Sign in to follow this  
Libaax-Sankataabte

Barack Hussein Obama wins Iowa (97% Whites)

Recommended Posts

Ibtisam   

^^^Sorry dear, American Politicians are speaking on behalf of Israel and few powerful Zionist in key positions backed by well financed and targeted lobby group, which just happens to be more active.

 

The average American cares about America not Israel. what happens when the two interest conflict?? Guess what, it is Israel interest which will be on top.

 

Israel is a liability, the sooner y'll realise this, the better for your sorry a*ss country. Don’t get me wrong, I realise Obama would not be here if he did not endorse AIPAC. It is and always was much bigger than him, it does not make it any less pleasant or disappointing to watch him grovel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Goodness, and i thought i was as liberal as it got. L0L, You folks in the UK are too liberal,sometimes,you've got to say things and do things for the larger things in life.

 

Godwilling,He will be a better prez,support the man,when he comes to campaign in London,because that is where the next primary is gonna be @,since Ms Clinton didnt concede smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ibtisam   

Jerusalem has never been and will never be the capital, it is not even included as whole in the 1945 borders.

 

FB: Yeah yeah what ever. My blackness only can support Obama to an extent, my Muslimness and morality must overrule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fabregas   

Originally posted by Faarax-Brawn:

quote:Originally posted by Ibtisam:

Mr. Obama speech to AIPAC is everywhere. What an as*S kissing idoi*t, What a loser
icon_razz.gif
American politicians :rolleyes: are all the same and no back bone, always so terrified of the unseen lobby. When will America policy be about its own interest rather than Israel?

So what Obama is @ Aipac? Matter of fact,i am glad he is with the AIPAC folks. Let him actually say ALL that they want to hear. It is what Americans want to hear. Like it or hate it.

 

Anyway,lets say he went on TV & blasted off AIPAC? Like,say,he went on TV and said: "Screw you AIPAC,we will support Palestine" Would we be talking about Obama? Naga daaya ciyaarta
smile.gif

 

American politicians are speaking on behalf of AMericans,and wether people like it or not,this country is pro israel. People should embrace that.
Fair enough, that could all well be true! American is pro Israel, but the Muslim World isn't, and some where going on like Obamas gonna( if he ever gets elected) change the Muslim, which is a complete fantasy! I would love to see his policy with the Ethiopian Regime!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LANDER   

Well, no one country recognizes Jerusalem as the 'undivided' capital of Israel (not even the U.S.)

Mind you he isn't the first politician to speak such rhetoric in front of an Israeli lobby, but this doesn't reinforce his promise for 'change' and not bending to the demands of lobby groups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ibtisam   

He is not^, but I think the reason most people are shocked as you said is because of his emphasis on "change" I guess he meant limited change some areas icon_razz.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Baashi   

Libaax, regardless of the validity of this particular rumor, Michele has proven to be a laibility to her husband's candidacy. The sister is another Hillary in the making :D

 

Just-in

 

Plot thickens -- Clinton's email says she will "support" Obama. She's playing hardball and rightly so. Obama is on the hot seat. What to do with ambitious Hillary who has 18 million voters and 48% of pledged delegates under her belt?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Awoow, whatever you do, don't suggest that he puts her on the ticket. That will turned out to be a disastrous ticket.

 

Lets hope that the majority of the 18m and the 48% will come around once the compaign moves to the next level. They have to do that or endure another 4-8 yrs of McBush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Baashi   

My suggestion matters little bro. He is in a fix. He can't embrace her and the sametimes he can't ignore her. She knows that and she is not in the mood of getting him off the hook. Hence the strange kabuki dance. He is practical enough to know the calculus is on her side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Emperor   

^There was a news reporter for the BBC who suggested that the white house would be too small to accomdate both the Clinton dynasty and the rising popularity of reer Obama's... They will be far too big names to share or have enough space for both, the white Guri will simply get a bit over-crouded :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite the rhetoric of Jerusalem, Obama has rejected to support a Senate Resolution bill that called for the designation of the Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization. According to NY Times, he called the bill as "unnecessarily belligerent and overboard".

 

I think Mr. Obama understands the nature of Israeli-American historic and political relations and he has to reassure the Jews state, which enjoys 71% of public support in the U.S. that their government should militarily and financially aid the state of Israel overcome existential threats in a very volatile region. Yet, he is still willing to sit down and negotiate with America's adversaries without jeopardizing the country's interest. Many eminent foreign policy experts hail this as a bold step to restoring America's global leadership and calming the region’s tension.

 

The Democratic presumptive nominee knows what is at stake and important goals that he has accomplish if he were to win the next White/Black House.

 

There is an enormous public support for three items for the upcoming presidential election: ending the war in Iraq, reversing the worst economic slump America has faced since the Bush Sr. administration, and restoring the loss of civil liberties. The odds are heavily against him especially if keeping U.S. troops in Iraq is secretly high on the agenda. Obama understands this as he explicitly said in his St. Paul speech that "we should carefully withdraw from Iraq as we carelessly entered". :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This man is very smart. Look how he maneuvers in his VP search. Talk to the top Dems in congress and collect their consensus, to make his ultimate choice credible .

 

From NBC's Andrea Mitchell

Congressional sources tell NBC News that Obama's vice presidential vetting team of Jim Johnson, Caroline Kennedy, and Eric Holder will be on Capitol Hill Monday and Tuesday interviewing senators and members of Congress about their recommendations. Those being visited are NOT potential choices.

 

The point, according to Senate offices, is to collect information about a potential field.

 

 

source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this