'Muslim-Only' Airport Line

[The Resistance Movement]

Fox News Airs Suggestion for 'Muslim-Only' Airport Line

 

Yesterday on Fox News' "Dayside," conservative radio host Mike Gallagher proposed that airports institute a "Muslims only" line for airport travelers during a segment Tuesday on racial profiling. Meta, that. From Newshounds, who "watch FOX so you don't have to":

 

"Dayside" co-host Juliet Huddy set up the debate by noting that all terrorists have been Muslim extremists, and Jerrick claimed that some people oppose racial profiling as "politically incorrect."

 

"It's not just a matter of political correctness, please," responded [constitutional lawyer Michael] Gross.

 

"It's illegal, it's unconstitutional, unethical, immoral, it shouldn't be done. We do not in this country prejudge a person based upon their race, creed, color, country of national origin and it's wrong to do so and it addition it's not effective. It doesn't work. It actually perpetuates the problem. That is, it separates us."

 

Gallagher responded that Gross's statements were "absolutely absurd" and claimed that the Traffic Safety Administration is aggressively targeting uniformed members of the military. "Let's have a Muslim-only line," Gallagher said, as Gross started to talk.

 

Jerrick asked Gallagher to repeat what he said.

 

"It's time to have a Muslims check-point line in America's airports and have Muslims be scrutinized. You better believe it, it's time," Gallagher said, garnering tepid audience applause.

 

According to the Newshounds account, despite Gross' clarification above, the debate was framed as a "political correctness" issue rather than one of unconstitutionality.

 

Source :

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/08/16/fox-news-airs-suggestion-_e_27366.html

 

 

============================================

 

 

This would be a violation of the 5th Amendment

 

''No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime...''

 

and 4th Amendment

 

''The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized''

 

 

Having EVERYONE searched throughly for national security is significant however searching someone just because they're of a certian religion?

 

How about going back to "coloreds only" restrooms, and maybe make us wear a yellow crescent on our clothing (like the Jews of Nazi-Germany) and have special license plates on cars to identify ourselves to the police?

 

What are your opnions? Should there be a separate airport line for Muslims? If yes, how would they know who is and who isn't a Muslim?

[me]

Wow,

 

more and more I see the inevitability of a religious war. These people (Rightwing American Christians) are savages.

[The Resistance Movement]

Since 9/11 (or even before)Pope Bush and Arbishop Blair are executing a plan to combat the forces of "radical Islam", a blueprint for a new cold war to be fought principally by means of espionage, subversion and economic sanctions, backed by periodic and, theoretically, limited military incursions.

 

This war, war on terrorism,is the first to carry the blessing of all the world's major military powers: a grand global coalition against Islamic movements.

 

Russia would like no better than a free hand crush the independence struggle in Chechnya and suppress similar movements on its southern flanks. Recently they have assassinated Chechen rebel commander Shamil Basayev.

 

To its east, China is brutally smothering its own insurgency in Xinjiang, home to more than 50m Muslims.

 

Then you have India, another nuclear power, has some 700,000 troops quashing an insurrection in majority Muslim Kashmir.

 

War on terrorism is in fact a war against liberty, a war against us (Muslims) who cling to the hope that, just like those people in the west, we too will one day be able to determine and direct our own fate.

 

Ever since independence, Muslim societies from Marakesh to Mindanao have had their aspirations for self-rule repressed by western-backed elites and dictators.

 

For example take Algeria, where a ferocious war has been waged on Islamists (after elections they won in 1991 were annulled) with the active approval and connivance of the west.

 

In Turkey, the largest mainstream Islamic party has been banned twice; now in its third guise, its leader Tayyib Erdogan faces trial for comments he made years ago.

 

Forgotten by the world, hundreds of Turkish Islamists are serving 100-year-plus sentences for defying the taboo on mixing faith and politics.

 

In the central Asian republic of Uzbekistan, suddenly a valuable coalition partner, an authoritarian regime has executed scores of Islamist dissidents since a 1999 attempt on the life of its dictator, Islam Karimov.

 

Plus recently Muslims in Thailand have been randomly and openly by the Thailand's government under the cover of ''islamic Militants(see evidence http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3665293.stm).

 

Then you have the whole Middle East conflict from Iraq to Lebanon.

 

Does the Ummah need more proof?More bloodshed? More invasion, destruction and killings of Muslims to finaly wake up and come in defense?

[Oromia]

Nothing more could be said. It's all clear and it has always been clear. I don't know why we Muslims have to recreate the wheel over and over again. The western elite's so-called "Democracy" Malcolm X had summed it up as a whitewash of white supermacism. In the international arena we have seen for the last 50+ years the "international community's" reluctance to help the Muslim palestinians' everyday treatment as game animals by the Facsit Zionist entity. What's been going on since 9/11 doesn't need any comment. One can only be hopelessly blind and ignorant to still need more evidences to give the west the benefit of the doubt.The west is anti-Islam in its all forms. It only vouchs for "moderate" Islam to hit one after the other in the classical infamous Divide and Rule colonial policy it is well versed with. To avoid a wholesale Muslim massacre (it is already happening in many parts of the world), the West has to be confronted resolutely. But the struggle should start from within as the UIC have begun. We expect the Oromos to start doing the same, the Gama Islamia to overthrow that salve of the west Mubarak....many, many more. The struggle should first be to clean our houses. Insh'Allah...

[Resistance]

Well am all for this policy, jsut think about it has too much benefits for all the travelling Muslims:

 

1. It means we stand out, hence makes us more proud of whom we are

 

2. Since we have a seperate line it means less time to wait and lool @ those in the long quess

 

3. Since wr went through a more through security checks less suspicious on us muslims.

 

4. But the most important benefit of this, it will easier to smuggle explosives in planes via our lovely White reverts ...

 

U see win win for the muslims ..

[Baluug]

Originally posted by Hizb_UK:

it will easier to smuggle explosives in planes via our lovely White reverts ...

[Modesty]

^lol

The thing is these supremacist bigots are so full of fear and paranoia, that they think muslims are a race, they forget we are all people, so they can give the middle eastern looking or pakistani looking people in lines, but what about the chinese muslim, or the white guy? it wouldn't work, it's just paranoia, I think they live in so much fear I wonder how they survive these racist bigots.

[N.O.R.F]

Yes the level of paranio is very high, yes people are very jittery, yes we are looked at with suspicion but have you seen the queues at Heathrow on a Friday night?

 

Racial profiling is not an injustic, it is a requirement. Bring it on!