method

[Muriidi]

should sharia law be directly even literally derived from quran and sunnah ,or should we make rules and search confirmation in quran and sunnah thus declaring our legislation law?

[Muriidi]

what if a convicted criminal insists on his/her right to huduud literally as in quran and sunnah?

is the imam/qadi is obliged to for example to cut his/her hand off.

yes the imam/qadi is obliged to apply huduud but only if found in form of prophet's hadith pbuh.

 

Allahu aclam.

[Chocolate and Honey]

should we make rules and search confirmation in quran and sunnah thus declaring our legislation law?

This is the most dangerous Idea I have heard regarding Shari'a law. Our hands are already full with Al-Shabaab and other ahlu's who are forever declaring Jihad and issuing assisanations based on who is the "munaafiq" or "kaafir" of the day :eek: .

You can't make up rules period!! :rolleyes: Everything you need is already revealed. The Qur'an is complete.

[Hassan_B]

Originally posted by chocolate & honey:

quote: should we make rules and search confirmation in quran and sunnah thus declaring our legislation law?

This is the most dangerous Idea I have heard regarding Shari'a law. Our hands are already full with Al-Shabaab and other ahlu's who are forever declaring Jihad and issuing assisanations based on who is the "munaafiq" or "kaafir" of the day :eek: .

You can't make up rules period!! :rolleyes: Everything you need is already revealed. The Qur'an is complete.

It seems that it is precisely because that Muslims have for one reason or another felt that Islam needed to be reformed that we are now with groups that are extreme on both sides of the spectrum.

 

You have those that are very extremely harsh in trying to uphold the religion and then you have those that are so loose they are extremely lacking in their religion. All because Muslims felt Islam needed to be reformed. They got their wish and it is not pretty!

[Nur]

Chocolate&Honey sis

 

you write:

 

"Our hands are already full with Al-Shabaab and other ahlu's who are forever declaring Jihad and issuing assisanations based on who is the "munaafiq" or "kaafir" of the day"

 

 

Tom Engelhardt writes:

 

"Our drone wars also represent a new chapter in the history of assassination. Once upon a time, to be an assassin for a government was a furtive, shameful thing. In those days, of course, an assassin, if successful, took down a single person, not the targeted individual and anyone in the vicinity (or simply, if targeting intelligence proves wrong, anyone in the vicinity). No more poison-dart-tipped umbrellas, as in past KGB operations, or toxic cigars as in CIA ones -- not now that assassination has taken to the skies as an every day, all-year-round activity.

 

Today, we increasingly display our assassination wares with pride. To us, at least, it seems perfectly normal for assassination aerial operations to be a part of an open discussion in Washington and in the media. Consider this a new definition of "progress" in our world "

 

Two questions on your note and Engelhardt's:

 

1. What is the difference between the Jihad declared by Al Shabaab on foreign invaders and the Aerial and Military Invasions of Ethiopia and USA on poor fragmented Somalia? isn't a defensive resistance against a foreign invasion?

 

2. What is the difference between the Ethiopian-American Assassinations of clerics and the Al Shabaab's response of hunting down of the paid warlord drug dealer assassins? isn't all the same game?

 

 

Nur

[Muriidi]

but think about it .. are such acts even necessary nowadays ... ?

 

i mean the Prophet pbuh was here on this earth we live on .. the Message was completed .. we don't have to free Jerusalem again .. we need to realize that , or ignore the fact that the Message was completed by God's Prophet and do everything ourselves ,

imagine ,everything that is in the Quran & Sunna ..

Laws that need to be applied and implemented and upheld .. instated and sustained ..