ailamos Posted January 19, 2010 LOL@ assumptions is mother to whom? Bush and Blair?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ailamos Posted January 19, 2010 Originally posted by grasshopper: The scene in Portugal with the lady putting away her necklace reminded me of this I got so angry when I first watched it. I hear ya grasshopper, that was messed up what they did :mad: They convinced themselves that they're the victims and went on the offensive. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jibreel Posted January 19, 2010 History has again and again recorded the moral deficits of the Europeans together with their American cousins. They should be the last to question other peoples(s) integrity inregards to their moral ethics. For the racists mentioned in the post, a history lesson is imperative. Jibreel. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ailamos Posted January 19, 2010 Originally posted by Jibreel: For the racists mentioned in the post, a history lesson is imperative. Word. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Che -Guevara Posted January 19, 2010 How would history lesson change a human condition? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SayidSomal Posted January 19, 2010 Originally posted by ailamos: quote:Originally posted by Jibreel: For the racists mentioned in the post, a history lesson is imperative. Word. No that is a sentence, not word. and whilst i am at it - 'implicity' is not a word - the correct word you were looking for is 'implicitness'. Che - history is full of racism. Anybody know - who the first racist was? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ailamos Posted January 19, 2010 ^ Good point. If a person consciously hates a certain group, then no amount of history will fix it. However, I think there are certain life lessons that people, even the *really* bad ones, could learn from and make them change their ways. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibtisam Posted January 19, 2010 One of Adam son (the one who killed) was darker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Che -Guevara Posted January 19, 2010 Sayid-Athiests would say the first prophet? I know history is full of racism, I watch the Nazi week on TLC Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibtisam Posted January 19, 2010 ^^^ :confused: Che yaa? No, I don't know what athiest would say, I don't speak for them you know Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SayidSomal Posted January 19, 2010 Whoopee! - i am more knowledgeable than 'Shikha' Ibti. wrong answer. it was Satan when he refused to bow down to Adam (AS) - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jibreel Posted January 19, 2010 A history lesson like all forms of education would have brought about an understanding. It is this realized insight(acquired from the understanding) that would bring about change in this particular human condition. Jibreel. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Che -Guevara Posted January 19, 2010 Sayid-Makes sense actually. Ibti...LooooooooL that was for Sayid but I think athiests would accuse prophets of racism. Jibreel...You sound like an eternal optimist? How does education of recorded help Palestanians I wonder? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ibtisam Posted January 19, 2010 @ Sayid: Err Satan was not racist, it was pride. Had nothing to do with colour, just that Adam was made from mud (unless you are saying black people got the dark mud which white people got white beach sand) Che, they don't believe in prophets how can they accuse them of racism? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ailamos Posted January 19, 2010 Originally posted by Sayid*Somal: No that is a sentence, not word. and whilst i am at it - 'implicity' is not a word - the correct word you were looking for is 'implicitness'. Che - history is full of racism. Anybody know - who the first racist was? I have a feeling that you really don't like me Sayid Since when are you an expert on the English language? Frankly, I am getting tired of your BS... see here for the definition of the implicity http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/implicity . Just because your web browser doesn't recognize it, doesn't mean that it's not in the lexicon. And about "Word", if you go to the Urban Dictionary http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=word you will see that "Word" has no single meaning, but is used to convey a casual sense of affirmation, acknowledgement, agreement, or to indicate that something has impressed you favorably. I'm glad you've learnt a couple of things about the English language and its use. Please do some research before you post bogus stuff. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites