tallow mamuulka galmudug ma balaadhin raba ila woqoyiga galkyaco?

Somalina;685418 wrote: See, I told you. He is your father indeed! loooool Xaji, sannadka cusub waxaad ku soo dhaweysen fadeexo. PL looks good right now marka xooga yar break iska qaata, tani wey idinka kor duushayee. Ceeb badanaa. One day xabsi baad ku xukunteen Ruushkii, maalintii danbena airport-ka ku sagootiseen. Guddi sameysta hadda oo sumcada idin soo celiya...loooool Puntland sanadka cusub waxay ku wabireysten gudoomiyaha gobolka mudug oo qarax lala beegsaday iyo suldaankoodi u leh Somaliland maxay hubka nooga dhigtay Now awoow fadeexada qolada aad dalka wadaagtin eeh mamuulka budhcad badeedka bay buux dhaafisay

i am yamyam and jacaylbaro is qadaadweyne:D

Haye gudigani wa gudigi imisaad? Gudi for Buhoodle Gudi for ceelbaardale issue Gudi for diyaarad Gudi hargeisa beautification Gudi xil wareejin Gudi ilaalinta hantida qaranka Gudi xaqiiqa raadis galbeedka onlfti so dagtay

Somaliland shaqo kuma laha argagixiso ma waxay na moodeen dawlada budhcaad badeedka eeh badaha isbaaro dhigtay oo kale

i thought ceelbaardale was solved long time ago

The dervishes just like the shabaab of today they had a international agenda. Muhammad abdulla hassan even composed a poem saying (mar hadaan wayey calan lay nashiro tan iyo nairobi ) How is this different from alshabaab threatening to capture adis ababa or nairobi

ahahahhahahhahaahahhaahah

Chimera there are Millions of sources that tell you that dervishes had foreign allies such as the ottoman Empire , And today Alshabaab has Arab Allies, they had foreign fighters like sunusi sudanis , the Alshabaab has foreign fighters from pakistan. Now u can claim they were pan Somalism but in their are poems they always refer them selfs as anauguna darawishti saalixyadanu ahayn kuwi saancadalaha sawrta ugu ridayey.

You are wrong chimere the dervishes were influenced by a sheikh called Maxammad ibn saalix.and the saalixiya order they used to claim Darawish AL saalixiya never Somali or Fighting for pan Somalism. You can read it in the poems of Gabay xoog the dervish poet. And why would the Mullah make a deal with the italians and declare war against the British while making treaty's with the italians.. it doesn't add up, Also Sultan nur Axmed amaan the pro dervish sultan in the early stage of the dervishes had Sunusi Soldiers from Sudan not Somalis. it's mentioned in the book. seventeen trips through Somaliland.

General Duke;685245 wrote: Puntland will deal with this issue as it always does, with calmness and confidance. It wont do a Gaboose beenaale routine, thats not the style of the state... puntland should do something about the governor of mudug being attacked

The new SOL is great i am getting used to eat allready , i just miss my signature picture.

you should do what ever u like we could care less. , jigjiga baa adis ababa looga taliya ta ku seexo:D

SNM came and they defeated and Built Somaliland that's the history

Salaax maba oga kan kamaavi Nimanka shinila daga Djibouti wa u xor ,. Dadka awbare iyo teferi ber iyo harshin iyo harte sheikh cariley iyo awara mirsak gaashaamo iyo daror iyo danod, Jamhuuriyada Somaliland wa u xor.

nothing good comes from mudug these days

Kool_Kat;685175 wrote: Wasn't the original xukun one year AND ganaax? Not one year OR pay the ganaax? :cool: No it was sit one year or pay ganaax it was clear all along.

To much qabyalaad there

Abtigiis;685154 wrote: Bilan, waa fahmay meeshaad ka hadashay. But the fact is the SSC people are subjects as long as Las Anod is under occupation. I hope the gallant Daraawish will unite soon and chase away the SNM mafia. Abtigis thinks if he is under occupation every one else is under occupation wishful thinking

Mr. Somalia;685100 wrote: ^ Oo muxuu u dili waayey, badankood Xaaji Xunduf wada miiran bey ubadnaayeene!...lol But I find it funny how those marfashlanders whose ancestors the great Sayid humbled and humuliated are quick to proffer their opinion on a topic such as this as if we were expecting them to say something nice about Ina Cabdille Xassan. waxad ka sheekeysa barigu wadadki waalna bari ku duulay oo 700 oo nin ka dilay talow kuwasi na ma gaalay ahayeen

war wa caadi wa ina amaani karan , amaantooda waan ogalahay laakin Somaliland siyasadeeda ma cid ba loo joojinaya

^^ Moonlight if you like the mullah so much why did you guys destroy his statue in Mogadisho? , he wasn't that great after all

Will Sudan explode on Obama's watch? Sudanese schoolgirls showed support for the southern Sudan independence referendum during a visit by U.N. officials last fall. The United States is trying to mitigate the chances of violence after the Jan. 9 vote. (Lucian Perkins/u.s. Holocaust Memorial Museum) Network NewsX Profile Your browser's settings may be preventing you from commenting on and viewing comments about this item. See instructions for fixing the problem. Discussion Policy CLOSEComments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. By Michael Abramowitz Sunday, January 2, 2011 Looking back on his presidency, Bill Clinton has often expressed regret over his administration's failure to stop the genocide that ravaged Rwanda in 1994 and cost 800,000 lives, even referring to it as a "personal failure" on his part. And President George W. Bush, who labeled the mass killings in Darfur in 2004 as "genocide," has voiced frustration over his inability to persuade the United Nations and others to intervene more forcefully. Now President Obama is trying to avoid having to issue his own mea culpa. Obama's test comes in Sudan, which on Jan. 9 is supposed to hold a referendum on whether the country's southern region will secede from the north. If the south votes for independence - as it is expected to do after decades of marginalization and a north-south civil war - deadly violence could easily erupt. The government in Khartoum has proved willing to brutalize its citizens (in the Darfur region and elsewhere) to remain in power and achieve its aims, and secession would bring to the fore unresolved tensions over Sudan's oil wealth and where to draw the new borders. This time, the United States seems to have finally learned its lesson. In recent months, the Obama White House has convened multiple meetings of top advisers to discuss Sudan, sent a special envoy to the region more than 20 times and offered Khartoum a package of carrots and sticks aimed at avoiding the worst violence. While the administration won't deal directly with Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who has been indicted for war crimes committed in Darfur, U.S. officials have enlisted Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Sudan's neighbors to send a strong message that the referendum must be held peacefully and on time. "This is the first time I have seen the U.S. government devote so many high-level resources to preventing violence before it happens rather than responding to it after the fact," Samantha Power told me in an interview. Power - whose 2002 book, "A Problem From Hell," chronicled the world's failure to deal with 20th-century genocides and mass slaughters from Armenia and the Holocaust to Rwanda and Bosnia - is now an adviser to Obama. But these efforts and resources may not be enough. Yes, the world is watching: In addition to Washington's diplomatic push, the African Union is trying to broker peace, European nations are sending economic assistance, and 10,000 U.N. peacekeepers are in southern Sudan monitoring the situation. But the sad reality is that even an actively engaged international community may be unable to head off mass violence in the months or years ahead. A coup in Khartoum, a cattle raid in the south that escalates into tribal violence, a rogue militia commander deciding to start a new conflict in a fragile border region - there is virtually no limit to the plausible scenarios that could lead to renewed fighting in Sudan. Ethnic and economic tensions, the willingness of political leaders to manipulate them and the easy availability of weapons will continue to make the country vulnerable to violence, even genocide. If the referendum is not held on time or is tampered with by the north, "there is a huge potential for war," former guerrilla soldier Acuil Malith Banggol told me during my recent trip to the south. "Both parties are arming themselves, and there will be more destruction. . . . There is no way southern Sudan is going to accept being humiliated and subject to slavery, racial discrimination and religious discrimination." Preventing such violence through diplomacy, as the Obama administration is attempting, is obviously preferable to dealing with it later - but the options may be limited. Diplomacy can be effective only if it is complemented by willingness to take action if prevention fails. And here, the legacy of places such as Rwanda and Bosnia yields a dispiriting conclusion: It is hard to have confidence that the world would be willing or able to intervene to stop a mass slaughter in Sudan, especially in the months after the referendum, when international attention will inevitably fade. It is far from clear that the U.N. Security Council would react quickly to an unfolding crisis, and most experts agree that the U.N. troops in Sudan would be of little use should atrocities commence. (Years of conferences, NATO and E.U. deliberations, and think-tank studies on civilian protection have yet to yield momentum for an effective international rapid-deployment force to deal with such emergencies.) The United States has the capacity to intervene militarily in Sudan, but after 10 years of war in Afghanistan and Iraq, would it have the will, and would it be effective? If the unthinkable were to happen in Sudan this year, we might hear echoes of Romeo Dallaire, the Canadian general in charge of peacekeeping forces in Rwanda in 1994, who futilely begged the United Nations for more troops to end the slaughter there - and who has lived in anguished regret over his failure ever since. In many respects, southern Sudan should offer an easy test case for the international community. The potential for crisis has been slow-burning, with the January referendum date long looming as a possible trigger for violence, so the world's political and military leaders have had the luxury of giving serious planning and thought to how to avoid calamity. Two successive U.S. administrations of both parties, along with political leaders from Africa and elsewhere, have worked hard, if not always effectively, to keep the peace process on track. And everyone involved in the diplomatic efforts is keenly aware of the recent failures to prevent massive killing in Darfur, where an ongoing conflict has kept more than 2 million people living perilously in displacement camps.

Somali persons of the year

Hiiraan Online Editorial Sunday, January 02, 2011 Peace has been illusive in Somalia since 1991. Due to the protracted civil war the news from Somalia was always negative. This year alone according to human Rights watch Some 3.75 million people – roughly half of Somalia's remaining population – are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance. More than a million people are displaced from their homes within Somalia and tens of thousands fled the country as refugees into neighboring countries. More people who escaped from the daily shelling and bombardment of civilians by the warring parties in Mogadishu were extended to a welcome mat by both previous and current administration of Somaliland. Opening the gates to thousands of civilians, mostly Internally Displaced Persons (IDP's) from the chaos of Southern Somalia has earned Somaliland a championship title in humanitarian. Such a gesture indicates not only a strong commitment in brotherhood, but also a deeper value in human rights protections. The Puntland administration equally played a vital role and deserves the admiration of all Somalis for welcoming IDPs as well as hosting the Somali Regions Soccer Tournament, this is a noble gesture that will build confidence and enhance communities to reconcile through sports. There are so many Somalis inside the country and in the Diaspora community who worked tirelessly to alleviate some of the suffering subjected to civilians through aid and development assistance. While we couldn't possibly recognize all of them, we chose two outstanding individuals whose efforts contributed to the welfare of other Somalis last year and who through democracy and good governance are future beacons for other parts of Africa and regions in Somalia to follow suit their great exemplary footsteps. Somalia had countless of heroes across the various spectrums, but the writers and editors of Hiiraan Online are delighted to split the "Person of the Year" award of 2010 between a former president Dahir Riyale Kahin and the current president of Somaliland Ahmed Mohamed Mohamud aka "Siilaanyo" for the following reasons: a) The peaceful transfer of power; a rare occurrence in the continent since 1960s when many African countries got their independence from colonial powers, as this is the second time in the history of Somali, the first being in the sixties when the late president Aden Adde transferred power peacefully. b) Fair and democratic election; on September 30, 2009 the three political parties in Somaliland, the ruling UDUB and the opposition parties Kulmiye and UCID signed a six point Memorandum of understanding (MoU) to bring an end to months of political bickering with respect to the upcoming election. Subsequently, Somaliland held a fair and democratic election in (exact date) according to the election monitoring commission and Ahmed Mohamed Mohamud (Siilaanyo) was declared the new president through fair and democratic process at the ballot box. Other regional administrations should follow suit and embrace the election modality exercised by the people of Somaliland rather than using clan elders to select the president as in the case of Puntland. Respecting the aspirations of the people is an important milestone that is requisite for any functioning democracy. The last election in Somaliland has demonstrated that regional administrations can deploy their masses to the ballot box and respect the outcome as that instills the necessary political culture that improves the nascent system. Despite the political and social upheavals that mired Somalia and its regional administrations, there has been never without opportunities to make a difference in the lives of the people. Leaders across the country should be brazen by a desire to impact positively on their respective constituents. Hiiraan Online recognizes President Riyale the person of the year 2010 for conceding defeat and facilitating the peaceful transfer of power to the newly elected president Siilaanyo. Likewise Hiiraan Online recognizes President Ahmed Mohamud (Siilaanyo) the person of the year 2010 for contesting the presidential post through election and ballot box and by not contesting power through force and the barrel of gun. We, the writers and editors of Hiiraan Online, urge President Siilaanyo to walk that extra mile and work towards uniting the nation by making use of his savvy leadership skills and his newly earned statesmanship status. At the end, no one thrives in a neighborhood that suffers from chronic wars, corruptions and with leaders that are unaccountable to the people. Replicating the strides that Somaliland has made in its security sector is an important step towards a constructive "Siilaanyo Policy" for the rest of the country. Please join Hiiraan Online in congratulating both president Riyale and President Siilaanyo.