there is a campaign for funds and food stuff collection started in nairobi mosques, specifically in masjid 6ka. i think tonight insha allah, they will be collecting cash-money to buy household stuff for the new arrivals from somalia. p.s. in masjid 6, the norm for collection is: the sheikhs will start from million, coming downwards. its interesting to see men who surrender millions as sadaqa. ya noo bixiyay hal milyan, oo ilaahi kheyr siiyaa, ,,,,,,,,,,,hebel ayaa bixiyay hal milyan allah hauziyaadiyo,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, till coins laga soo gaaro

Xaaji Xunjuf;733923 wrote: Somalia dee magac ahaan waa jirta ma aniga diidan laakin qaran Somali ma jiro Somalia waxa ka taliya Mamuulka beeleysan Is somaliland not part of this beel issue??

MALIKA, ambia yeye hapana iko fisuuri yeye kuenda. ile ya dacwah ako kuwa pole-pole. lol

nur, i really appreciate your efforts this long and might the almighty bless you. with your active participation, if this pages were passive, what do you think of your retirement?????? i will say, taking this as a dacwah programme, is it in order for a muslim to retire from giving dacwah?? p.s. i really wish you reconsider your decission and keep on as long as life is vibrate deep in your heart.

nina fox, ducadaas maguntami wa sualeee??????? all you can pray for her is guidance(hidaaya). may the almighty guide her. achievements aint measured on pety material gain, but rather, on your relation with the almighty.

everyone knows what he needs. if burahadeer needs kid's page, then may be he is one of them. if not physically, may be mentally.;);) p.s. surely, why would one find problem if people talk about the diin.???

ma waxaa somalinimo ah: 1) in maqaaxi layiraahdo ''adis ababa'' laga furo somaliland? 2)in somaali laga iibsado amxaaro? 3)in somaliweyn ladiido? 4) in qof somaliyeed laga tarxiilo somaliland qabiil dartii? 5) in dadka udoodaayo somaliland ey kacodsadaan galkacayo basaboorka somalia si eey oogu safraan? 6) talow tan lixaad maxan kadhigaaa? lol p.s.

Oodweyne;732879 wrote: So, finally, after too much political correctness and trying desperately to come across as "neutral" , HiranOnline ( HOL ) have decided that they couldn't in life of them , hide their "petty claws" and openly biased view of all things that is to do with Somaliland. And, therefore, they would be better off in coming out swinging with it, indeed... I guess, I shouldn't be that surprise in here. After all, one knew in one's bones that such a "conceit" of "neutrality" was only a fiction intended to bamboozle others into thinking that somehow there are some "contextually unbiased" news portal in the Somali websites, indeed. Hence, it's nice to see the sheer slipping of the "mask" in here, indeed... As for, Sh. Hotel and his trip, well I suppose he is welcome like any other president in that festivities . But, I am not sure that his "pleas" will fall into a receptive ears in here. Considering how Somalia, from Gen. Barre's regime to all the way into the successive transitional governments of Somalia during the last 20 or so odd years, were stalwart supporters of the northern-dominated regime of Sudan. And, how, that will effectively, "color" the political view that this new state will take in so far as the issue of Somalia vis-a-vis Somaliland is concern . But, we shall see, anyway... :D:D

if exposure of our body is MODERNIZATION then animals are more modern than humans

waxa layaab leh, nin aan hubin diintiisa wuxuu ooga hadlo nolal. waxaan kuwadaa burahadeer. yacni qofka aadanaha ahi waa inuu meel kutirsanaado, religiously. p.s. how do you talk about living, while you don't know life??

Jacaylbaro;732424 wrote: Culimadu inay night club soo galaanba maaha ,,,,, not only culima, but every muslim inuu galo ma ahan. even YOU.

burahadeer Colonialism,colonialism.Atheist,atheist.I heard all before,very too often.Slavery was started long before the west by the Arabs(Muslim).Find out the word" ENUCH";it means slaves castrated in Mecca. Now,there are many religions,Christian, buddist,pagan,etc.etc.Why only Islamic fundamentalists are in such a state of mind. Keep on carrying the gun,& at the end of the day only right will prevail. The art of acting consists in keeping people from coughing. Sir Ralph Richardson. Is he an Infidel I don't have to quote. no wonder this your third post at the inception. yad gaadi????? nimaad taqaano yatahay lama dhoho.

its not new ina-adeer. malaha qof walbo wuxuu yahay umbuu soo bandhigaa. this soul from sl, wan kayaabanahay.

its really funny. when someone congratulates evil its ''freedom'', and when someone talks against evil its ''fundamentalism''. The way this lady chooses to dress is none of your business. it is every muslims business. p.s. it beats logic when the freedom elite are irritated by the views of others. you either leave freedom and embrace ethics, or else appreciate the dogma itself and accept all the woes it comes with.period.

The Saudis prepare to step up Palestine's plan to declare statehood at the UN has attracted new supporters amidst threats from the US and Israel. MJ Rosenberg Last Modified: 04 Jul 2011 12:47 EmailPrintShareSend Feedback The famous Oslo agreement stipulated that Palestine should have an independent state by 2000, instead, they have lost more land to illegal Israeli settlements [GALLO/GETTY] One of the biggest problems with our Middle East policy - and international policy in general - is the idea that the world is made up of good guys and bad guys and that one can determine which is which by nationality. For better or worse, that isn't true. One can no more deem the Israelis good and the Palestinians bad than draw such distinctions between French and Germans, Serbs and Croats, Japanese and Chinese. It's all a matter of circumstance, of who is on top and who is on the bottom. That is why I don't accept self-righteous attacks on Israel by Palestinians who seem to believe that if the shoe were on the other foot Palestinians would treat Israelis with sweet sympathy. After all, didn't we learn after World War II how quickly victims become victimisers? Congress, of course, chooses not to understand that. With the strong encouragement of its AIPAC donors, Congress treats Palestinians as warmongers even when they are pursuing peace and Israelis as peace-loving even when they reject peace. That is just cynical. As for the people demanding Congress behave that way, they are just ethnic chauvinists who cheer their team on as if it were a baseball game and not a contest that kills. New resolutions This week the Senate unanimously passed an AIPAC-drafted resolution warning the Palestinians of dire consequences if they go to the United Nations to seek recognition of their state. The bill is full of the usual AIPAC boilerplate about Hamas, terrorism, and, by means of contrast, Israel's enthusiastic endorsement of achieving peace through negotiations. The only new thing, which demonstrates a real sense of humour, is the pointed reference to the US $550 million the United States provides to the Palestinians annually, with the suggestion that a half billion in aid should make them heed our wishes. The Israelis, of course, receive six times as much and have essentially told President Obama to drop dead every time he has asked them for a temporary settlement freeze to help him advance negotiations. But it is the $550 million that the resolution is all about. The Senate, urged by AIPAC, is telling Palestinians that if they go to the UN they can forget about any aid from us. US opposition to the Palestinians going to the UN is absurd. What alternative do the Palestinians have? According to the terms of the Oslo agreement of 1993 (the mutual recognition agreement signed by Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin), the Palestinians should have had their state by 2000 at the latest. But in 18 years, the Israelis have not yielded a single inch of territory. (They pulled their troops out of Gaza but control its air, land and sea entry points and keep Gaza under blockade.) The number of settlers in the West Bank (the site of the future state) has increased threefold, from 100,000 to well over 300,000. And, as mentioned above, Israel has repeatedly refused President Obama's request to freeze settlement activity for three months in order to facilitate negotiations. Nonetheless, the AIPAC/Senate resolution demands that Palestinians get back to unconditional "direct negotiations" with Israel and stay away from the UN. As for settlements, the resolution says Palestinians should negotiate over the future of the land while Israel is gobbling it up with expanded settlements and more settlers. The Palestinian response: Been there, done that, gained nothing. As the Israelis did in 1947, Palestinians should go to the UN to achieve recognition. Following that, the state of Israel should negotiate a final status agreement with the state of Palestine. Recognition There are those who say that the Palestinians will not succeed at the UN, that the United States will do Israel's bidding and block statehood by using its veto power at the Security Council. That is probably true. Nonetheless, the Palestinian position will be immeasurably strengthened by a broad show of international support. The best evidence of that is how hard Israel is working to prevent a UN vote. If UN action were so insignificant, neither Israel nor its lobby here would be pulling out every stop (like passing this Senate resolution) to scare the Palestinians out of going there. The threat to cut off US aid is a classic case of cutting off our nose to spite our face. The only leverage we have on the Palestinians comes from that aid. If we end it, they will turn for support elsewhere. The elsewhere is Saudi Arabia. In a Washington Post op-ed last month, Prince Turki al Faisal, who was Saudi intelligence chief from 1977 to 2001 and ambassador to the United States from 2004 to 2006, wrote that "the time has come for Palestinians to bypass the United States and Israel and to seek direct international endorsement of statehood at the United Nations." He also says that the United States will pay a price if it blocks statehood: "In September, the kingdom will use its considerable diplomatic might to support the Palestinians in their quest for international recognition. American leaders have long called Israel an 'indispensable' ally. They will soon learn that there are other players in the region - not least the Arab street - who are as, if not more, 'indispensable'. The game of favoritism toward Israel has not proven wise for Washington, and soon it will be shown to be an even greater folly." His conclusion is startling: "We Arabs used to say no to peace, and we got our comeuppance in 1967. In 2002 King Abdullah offered what has become the Arab Peace Initiative. Based on UN Security Council Resolution 242, it calls for an end to the conflict based on land for peace. The Israelis withdraw from all occupied lands, including East Jerusalem, reach a mutually agreed solution to the Palestinian refugees and recognise the Palestinian state. In return, they will get full diplomatic recognition from the Arab world and all the Muslim states, an end to hostilities and normal relations with all these states." Now, it is the Israelis who are saying no. I'd hate to be around when they face their comeuppance. That "comeuppance" is inevitable unless Israel comes to its senses, which most likely requires electing a new government and ignoring the advice of ethnic chauvinists here who are always willing to fight to the last Israeli. I don't know if Prince Turki really would "hate to be around" when Israel is forced to pay the price for the current government's ****** arrogance. I know I would.

least you forget, not shaking hands or not intermingling with men is ISLAM, not a somali culture. and this girl, allah hasoo hanuuniyo. p.s. for somalina to copy paste the utter of a strayed young somali girl, who thinks talking ill about islam,( whether knowingly on by ignorance), is investigative journalism, amounts to spreading falsehood.

for the girls: never let a man loosely into your life. and never think of befriending a man. if you want to know why, just ask the girls who say so and so," we have a walaltinimo relationship"

alpha, something is fishy about your talk. how comes you are squarely against this man? may be your location is the trigger.

Alpha Blondy;730945 wrote: sayid, you are calling for uniformity of opinions, instead we should encourage a pluralist model of thinking. all things considered, the 'somali peninsula is at a very dynamic point in its modern history. perhaps, the political upheaval was necessary. change is always good. u missed the point alpha. from what sayidsomal wrote, he didn't call for uniformity of opinions but ratherHow can we in SOL achieve unity of purpose and common interest for the betterment of ourselves and our people where ever they might be??. and this, by any far doesn't mean uniformity of opinion.

nin tag lama dhahee wuxu ku tago ba la tusa (lmao so trueeee) amina, naga qalee noo p.s., dumakana talow????

in fact it is a treasure if a wife is obedient to her husband, and that has no limits. the man too, has to be kind and obedient. waloow ey dhib badan yihiin dumarka badankooda, in lawanaajiyo ayeey quruxdu kujirtaa. but me, walee wan wanaajin. p.s. however a woman loves her husband, muran un weey keeni. and the men have to know how to handle this perfectly.

Maar het weer is dodelijk, ik denk dat het strand is meer dodelijk, OHH!

there's nothing to congratulate. look at her head and mode of dress? she is really down. p.s. the standard is simple. be away from the diin. and they shall award you. but who will award us in the hereafter?????????

^^you have said the truth. some young people inteey gabdhaha ka walaan, ayeey hadhowna furayaan. responsibility is a function of sound reasoning and good character. p.s. the issue of LOVE, is failure. i mean, how do you love someone you didn't live with

qoys qaran manoqdo. period. p.s. armeey qof walbo ufiicantahay inuu dantiisa raacdo, yacni be a good muslim and pray for somalia, may be that is the utmost help at individual's reach.