Shuush.

LOL I have never seen someone reword the same sentiment so many times. Your first paragraph would suffice but it looks like that gave you some catharsis.

This region is a mess, a small miscalculation can cause serious havoc. Abiy could barely manage Ethiopia.

There are some legitimate points.

From looter's inc to intellectuals, what transformation.

This is his therapy session.

I remember the Caydiid-Cali Mahdi fights. Apart from secessionists, who are grievance driven, other Somalis change sides often. So, these morons will be singing their tune tomorrow. What I feel sorry for is the masses who have no sense of agency.

For a region that claims to be the mother of Somali federalism, it looks like Puntland is doing everything it can to dismantle Somali federalism. The actions that were taken by Deni administration in closing the federal election commission office in Garowe and the call for the re-evaluation of Puntland’s ties to the Federal Government are detrimental to Puntland’s ultimate goal, which is to create a prosperous and peaceful Somalia. It is not clear if Puntland’s actions are by design or if it is simply a lack of understanding by the elite in regards to what federalism entails. What is federalism? The Western form of governance is still an alien concept to us, Somalis, even to this day. As a society, prior to 1960, we have never been under one legal authority so it is only natural we have a little appreciation for the Westphalian idea of a nation-state let alone the complexities of a federation form of governance. Governments are defined through power structures namely confederation, federation and unitary system. A confederation is a union of sovereign states created through an act of a treaty. A federation is a union of partially self-governing states or provinces which comes under one central government. Finally, there is the unitary system which allows the central government to have supreme authority on all matters whether it is at the local level or the central level. A less talked about the system is anarchy where all systems of government and institutions have ceased to exist. Luckily for Somalis, we are moving away from complete anarchy and inching towards what in reality looks like a confederation. The source of power for these forms of government can come from autocracy where power is concentrated in one person, democracy where people choose leaders through direct voting and oligarchy where powers are in the hands of few people. If an impartial and dispassionate person was to assess the current political situation in Somalia, one can reasonably argue Somalia is run by oligarchs as the citizens have no say in electing their leaders. There are 15 or so countries in the world where a federation is the primary form of governance. A close examination of these countries shows that there has always been a tug of war between the center and the periphery. This war revolves around the allocation of power between the states and the federal government. Fortunately for these entities, disagreements are settled through their constitutional mechanisms or through their courts. However, despite this constant friction between states and the federal government, there is no federal country in the world where state governments usurp the powers of the federal government. There can be policy disagreements but such disagreements are resolved through the court systems and through the legislative branch which can create new or revised the old legislations. What sort of governance does Puntland want? As it stands now, Puntland is a country within country. It only preaches federalism but it does not practice it. It has its own foreign policy and armed forces. Puntland collects no taxes for the federal government. It is in an essence an unrecognized sovereign country. It wants to reap the benefits of federalism but not honor its obligations. Allocating power between the states and federal government means allocating responsibility, do Puntland leadership understand there could no power allocated to them if they don’t carry out their responsibilities? Puntland is encroaching on the Federal Government’s areas of responsibilities but it has failed to meet its own responsibility. In the time it existed, Puntland has not built hospitals, schools, roads and housing for the poor. It has not done much to curb corruption. It has yet to implement any democratic reforms. To this day, mayors and governors are appointed by Garowe. The citizens have not been given an opportunity to elect their local, state and federal representatives. Their Puntland presidency itself is chosen by MPs who were selected by tribal chieftains. The process of choosing the president is fraught with corruption. Who represents Puntland at the federal level? The rules and norms of federalism dictate the interest of a state is protected by its elected representatives or in our case, the selected parliamentarians and senators. The state executive branch can lobby for its interests but it is the representatives of the state that are legal conduits. In other words, it is the likes Senator Abdirahman Farole and Senator Abdirizak Jurile to advance the interests of Puntland and the country at a large or oppose any legislation that they deem unfair. President Deni can express his displeasure but he is no position or should no position to hinder or oppose the federal government’s agenda at every turn. If Puntland is not happy with its current crop of representatives, it has the power to replace them through elections and other legal mechanisms. Gaa dil gartiisana sii Despite obstruction streak, Puntland does have legitimate grievances. This biggest one is the provincial constitution whose completion process has been dragging for a long time. Both Farmajo and Xasan Sheikh administrations failed to address this issue. The Farmaajo has less than a year to finalize the constitution. Though the Federal Government claims that it has consulted every region, the reality is the government has not made the constitution a top priority. It is not clear who much input was the regional governments, civic organizations. religious group, the youth and other stakeholders are given. Another grievance that is shared by other states and opposition parties is the lack of constitutional court. Puntland and others have opposed the election and petroleum laws but the federal government has the right to pass any legislation where the regional governments like or not. However, there should be a high court or constitutional court where the states and in fact the average can challenge the legality of any legislation. The most important grievance by Puntland and this is shared by many Somalis is the lack of sincere reconciliation process. The federal government has no made effort in reconciling the people of Somalia. The horrible civil war has left many victims. These victims need justice and closure. And finally, Puntland and others are right in pointing out that the Federal Government has no right involving itself in regional. The local elections are within purview of the states. The Federal Executive Branch and opposition parties can field their own candidates, the process belongs to the states. Any mismanagement and discrepancies of a local election can be litigated through the courts or be addressed through legislation as long as such legislation does not violate the constitution. What now? President Deni has called Puntand’s federal representatives back to Garowe for consultation. He called for a grand conference. I welcome this initiative. If the purpose of the conference is to find a solution to the current impasse, I hope Puntland would invite other regional leaders, opposition parties and other stakeholders. The endeavor of this conference should be about finding a workable solution to Somalia’s political crisis. Puntland and all parties must come up with solutions, a better alternative to what the Federal Government is doing. However, it must understand any proposed solution that can not undermine the federation arrangement and it is to not usurp the federal government’s constitutionally mandated powers. To President Deni It has been rumored the late President Abdullahi Yusuf expressed regret in picking up the gun against the Barre regime. I am not actually sure if this is true or not. Abdullahi and others who set up rebel groups to overthrow Siyad Barre’s dictatorship ended up destroying the Somali state itself, a place of refuge for the Somali nation. The question becomes would your actions destroy the recovering Somali state or would they usher a new prosperous republic. Puntland is undermining federalism in Somalia | Somali news, politics, opinions WWW.SOMALITRIBE.COM

The Turks have been patient and endeared themselves to the public.

Turkey sets up mechanism to explore oil, gas and mining opportunities in Somalia WWW.HIIRAAN.COM The Turkish government is moving to exploit oil, gas and mining prospects in Somalia by establishing a mechanism that will allow both private and state-owned companies to explore energy opportunities in...

Or the undercounted.

He was one of the first purges of Barre regime. Here's Wiki bio Yusuf Osman Samatar - Wikipedia EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

I met a few times in Boston. Amazingly he wasn't bitter about his imprisonment.

He spent 18 years in solitary confinement.

His government does not literally control Amhara or Tigray. He is killing the very Oromo youth (Western Oromia) that put him in power. Eastern Oromo (Muslim) is falling under the influence of Jawar, OLF, and OFC. They only people he can bully are silly Somalis and Afar. Even the southern states are a mess. Do you realize he travels when things are going bad at home? It is Arabs and American evangelicals that are supportive of him. The orthodox church is pushing back aganst these evangelicals while still trying to play the Christain card.

Galbeedi, You are overestimating this evangelist can do.

Actually, these three men could use this to their advantage politically speaking. They are all facing internal issues that threaten their political grip.

Actually both emperors have no clothes.

Musa's bellicose behavior and lack of decorum are there for all to see. He was offered a hand of peace and an apology but he chose belligerence. I believe Somalia has met its obligation

I find reer Waqooyi generally funny, my experience with my reer abti (dhulos)and some cousins (Habar-J) have been one of humor so have been my interaction with the general public from those regions. Now, it seems to me bitterness has damaged your humor, I am assuming you had one, to begin with. Lighten up, or at minimum see a therapist.

The IMF asks its 189 members to contribute funds towards any debt relief under the heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) program. Any member nation can choose to contribute. In terms of Somalia, Norway, Britain, and the US are the biggest contributors. Any nation can contribute poor or rich. It is the IMF that sent out requests not the actual indebted nation. It seems some folks put a premium on the man white' men's money and mock others. What worse is these same folks will be clamoring for any funds that come Somalia's way since Somali has been deemed eligible and it will be able to borrow again or at least be able to get grants without too many restrictions. In any case, we thank Bangladesh and Sri-Lanka.

These ministers could have only shown their competency and experience that had they been given enough time to a make difference. This is where Sharif and Xasan Sheekh failed. Regardless of what people say about Farmaajo and Kheyr, they should be given credit for stopping constant bickering between PM and the presidency. Considering there is no real bureaucracy (the actual government) in Somalia, any change in any ministry would have been a serious setback. Kudos to Minister Beileh.

Oodweyne has been in a good the last few weeks. Don't spoil it