Castro Posted June 16, 2005 What's your point, Ofleh ? My point is a reference to your "gullible and obtuse" remark. A hadith narrated by Anas ibn Malik, as stated above, is most questionable by many standards of hadith authentication. I know because I've researched this particular hadith and others many years ago. If anyone's interested, they can do their own search. I'll refrain from providing any links lest I "mislead" anyone. It's very convenient to find a hadith that just so happens to fit the case of the doctored picture. While the alleged punishment in the hadith is not for disrespecting the Quran, but for liking music, dancing and booze, it is nonetheless being used as proof that the picture is authentic. Using the hadith to prove the authenticity of the picture is refered to as argumentum ad verecundiam in the study of logic. Also know as an appeal to authority. In this case, the authority to which the appeal is made is questionable in and of itself. Anyhow, that was my point. May be I elaborated too much here. Thanks, Ofleh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faarax-Brawn Posted June 16, 2005 Why isnt anyone saying the OBVIOUS? Those are UGLY ANIMALS Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Valenteenah. Posted June 16, 2005 Ofleh, Thanks for the clarification. I get it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H Posted August 2, 2005 SUBHANA ALLAH some people actually believed in this hoax... thanks AF for bring the proof into light Salams Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foxy Posted August 3, 2005 Loooooooooolz@Afro They sure as hell are Ugly creatures...... cheers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
