Paragon Posted January 8, 2010 Приветствую всех! У меня такой вопрос,кто что интересное подскажет буду признателен. Мы с друзьями собираемся поехать в круиз по просторам России и ближнего зарубежья месяца на два на своих машинах,но не как не можем согласовать маршрут,если у кого уже был опыт такого путешествия,мож& #1077;т,что посоветуете.Дев& #1095;онок с собой не берем,думаем,что во все городах России с этим не будет проблем,если у кого будут рекомендации и в вопросе отдыха с девушками тоже буду признателен. С уважением Сеньчик Translation Greetings to all! My question, who tells interesting that I should be grateful. My friends and I are going to go for a cruise on the expanses of Russia and neighboring countries for about two months on their machines, but not as we can not agree on a route, if anyone has had experience of such travel, can that posovetuete.Devchonok with them do not take, we think, that in all cities in Russia this would be no problem, if someone would be recommendations in the matter rest with the girls, too, will appreciate. Sincerely Senchik ---Follow up 19 | Rhinnalam December 29, 2009 at 10:04 pm По бокам космического корабля “Кеннеди” размещаются 2 двигателя по 5 футов шириной. Конструкторы американского корабля желали бы устроить эти моторы более, но не смогли. Почему? А дело в том, что двигатели эти доставлялись по металлической дороге, которая проходит по узкому туннелю. Расстояние между рельсами стандартное: 4 фута 8.5 дюйма, поэтому конструкторы имели возможность сделать моторы лишь шириной 5 футов. Возникает вопрос: почему расстояние между рельсами 4 фута 8.5 дюйма? Откуда принялись данные цифры? Оказывается, металлическую дорогу в Штатах делали эту ведь, как и в Англии, а в Англии делали железнодорожны 1077; вагоны по тому ведь принципу, что и трамвайные, а первые трамваи производились в Англии по образу и подобию конки. А длина оси конки составляла как раз 4 фута 8.5 дюйма! Хотя почему? Потому что конки делали с тем расчетом, чтобы их оси попадались в колеи на английских дорогах, чтобы колеса меньше изнашивались, а расстояние меж колеями в Англии как раз 4 фута 8.5 дюйма! Отчего так? Да просто дороги в Великобритании стали строить еще римляне, подводя их под размер собственных боевых колесниц, и протяженность оси шаблонной римской колесницы равнялась… правильно, 4 футам 8.5 дюймам! Ну вот теперь мы докопались, откуда взялся этот объем, хотя все ведь: отчего римлянам вздумалось делать свои колесницы с осями именно такой длины? А вот почему: в эту колесницу запрягали обыкновенно 2 лошадей. А 4 фута 8.5 дюйма – данное был как раз объем 2 лошадиных задниц! Делать ось колесницы длиннее было некомфортно, так как данное нарушало бы равновесие колесницы. А значит, вот и ответ на самый первый вопрос: в том числе и и уже, когда человек вышел в космос, его наивысшие технические достижения уже 2 ТЫС. ЛЕТ напрямую зависят от ОБЪЕМА ЛОШАДИНОЙ ЗАДНИЦЫ. А отчего в Российской федерации растояние меж рельсами на 18 см больше? Когда у повелителя Николая спросили делать ширину как в европе либо больше, он ответил “да на хер более” ну наши и сделали на 18см больше. )))) производство мебели заказ Translation 19 | Rhinnalam December 29, 2009 at 10:04 pm On either side of the Space Shuttle Kennedy placed 2 engines and 5 feet wide. The designers of the American ship would be willing to arrange these motors better, but could not. Why? And the fact is that these engines were delivered to a metal road, which passes through a narrow tunnel. The distance between the rails standard: 4 feet 8.5 inches, so the designers had the opportunity to make motors only 5 feet wide. The question arises: why the distance between the rails 4 feet 8.5 inches? Where accepted these figures? It turns out that the metal road in the United States did this because, as in England, and England made rail cars because of that principle as the tram, and the first trams were made in England in the image and likeness of the tram. A length of the axis of the tram was just 4 feet 8.5 inches! But why? Because the tram made so as to ensure that their axes fell into ruts on British roads, the wheels wear out less, and the distance between the ruts in the UK just 4 feet 8.5 inches! Why so? Simply the road in the UK were built by the Romans, leading them into the size of its own war chariots, and the length of the axis of the template Roman chariot equaled ... properly, 4 feet 8.5 inches! Well, now we got to the bottom, where this volume, although in fact: why it occurred to the Romans to do their chariots with the axes is such a length? Here's why: this chariot harnessed usually 2 horses. A 4 feet 8.5 inches - this was just volume 2 horses asses! To make a long axis of the chariot was not comfortable with, because this would violate the balance of the chariot So, here is the answer to the original question: including and already, when a man went into space, its highest technical achievement already 2 THOUSAND. YEARS directly depend on the amount Horse ***. And why in the Russia Federation distance between the rails at 18 cm more? When the ruler Nicholas asked to do the width as in Europe any more, he said yes to the dick more than "well we did at 18cm more. )))) furniture order --Follow up 20 | Даниил January 6, 2010 at 8:21 am Вот про это я почитал с большим интересом. И с удовольствием прочитал бы еще больше! Планируете и дальше писать на эту же тему? Спасибо Translation 20 | Daniel January 6, 2010 at 8:21 am That's about it, I just read with great interest. I would be happy to read more! Plan to continue writing on this same subject? Thanks --------------- I have deleted at least another 15 comments such as the above, thinking they were all junk. But then I thought why don't I try to translate? And the strange thing is they only target one 'post'! Never on other posts of my now defunct blog. Now I am suspicious. What's going on? Is this some kind of coded messages exchanged on my blog? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fabregas_Bruv Posted January 8, 2010 muridi ba fahma these kind of things ps. if you go missing, at least we'll have some sort of evidence. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paragon Posted January 8, 2010 ^Lol. It's really worrying. I have been deleting their messages constantly so i won't be surprised if they get pissed and hijack me to Gulag? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sheherazade Posted January 8, 2010 you have to break the code; muridi just writes them, he's no help here. It's a woman. Really. I can tell. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paragon Posted January 8, 2010 Sheh, what's her plot. She's confusing me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sheherazade Posted January 8, 2010 who am I to interfere with another woman's PLAN to bring down a man? I'll warn you, this one is good. Haha. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paragon Posted January 8, 2010 It's not so bad to felled (like a plank) by a Xalimo but a Russian one? Miyaad igu eeganeysaa gaasha? Cadow baad ahayd illeen? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cara. Posted January 8, 2010 At least the comments are interesting, rather than spam about FREE VIAGRA FREE VICODIN CHEAP ONLINE PHARMACY. I had this book about other odd design features and the history behind them. Like why shirt buttons are on the left side on women's shirts but on the right side on men's. And why most places cars are on the right but a few like Britain people drive on the left. Technological just-so stories. Don't discourage them if the Russkies decide to post more, Paragon. Wait, you speak Russian? I knew you were a spy all along! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paragon Posted January 8, 2010 ^Lol@about the shirt buttons. Did they explain why women have them on the left side? Car, c'mon now. You can trust. I'm one of the goodies . PS: Мне нравится ваше имя, кстати Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cara. Posted January 8, 2010 ^No, I will not give you the code to the Doomsday device, comrade. The shirt button thing: men used to carry swords on their left hip and will pull the sword out with their right hand if someone challenged their honor (or impugned their noble lineage ). Women on the other hand carry babies on their left hip, using their left arm to support the little hanger-ons. So their right hands would be free to unbutton. It's nonsense of course. Why are men and women deciding to undress while pulling out swords or carrying babies around? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paragon Posted January 8, 2010 Gimme the code or I'll pull a sword on you, courtesy of my nobility. Ahem. I think they need to undress due to the old English saying (which has now been hippie-fied) of 'Make Love After War'. Just like a couple after a furious argument. There's actually a French invader of ancient England who made love after every victory at war. So in old days perhaps it made sense? Lol. Now, Comrade Cara, give it to me, will you? The code, ofcourse. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Allamagan Posted January 9, 2010 Paragon, could these be cryptic messages ( a form of communication) from the space, maybe aliens trying to communicate humans down under and you become the lucy winer dee dont dismiss these messages as spam, ask them politely to give you the key, the private key in order for you to decrypt these rusisk codes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AYOUB Posted January 9, 2010 Cara Did say FREE? By-the-way, Paragon you are in serious trouble. You have to notify the authorities asap. Don't you dare mention my name, you'll be in deeper waters if you do. All the best. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacaylbaro Posted January 10, 2010 Maba fahminba ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, belo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paragon Posted January 11, 2010 ^ Anba ma fahmin JB Allamagan iyo Ayup, bacbaad igu sii xireeysaan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
