Aun ilaahay janada haka waaraabiyo

It is official guys trump is our next leader what a great leader he will be , better then those lefty democrats.

Dems freak out over Biden’s debate performance: ‘Biden is toast’ One prominent operative texted, “Time for an open convention.” Biden stumbles, rambles at first presidential debate beside Trump President Joe Biden's performance was widely panned online and will likely reinforce the impression that he’s lost a step. By LISA KASHINSKY, ADAM CANCRYN and EUGENE DANIELS 06/27/2024 10:15 PM EDT Updated: 06/28/2024 12:17 AM EDT All Joe Biden needed to do was deliver a repeat performance of his State of the Union address. Instead, he stammered. He stumbled. And, with fewer than five months to November, he played straight into Democrats’ worst fears — that he’s fumbling away this election to Donald Trump. The alarm bells for Democrats started ringing the second Biden started speaking in a haltingly hoarse voice. Minutes into the debate, he struggled to mount an effective defense of the economy on his watch and flubbed the description of key health initiatives he’s made central to his reelection bid, saying “we finally beat Medicare” and incorrectly stating how much his administration lowered the price of insulin. He talked himself into a corner on Afghanistan, bringing up his administration’s botched withdrawal unprompted. He repeatedly mixed up “billion” and “million,” and found himself stuck for long stretches of the 90-minute debate playing defense. And when he wasn’t speaking, he stood frozen behind his podium, mouth agape, his eyes wide and unblinking for long stretches of time. 'There's still time': Van Jones says Biden should be replaced “Biden is toast — calling it now,” said Jay Surdukowski, an attorney and Democratic activist from New Hampshire who co-chaired former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley’s 2016 presidential campaign in the state. In text messages with POLITICO, Democrats expressed confusion and concern as they watched the first minutes of the event. One former Biden White House and campaign aide called it “terrible,” adding that they have had to ask themselves over and over: “What did he just say? This is crazy.” “Not good,” Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) wrote. POLITICO spoke to about a dozen Democrats, some of whom were granted anonymity to discuss Biden’s performance. Biden’s team was quick to defend the president’s performance. First they said he had a cold (and that he was negative for Covid-19). Then they insisted Trump was hurting himself by insulting Biden’s presidential record. Biden did grow stronger throughout the night, at one point seizing on Trump’s reported dismissal of fallen soldiers as “suckers and losers” to skewer the former president as the real “sucker” and “loser.” At others, he hammered Trump’s criminal conviction in New York. “The only person on this stage who’s a convicted felon is the man I’m looking at right now,” Biden said. But first impressions matter — particularly to voters just tuning into the election and who were more likely to watch the first debate than the second that’s scheduled for September. And instead of setting the tone of the next phase of the presidential campaign, Biden’s shaky performance reignited fears among Democrats that the octogenarian whose mental acuity and physical fitness have stood as voters’ chief concerns about returning him to the White House might not even be able to carry the party through to November. “Time for an open convention,” one prominent operative texted. Biden’s team had tried to engineer the debate in his favor — pushing for it to be early and without an audience. And the president agreed to hold the event in part to calm Democratic nerves over whether he could win in November. Afterward they didn’t try to cover up his poor performance, but instead tried to emphasize that Trump remained a threat to American interests at home and abroad. “It was a slow start, that’s obvious to everyone. I’m not going to debate that point,” Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN’s Anderson Cooper an hour after the debate wrapped. “I’m talking about the choice in November. I’m talking about one of the most important elections in our collective lifetime. And do we want to look at what November will bring and go on a course for America that is about a destruction of democracy?” Biden flubs early lines at first presidential debate Share Play Video While some Democrats were quick to brush aside Biden’s blunders — Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) said Biden “isn’t a TV showman, he’s a workhorse” — the trajectory of the race appears dramatically changed. “My job right now is to be really honest. Joe Biden had one thing he had to do tonight. And he didn’t do it,” former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) told MSNBC. “He had one thing he had to accomplish. And that was reassure America that he was up to the job at his age. And he failed at that tonight.” Already, some Democrats were openly saying that Biden should end his campaign. One major Democratic donor and Biden supporter said simply: “Biden needs to drop out. No question about it.” MOST READ Judge rejects Trump’s claims that FBI misled court in Mar-a-Lago search warrant Guess how much border crossing numbers plummeted after Biden put in a new policy ‘It may be one of the more consequential in American history’: Why tonight’s debate could upend the 2024 campaign. Man charged with threatening to kill presidential candidates found dead as jury was deciding verdict Here’s what could actually move the 2024 needle during tonight’s debate Biden struggled at times to articulate strong arguments on some of his campaign’s biggest selling points, bungling his health care record and stumbling through a response on his support for abortion rights. “I support Roe v. Wade. You have three trimesters. First time is between a woman and a doctor. Second time is between a doctor and an extreme situation. Third time is between the doctor — I mean, between the woman and the state,” he said. Trump tripped, too. He called former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, a documentary filmmaker, a “fil-i-maker.” He accused Democrats of wanting to “take the life” of a child “after birth.” He inflated the country’s economic strength under his presidency. He reiterated his defense of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists, launching into a lengthy diatribe against the convictions of hundreds of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol in an effort to overturn the 2020 election. And asked repeatedly if he would accept the results of the election no matter the winner, Trump refused to give a straight answer — eventually specifying that he’d only do so “if the election is fair and free.” But Trump largely did what Republicans had begged him to do: show a modicum of restraint while also laying bare Biden’s weaknesses. The former president, who delights in calling Biden “sleepy” and “crooked” at every turn, waited a full 20 minutes to draw attention to the Democrat’s initially shaky performance. “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence,” Trump said, after Biden stuttered through an answer to a question about immigration. “I don’t think he knows what he said, either.” And in a relatively staid debate, it was Biden who fell short of even the lowest of expectations. “Biden seems to have needed a few minutes to warm up,” said one veteran Democratic operative. “Poor guy needs a tea. Maybe a whiskey.” Another suggested that Biden get a throat lozenge. Both Biden and Trump, who is just three years younger than the incumbent, faced questions toward the end of the debate about their fitness for another four years of the presidency. Biden, with a cough, urged voters to judge his competence based on his record, attacking Trump as “three years younger and a lot less competent.” “Look at the record. Look at what I’ve done,” he said, reprising a line he’s often deployed on the campaign trail. Trump then offered his own meandering case for his aptitude, claiming to have “aced” a pair of cognitive tests and pointing to golf tournament championships he’s won at his own golf course as evidence of his physical stamina. The exchange quickly devolved into a game of one-upmanship — “I’m happy to play golf if you carry your own bag,” Biden shot back at one point. But by that point, many viewers’ opinions were likely long cemented. Fergus Cullen, a former New Hampshire GOP chair and “Never Trumper” who is considering voting for Biden, had warned that Democrats would need to reconsider their ticket if the president delivered a poor performance on Thursday. After the debate, Cullen said: “Anyone who has watched a parent grow old, frail, and foggy recognizes what they are seeing and knows it only gets worse, at an accelerating rate, from here.” Nicholas Wu and Josh Seigel contributed to this report.

There is nothing inherently wrong with the desire for self-determination that he envisions for the Garaad clan; their right to shape their own future is perfectly understandable. He asserts that his current stance is in opposition to what his father once opposed, and thus he opposes the aspirations of the masses in Somaliland. However, his reasoning falters when he seeks to dictate what he believes is best for his clan while simultaneously entertaining the notion that his clan serves as a bridge to obstruct the political ambitions of Somaliland. If he opposes the Republic of Somaliland, that is his prerogative. However, he must also respect the wishes of the people of Somaliland who do not wish to be governed by Mogadishu, just as he does not wish to be ruled by Hargeisa. Somaliland is fully capable of thriving without the Garaad clan or Eastern Sool; their absence poses no existential threat to Somaliland's survival. He further claims that his grandfathers fought for the Dervishes to create a Somali state. Yet, he neglects to mention that the only survivors from his clan were those who sought refuge in Western Somaliland, while the rest of his kin perished. Moreover, it is crucial to note that his great-grandfather, Garaad Ali, was opposed to the Mad Mullah. The Mad Mullah executed him, accusing him of being a British spy. This is a fact recorded in historical British chronicles, which document that Garaad Ali Korebas, the father of Garaad Jamac, was killed by the Dervishes under suspicion of espionage. By glossing over these historical details, he presents a skewed narrative. The assertion that his forefathers were aligned with the Dervishes is, therefore, fundamentally flawed. Accurate historical recounting reveals that his great-grandfather was, in fact, an adversary of the Dervishes. This nuanced understanding of history is vital for any meaningful discourse on the political and social dynamics of the region.

Ina rayaale tells ina bixii to completly stop the SL and Somalia talks and he breaks it down and tells the Koonfurians whats up

The Garaad's Argument on the Independence of Somaliland on 26 June and my counter argument for his assertion. Garaad has posited that June 26th is not a date of independence for Somaliland, but rather a day marking the territory's inclusion into Somalia. The Significance of June 26th, 1960 Garaad claims that June 26th was not a day of independence but merely a day when the people of Somaliland were allowed to join Somalia. This assertion is fundamentally flawed and inaccurate . Historical records indicate that June 26th, 1960, was indeed the day when British Somaliland gained its independence from the United Kingdom. This event was celebrated with the raising of the Somali flag, symbolizing the region's newfound sovereignty. If, as Garaad suggests, this date did not signify independence, the subsequent Act of Union and the formation of a joint parliament with Somalia would have been unnecessary. The Premise of No Independence Garaad’s assertion implies that without independence, Somaliland’s people were effectively "caged" without a functioning system or political parties. This narrative is contradicted by historical evidence. Upon gaining independence, Somaliland operated as a sovereign state with its own government, albeit briefly, before uniting with Somalia. Mohamed Haji Ibrahim Egal served as the Prime Minister of Somaliland during this short-lived period of sovereignty, highlighting the existence of a structured political system. The Union and Independence Garaad’s argument overlooks critical historical events and agreements. The leaders of Somaliland and Somalia, including Egal and Abdullahi Issa, held multiple meetings to discuss and formalize the union. Iding to enter into a union with Somalia. This foundational fact invalidates Garaad’s claim that British Somaliland had not achieved independence first, it would not have had the legal standing that there was no independence. Political Parties and Representation Garaad jamac further argues that the existence of political parties such as USP, SNL, and NUF during the pre-union period negates the notion of Somaliland's independence. However, the formation and operation of these parties demonstrate a functioning political landscape. Egal’s decision to allocate parliamentary seats to the USP, despite their inability to secure them independently, underscores the active political maneuvers within an independent Somaliland. The Flag and Symbolism Garaad accurately notes that the Somali flag was raised in Somaliland, signifying unity among Somali territories. However, he misinterprets the symbolism. The five-pointed star on the flag represents the five Somali regions: Garaad's interpretation of historical events and symbols presents a skewed narrative that warrants correction. His claim that the Somali flag was exclusively the flag of Italian Somalia is fundamentally inaccurate. The Somali flag, in fact, was designed to represent a superstate encompassing the Somali-inhabited regions from Kenya's North Eastern Province to Djibouti, Dire Dawa, and beyond the Awash River, marking the border with the Amhara region. It was not the property of Somalia, Somaliland, or Djibouti alone; rather, it symbolized the unity and aspirations of all Somali people Djibouti, the Ogaden region in Ethiopia, the Northern Frontier District (NFD) in Kenya, Somalia, and Somaliland. This star underscores the intention of unity among these territories, not a lack of independence. Had Somaliland not been recognized as independent, the star would not have included it. Garaad's assertion that the Somali flag belonged solely to Somalia undermines the flag's true significance. The flag was conceived to symbolize the pan-Somali aspirations, uniting various Somali regions under a common banner. By claiming it was exclusively Somalia's, Garaad distorts the flag's intended representation of a broader Somali identity and heritage. Some even argue that the flag is an ethnic symbol, further reinforcing that it transcends any single nation's claim. Garaad's jamac efforts to rewrite history seem to stem from his political discontent with Somaliland. He attempts to downplay the significance of June 26th and elevate July 1st, driven by a fear of what the former represents—Somaliland as a distinct entity with its own identity. By attributing all significant historical milestones and symbols to Somalia, he aims to diminish Somaliland's achievements and status. Contrary to Garaad's claims, the independence of British Somaliland on June 26th, 1960, was a standalone event, separate from the July 1st independence of Italian Somalia. The notion that the trusteeship of Italian Somalia somehow influenced or was integrated into British Somaliland is baseless. Each territory's path to independence was distinct and independently recognized by the international community. Garaad's narrative, driven by personal grievances against Somaliland, seeks to alter historical facts. His assertions about the Somali flag, the independence dates, and the relationship between the trusteeships are not only misleading but also an attempt to undermine Somaliland's unique historical and political identity. Revisionist History and Self-Determination of the Garaad clan, Garaad’s statements appear to stem from a desire to revise historical narratives, possibly to align with contemporary political ambitions of wanting to unite with H@rti kin . While revisiting history can be constructive, it must be grounded in factual accuracy. Garaad is entitled to advocate for the self-determination of his clan and express their desire not to be part of Somaliland. However, this should not involve distorting historical events such as the Act of Union, the existence of the Somaliland Protectorate, and the established boundaries. Garaad’s argument contains several inaccuracies and contradictions and some blatant lies . While it is legitimate to oppose political integration with Somaliland based on current preferences for self-determination, it is essential to base such opposition on factual history. The events of June 26th, 1960, the subsequent union with Somalia, and the political activities during that period are well-documented and indisputable. Therefore, while Garaad may reject Somaliland's political ambitions, misrepresenting historical facts undermines the credibility of his position.

nobody said anything about that what we do know is the MOU deal is nearing its closure and the two sides have reached an agreement thats what we know but we dont have exact date when it will be officially signed. Madaxweynaha Somaliland oo sheegay in ay ka go'antahay in la fuliyo heshiiska Itoobiya Arbaco, Juun, 26, 2024 (HOL) - Madaxweynaha Somaliland Muuse Biixi Cabdi, ayaa sheegay in Somaliland iyo Itoobiya ay ka go'antahay in isfahankii badda loo badalo heshiis rasmi ah. Biixi oo hadal ka jeediyay munaasibada xuska maalinta xornimada ee 26 Juun, ayaa sheegay in Somaliland iyo Itoobiya ay labada ka go'antahay in ay fuliyaan heshiiska oo uu sheegay in uu Somaliland u horseedi doono aqoonsi. Waxa uu Madaxweynaha Soomaaliya Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud ku eedeeyay daacadnimo daro, isaga oo sheegay in aanu diidanayn in heshiis badeed la galo, lakiin uu diidanyahay in ay Somaliland gasho. Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud oo isna dhankiisa ka hadlay munaasibada 26 Juun ee magaalada Muqdisho, ayaa sheegay in aanu kasoo horjeedin in reer Somaliland ay heshiis galaan, lakiin uu kasoo horjeedo in dhul la bixiyo, isaga oo sheegay in ay leedahay khatar mustaqbal. Heshiiska Somaliland iyo Itoobiya ayaa gobolka ka abuuray xiisad dibulumaasiyadeed oo ka dhaxaysa waddamada Soomaaliya iyo Itoobiya, sidookale qaar badan oo kamid ah urur goboleedyada caalamka ayaa kasoo horjeedsaday heshiiska.

nobody said anything about that what we do know is the MOU deal is nearing its closure and the two sides have reached an agreement thats what we know but we dont have exact date when it will be officially signed.

Ulusow crocodile tears he doesnt oppose Ethiopia access to the sea

Galbeedi, your stance towards Fawzia Yusuf appears to be unfairly biased against her simply because she hails from Somaliland. This form of discrimination is both unwarranted and detrimental. While you commend her for exposing certain truths about Ulusow, you simultaneously deny her the opportunity to serve in a significant capacity due to her origins. This contradiction highlights a deeper issue of prejudice on your part. It is essential to recognize that personal beliefs should not overshadow one's professional capabilities or qualifications. Fawzia Yusuf's belief in the independence of Somaliland, while deeply personal, should not disqualify her from contributing to broader Somali political efforts. Many Somalis hold the conviction that the five Somali regions are integral parts of the Somali Republic, yet they do not actively pursue this belief in ways that undermine their professional responsibilities or national unity. Fawzia Yusuf's situation is similar. Her commitment to Somaliland does not diminish her ability to serve effectively in a wider Somali context. Discriminating against her on the basis of her origins sets a troubling precedent and undermines the potential for inclusive governance. Furthermore, it is crucial to reiterate that Somaliland will and shall remain independent. This independence is a core aspect of its identity and aspirations. However, this does not preclude individuals from Somaliland from participating in broader Somali political processes, nor should it serve as a basis for exclusion or discrimination. In conclusion, it is imperative to judge individuals on their merits and contributions rather than their origins or personal beliefs. Fawzia Yusuf has much to offer, and her exclusion based on her Somaliland heritage is a disservice to both her and the wider Somali community. Inclusivity and fairness should guide our decisions, ensuring that all voices are heard and respected indeed.

Hassan ma xishoodo maantana sheekada ina geeele ayuu la yimid. Allow na astur yesterday he was bending for the Kenyans today for the Djiboutians

Meles zenawi objection to support Somaliland over Somalia was different because meles believe u keep the Somalis under ur thumb if u keep all of them as ur friend and don’t support one group over the other and he managed it well. Meles wanted good relations with Somaliland but not at the expense of the bunker simply because if he had supported Somaliland he would have lost grip over Mogadishu and they would feel antagonised and anti Ethiopianism would rise every one would have abandoned the tigray funded govt aka the tfg back then led by cabdilahi yusuf . Xabashida their politicians are smart meles had a grudge against afewerqi he said I will ignore assap and massawa I will use jabuuti I will give them all the money in the world and let u Eritreans die of poverty but things have changed abiye gave the Eritreans the chance to commit genocide in tigray as they did and they slaughter their tigrayan cousins . but abiye is not meles abiye doesn’t want to pay 2,5 billion dolllar to jabuuti every year and counting. Abiye wants to protect the abay dam . He is flirting with the Arabs suggested to join the Arab league not sure what relations they have with Arabs abiye want to be seen as a hero in Ethiopia greater then Haile sellasie who federated eritrea with Ethiopia. And abiye hada wuxu fahmay that the bunker is just booto the may may crew the pirates in garowe all defied the bunker on Ethiopia despite abiye being nice to Somaliland this shows u the times have changed this was u thinkable 15 years ago . The only one that can stop this deal from going through is really somaliland and that will only happen if the bunker gives a better alternative but I don’t think they will . The other option is if Ethiopia backs down but that is unlikely the other scenario is a full scale war with eritrea to get assap . If they go that route good let the xabahsis kill each other

What makes u so sure about that ,are u saying they are not really after a sea outlet. Time will tell indeed.

Itoobiya oo sheegtay in ay Somaliland aqoonsanayso Axad, Juun, 16, 2024 (HOL) - Wasiiru-duulaha Hawlaha Guud ee Itoobiya Tarekegn Bulbulta ayaa sheegay in Itoobiya ay aqoonsandoonto Somaliland. Bulbulta waxa uu sheegay in uu kalsooni ku qabo in Itoobiya ay Somaliland aqoonsan doonto "Waxaan kalsooni ku qabaa in Itoobiya ay noqonayso waddanka ugu horeeya ee Somaliland u aqoonsada waddan madaxbannaan" ayuu ku sheegay bartiisa X. Bulbulta waxa uu sheegay in kadib marka la gaadho heshiis rasmi ah ay Somaliland iyo Itoobiya noqon doonaan xulufo dhaqaale iyo millateri. Sannadkan horaantiisii ayay Somaliland iyo Itoobiya yeesheen isfahan ku salaysan in Itoobiya ay saldhig millateri ku yeelato biyaha Somaliland isla markaana ay Somaliland u aqoonsato waddan madaxbannaan. Isfahankan oo la rajaynayo in heshiis rasmiya loo badalo dhawaan, ayaa waxa si wayn uga soo horjeedsatay dowlada Soomaaliya, sidookale urur dowladeedyada gobolka ayaa cambaareeyay.

Prof: Samatar: Aqoonsi Somaliland usoo socdaa ma jiro 20Shares Axad, Juun, 16, 2024 (HOL) - Guddoomiyaha Ururka Hillaac Prof: Axmed Ismaaciil Samatar ayaa sheegay in Somaliland anay dadaalkii loo baahnaa galin aqoonsi raadinta. Samatar oo hadal u jeediyay ardayda Jaamacada New Generation ee Hargaysa, ayaa sheegay in anay jirin doodo cilmiyaysan oo qoran si adduunka loogu qanciyo waxa ay Somaliland tahay. "Aqoonsi Somaliland usoo socdaa ma jiro, sabab? Waayo maynaan kasban dee, hawsheedii maynaan galin, waa ciyaar ciyaar sheekadii aynu haynay 33kii sannadood, car soo sheeg meel Somaliland qadiyadeedu ku qorantahay oo ay cilmiyaysantahay, waxaynu nahay" ayuu yidhi Samatar. Samatar ayaa in badan fagaarayaal kala duwan ka sheegay in loo baahanyahay in la diyaariyo dood cilmiyaysan oo ka turjumaysa waxa ay Somaliland tahay iyo wixii ay ahayd xiligii xoriyada iyo ka hor. Hore waxa uu u sheegay in xuska 26 Juun uu ka muhiimsanyhay 18 May, isaga oo sheegay in 26 Juun ay ka turjumayso dowladnimada Somaliland ee dhabta ah. he is right though Somaliland politicians haven’t done a great job to sell Somaliland to the world I really liked ina rayaale policy who knocked on every door in the African Union . Somaliland was invited to au several times. And was even on the verge to present its case at the African Union Sudan and Egypt threatend to pull out of the au if Somaliland is given platform there . Though Somaliland took a few steps back when siilaanyo and kulmiye came and opened talks with the bunker that didn’t help one bit to the SL luckily ina biix stopped these meaningless talks there were only two attempts of talks held during his reigning one time during. Farmaajo in jabuuti . The meeting ended with no result. And the other one was last year then muse biixi held talks but to r next day he flew to Addis and signed the mou agreement . in essence muuse didn’t fully cancel the talks but he down graded it and ignored the koonfurians and focused on the berbera port on the Americans and engagement with Taiwan and to sell that America can be an ally to sl there was almost an American somaliland joint military excercise things were going good until the laaacanood war. But samatar is right and I agree SL doesn’t have a clear policy one policy enshrined by the parliament to sell Somaliland to the world and to achieve recognition and don’t deviate from that policy a well drafted Somaliland policy towards recognition with the clear story of Somaliland . That we don’t have we just doing some thing but things are changing slowly now

According to Ethiopia the state minister said just now just in that his country Ethiopia will be the first to country recognise Somaliland sovereignty and independence

On the contrary xaaji xunjuf is always consistent and no contradictory on his part . Protecting Somaliland interest is what iam after and objective . The moment Ethiopias interest do not align with what ever security arraignment they have reached that will fly out of the window . Israel and Egypt and Israel and Jordan. Israel and uae all have relations doesn’t mean they have to like each other but because they have common interest it is fine now. The Persians are the enemy now. The Persians are the enemy of the Israelites and ishmaelites. Politics is thé art of deception and camouflaged motives . In 1960 Somaliland united with Somalia why because of fear of Haile sellasie back then yes the atmosphere was different Ethiopia conquest was real and tangible fast move forward. Ethiopia is a country based on kilil regions the country is ruled by gallas not the clever by half Amhara chauvinist. Eritrean rebels have successfully seceded from the empire . Today Somaliland isn’t uniting with Ethiopia because it’s scared of Somalia . Somalia can’t hurt somaliland in its current formation how ever it might hurt Somaliland when it is resurrected from the ashes . This is how SL Preparing it self for Somaliland it’s goals is recognition. All roads lead to Somaliland protecting its interests in this volatile region. Called the Horn of Africa . Anigu ma sheegin if some how a leader in SL stands up or a leader in the bunker stands up and really addresses the contentious issue between the two nations and once and for all solve it with huge concessions on both sides but I don’t see that happening . The bunker is convinced it can defeat Ethiopia by writing letters to the United Nations and European Union . Or signing fish deals with the Turks. Wake up che do u think we don’t know the intentions of Ethiopia I am old enough to remember what our people endured the last half a century we share the longest border worked and lived inside Ethiopia. We know what they want but we also know what we want. The problem is the bunker takes us for granted .but maalin kale bay ka shalayn doonan.

Bit erotic dear lad hahaha aad baan u qoslay

Thé only people that want to destroy somaliland and capture somaliland are the koonfurians in the bunker do not tell me about the Ethiopian boogeyman Arafat. Surely Ethiopians have had their eyes on the Red Sea but it isn’t just Somaliland abiye Ahmed didnt say that he is after sl sea he could be after Eritreans or jabuutis or even Somalia. We remain firm we have defended our land from all sort of enemies s did our grandfathers . The noble men of the north know how to defend their land.

Ethiopia claims that Somaliland is part of Ethiopia when and where ??

biixi doesnt want to give land to abiye he wants to lease land to them the palestenians sold land for money there is a difference not a single inch of SL is going to be sold to the Ethiopians, but a possible lease same as as jabuuti leases land to china japan america france etc

its getting serious now

All Somalis should support the site people and wage war against these ignoble affars. Wey kibren ismaciil buur should also send troops the people that are being displaced are mostly his Jesus people

Long live trump hopefully he becomes president this time me and galbeedi agree