unaltered by recent developments because they are grounded in the realities of the Somali clans, their history, and political aspirations:

 

Recognition of the "wholesale rejection by Somali clans of the TFG as well as any foreign forces which are viewed as shoring up that pretender government… Stop wasting time, money, political capital, and, now, lives on the TFG."

 

 

Acceptance of the fact that "there is no hope of outsiders being able to reconstitute a unitary Somali state." Somalilanders will never agree to turn back the clock and reenter into a union with the rest of the country. The inhabitants of the semi-autonomous northeastern region of Puntland have likewise shown themselves unwilling to chain their destiny to that to the anarchic rest of the former state. Consequently, "short of employing overwhelming brutal force – and, even then, the odds of success are not good – there is little likelihood that Humpty Dumpty can be put back together again."

 

 

Realization that the primary strategic objective of the international community "must therefore be to prevent both outside actors from exploiting the vacuum left by the de facto extinction of the entity formerly known as Somalia and those inside the onetime state from spreading their insecurity throughout a geopolitically sensitive region." While on a purely secondary level the international community might also be interested in facilitating progress inside the failed state, "outsiders' chief interests will be allocating their scarce resources where they can achieve some effect."

This last point is particularly important because actual resources are even scarcer than political will to become involved in the Somali imbroglio: almost six months after a unanimous UN Security Council first authorized an African peacekeeping mission only Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni has stepped forward to make a real contribution to the force, the now embattled 1,200 seasoned troops under the command of Major General Levi Karuhunga. Despite repeated assurances of their commitment, the other countries which have pledged troops – Burundi, Ghana, Malawi, and Nigeria – have yet to send so much as platoon, leaving AMISOM woefully under its authorized strength of 8,000. And, as I noted in my January 25 column, "even if U.S. and European envoys manage to cajole other countries into contributing the rest of the 8,000 peacekeepers to take the place of the withdrawing Ethiopian intervention force, it is beyond delusional to think that such a modest contingent of Africans can succeed where the infinitely more robust UNITAF and UNOSOM II forces, with their 37,000 and 28,000 personnel respectively, failed barely a decade ago."

 

In the final analysis, the only true national interest that the United States has in Somalia is ensuring that foreign non-state actors such as al-Qaeda as well as state sponsors of terrorism or other spoiler states such as Eritrea do not avail themselves of the carcass of the onetime state breed the maggots of their instability and radical Islamist ideology. While an effective Somali central government could potentially be a help in this regard, it is not a prerequisite. A policy of containment can achieve the same strategic effect by a continuing partnership with Ethiopia which has a strong vested interest in preventing spillover, a long-overdue recognition of the democratically elected and politically legitimate authorities in Somaliland, and a redeployment of AMISOM along the boundaries of the former Somali Democratic Republic while beefing up the African force's capabilities. And the U.S. Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) based in nearby Djibouti should certainly continue and even expand its efforts to help build these local capacities even as it remains ready to take preemptive action against terrorist threats should our partners prove themselves unwilling or simply unable to do so.

 

The "offshore" approach I advocate would not only give Somalis the time and space within which to exercise their self-determination concerning the shape that their political future(s) ought to assume, but it would also more directly and realistically address the key interest of other countries, especially the neighboring states in the Horn of Africa, their concern about spreading insecurity. Furthermore, this realist foreign policy enjoys, at the state level, the advantage of being dependent on neither manic hyperactivity nor exaggerated paralysis, behavioral symptoms which, in individual physiology, can be indicative of smoking – or chewing – psychoactive drugs on the DEA's Schedule I for controlled substances.

 

 

© 2007 J. Peter Pham

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Castro   

Originally posted by Jacaylbaro:

Everybody supporting somaliland is fascist to some ppl

You're a smart man, JB. You also probably get the feeling that the tide has turned (probably long ago) and recognition is not coming. Why do you insist on projecting this image of Somaliland as a formidable entity and its secession a foregone conclusion? Neither of those are true. When Zenawi has a better lover he'll drop you like a hot potato. The basis of the secession is questionable if not outright fraudulent. Somaliland is unable to defend itself against skirmishes with (the other deluded entity) Puntland so how will it defend itself against the US/Ethiopian backed TFG?

 

Be realistic saaxib. Like Ngonge said, it's time to clean the dust off your old white and blue or just stick with your foreign passport.

 

And J. Peter Pham is no friend of yours. You'll realize that when you wake up from this Somaliland coma. We're all nolanders saaxib.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^Dawladuhu waa boqol noocoo

Tii Lamumbe biraysay

Middaa boqor Xayle Salaase

Teenna baandadu :D hayso

Iyo Bilgaamkaa :D u wanaagsan~~

 

Playwright Ali Sugule wrote this satirical peace in 1960-ties~~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JBro have you ever thought if the burco waadado took over somaliland that they will come after south and reunite the country once again?

 

this is what the usa and ethopian is trying to provent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RedSea   

Castro,

 

Alot of that has to do with the lack of progress made by the Riyaale kahin adminstrations. The current Somaliland adminstration hasn't done anything to improve the system, the rule of law, or alot of other basic needs. That still does not stand on the way nor does it mean since Somaliland isn't doing quite well as far political wise, then they should give up their dream, that is not how things will go.

 

Somaliland is still years ahead and there is not an entity that can claim the same success of Somaliand, though in my eyes somaliland has along way to go.

 

What needs to happen now?

 

we need leadership change, we need to reshuffle somethings to improve. Both foreign and domestic affairs. Somaliland needs to start to evolve from within. We need to improve the quality of government that we have, Riyaale kahin and his Udub party are by far the ones who are holding back Somaliland. That is why the upcoming elections are so important for Somalilanders to choose their leaders wisely unlike the last time.

 

On your point about self defense. You are right, you know you are really correct on that. Somaliland should unleash hell on Puntland, so that way they could get some respect. They really should start a war right now, and even press onto gorowe, perhaps then Somaliland can be viewed as an entity that has the sheer will power to protect the territory which it claims. I feel like this is the only way Somalis will appriciate things, if they feel the baaruud itself. This is Africa after all, and the way one gets respect or be taken seriously is being assertive.

 

PROF: Peterm Pham is a civilian pen, whatever he utters is his own personal opinion. So whether he is friend or not doesn't really concern anyone, but his writings may help Somaliland in the short term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

J. Peter Pham

The confused Vietcon once again writes another amateur, uninformed article, masqueraded as a political piece.

 

Whoever hired this -- and I am sure he is on commission -- should be fired. Even if some of our Waqooyi brothers' lobbying budget is not that much, hiring confused, mumbling Vietcon, who is totally ignorant about what is happening in Soomaaliya, is wasting some needy hard currency and a bandwith.

 

This Vietcon [or should I say Vietcong?] should devote his little time advocating the dismemberment of south and north Vietnam once again, since they were not "officially" together and were de facto independent nations for more than two decades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

naah! did u folks have forgetton that sland has enjoyed the most peacefull time of any somali nation since independence from our white masters!! 17yrs of peace and prosperity is new unbroken record! economy wise, they out gained our lil djbouti. lets see who can beat that among somali nations.

 

i say give it up for sland!! clap clap!! the rest is pure nonsense!! when rest of somali reach that mile stone, then let them talk. till then shutup!

 

recognize by who...the whites and their poodles. i say to hell with them.

 

sland i recongize yall!! keep it up homies. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Stealth:

On your point about self defense. You are right, you know you are really correct on that. Somaliland should unleash hell on Puntland, so that way they could get some respect. They really should start a war right now, and even press onto gorowe, perhaps then Somaliland can be viewed as an entity that has the sheer will power to protect the territory which it claims. I feel like this is the only way Somalis will appriciate things, if they feel the baaruud itself. This is Africa after all, and the way one gets respect or be taken seriously is being
assertive.

How old are you man? 13, 14 -- come back when the hormone rush stops and your head is firmly out of your ****** .. if you don't understand what that means maybe you could appeal to your ancestral ****** ****** ******

_____________

 

Xishmada hala adkeeyo, baliis. Caanogeel, isdaji walaaloow.

 

[ May 26, 2007, 03:05 PM: Message edited by: Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar ]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cg thats his opinion aint nothing wrong with that...everybody is entitled to that!

 

what rubbed u the wrong way care to share?? or u think ptland is holly cow!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A.J.   

Rudy,

 

Well said there dude,

 

MMA,

 

This Peter Pham dude has really got you spitting hasnt he?

 

I reckon the only reason why people are getting so worked up, is because he is a foreigner supporting Somaliland. That is just my opinion but it seems that anybody in support of Somaliland must be a fascist, deluded fool.

 

Just cant win with some people i guess,,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rudy, purleeeeee

 

Raadsddeh, the man is a fascist, and we call fascists, fascists .. plain and simple .. have you read what he writes. Does he support a waqooyi nation or a fractured somalia that is more easily malleable to outside interests, have you read anything the man has written before or were your just blurry eyed by the mention of the SL word?

 

 

MMA,

your right i find it hard to keep a cool when the blood lust is so blatant

 

[edit]

MMA,

Actually 5 mins later, I'm not sure that right .. which do you find more offensive, a call for somalis to kill each other, or someone being told were to put their call for somali's to kill each other? Even if i was just insulting him for the sake of it.. which comment actually insults your intelligence and morality?

 

we write rules that regard the use of profanities. But you do not have to be profane to offend .. if we are more concerned with offense as opposed to words, then we should not let such idiotic and hateful tripe be thrown around so easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted by Stealth

"On your point about self defense. You are right, you know you are really correct on that. Somaliland should unleash hell on Puntland, so that way they could get some respect. They really should start a war right now, and even press onto gorowe, perhaps then Somaliland can be viewed as an entity that has the sheer will power to protect the territory which it claims. I feel like this is the only way Somalis will appriciate things, if they feel the baaruud itself. This is Africa after all, and the way one gets respect or be taken seriously is being assertive."

Baruud, this sounds like what Yeey would say. Let us kick some butt hehehe. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this