Ibtisam Posted January 4, 2009 President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt a country where 'the idea of service has simply ceased to exist' There was a day when we worried about the "Arab masses" – the millions of "ordinary" Arabs on the streets of Cairo, Kuwait, Amman, Beirut – and their reaction to the constant bloodbaths in the Middle East. Could Anwar Sadat restrain the anger of his people? And now – after three decades of Hosni Mubarak – can Mubarak (or "La Vache Qui Rit", as he is still called in Cairo) restrain the anger of his people? The answer, of course, is that Egyptians and Kuwaitis and Jordanians will be allowed to shout in the streets of their capitals – but then they will be shut down, with the help of the tens of thousands of secret policemen and government militiamen who serve the princes and kings and elderly rulers of the Arab world. Egyptians demand that Mubarak open the Rafah crossing-point into Gaza, break off diplomatic relations with Israel, even send weapons to Hamas. And there is a kind of perverse beauty in listening to the response of the Egyptian government: why not complain about the three gates which the Israelis refuse to open? And anyway, the Rafah crossing-point is politically controlled by the four powers that produced the "road map" for peace, including Britain and the US. Why blame Mubarak? To admit that Egypt can't even open its sovereign border without permission from Washington tells you all you need to know about the powerlessness of the satraps that run the Middle East for us. Open the Rafah gate – or break off relations with Israel – and Egypt's economic foundations crumble. Any Arab leader who took that kind of step will find that the West's economic and military support is withdrawn. Without subventions, Egypt is bankrupt. Of course, it works both ways. Individual Arab leaders are no longer going to make emotional gestures for anyone. When Sadat flew to Jerusalem – "I am tired of the dwarves," he said of his fellow Arab leaders – he paid the price with his own blood at the Cairo reviewing-stand where one of his own soldiers called him a "Pharaoh" before shooting him dead. The true disgrace of Egypt, however, is not in its response to the slaughter in Gaza. It is the corruption that has become embedded in an Egyptian society where the idea of service – health, education, genuine security for ordinary people – has simply ceased to exist. It's a land where the first duty of the police is to protect the regime, where protesters are beaten up by the security police, where young women objecting to Mubarak's endless regime – likely to be passed on caliph-like to his son Gamal, whatever we may be told – are sexually molested by plain-clothes agents, where prisoners in the Tora-Tora complex are forced to rape each other by their guards. There has developed in Egypt a kind of religious facade in which the meaning of Islam has become effaced by its physical representation. Egyptian civil "servants" and government officials are often scrupulous in their religious observances – yet they tolerate and connive in rigged elections, violations of the law and prison torture. A young American doctor described to me recently how in a Cairo hospital busy doctors merely blocked doors with plastic chairs to prevent access to patients. In November, the Egyptian newspaper Al-Masry al-Youm reported how doctors abandoned their patients to attend prayers during Ramadan. And amid all this, Egyptians have to live amid daily slaughter by their own shabby infrastructure. Alaa al-Aswani wrote eloquently in the Cairo paper Al-Dastour that the regime's "martyrs" outnumber all the dead of Egypt's wars against Israel – victims of railway accidents, ferry sinkings, the collapse of city buildings, sickness, cancers and pesticide poisonings – all victims, as Aswani says, "of the corruption and abuse of power". Opening the Rafah border-crossing for wounded Palestinians – the Palestinian medical staff being pushed back into their Gaza prison once the bloodied survivors of air raids have been dumped on Egyptian territory – is not going to change the midden in which Egyptians themselves live. Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, the Hizbollah secretary general in Lebanon, felt able to call on Egyptians to "rise in their millions" to open the border with Gaza, but they will not do so. Ahmed Aboul Gheit, the feeble Egyptian Foreign Minister, could only taunt the Hizbollah leaders by accusing them of trying to provoke "an anarchy similar to the one they created in their own country." But he is well-protected. So is President Mubarak. Egypt's malaise is in many ways as dark as that of the Palestinians. Its impotence in the face of Gaza's suffering is a symbol of its own political sickness. Independent Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Salma Posted January 4, 2009 LOOL @ "La Vache Qui Rit", hey why ppl always use this tasty cheese as a bad symbol Anyway, the Arabs & Muslims will always remain weak and helpless as long as they are throwing the responsibility on each other. For god sake, who said that protecting & defending Palestine is the full responsibility of Egypt???? Why always Egypt???? and why always Arabs are to be accused?? If generally all muslims are weak why to focus only on Arabs?? just bcz they share the borders with Palestine, it doesn't mean we have to wait for the Egyptian government to re-act. Where are the muslims on this earth, what about the Pakistanis,, Indonesians, Nigerians, Malaysians,, Indians,, Iranians,, Africans,,,etc? Trust me we are all accused for irresponsibility and those politicians & presidents will NEVER EVER do something that would threat their lives & thrones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
me Posted January 4, 2009 ^Count on Somalis to get their noses into business that is not theirs. Maxaa naga galay carab? Let's deal with out business first. Charity starts at home. Danteena aanka fakarno marka hore, markaas un kadib ayaan dad kale caawin karnaa. It is just sad the hypocrisy that you see in the forum. One minute they are rejoicing and celebrating the injustices in Somalia, and the next minute they are shedding tears for Palestinians. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted January 4, 2009 ^^ Robert Fisk is not a Somali, you madman. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LayZie G. Posted January 4, 2009 ^WARYEE, you know full well inuu the movement ula jeeday. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted January 4, 2009 ^^ I know what he meant but I spit on what he means (and he knows it). Better to sneer when it comes to ME and his fellow 'dreamy' Somalis. Anyway, what are you doing agreeing with him there? Don't you know what he stands for? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
me Posted January 4, 2009 ^Rather stand for Somalia, then bow like a walad Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted January 4, 2009 ^^ We spoke about this before, saaxib. You DON'T stand for Somalia. You stand for dreams and lies. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
me Posted January 4, 2009 ^You must have had that conversation with yourself. Because I can't remember you and I speaking about anything except your walad memories. Care to refresh my mind about what we spoke about that indicate that I stand for dreams and lies? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NGONGE Posted January 4, 2009 ^^ I don't have the energy to do a search now. Will do in the morning, saaxib. Watch this space. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
me Posted January 4, 2009 Originally posted by NGONGE: ^^ We spoke about this before, saaxib. You DON'T stand for Somalia. You stand for dreams and lies. I am just quoting you before you change it. I would like to see the lies that you think that I stand for. I could be labeled an idealist because I believe in something. So the dreams part is something I can live with, we can even go further and call it visionary. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fabregas Posted January 5, 2009 ^^Your idealistic version of "SOmalinimo" is not greatly different from the Carabnimo/Pan Arabism which was peddled by Arab socialist governments. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibtisam Posted January 5, 2009 Why have you all hijack my thread. :mad: You have the whole of Politics section to discuss Somali and all their problems. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fabregas Posted January 5, 2009 cuz some folks said, " carab maxa naga galay"? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites