Welcome back Horn . Cheerleading squad must be feeling quiet silly right about now!

Ah the wonders of indecent referencing, pony he says… I wonder what he means . Sassy and classy, not trashy and immoral.

Another post? You missed the sassy and classy part of my advice Now i'm embarrassed for you. How old are you?

^^WHo said I was going to make fun. If you would actually read between the lines you'd recognise that I meant making fun at the expense of you and certainly you ain't supposed to laugh at me, because ill leave it to the neutrals sister. You know I have been made fun of in the past and honestly, have found some (even if very few) funny myself. One can laugh at themselves (but of course you wouldn’t know being so uptight and all), but that attempt of yours was blaze at the very least, embarrassing truthfully and just silly. And what do you mean neutral, this section contains two groups of people, the Beavis and Butthead wannabes and the witty individuals who will no doubt attest to the below average status of that attempt. Either way, you suck dude, stick to the anger, more your forte me thinks . Sister I have no place for insults and I won't insult you, guranteed. I only make fun of you. Insult, fun whatever, makes no difference to me. I promise I won’t be crying to admin to ‘charge’ you for your ‘crimes’ even if you insult me (I still can’t believe that he takes this so seriously ). Keep the mobilisation process going. What's the next move a mini-cyper demonstration or what? Horta what is this mobilization the cheerleading squad keep going on about? I’ve never even had an exchange with admin let alone demonstrate (which I like, see that is passable funny, but still you need to work on). You boys really are just a sad sad bunch of little boys who cannot discuss like grown people. Honestly I feel sorry for SOL, all we are now going to get is the same brain-draining garbage over and over with no diversity (mind you the needed type) whatsoever. God help us all.

^Oh mate, you are one heck of a character . You are so immature it's beyond belief walaahi. And really some of your terminology is very how do i say...familiar. You must have been away for the last month or so because if you were here you'd realise that I took on both of them and guess what they were slaughtered by me singlehandedly. I have been around and I can safely say that even if every cell in your brain was working at an optimum peak, you wouldn’t be able to take on the pinky of one let alone slaughter both . In all honesty (without bias of course), both HA and wind are way ahead of most if not all the cheerleading squad here. and info@Rahima_hornafrique_fanclub.au lol. is that what you call fun? I can already see that you are going to be no fun, that dude is not making fun, that is just silly :rolleyes: . You need to be sassy and classy with your insults .

Yoonis, Like i said, bitter bitter individual. Re-read your posts and look at the revenge-seeking. Admin he hurt me please make him stop :rolleyes: ...so embarrasing walaahi. Grown men acting like children. Also, let me remind you t is only a forum, it is only politics. As for making fun of me, bring it on mate , you should know i flourish in such exchanges .

Rahima, just chill. Your friend HornAfrique is busted. There's nothing you can do for him anymore. He's beyond help. I now know what the problem is- you boys don’t know what proof is. Go learn what proof means then we can discuss, till then this is all nothing but baseless allegations from bitter individuals who want revenge on both these brothers because they put you all in your places. It all comes down to this, so I suggest you all grow up . SOL would be better without certain individuals but certainly not these two.

I rest my case here. What case? You haven’t made one to rest dude. Like it was said, bring forth proof or please kindly put a sock in it. Yes I do often agree with HA, but that still doesn’t change a thing. You still have not provided proof, my feelings or supposed like of HA matter not. Argue on substance rather than irrelevant issues. Haye Cambuuladii, lowskii, qaxwaha iyo digrita iskala daala for as I don't care. Nice . I like how you’ve highlighted your views . P.S. Juma don't dare to call me your abti again because I ain't your abti. Go and look for your lost abti. Man some people . Thanks for the laugh, i needed it. But dare I say it Yoonis (who knows you might want my head as well), I think you have anger issues brother. Don’t dare he says , war chill man. Anyways all that aside we still await that wonderful supposed piece of proof .

Community in shock and disbelief By Staff Reporters November 10, 2005 THEY sported beards, they professed to be "good Muslims" and frequented mosques in the northern suburbs. Their families and neighbours believed they were quiet men of faith living peaceably in the community. The followers of Abdul Nacer Benbrika were by and large from Lebanese migrant families who had fled a brutal civil war; the parents were hard-working and respected. Most worshipped regularly at Preston mosque, where cleric Sheikh Fehmi Naji el-Imam was at a loss to understand or explain their alleged activities. "Generally, I know them very well and they are good. They used to come to the mosque, they carried out their duties here and shared in the services. They came in and out peacefully. No problem whatsoever," he said. "That why I don't understand what they were involved in outside." This image stands in marked contrast to the one painted by authorities: of a secret cell of young men hatching plans to unleash a "catastrophic" terrorist attack at home. The relatives who spoke to The Age yesterday universally protested the defendants' innocence and expressed disbelief. "He is not an extremist. He's been targeted for practising his religion, for being a Muslim," said Maryann Raad, wife of accused man Ahmed Raad, the alleged treasurer of the group. The Taha family — an extended migrant clan with links across several northern suburbs — yesterday defended accused Hany Taha. "He's just innocent, that's all. He's no terrorist," a younger sister said. Mahmoud Joud described his eldest son, Aiman Joud, 21, as a hard-working, obedient son. "I believe he's an angel because he's a very clean man. Why they accuse him? He never go to the pub, never do anything. Why they say he's a fundamentalist? Why?" As students at a Coburg Islamic school, Ahmed and Ezzit Raad appeared disinterested in religious studies. At times, teachers would have to force the brothers into King Khalid school's prayer room for midday recitations. The principal, Salah Salman, said the brothers, born in Australia of Lebanese parents, were unremarkable students who loved sport. "They are from a very decent, nice family." Only recently did the brothers embrace a fierce profession of their faith, although family and friends are mystified as to the cause. Ahmed Raad, 22, of Fawkner, is a former apprentice plumber who had lived with his pregnant wife, Maryann. His elder brother, Ezzit, 23, of Preston, is an electrician, described by neighbours as a quiet man who rarely said hello. He is married with a toddler daughter. Mrs Raad said her husband Ahmed had become a practising Muslim late last year. "He's just an extremely friendly young man who gets along with people of all nationalities and religions. Everyone loves him." Mrs Raad said the brothers were a tight-knit duo who often socialised together, playing cards and watching DVDs. Another of the accused, Abdulla Merhi, an Australian-born man of Lebanese origin, was working as an apprentice electrician. Recently married, his wife is due to give birth soon, which is why a friend yesterday was so shocked to hear allegations that he was anxious to be a suicide bomber. His brother, Omar Merhi, is a shop steward with the Electrical Trade Union and was interviewed for the union's website in September this year. He spoke of a peaceable family comfortable with the mainstream culture. In the interview, Mr Merhi said his family came to Australia in 1977 from Lebanon and spoke of his hatred of terrorist acts. "We're totally against any form of terrorism. Anyone who is a Muslim knows Islam is totally against all of that." About four months ago another accused, Fadal Sayadi, moved into a weatherboard home in Coburg with his wife. Sayadi, 25, appeared at Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday to plead guilty to a charge of attempted theft by deception this year. A plumber, he had paid for two power drills worth $1260 with a card issued in the name of "Brown". He told police he "needed the money". Raided by ASIO in June, he reportedly attended the radical Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah mosque in Brunswick, which is led by fringe cleric Sheikh Mohammed Omran. Another of the men, Ammer Haddara, also lived at home with his Lebanese migrant family in Yarraville. An associate said he had good IT skills and was "business-minded". The source said Haddara, 26, was always on the look-out for new business opportunities. He is listed as the sole director of al-Haramain Travel Pty Ltd, a company registered to his home address. His family yesterday refused to speak to the media. Sheikh Fehmi said they had pleaded to be left alone."They are not prepared to talk to anybody at this stage, not even to me," he said. While his parents and several younger siblings live in a smart house in Coburg, Hany Taha, 31, had recently moved with his wife and three young children to a more modest property in nearby Hadfield. The close-knit nature of the clan meant that Taha also worked in the family panelbeating business, Taha Motors, with his father, Khaled, and older brother. On weekends he could sometimes be spotted in the vicinity of halal pizza shops in the Coburg area. The immediate family is known to be prosperous in the larger Lebanese community. "They are a respectable, middle-class family," one source said. Sheikh Fehmi said he had officiated at Taha's wedding some years ago and had been disturbed to discover the mild-mannered man had been accused of planning terror. "He's a straightforward, quiet man," he said. Another accused, Shane Kent, 28, had converted to Islam and was known by his adopted Muslim name Yasin. Sheikh Fehmi yesterday said he did not know Kent, who reportedly visited Afghanistan in 2001 to fight for the Taliban and train in a military camp run by al-Qaeda. "We don't know the biography of every one of these people," he said. "We know them as people who come here from the community. Whenever they come, whoever they are, they are welcome." Reported by Farah Farouque, Ewin Hannan, Sasha Shtargot, Martin Boulton, Carolyn Webb, Rachel Kleinman and Lorna Edwards theage.com.au

Lawyer attacks trial by police, politicians and media By Fergus Shiel November 10, 2005 Has the central legal concept of innocence until proven guilty been crushed under the weight of political brinkmanship, talkback fury and tabloid headlines such as 'Holy War Plot' and 'Ready to die for Jihad'? Rob Stary, lawyer for eight of the nine terror suspects arrested in Melbourne this week, says the public comments of politicians, police chiefs and talkback callers have denied his clients the presumption of innocence. But others, like former chief magistrate Michael Adams, QC, say media coverage has no effect on our magistrates and judges and juries can be directed to disregard it. Mr Stary said: "There is no presumption of innocence. That's just a quaint notion we all say we subscribe to as lawyers — and the Attorney-General says he subscribes to — but the reality is that these people are presumed guilty. "I heard a caller to talkback radio saying, 'How is it that these men can apply for bail?' and that about sums up most people's attitudes. "But if you actually look at the evidence — what they are charged with is membership of an organisation, not even one of the Government's proscribed organisations, just membership of an unspecified organisation. "They are not charged with a weapons offence, nor do they face conspiracy charges or any of the other raft of possible (terrorism) charges." Mr Stary said there was nothing to suggest that the men, who were in the same prayer group, were involved in an imminent attack. Mr Adams said that presumption of innocence, while often abused in the media, remained fundamentally important in our courts. He said that magistrates and judges were focused solely on evidence and juries were sophisticated enough to disregard what they heard in the media and concentrate on the case before them. "I really don't think that any magistrate would be affected by public clamour. The presumption of innocence is a fundamental and great protector of our society," he said. The premiers of Victoria and NSW and senior police have claimed that a terrorist attack was thwarted by the arrest of the suspects in Melbourne and Sydney. Victorian Premier Steve Bracks said he believed police had disrupted "probably the most serious preparation for a terrorist attack that we have seen in Australia". NSW Police Minister Carl Scully said: "I am satisfied that this state was under an imminent threat of a potentially catastrophic terrorist act." One Melbourne newsreader told viewers: "These are people who hate our way of life." Melbourne University media law expert Andrew Kenyon said the intensity of media coverage was understandable given the unprecedented scale of the raids and arrests and the terrorist threat climate. He said that some coverage "did appear to presume guilt and that may have been accidental because events happened very quickly". University of NSW law expert David Brown said there appeared to be a disparity between some of the sweeping comments made by politicians and police and the charges faced by the Melbourne men. Professor Brown said the terrorism issue had become highly politicised and the rush to pre-judge was concerning, but it would be wrong to overplay the susceptibility of juries to media clamour. He said the concept of innocence until proven guilty was somewhat nebulous when between 20 and 25 per cent of prisoners were held in remand awaiting trial. But it remained a fundamental principle and it was worrying when politicians made comments relating to specifics of charges still to be proven, he said. Victoria Police Acting Deputy Commissioner Noel Ashby said authorities did not go too far in describing an "imminent attack" being planned by the Melbourne group despite no such evidence being led in court. He said that other serious charges were likely to be laid against the nine. theage.com.au

Terror threat just a coincidence: PM Prime Minister John Howard has rejected suggestions his announcement today of a potential terrorist threat to Australia was timed to coincide with the introduction of controversial new laws. Mr Howard said he had received intelligence indicating an attack on Australia was possible. Although he refused to give details, he said an urgent amendment to existing anti-terrorism laws was required to strengthen the capacity of law enforcement agencies to protect Australians. Asked tonight if it was merely a coincidence today's announcement of the terror threat came as the government was introducing controversial anti-terror laws and workplace relations legislation, Mr Howard said "absolutely, absolutely." "Those who would argue that - and I know you're not suggesting that in some way the police and the security services are doing the government's bidding - (are wrong)," Mr Howard told the Nine Network. "What happens with these situations is that when the security services and the police get information ... they bring it to people in my position. "We discuss it with them and in this particular case, advice was given that the situation would be strengthened if we could make this amendment." He denied the move was designed to frighten voters concerned about the loss of civil liberties under the government's proposed anti-terror legislation. "I didn't set out to scare anybody," Mr Howard said. "It's a question of you're damned if you do (reveal details of the threat) and you're damned if you don't." Australia's law-enforcement agencies had urged the government to alter existing laws, believing it would help the fight against terror. "After consulting all six state premiers yesterday, we've decided to alter the existing terrorism legislation to substitute the current provision that says in order to prove a charge you have to prove an established preparation for a specific terrorist act, with a more general provision providing for 'a' terrorist act," Mr Howard said. "I know that sounds pedantic but ... in order to prosecute people you've got to do it legally and you've got to have the law on your side. "The reason that we have passed it through the House of Representatives is that we have been told by our law-enforcement agencies ... that passing this law, making this change, would enhance the capacity of the law-enforcement agencies to deal with the situation." Mr Howard said he could not rule out whether or not terrorists would attack Australia. "I can't guarantee that any particular thing is going to happen," he said. "I can't go into detail of the information I have." He said Australia's security agencies may advise him to change the nation's medium security alert level. "We might be advised any moment to change that," he said. "But medium (alert level) covers, in a sense, the current situation which is that a terrorist attack is possible." Mr Howard said he did not want to bungle police investigations into the terror threat by revealing specifics. "This is a very difficult balancing act," he said. "On the one hand we have to tell the public why we're changing the law but on the other hand if I go into all the details of what I've been given I will prejudice the operation. "I have information tonight that I didn't have at the weekend. "That information concerns me, and that information's been shared with the Labor Party and, in general terms, with the state premiers, and it's caused us to change the law. "We are doing everything we can." - AAP theage.com.au

Terror package introduced to parliament The federal government's package of tough new anti-terror laws have been introduced to parliament. Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the legislation would ensure Australia had "the toughest laws possible to prosecute those responsible should a terrorist attack occur". "The bill ensures that we are in the strongest position to prevent new and emerging threats to stop terrorists carrying out their intended acts," he told parliament. The government hopes the legislation will be approved by parliament before Christmas. Mr Ruddock said there were extensive safeguards locked into the legislation on the issue of control orders. "In considering whether to apply for or issue a control order, the personal circumstances of an individual will need to be balanced against the threat to the community," he said. "This does not mean that personal circumstances will outweigh the assessment of a threat, but it is recognised that both issue need to be taken into account." Mr Ruddock said the bill would be referred to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee for consideration to report by November 28. All states and territories except the ACT have given the green light to the reforms, after the government agreed to better civil liberties protections. The premiers had been seeking greater judicial oversight of control and detention orders, a removal of shoot-to-kill provisions, tightening of the laws to avoid a High Court challenge and a public interest monitor to oversee federal police operating in Queensland. The government wants to have the laws passed by Christmas. The package is separate from an amendment to the existing anti-terror laws passed by the lower house on Wednesday, following specific information about a potential terrorist threat in Australia. The amendment, which is still being debated in the Senate, would make it easier to prosecute people thought to be planning a terrorist attack. Theage.com.au

Any Muslim thinking of getting comfortable down under or anywhere else in the west better think again. We should all migrate back to the Muslim lands before the worst of these laws take effect. _________________________________________________ 'Australia's biggest counter-terror operation' By Elisabeth Lopez, Debbie Cuthbertson Today's terror raids which netted 17 arrests were the biggest counter-terrorist police operation Australia has ever seen, police say. Victoria Police chief commissioner Christine Nixon has hailed the actions of more than 100 of her officers, in co-operation with the Australian Federal Police, ASIO, and NSW police, in bringing a 16-month anti-terrorism investigation to fruition. "It's easily the biggest operation that's ever taken place in this country," she told reporters in Melbourne this morning. "It's certainly up there with the Purana (Melbourne gangland) taskforce." "We've been able to keep it secret, we've been able to carry out the investigations and bring it to a point where (arrests have been made)." Nine suspects charged after the Melbourne raids could face up to 25 years in prison, she said. The men, who include Muslim cleric Abu Bakr, were charged with intentionally being a member of a terrorist organisation; some were also charged with intentionally directing the activities of a terrorist organisation. The nine men are at Melbourne Magistrates Court, where their bail application is being heard. Commissioner Nixon said the charge of being a member of a terrorist organisation attracted a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. The charge of directing a terrorist organisation attracted a maximum of 25 years, she said. "These are serious charges and serious offences," she told a press conference this morning. "There was sufficient evidence for a significant attack." Asked if the thwarted attack was a bombing, Ms Nixon said: "It was a significant attack", and the intelligence revealed publicly last week by the Prime Minister was "key" to the raids and subsequent arrests. She said the men who had been charged were expected to face further charges involving "a range of state-based offences". Australian Federal Police agent Frank Prendergast then stepped in to tell the media that they were "starting to get into details about an ongoing investigation" and that police could therefore not provide detailed answers to all questions. Commissioner Nixon said the group to which the men belonged "doesn't have a name" and "had no specific target in mind". She said there was no evidence to suggest the group's alleged preparations related to the Melbourne 2006 Commonwealth Games. Commissioner Nixon said her officers had been watching the group for 16 months. "We came to a point where we felt we were able to lay charges. We believed that (an amendment to Commonwealth counter-terrorism legislation last week) assisted us. We were working to a point where we believed we would have been able to take action against this group otherwise." Mr Prendergast said more suspects could be interviewed as part of the investigation. "This has been a very protracted and complex operation," he said. "It's broken new ground in many ways". Mr Prendergast said items seized during the raids including computer files and documents. He said some suspects had made overseas trips in recent months or years, but declined to give dates or locations. Asked why the terror level alert had stayed at medium through the 16-month investigation, he said: "Terror level alert levels are not an issue for the police. "(ASIO) was very much aware of the threat and took it into account. "The timing (of the raids) was influenced by operational issues. The decision to arrest was an operational decision. The laws passed last week in Federal Parliament are an issue for the Government." He said that although police had spoken to everyone they wanted to at this stage, he refused to say whether others would be sought for questioning later. "We're starting to touch on detail around the ongoing investigation." He said there was "no specific evidence" linking the raids with September 11 or the London bombings. "I think that would be putting it too strongly," he said. - theage.com.au

That's very nice of you Juma and Rahima reminds me of the saying "one for all and all for one", Iam almost in tears. I’m sorry, but please be kind enough to explain that. I’m not exactly sure how that applies to what is being discussed. No need for tears, all I did was a highlight a sticking point and you obviously have no explanation for it. Not all of us are active members of a cheerleading squad you see, some of us say as it is. I ask the admin to repulse those lies agianst me and to charge this people with slander. Charge? War it’s just the bloody internet. Man walaahi some of us take this cyber stuff way too seriously. Also, here you are trying to take the moral ground talking about proof and slander and whatnot, yet you are yourself accusing others of the same thing and fail to provide proof. There is no way to prove that they are the same person unless they say so themselves. IP address is not proof. Pot calling the kettle black me thinks.

War meeshu waa ka kac, the SOL we knew is gone! How true. Yoonis, let the Admin check out the IP-addresses. If we have the same IP-address, than they can kick us out. If not, Horn, his family and his soulmate wind.talker are out of here. IP address doesn’t prove or disprove anything. The same person can be using two different accounts on two different computers. Likewise, two different friends/ siblings can have two different accounts but use the same computer therefore have the same IP address. I still don’t see how any of this (IP stuff) can be used as evidence of anything. Only way to tell is if the person basically outs themselves without noticing. As for HA and wind talker being the same person, if any of that is happening on SOL (and I’m sure there is) is sure as hell wouldn’t be these two for they have disagreed in the past. Once again folks IP address means nutta, I can have three different IP addresses because I use three different PCs and some other nomad and I can have the same IP address because we used the same PC because we so happen friends. Ever thought that these two nomads just might be friends who so happen to live the same area.

What I find most amazing about this corner of SOL is the continuous tirade of Mogadishu bashing. Some of the perpetrators are old timers, and many nowadays keep popping up everyday. That said none claim to be from Mogadishu or have been lately yet they somehow are all historians and experts of the city because they read rubbish that the killing of four people is a ‘killing rampage’ or believe that heresy is reliable news. Like I said interestingly none are from Mogadishu, yet opinions keep flying from all directions. I wonder why the interest and the hatemongering? (rhetorical boys, rhetorical). You’d think that they would be more interested in their own affairs wouldn’t you? But of course not, ‘we and our region is the most productive, safest and wonderful region of Somalia’ they say, that is misconstrued pride but laughably passable (we are Somalis after all), but that is not enough…no it’s not… we must do some bashing to try to raise our status..hmm I wonder who we should bash, oh yes that old foe, those disgusting feral people (of course for diplomatic reasons we must never say that in public), and where do most of them live… what was that city again, our capital (so useless that I can barely recall the name :rolleyes: )..umm Mogadishu I think, yes Mogadishu. Boys, attack on three .

Omar Jamal and the Puntlander's lobbying Campaign for C/Y will always be there not force can remove them. Minnesota is the headquarters for Puntland and C/Y Affairs no Somalilander or some southerners who are minority in the city can do some thing about it.They don't have the support of the Somalians living in the city of Minnesota to do anything. ps: The war is being fought in the four conners of the World. Qabiil politics overshadow everything where ever we Somalians are. Even in the internet!. Horta, the word is Somali (how I hate somalian) and perhaps you should start with yourself and get out of the qabiil politics. lol@minority . Walaahi some of us are sick, pray that you all get better soon.

You would think that Islam would be safe from such garbage; alas these people have no boundaries. I’m pretty certain that each group has it’s sincere Muslims but are unfortunately been ruined by the wicked amongst us- even so-called wadaado (and believe you me we Somalis everywhere have many of them). As for the two scholars, Sheekh Umal and Sheekh Cukaasha, they are brothers in Islam (including same manhaj and caqiidah mind you) first and foremost, but also friends. People can disagree on a matter and remain friends, it just so happens with Somalis though that if these two individuals are from two different qabiils, it will be misconstrued and misused to create disunity. What these people fail to comprehend in their sick minds is that the true Muslims are a one brotherhood protected by the Almighty. Inshallah both these scholars will be coming to visit us in Australia early next year- and are invited by the same group of Somalis.

Inaa lilaahi wa inaa ilayhi raajicuun. May Allah forgive his sins and grant him jannatul firdows. May He have mercy on him. Aamiin.

Asalaamu Calaykum, Sorry, I could not help but say something on this rather tough issue. I think when it comes down to gudniin Vs. possibility of abortion -- I rather chop my little girls stuff. I just think it will save a lot of POSSIBLE suffering. (PLEASE NOTE THE WORD POSSIBLE) I agree with many gentlemen's remarks' being Pro-Guditaan, and I agree with them because of the way of life in Today's missguided massess. Let's bring back the practices of our forefathers, we have under estimated their wisdom. You are no doubt the misguided fella. Suggestion, please learn your religion and god i hope that whilst you carry these views you do not have any daughters. You are on the safe side, and of course, I am with you. We will only stick to our culture and yet practice fully our religion. Don't get intimidated, activists in here are so aggressive in pushing their views down to the throats of others. People like you will not get lost when they stick to the two main sources that embody our morale framework, which is the Quran and the Sunnah. They accuse you for being Jeego-dheere, but don't worry, you tell them we're not dissatisfied with our diin and dhaqan. So Alle-ubaahane, let me give you the benefit of the doubt here. Please explain that disgusting paragraph above. Are you calling for FGM? And more importantly how is it part of our religion? That said, if you are calling for it (which you seemingly are suggesting thus far), dare I say it you are the one who is in dire need of all that you suggest to the ‘activists’. These days Alle-ubaahane, you dissapoint many of us. Your views seem incredibly backward and inslamic.

^ I was deciding when was the right time . He called you Queen and decided to hibernate . He better not deny it, I read it with my own two eyes I tell ya . Sheh, It feels good,lol .

Aeronwen You know I’ve been meaning to inform you of something for a while. Some time back, I came to know some information , you my dear have a male nomad here absolutely obsessed with you . I think he is exposing himself in this thread-hopefully you’ll be able to work it out yourself, but if you cant pm me .

naah Rahima i'm fair dinkum, i'm from Hoppers the mosque being the newly built one between Hogans and Derrimut Road ( assuming you know the area "very well" ) Ok, but don’t say that you from out of Melbourne. Both Hoppers and Werribee are in Melbourne . and the islamic school werribee islamic school shoot your jokes about our wonderful sewage farm system just like everyone else I thought about it, that and all the animal jokes , but I thought I’d pass since its Ramadan and all. Intaas ayaad ku fakatay u know . Foxy, sorry for hijacking the thread .

Congrats, and may there be many more

even if that costs the wellbeing of my wife for marrying other women than her Nice . I like the way you put it. At the cost of her well-being, very nice And I mean I’m sure numbers are more important than your supposed life partner yeah .