Originally posted by Fahiye: The Trinity is complete ^ Now congrats to the new President and I hope that all P-landerz to work with him towards peace, stability and development in puntland as well as the whole northern regions of Somalia

Cynical lady, to hell with all your zionist list!

OK no hassle folks, making Dua for your Gazan brothers and sisters in Islam is important and especially this time.

How Israel brought Gaza to the brink of humanitarian catastrophe Oxford professor of international relations Avi Shlaim served in the Israeli army and has never questioned the state's legitimacy. But its merciless assault on Gaza has led him to devastating conclusions A wounded Palestinian policeman gestures while lying on the ground outside Hamas police headquarters following an Israeli air strike in Gaza City. Photograph: Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images The only way to make sense of Israel's senseless war in Gaza is through understanding the historical context. Establishing the state of Israel in May 1948 involved a monumental injustice to the Palestinians. British officials bitterly resented American partisanship on behalf of the infant state. On 2 June 1948, Sir John Troutbeck wrote to the foreign secretary, Ernest Bevin, that the Americans were responsible for the creation of a gangster state headed by "an utterly unscrupulous set of leaders". I used to think that this judgment was too harsh but Israel's vicious assault on the people of Gaza, and the Bush administration's complicity in this assault, have reopened the question. I write as someone who served loyally in the Israeli army in the mid-1960s and who has never questioned the legitimacy of the state of Israel within its pre-1967 borders. What I utterly reject is the Zionist colonial project beyond the Green Line. The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in the aftermath of the June 1967 war had very little to do with security and everything to do with territorial expansionism. The aim was to establish Greater Israel through permanent political, economic and military control over the Palestinian territories. And the result has been one of the most prolonged and brutal military occupations of modern times. Four decades of Israeli control did incalculable damage to the economy of the Gaza Strip. With a large population of 1948 refugees crammed into a tiny strip of land, with no infrastructure or natural resources, Gaza's prospects were never bright. Gaza, however, is not simply a case of economic under-development but a uniquely cruel case of deliberate de-development. To use the Biblical phrase, Israel turned the people of Gaza into the hewers of wood and the drawers of water, into a source of cheap labour and a captive market for Israeli goods. The development of local industry was actively impeded so as to make it impossible for the Palestinians to end their subordination to Israel and to establish the economic underpinnings essential for real political independence. Gaza is a classic case of colonial exploitation in the post-colonial era. Jewish settlements in occupied territories are immoral, illegal and an insurmountable obstacle to peace. They are at once the instrument of exploitation and the symbol of the hated occupation. In Gaza, the Jewish settlers numbered only 8,000 in 2005 compared with 1.4 million local residents. Yet the settlers controlled 25% of the territory, 40% of the arable land and the lion's share of the scarce water resources. Cheek by jowl with these foreign intruders, the majority of the local population lived in abject poverty and unimaginable misery. Eighty per cent of them still subsist on less than $2 a day. The living conditions in the strip remain an affront to civilised values, a powerful precipitant to resistance and a fertile breeding ground for political extremism. In August 2005 a Likud government headed by Ariel Sharon staged a unilateral Israeli pullout from Gaza, withdrawing all 8,000 settlers and destroying the houses and farms they had left behind. Hamas, the Islamic resistance movement, conducted an effective campaign to drive the Israelis out of Gaza. The withdrawal was a humiliation for the Israeli Defence Forces. To the world, Sharon presented the withdrawal from Gaza as a contribution to peace based on a two-state solution. But in the year after, another 12,000 Israelis settled on the West Bank, further reducing the scope for an independent Palestinian state. Land-grabbing and peace-making are simply incompatible. Israel had a choice and it chose land over peace. The real purpose behind the move was to redraw unilaterally the borders of Greater Israel by incorporating the main settlement blocs on the West Bank to the state of Israel. Withdrawal from Gaza was thus not a prelude to a peace deal with the Palestinian Authority but a prelude to further Zionist expansion on the West Bank. It was a unilateral Israeli move undertaken in what was seen, mistakenly in my view, as an Israeli national interest. Anchored in a fundamental rejection of the Palestinian national identity, the withdrawal from Gaza was part of a long-term effort to deny the Palestinian people any independent political existence on their land. Israel's settlers were withdrawn but Israeli soldiers continued to control all access to the Gaza Strip by land, sea and air. Gaza was converted overnight into an open-air prison. From this point on, the Israeli air force enjoyed unrestricted freedom to drop bombs, to make sonic booms by flying low and breaking the sound barrier, and to terrorise the hapless inhabitants of this prison. Israel likes to portray itself as an island of democracy in a sea of authoritarianism. Yet Israel has never in its entire history done anything to promote democracy on the Arab side and has done a great deal to undermine it. Israel has a long history of secret collaboration with reactionary Arab regimes to suppress Palestinian nationalism. Despite all the handicaps, the Palestinian people succeeded in building the only genuine democracy in the Arab world with the possible exception of Lebanon. In January 2006, free and fair elections for the Legislative Council of the Palestinian Authority brought to power a Hamas-led government. Israel, however, refused to recognise the democratically elected government, claiming that Hamas is purely and simply a terrorist organisation. America and the EU shamelessly joined Israel in ostracising and demonising the Hamas government and in trying to bring it down by withholding tax revenues and foreign aid. A surreal situation thus developed with a significant part of the international community imposing economic sanctions not against the occupier but against the occupied, not against the oppressor but against the oppressed. As so often in the tragic history of Palestine, the victims were blamed for their own misfortunes. Israel's propaganda machine persistently purveyed the notion that the Palestinians are terrorists, that they reject coexistence with the Jewish state, that their nationalism is little more than antisemitism, that Hamas is just a bunch of religious fanatics and that Islam is incompatible with democracy. But the simple truth is that the Palestinian people are a normal people with normal aspirations. They are no better but they are no worse than any other national group. What they aspire to, above all, is a piece of land to call their own on which to live in freedom and dignity. Like other radical movements, Hamas began to moderate its political programme following its rise to power. From the ideological rejectionism of its charter, it began to move towards pragmatic accommodation of a two-state solution. In March 2007, Hamas and Fatah formed a national unity government that was ready to negotiate a long-term ceasefire with Israel. Israel, however, refused to negotiate with a government that included Hamas. It continued to play the old game of divide and rule between rival Palestinian factions. In the late 1980s, Israel had supported the nascent Hamas in order to weaken Fatah, the secular nationalist movement led by Yasser Arafat. Now Israel began to encourage the corrupt and pliant Fatah leaders to overthrow their religious political rivals and recapture power. Aggressive American neoconservatives participated in the sinister plot to instigate a Palestinian civil war. Their meddling was a major factor in the collapse of the national unity government and in driving Hamas to seize power in Gaza in June 2007 to pre-empt a Fatah coup. The war unleashed by Israel on Gaza on 27 December was the culmination of a series of clashes and confrontations with the Hamas government. In a broader sense, however, it is a war between Israel and the Palestinian people, because the people had elected the party to power. The declared aim of the war is to weaken Hamas and to intensify the pressure until its leaders agree to a new ceasefire on Israel's terms. The undeclared aim is to ensure that the Palestinians in Gaza are seen by the world simply as a humanitarian problem and thus to derail their struggle for independence and statehood. The timing of the war was determined by political expediency. A general election is scheduled for 10 February and, in the lead-up to the election, all the main contenders are looking for an opportunity to prove their toughness. The army top brass had been champing at the bit to deliver a crushing blow to Hamas in order to remove the stain left on their reputation by the failure of the war against Hezbollah in Lebanon in July 2006. Israel's cynical leaders could also count on apathy and impotence of the pro-western Arab regimes and on blind support from President Bush in the twilight of his term in the White House. Bush readily obliged by putting all the blame for the crisis on Hamas, vetoing proposals at the UN Security Council for an immediate ceasefire and issuing Israel with a free pass to mount a ground invasion of Gaza. As always, mighty Israel claims to be the victim of Palestinian aggression but the sheer asymmetry of power between the two sides leaves little room for doubt as to who is the real victim. This is indeed a conflict between David and Goliath but the Biblical image has been inverted - a small and defenceless Palestinian David faces a heavily armed, merciless and overbearing Israeli Goliath. The resort to brute military force is accompanied, as always, by the shrill rhetoric of victimhood and a farrago of self-pity overlaid with self-righteousness. In Hebrew this is known as the syndrome of bokhim ve-yorim, "crying and shooting". To be sure, Hamas is not an entirely innocent party in this conflict. Denied the fruit of its electoral victory and confronted with an unscrupulous adversary, it has resorted to the weapon of the weak - terror. Militants from Hamas and Islamic Jihad kept launching Qassam rocket attacks against Israeli settlements near the border with Gaza until Egypt brokered a six-month ceasefire last June. The damage caused by these primitive rockets is minimal but the psychological impact is immense, prompting the public to demand protection from its government. Under the circumstances, Israel had the right to act in self-defence but its response to the pinpricks of rocket attacks was totally disproportionate. The figures speak for themselves. In the three years after the withdrawal from Gaza, 11 Israelis were killed by rocket fire. On the other hand, in 2005-7 alone, the IDF killed 1,290 Palestinians in Gaza, including 222 children. Whatever the numbers, killing civilians is wrong. This rule applies to Israel as much as it does to Hamas, but Israel's entire record is one of unbridled and unremitting brutality towards the inhabitants of Gaza. Israel also maintained the blockade of Gaza after the ceasefire came into force which, in the view of the Hamas leaders, amounted to a violation of the agreement. During the ceasefire, Israel prevented any exports from leaving the strip in clear violation of a 2005 accord, leading to a sharp drop in employment opportunities. Officially, 49.1% of the population is unemployed. At the same time, Israel restricted drastically the number of trucks carrying food, fuel, cooking-gas canisters, spare parts for water and sanitation plants, and medical supplies to Gaza. It is difficult to see how starving and freezing the civilians of Gaza could protect the people on the Israeli side of the border. But even if it did, it would still be immoral, a form of collective punishment that is strictly forbidden by international humanitarian law. The brutality of Israel's soldiers is fully matched by the mendacity of its spokesmen. Eight months before launching the current war on Gaza, Israel established a National Information Directorate. The core messages of this directorate to the media are that Hamas broke the ceasefire agreements; that Israel's objective is the defence of its population; and that Israel's forces are taking the utmost care not to hurt innocent civilians. Israel's spin doctors have been remarkably successful in getting this message across. But, in essence, their propaganda is a pack of lies. A wide gap separates the reality of Israel's actions from the rhetoric of its spokesmen. It was not Hamas but the IDF that broke the ceasefire. It di d so by a raid into Gaza on 4 November that killed six Hamas men. Israel's objective is not just the defence of its population but the eventual overthrow of the Hamas government in Gaza by turning the people against their rulers. And far from taking care to spare civilians, Israel is guilty of indiscriminate bombing and of a three-year-old blockade that has brought the inhabitants of Gaza, now 1.5 million, to the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe. The Biblical injunction of an eye for an eye is savage enough. But Israel's insane offensive against Gaza seems to follow the logic of an eye for an eyelash. After eight days of bombing, with a death toll of more than 400 Palestinians and four Israelis, the gung-ho cabinet ordered a land invasion of Gaza the consequences of which are incalculable. No amount of military escalation can buy Israel immunity from rocket attacks from the military wing of Hamas. Despite all the death and destruction that Israel has inflicted on them, they kept up their resistance and they kept firing their rockets. This is a movement that glorifies victimhood and martyrdom. There is simply no military solution to the conflict between the two communities. The problem with Israel's concept of security is that it denies even the most elementary security to the other community. The only way for Israel to achieve security is not through shooting but through talks with Hamas, which has repeatedly declared its readiness to negotiate a long-term ceasefire with the Jewish state within its pre-1967 borders for 20, 30, or even 50 years. Israel has rejected this offer for the same reason it spurned the Arab League peace plan of 2002, which is still on the table: it involves concessions and compromises. This brief review of Israel's record over the past four decades makes it difficult to resist the conclusion that it has become a rogue state with "an utterly unscrupulous set of leaders". A rogue state habitually violates international law, possesses weapons of mass destruction and practises terrorism - the use of violence against civilians for political purposes. Israel fulfils all of these three criteria; the cap fits and it must wear it. Israel's real aim is not peaceful coexistence with its Palestinian neighbours but military domination. It keeps compounding the mistakes of the past with new and more disastrous ones. Politicians, like everyone else, are of course free to repeat the lies and mistakes of the past. But it is not mandatory to do so. • Avi Shlaim is a professor of international relations at the University of Oxford and the author of The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World and of Lion of Jordan: King Hussein's Life in War and Peace. .....

^ and soon will be KK's turn. Val, horta cheers and happy annivesray. You didn't waste your time but instead you were getting more and more secret admirers. Already looking forward your next silver jubilee (10 yrs) and all that throwing wild party! and ofcourse at SOL admin's expence

Originally posted by General Duke: ^^^The Puntland Parliment is held in a small room, since we have not created a new Parliment with lavish grand rooms and leather seats. Anyhow what is important is not the room but what i represents, Somali's together holding open debates and elections and choosing their leaders without fighting, without clan wailing and with no foreign groups. Progress I say, as for Nuridin, he is in the running though he is not the choice we want to lead our beloved state. Fair enough, I agree with you and I hope this time it is free and fair election. By the way PL & SL making good examples for the rest of the republic by doing their best to uphold the principles of democracy. As for Nuradin, c'mon dont write him off or underestimate the guy. And like Obama, he is young and of course can make the CHANGE that PL badly needs!

Innocent Critic: I wonder why do they (puntland admin) always hold meetings in a small rooms with prison-like windows? It looks like an ordinary school room. Look at any picture that Duke or anyone else post here and you will see what am talking about. Anyone should tell them to invest and build a proper modern confrence rooms or auditoriums. Its depressing to see leaders and Issimo in small darky rooms like these pictures. BTW, Nuradiin would make good PL leader, because he is new blood (not old school), young and intelligent as well. and thats what people need today. Whishing him good luck!

Robert Fisk is true journalist

Originally posted by nuune: Denmark has summoned the Israeli ambassador in Copenhagen. "We shall summon the Israeli ambassador because it (the bombing of the clinics) should not take place," Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Moeller told reporters on Tuesday. What a show off!! they can summon the ambassador but I dont think he will be expelled from Denmark. Denmark would never dare to do such that thing to Isreal. Btw, this fag.got got a phobia about islam/muslims.

Originally posted by AYOUB: The strongest reaction so far has been the cancellation of new year celebrations by UAE. How pathetic? I am sorry to say this but the only thing they, the arab rullers do understand is how to suck zionist c**k!! S.O.Bs.

Aphilanthropic bid by a Hong Kong tycoon to preserve the one-time residence of kung fu legend Bruce Lee and transform it into a major tourist attraction honouring the film icon was approved on Tuesday. The green light comes after a long-running struggle by fans to save the 5,700 square-foot, two-storey town house from an inglorious fate as a seedy love motel in a leafy Kowloon suburb. The fate of Lee's last home had hung in the balance for years, until its owner, real estate and hotel tycoon Yu Pang-lin, made a surprise decision last year to donate it to the city where the martial arts master first shot to fame. "Both sides have now reached a consensus to go ahead and essentially proceed with this good plan," Yu told reporters after a meeting with government officials. "I'm 88 years old now and hope that while I'm still alive I'll be able to see this Bruce Lee museum completed," he added. Hong Kong's Commerce and Economic Development Bureau said it agreed to preserve the "original outlook of the building and its features" with an aim to revitalise it for long-term sustainable operation as a tourism attraction. Parts of the home will be recreated, including Lee's study and training hall stacked with martial arts weaponry and other paraphernalia of his discipline. While further details have yet to be hammered out, Yu wants the site, which has served as a love motel with rooms rented out by the hour -- to include a library, martial arts centre and a movie theatre to fully commemorate Lee's life and philosophy. A government spokeswoman gave no timeframe but hoped to get the project up and running as soon as possible. Lee, who died under mysterious circumstances in 1973 aged 32, starred in such kung fu classics as "Fist of Fury," "Game of Death" and "Enter the Dragon." Revered both by martial arts adherents and movie buffs the world over for popularising the kung fu cinematic genre, Lee also helped usher in a golden age of Hong Kong film in the 1960s. Before Yu's charitable gesture however, the government seemed reluctant to invest public money in a major site to commemorate the legacy of one of Hong Kong's most famous names. While born in San Francisco, the brash though sinewy fighter was raised and made his name in Hong Kong. Hong Kong's Bruce Lee fan club welcomed the breakthrough, and expressed hopes the residence could prove as big a draw as other global memorial sites such as the Beatles Story in Liverpool and Elvis Presley's Graceland mansion in Tennessee. ..would love to see this Bruce Lee museum when it finishes! am a big fan of this kung fu legend.

Technically they are not that bad and this team can still create problems to any teams, however, their main weakness is the physical side of the game as you know this is crucial in the game..

^ he is from Mali, west Africa.

Horta ninkii Alle-ubaahne ahaa xagguu ku dambeeyey. Rag badan oo halka laga mamnuucay ayaa hadda jooga oo la soo ceshay asna in jaanis la siiyo ayeey ahayd oo la soo cesho. Alle-ubaahne, Abti waa lagu tabayee soo noqo aad inooga shekeysid jabkii amxaarada iyo meesha wax idin marahayaan hadda e!

...so Duke, Al shababs are Alshababs and not Al Kebabs huh?

lol @ Ahlu **** Wal Jama.... by Amin Camir.

The true somali islamists: A: Their strength ..is their ability to restore peace and order at any cost in the area that they do control. By this they win the hearts and minds of the people. On a scale of -5 to 5: I give them 5 POINTS ...very impressive!! B: Their weakness ..is though political one and their lack of good social conscience (good judgment). By this they make more and more silly mistakes and comments, create enemies..plus organisation wise they are state of disorder all of these will ultimately contribute to their downfall. On a scale of -5 to 5: -4 POINTS ...failed! So lets do the maths: A-B=1 Overall: They are slightly below the everage!! C'mon I know they can do better!

I am not surprised at all. Just an upgrade from the previous boring Warlord version to a new exciting one, this time with more raw recruits (new blood) to be involved.

O marumaysateen inay baxayaan? Bixitaanka Itoobiyaanku waxy la mid tahay Diidiinkii inta dhaanshay markuu maalmo sii maqnaa maalintii dambe la maqlay shanqartiisi oo la yiri xaajigii wuu soo socda, markaas inta xanaaqay ku yiri: "War waxaan yaa u dhaamin jiray, war iga aamusa waa annigiiyoo sii socda e" Hadda waxbadan waydun sugi Itoobiyo oo Somalia kawada baxday. Annigu ma sheegin dadka qaarkii haddii ay arkaan amxaro Muqdisho ka guurtay in aay u qaatan in aay somaliya oo dhan isaga baxday. Waa wax iska cad in ay ku noqoneyso baraheedi hore ee aay waligeed the last 18 yrs dalka ka joogi jirtay ee ku teedsan aagaga xaduudaha sida Bay & Bakool, Gedo, Hiiraan, Galgaduud meelahaas ayeey ku noqoneysaa halkaas oo ay ku soo dhisi doonto (developing) the next level of its famous deadly game, the Age of Warlord Ver. 2.0 which this time will be coming out with xtra amazing features like: Are you a warlord: test yourself, Somali Family Tree, Know Your Clan Better quiz and many many more. Also compatible with Vista Yareey, Xalimo P iyo weliba Daaqadaha 2000. This application is free for inter-clan use only and not for SALE and can be downloaded from special designated UN or NGO servers in East Africa. If you live near the border... fine.. go and grab the CD now.

Allaha u naxariisto marxuumka. In a matter of one week, two people were shot dead in Baidhabo, and the two happened to be from same clan, one after another... aheey,,, can one say that a pure coincidence? I dont think so. Today's Somalia the chance for anyone including Yeyisters or even the secessionists or any anyone else can hire assassin(s) to eliminate anyone that they dont like is HIGH especially under the cover of darkness & lawless that South Somalia finding itself in these days. So in short blame on anyone else but please dont blame it on Alshababs this time around.

^ lool, marka raali ha la iga noqdo

Sanadkii 1920kii mar darawishtu ku jirtay xaalad qalafsan sheekaduna ku xumayd ayuu Ismaciil mire ku yiri Sayidka: "Sayidow, maad carabta qaylo-dhan inoogu dirtid hanoo soo gurmadane" Sayidku inta ku qoslay ayuu tix yar oo uu tiriyey waxaa ka mid ahaa:"Mandhow catowga iga daa Carabi waa naage" Marka hadda oo aanu joogno 2009 Arab rulers waxba ha kasugine ee faataxada aanu u marno masaakiintaas dhimatay una duceeyno.

Originally posted by Caamir: Somaliland and Puntland . These two regions which together make up at least 2/3 of Somalia Caamir, Lets not go further, look at your signature map and see if Puntland & Somaliland together make 2/3 of the whole republic. BTW you haven't mentioned Makhir State awoowe maxa dhacay? Dhinacee ku biirisay?

Thanks Kadawo, if I was a millionaire like many many somali millionaires in both Africa and Arabia I would have taken over the whole cost of the Somali national team while in the game and to inject some pride and confidence in them and to give them all the support they need and all the way to the final. caku!! ...wishing them good luck!

Empreror, Will Maxamed Dheere be protected and given "asylum" by Puntland or is it adeer ka dabaalo? and good-bye????