Ninkaani ayaa waxaa gacanta ku soo dhigay 30-ka May Ciidamada Xarakatul Shabaabul Mujaahidiin kadib howlgalo balaaran oo ay sameeyeen, waxaana Baaritaano iyo Maxkamadayn la saaray ninkasi uu ku qirtay dambiga loo heystay. Duke did you happen to read this part ^ of the story at all ? Dadweynaha ku dhaqan degmada Wanlaweyne ee gobolka Sh/hoose ayaa si weyn u soo dhaweeyay xakunka ninkaasi lagu dilay waxaa ay ku booriyeen maamulka islaamiga ee degmadaasi in ay sii wadaan dadaaladooda ku aadan dhinaca dhaqan galinta shareecada Islaamka. or even this ^ ? aha the famous "what evidence did they have?" ... that the rapist/murderer confessed is an inconsequential foot note ... in your little head isn't it ? let me save you the trouble and pre-empt you here and reply for you "It was co-erced" all the way until we get to "he was the victim here, they killed an innocent man" Duke one of the things I admired about you is you are honest .. your a qabilist shill and don't apologize for it. but you are not being honest in this case ... no matter if they caught and executed a child molester/ mass murder you would still blame them !

Why am i not surprised that this thread hasn't attracted as much attention as the one where four road bandits were amputated ? it doesn't quite fit into the whole EVIL Al-shabaab narrative that you blindly hold dear. what they are punishing rapists and murderers :confused: .. that cant be .. this must be an anomaly ! :eek: so jaamaca especially for those of you who were outraged when that xukun was carried out. what say you about this one ? should they have waited until a 'suitable government' is in place to fulfill justice for the raped and killed innocent victim ? I understand ... it isn't politically expedient to be outraged on behalf of a rapist eh. but do try to be consistent

"sida xidhiga dhuubnow oo xulus iyo miskaba waa" arint kaliya ku saxsanayd mida reer magaalka .. int kale waa laga helay. .. this is stand up comedy Geeljire style LOL the man is a genius .. kuwa kale youtube ku jira ayaan maantoo dhan dhagaysanayay. find one called "Maxaa uraya ?"

An excellent read thanks for sharing it brother. Qofkii kabiiro ( danbi wayn ) ku dhaca, sida: xanta beenta …iwm shabaabku ma ku gaalay-siiyaan?. Saxaabadii suubanaha afkooda ma la gaadhaan , gaar ahaan , Cuthmaan ,Cali Dalxa , Caa’isha ? Gaaladu ma ka badbaadaa dirirtooda ? Su’aalahan jawaabtooda ayaa fure u ah su’aasheenna jawaabteeda. Aaway ragii mujaahidiinta ku tilmaamay Khawaarij ma idin ku jiraa nin su'aalhan si daacad ah iga jawaabi kara ?

Goodir .. ma maqashay doqon meel lagu kaftamay in lagu kala tagay moodaa. don't twist a lighthearted comment into something else. MMA abti .. ma aaminsani inaan wax badan kala fognahay ... dhalinta inay denbi leeyihiin la iskuma haysto oo aniguba wax weliba ay sameeyeen kuma raacsani lakin I would take them over TFG 2.0 any day. habeen wanaagsan akhyaarta

^ good to know abti. now that's cleared all that is remaining is you are just plainly on the wrong side of the current issue .. which is a far less graver sin than pulling a Duke Circa 2006.

Originally posted by Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiy aar: And someone dares to accuse others being in 'denial' now. 'Motivational prank' indeed. How fitting in this title of the other thread now, initiated by the same member in 180 degree change of principle. Xabashi kaariyaashooda ku socdo ayaa la deny gareynaaye, haddana iyagoo joogin in empty wind laga raadinoyaa. If only some had principles. Eebboow. MMA abti ma kaa daacad baa sidan ? tell me your not pulling a Duke circa 2006 on me. I would accuse you of being on the wrong side of the current issue .. but i never thougt you would outright deny what is clear for everyone to see. bal arintan ii jilci abti

I'm glad you decided to take my advice and try again. you certainly have used more words than your first failed attempt but have you made any more sense ? ... let dissect your second attempt. Originally posted by LayZie G.: In article one of the French constitution, it clearly states that "France shall be an indivisible, secular, democratic and social Republic". Therefore, there should be no reason why any of you should be surprised of the latest news coming out of the republic regarding of the possible ban of the Burqa, Taliban's most priced possession. First of all Article I of the french constitution states Article 1. The Republic and those peoples of the Overseas territories who, by an act of free determination, adopt the present Constitution set up a Community. The Community is founded upon the equality and solidarity of the peoples composing it. you are probably referring to Article 2 which you redacted (a bit dishonest) but not surprising considering the entire Article not only does not support your argument but blows it out of the water completely Article 2. France is an indivisible, secular, democratic and social Republic. It ensures the equality before the law of all citizens, without distinction of origin, race or religion. It respects all beliefs. The national emblem is the tricolour flag, blue, white and red. The national anthem is the 'Marseillaise'. The motto of the Republic is 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity'. Its principle is government of the people, by the people, for the people. to me that means that they cannot ban the Burkha,Habit, cross, star of david etc. I'm curios how your reading of Article 2. resulted in this Originally posted by LayZie G.: Therefore, there should be no reason why any of you should be surprised of the latest news coming out of the republic regarding of the possible ban of the Burqa Originally posted by LayZie G.: With that said, I can't help but address the garment for its worth. What is the purpose of the veil? Who dictates what a women should wear, certainly not the mullah next door but then who? Your brother, husband, your imaam? Who exactly? What are you trying to say exactly ? the Burkha is forced onto women by their brothers, husbands and imaams ... care to back this claim up ? Originally posted by LayZie G.: Furthermore, men for centuries have told woman what to do and what to say, is it so bad that the French are now doing their part to see that their secular state remains in its current state, secular, separate from religious dogma. Is it really so bad? Like North I'm beginning to think you have no clue what a 'secular state' actually means. This is the dictionary definition: "A secular state is a concept of secularism, whereby a state or country is officially neutral in matters of religion, neither supporting nor opposing any particular religious beliefs or practices. A secular state also treats all its citizens equally regardless of religion, and does not give preferential treatment for a citizen from a particular religion over other religions. Most often it has no state religion or equivalent." If im not mistaken by this "banning of the Burkha" crusade Sorkazy is actually involving the government in private individual religious affairs, which is directly anti-thetical to the whole 'secular state' thing no ? Originally posted by LayZie G.: This brings me to the subject of the motion about the Burqa ban in public places. Do you support the ban or are you against the motion. The floor is all yours. I'm completely against it, because it is a impinging on personal liberty and freedom of the individual by dictating what they can or cannot wear. abti you have managed to use more words and make even less sense than your first try. now are you ready to address my points .. or are going to take your ball go home ? like you did in the other thread

Origanally posted by LayZie G. Come to think of it, this is a sad day for muslims all over the world when the French are having a debate that concerns people of muslim faith (excluding geeljire), especially women who should have been front and centre of this discussion, instead Sarkozy is speaking on behalf of our women. Speaking of Geelka, the geele brothers seem to be out in full force caawa, how about that? Familiar territory boys eh? A mask debate of all things. Does the Burqa remind you of the day you boys will strap a belt all over your bodies in route to paradise. Aside from that geelka, I know where you are heading. You want to make this topic 'us' Vs "them" issue and it isn't. I asked you a simple question, kindly answer my question or move out of the way. Do you agree with the French's proposal for banning the Burqa or do you disagreE? If the ladder, support your argument. abti as they used to say "either put up or shut up !" stop waffling all over the place. your thread title says "Why I agree with Sarkozy" but your post so far is very lacking either support your views i.e that the niqaab is a sign of subservience, a sign of debasement .. copying/pasting and/or cheerleading ( "He couldn't be more right" ) is no way to present your argument. ps: you get no extra points for the over the top melodrama and the distasteful & unnecessary pictures you are trying to hide your weak arguments with. all in all im not impressed, but im willing to give you another chance .. The floor is yours

Originally posted by LayZie G.: I agree with the French in calling for the ban of Burqa in public. The French President Sarkozy in his address said: quote: "The burqa is not a religious sign, it's a sign of subservience, a sign of debasement _ I want to say it solemnly," he said. "It will not be welcome on the territory of the French Republic." He couldn't be more right. Do you agree with this call for the ban of Burqa? My only worry is that they will not include the niqab and it will just be the Burqa. care to elaborate on the bold bits ?

I think vindicated is the wrong word in this case. more like sharif is as gutless a traitor abdullahi amxaar was. vidication implies that what abdullahi amxaar was doing was right and what sharif is doing by following yey's example is also right.

@ sharif amxaar .. he and Abdullahi Amxaar could be cousins.

^ Hassan Dahir ... has become very proficient in slaying xabashi's take a loot at the mans resume it is littered with tigre carcasses. Kenyans will follows the route of the tigre .. and will run away once their carcasses pile up and they can handle no more.

Originally posted by LayZie G.: Furthermore, I believe that with the help of the Kenyan government and our eagerly waiting axmaaro brothers we can get the governments of Burundi and Uganda to commit more troops as well as gather much needed support from Rwanda, Djibouti and Tanzania before the La princessa sinks. is this what it has come to ? somalida waxay tidhaa hadii la dhimanayana dhareerka waa la iska duwaa.

^ enough with your wailing already abti. these men (tfg)deserve no sympathy as they have already chosen which side they are on. (Ethiopian, AMISOM) to act all indignant now is sheer hypocrisy .. what did you expect was going to happen ?

^ no confusion here abti. I support al-shabaab to overthrow the government ... the deaths i regret are those of civilians.

Kashafa brother, tone it down a little. I sincerely support the Mujahadin in their goal of overthrowing this worthless sham of a government. but this ever rising death toll is not something to celebrate .. many innocent people are suffering alongside the TFG ... it seems like it will never end

I dont if they mean buy 3 for the price of 3 in which case it is much of a sale or buy 3 for the price of 3! (factorial) in which case 3! = 1 x 2 x 3 i.e buy 3 for the price of 6 which is a rippoff

^ I took that as an axiom .. otherwise no way to proceed. how are you ?

max bus speed with 6 passengers = 100 km/hour if bus speed decreases in direct proportion to number of passengers and assuming there is a uniform distribution of weight. each passenger contributes 16.67 km/hour if there are 3 passengers on the bus .. the max bus speed is = 150 km/hour ie. speed of the bus is inversely proportional to the number of passengers or put in another way a 50% drop in weight results in a 50% gain in speed

@ Shakina .. Woman after i told you how sensitive i am about my bald spot.

@ NG .. NN cashar baan u wadaa ii dhaaf. yes there is a situation i'm not denying it ...the bloody protests can tell you that .. nor do i beleive the west is interfering in it .. im just point out their slanted coverage. since they do not have observers on the ground they have no way of knowing whether the election has been rigged or not let alone their claim of a "obvious sham". just pointing their intentions are not as altruistic as some hoodwinked people would like it to be .. with reference to past examples.

^ I'm not old enough to be flattered to be called a kid or young enough to be insulted by being called an oldie ... solve for x (where x is my age)

^ I think i'll relocate to uk if i do go ahead with a phd. Bsc 4 years , mastes 2 years and phd avg 5 years. that is a lifetime of books Shakina im not such an old man .. suuqa ha iga bixin im thinking of going back for a degree in mathematics .. i used to hate but i enjoy it now