^So you think - I'll leave you to your little illusions. Or is it delusions?

^Islamophobe. I should report you to the Human Rights Commission

^I wonder if this will attract as much attention as when Muslims do it.

Somalis are the not problem. It's these southern hicks. Additionally - the US economy is having serious issues which usually translates into a lot of talk like this. It's mostly single guys - just imagine if the wives wearing jilbaab and with 7 kids came.

^Said 'inconsistency' which you failed to elucidate [Hint: the 2 citations have distinct differences]. I am in a good mood so I won't press you further. Next time - don't rush to place people in little boxes.

^Wrong on all counts. You have a lot to learn. As I said before welcome to the 3rd world mate.

^Dee I thought you'd wanna toy with him first before going full throttle on him.

^Apparently! *Reconsiders whole outlook on life*

^It's about as barbaric as Egypt and Russia. Does that answer it for you? PS - Don't use the word barbaric unless something actually merits it PPS - There is no rule of law at any time in Somalia including the UIC's time - the only rule that counts is that of the ruler!

^You two should take it to the boxing ring. I'm betting on KoolKat for a 2nd round KO

^Expel them??? And I thought women had hearts

^Welcome to the 3rd world mate!

^They want to secede and have nothing to do with you yet they can't seem to stop involving themselves in your every affair. Reminds me of certain disgruntled and neurotic wives.

^You must be one of those chaps who never takes rejection or 'hell no' as a final answer from the opposite sex eh? If you persist in that - you will get what's coming to you and it likely won't be pretty

^Usually when the 'God' speaks - their stock goes on yet another run higher. But this time stiff economic headwinds are in place.

^Your writ is to prove neutrality and to prove political inconsistencies. You've got a big fat zero on both. So much for a number 10 goaler. SL is an entity that is for secession. The areas it has occupied are overwhelmingly against it as is common knowledge. If SL was not an entity that was all about secession - then I could be persuaded to 'give it chance' - though a 'democracy' and 'the shining light of Africa' should invite people to a political process rather than simply invade. In the face of this clear political incompatibility I cannot be 'neutral' nor have I ever been. You've got to analyze and then conclude something (logically!) from my previous statements rather than regurgitate them to me. That lazy streak seems to persist apparently. Make sure to take your time saaxib.

^LOL - sure - if you have actually written anything! This is getting ridiculous.

^LOL - and what does this prove? Did I say I was neutral or indifferent anywhere? Pray tell where? Talk about convenient little boxes. I told you to solicit help and now you've gone and buggered up your first attempt. Seek help mate. Allow sahal.

^LOL

^Oh stop whining. Why not tell him yourself here and now before bringing the mods in?

^Oh oh! You wanna tussle with everybody young man Even your side is seeing the futility North! But not all of us can be reasoned with

^I'd rather repeat myself than make a$s-backwards comments! But then again - each of us has his or her own forte

^Why did you wanna borrow it? Good luck.

Originally posted by ThePoint: ^Comprehension of the English language is not your forte I'd love details on my political inconsistencies. Take all the time you need. And be sure to solicit lots of help. You've finally got it! Slowly, slowly I guess! PS - reluctance = baseless in my book ; not to mention lazy and mendacious.

^Nobody has tried to ridicule you. Your statements(at least on this thread) have done that all by their lonesome.