-
Content Count
29,836 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
77
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Xaaji Xunjuf
-
Moonlight why did you not respond to my question on your comparison of the Late adolf Hitler and General Siad bare, why do you believe Somalilanders should protect Somaliweyn The french and the Brits never tried to protect the greater Europe 3rd reich, but the 3 economically politically and socially integrated their strength and powers under a shared organization called the EU.
-
Sad thing for the Somali bantus i hope they one day re integrate into Somalia and return from America and use their learned skills in Somalia , Somali bantus are the most hard working Somalis
-
^^ The talks are not to interesting for now either way they will reach a dead end , sooner or later what Somaliland sun mentioned was what was agreed on before, and what the 2 sides agreed on for now. Clearly if you have been following the dialogue very closely in June they reached a dead end, and only agreed on the airspace joint committee, for practical reasons. Other than that both sides have no room to reach an agreement on the most controversial and disputed area of the 2, Somaliland quest for recognition and the re establishment of the old Somali republic. Why do you think the 2 discussed for 72 hours and only agreed on the airspace, i think we have reached the final stage of these talks i believe with out our friends from the European union and they meddling and mediating and joining the negotiations table, the 2 sides will not come to an agreement, on their future relations.
-
Surely yes the Koonfurians are in a political crisis remember the Prime minister and the President are having a their usual cat fights sidi caadadu u ahayd. I think they told the Turks to give them more time no official statement there is still a chance for the talks to happen first week of December.
-
Somaliland: President Silanyo Parley Turkish Delegation E-mail Monday, 25 November 2013 02:02 Submit to Delicious Submit to Digg Submit to Facebook Submit to Google Bookmarks Submit to Stumbleupon Submit to Technorati Submit to Twitter Submit to LinkedIn VP Sayli and President Silanyo ® with the Turkish team VP Sayli and President Silanyo ® with the Turkish team By: M.A.Egge HARGEISA (Somalilandsun) - The President H.E Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud (Silanyo) met with Turkish Ambassador H.E. Cemalettin Kani Torun for Somaliland- Somalia and it was agreed that Turkey would open a consulate in Hargeisa soon. The Turkish envoy delegation comprising of Turkish businessmen at the Presidential Palace discussed several issues including the upcoming Somalia-Somaliland talks which are expected to resume next year in Istanbul, Turkey. President Silanyo flanked by Vice President Hon Abdurrahman Abdullah Ismael Sayli'i further discussed how Somaliland and Turkey would not only foster political relations but also how to increase trade and investment as means of reinforcing commercial and economic relations. Hon Mohamed Bihi Yonis, Minister of Foreign Affairs later speaking during a press briefing said, "Both sides have agreed on the significance of doubling the existing political and commercial exchange in the coming years and developing mutual relations in the field investment we now have a moment of opportunity to build stronger ties at all levels between our business worlds. Turkey will host a fourth round of talks between Somaliland and Somalia in January 2014, led by President Ahmed Mohamed Mahmoud Silanyo and President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, respectively. The new consulate office in Hargeisa will assist in maintaining momentum for the Dialogue process. The next round of talks between the governments of Somaliland and Somalia, due to take place in Turkey in January 2014, will cover a range of issues, including the management of air space, cooperation on the fight against terrorism, piracy, serious crime, illegal fishing and the dumping of toxic waste at sea, as well as economic development focusing on the encouragement of international aid, trade and investment. The FM also said the Turkish government will open a consulate in Hargeisa while Somaliland is also expected to open in Ankara in the near future, he also revealed the Turkish government to will increase the educational Scholarships to Somaliland Students. Through greater diplomatic and economic engagement, historic relations between Somaliland and Turkey, which have spanned centuries, will only deepen further."
-
itself bad and after the WW2 with the cost of 60 million deaths Europe came together and formed a civilized Pan-Europe with a single currency and foreign policy, if Siyad Barre messed up Somaliweyn ideology, why you condemn the ideology itself. Would u support an independent Somaliland and Somalia and Djibouti working together on the same terms of the European union. And later the other Somali inhabited regions to be championed by the other 3. And than to build a gallant and vibrant Somali peninsula based on trust equality and partnership, and let Somali solidarity shine across the Horn of Africa do you think that is feasible ever in our life times. The difference between Europe and the Somali peninsula is that Somalia claims Somaliland. Germany no longer claims France to be part of their 3rd reich and they were able to restore the trust The past feudal conflicts and animosities makes it impossible to build a win win situation for the generations to come. The Europeans are smart precise they learned from their mistakes they came back stronger than ever and are one of the super powers on the planet.
-
Burahadheer never take the defeated lot to serious trust me when they were in power, in the 80s they had a bigger mouth telling every one that their rule over the Somali republic is unbreakable. Now and days they love to masquerade under the so called notion of Somalinimo, which till this day no one has a clear definition of what Somalinimo actually means. They were the same folks who tried to use Ethiopian troops on the Abu warlords in Southern Somalia. It Was Muhammad Ali the General who shook their fragile foundation when the WSLF broke down along tribal lines and smashed their little WSLF movement funded by regime in Mogadishu at that time.
-
Classified;987477 wrote: Absolutely! Why not? I think the TPLF and the ONLF can work together for the betterment of both communities. Amongst the issues the ONLF should bring to the table for the negotiations/compromises should be the immediate arrest of members of Abdi-iley Administration. The administration in Jigjiga should be dissolved. ONLF should take over Kililka Shanaad administration and down the road (10-20 years), a referendum should be held for Independence. I dont think that is reachable do you know that Ileey told the highest TPLF politicians that he must be included in what ever Talks the TPLF is going to have with the ONLF. Ina ileey considers him self the man who integrated the Somalis in Kilinka into the wider Ethiopia. Ileey has liyuu police who are loyal to him he is the most loyal EPRDF member of all the Kilils Presidents in Ethiopia. I dont think there is some one in the TPLF right now who can adopt and implement such a radical move and Meles is dead. The only way the TPLF is going to discard ina Ileey is if ONLF is a major threat to them. But ileey is doing their dirty job for them.
-
Somaliland to Sign Accord With Fourth Company on Oil Exploration Sunday, 24 November 2013 21:37 font size decrease font size increase font size Print Email Somaliland expects to sign an agreement with a fourth international energy company this week to begin exploring for oil in the semi-autonomous region, Energy Minister Hussein Abdi Dualeh said. An accord with the Middle East-based company, which Dualeh declined to identify, has been completed, he said in a phone interview on Nov. 21 from Somaliland. The other three companies already operating in the country are London-based Genel Energy Plc (GENL), RAK Gas LLC, owned by the government of Ras al-Khaimah in the United Arab Emirates, and Oslo-based DNO International ASA. (DNO) “All talks are concluded” with the fourth company, Dualeh said. “It’s just a matter of inking the deal, which hopefully is going to be this month.” Somaliland, situated on the tip of the Horn of Africa, declared independence from Somalia in 1991, though no country has officially recognized it as a sovereign state. Somaliland and the neighboring region of Puntland are part of a southward extension of the “lucrative geologic framework of the Arabian Gulf” that includes Saudi Arabia, according to Osman Salad Hersi, an associate geology professor at the University of Regina in Canada. Saudi Arabia is the world’s biggest oil producer. Previous attempts to encourage exploration in the region foundered because of perceptions among investors that Somaliland has the same security concerns as neighboring Somalia, where Islamist militants have been seeking to establish an Islamic state since at least 2006. ‘Deteriorating Security’ Last week, Genel Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward, the former CEO of BP Plc, announced the company was resuming operations two months after suspending exploration work in September because of a “deteriorating security situation.” Somaliland’s government has done a “full-blown security assessment” to assess the threat, Dualeh said. The U.K. Foreign Office advises against all travel in Somaliland because of the “high threat” that westerners face from terrorism and kidnapping, according to its website. The U.S. State Department warns its citizens to obtain kidnap and recovery insurance when traveling in the region. “There are no real threats, but nevertheless we decided to make sure that we apply any security level that international companies need to operate in Somaliland,” Dualeh said. “We provide full protection for the operation, not only for Genel but for other operating companies here.” Genel, the biggest oil producer in the Kurdistan region of northern Iraq, is expected to need at least two months to put its logistics back in place before resuming exploration work next year, Dualeh said. Seismic work by the four companies is expected to be completed by the end of 2014, before drilling commences in 2015, Dualeh said. Genel is “very bullish” about finding oil in Somaliland, he said. “There’s a parallel between their successes in Kurdistan and successes we hope to have here in Somaliland.” Source: Bloomberg
-
READ: World powers strike historic deal on Iran's nuclear program Spokesman: Israel reserves the right to defend itself To be sure, there is no love lost between Iran and Israel. Iran, which in the past has questioned Israel's right to even exist, continues to push Tel Aviv's buttons with incendiary statements. Israel, which says it has the most to lose if Iran develops a nuclear bomb, has repeatedly warned the West to tread warily when dealing with Tehran. READ: White House releases deal details Iran deal 'important step forward' Iran nuclear deal reached Photos: Iran nuclear deal reached Photos: Iran nuclear deal reached So finding that their greatest ally, the United States, has struck an interim deal with Iran brought condemnation from Israeli lawmakers. "Israel cannot participate in the international celebration, which is based on Iranian deception and the world self-delusion," said Yuval Steinitz, minister of strategic and intelligence affairs responsible for international relations, and a member of the Knesset. Lawmakers stopped short of saying whether Israel would go it alone militarily, if the need arose. But Israeli officials told CNN's Ian Lee they would not rule out a strike against Iran -- and Netanyahu certainly didn't mince words. In a written statement, he said Israel "is not obliged to the agreement." "The regime in Iran is dedicated to destroying Israel and Israel has the right and obligation to defend itself with its own forces against every threat," he said. "I want to make clear as the prime minister of Israel, Israel will not let Iran develop a nuclear military capability." Israel bombed a reactor construction site in Iraq in 1981. Asked by CNN's Wolf Blitzer about the possibility of an Israeli airstrike on Iran's nuclear facilities in the next six months, Netanyahu's spokesman didn't rule out that option. "We, of course, would like to see a diplomatic solution. We'd like to see a peaceful dismantling of the Iranian nuclear program. If that can be achieved, that's obviously preferable," Regev said. "But Israel always reserves the right ... to defend ourselves, by ourselves, against possible threats." Obama to call Netanyahu The heightened rhetoric means Obama has his work cut out for him in appeasing a close U.S. ally. "You can be sure that President Obama will speak to Prime Minister Netanyahu" on Sunday, a senior administration official told reporters. "Ultimately, we understand why Israel is particularly skeptical about Iran," the official said, adding, "This is not simply about trusting the Iranian government. There are strict verification measures." Kerry said as the deal was announced in Geneva that Israel and the United States agree that Iran must not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. But Kerry said none of the world powers represented in Geneva believe that unrelenting sanctions can achieve that goal. He said the deal will make Israel safer by freezing some Iranian nuclear development and removing its stockpile of uranium enriched to 20% purity. Kerry also said military action, while still an option Obama would preserve, could not permanently solve the problem. Israeli leaders 'sleep with one eye open' It's hard for most Americans to understand why all Israeli prime ministers are said to sleep with one eye open, said Aaron David Miller of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. He was a Middle East negotiator in Democratic and Republican administrations. America, he says, has "nonpredatory neighbors to its north and south and fish to its east and west." Israel, on the other hand, is a small Jewish state surrounded by antagonistic Muslim neighbors. Israel cannot participate in the international celebration, which is based on Iranian deception and the world self-delusion. Israeli intelligence minister "I don't think Iran wants nuclear weapons to launch a first strike against Israel. But it's impossible to ignore, let alone trivialize, Israeli security concerns and vulnerabilities in this regard, particularly in the face of Iran's rhetoric, regional ambitions and support for terrorism over the years," he said. Indeed, the verbal attacks have been relentless. Even as the P5+1 met in Geneva, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei unleashed another volley last week in Tehran. Khamenei said Israeli officials "cannot be even called humans" and referred to Netanyahu as "the rabid dog of the region." When Iranian President Hassan Rouhani described the deal on Sunday, widows and children of slain Iranian nuclear scientists stood nearby as he addressed them in his speech. Iranian officials have long accused Israel of planting bombs under the scientists' cars, and analysts have argued that's a likely scenario. Israel generally refuses to comment on accusations and speculation. After one such attack killed an Iranian scientist last year, Israeli military spokesman Brig. Gen. Yoav Mordechai said in a Facebook post that he didn't know who'd targeted the scientist. "But I certainly didn't shed a tear," he said. Once a 'honeymoon' What is often forgotten in this tense relationship is that it wasn't always this way. After the birth of the nation of Israel in 1948, it and Iran enjoyed a "honeymoon" that lasted until just before the 1979 Islamic revolution, David Menashri, professor emeritus of Tel Aviv University, told CNN last year. Israel's ties with Iran were chiefly motivated by "a single word with three letters -- O-I-L," he said. But the Islamic revolution that overthrew the Shah of Iran marked a turning point. The Islamic Republic, led by Shiite clerics in the predominantly Shiite nation, saw Israel as an illegitimate state with no right to exist, certainly not amid Muslim nations. Despite harsh rhetoric, though, then-Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini "didn't want to get into a confrontation with Israel," said Ervand Abrahamian, a professor of Iranian and Middle Eastern history at Baruch College of the City University of New York. One reason: Israel and Iran had a common enemy in Iraq, a country that fought an eight-year war with Iran. Israel even supplied weapons to Iran to help it fight. In the years after the Iran-Iraq war, however, Israel began to regard Iran and its support of global terror as a chief threat. And it watched uneasily as Iran has gained influence in the Middle East since the first Gulf War began eroding Iraq's power. Those concerns escalated when international inspectors found traces of highly enriched uranium at a power plant in Iran in 2003. In the escalating conflict, the United States has always said, in the words of Obama last year, that it has "Israel's back." "The United States has no stake in concluding an agreement with Iran that leaves Israel angry, aggrieved and vulnerable. So, the two sides will find a way to work this through," Miller said. "But for now, buckle your seat belts. We could be in for one bumpy ride.
-
Israeli PM Netanyahu: Iran nuclear deal 'historic mistake' By David Simpson and Josh Levs, CNN November 24, 2013 -- Updated 2113 GMT (0513 HKT) Watch this video Netanyahu: Deal is 'historic mistake' STORY HIGHLIGHTS NEW: Spokesman: "Israel always reserves the right ... to defend ourselves" The deal makes the world "a much more dangerous place," Netanyahu says "You are not our enemies," Israel's president tells Iranian people Last week, Iran's supreme leader said Israeli officials "cannot be even called humans" (CNN) -- [breaking news update at 4:12 p.m. Sunday] U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke Sunday about the Iran nuclear deal, White House Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest said. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One as Obama traveled to Seattle, Earnest said the two leaders had a "useful discussion" for about a half hour. [Original story, posted at 12 p.m. Sunday] Israeli PM Netanyahu: Iran nuclear deal 'historic mistake' (CNN) -- While the EU and the United States cheered a deal that world powers reached with Tehran over its nuclear ambitions, Israel was fierce in its criticism Sunday. "What was concluded in Geneva last night is not a historic agreement, it's a historic mistake," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told reporters. "It's not made the world a safer place. Like the agreement with North Korea in 2005, this agreement has made the world a much more dangerous place." "For years the international community has demanded that Iran cease all uranium enrichment. Now, for the first time, the international community has formally consented that Iran continue its enrichment of uranium." Washington said the changes called for in the agreement will make Iran less of a threat to Israel. "We believe very strongly that because the Iranian nuclear program is actually set backwards and is actually locked into place in critical places, that that is better for Israel than if you were just continuing to go down the road and they rush towards a nuclear weapon," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told CNN's "State of the Union." Netanyahu disagreed. Kerry comments on Iran deal Obama reacts to Iran nuclear deal Iran happy with 'first step' Reaction to deal in Tehran The deal, Netanyahu argued, leaves Iran "taking only cosmetic steps which it could reverse easily within a few weeks, and in return, sanctions that took years to put in place are going to be eased." "This first step could very well be the last step," he said. "Without continued pressure, what incentive does the Iranian regime have to take serious steps that actually dismantle its nuclear weapons capability?" Mark Regev, a spokesman for Netanyahu, said easing pressure will remove any motivation for Iran's leaders to make difficult decisions. "It's like having a small hole in your tire, a small hole in the sanctions regime," he said. "In the end, like with your tire, you'll get a flat." Kerry: 'Very little relief' for Iran Kerry argued the sanctions part of the agreement is hardly a boost for Iran. "There is very little relief. We are convinced over the next few months, we will really be able to put to the test what Iran's intentions are," Kerry told CNN chief political correspondent Candy Crowley. The deal says that the U.S. will provide $6 billion to $7 billion in sanction relief -- just a drop in the bucket compared to the roughly $100 billion in foreign exchange holdings that are inaccessible to Iran because of sanctions, the White House says. Iran insists its nuclear program is purely for civilian purposes, with no long-term goal of developing a nuclear weapons arsenal. But such assurances haven't quelled sharp skepticism from Israel. "If in five years, a nuclear suitcase explodes in New York or Madrid," said Naftali Bennett, the Israeli minister of trade and industry, "it will be because of the agreement that was signed this morning." Shimon Peres, Israel's president, sounded a different note. "This is an interim deal. The success or failure of the deal will be judged by results, not by words," Peres said in a statement. "I would like to say to the Iranian people: You are not our enemies, and we are not yours. There is a possibility to solve this issue diplomatically. It is in your hands. Reject terrorism. Stop the nuclear program. Stop the development of long-range missiles. Israel, like others in the international community, prefers a diplomatic solution. "But I want to remind everyone of what President Obama said, and what I have personally heard from other leaders. The international community will not tolerate a nuclear Iran. And if the diplomatic path fails, the nuclear option will be prevented by other means. The alternative is far worse."
-
Iran Nuclear Deal Reached At Talks In Geneva Israel's Prime Minister criticises the development as an "historic mistake" and reserves his country's right to defend itself.6:09pm UK, Sunday 24 November 2013 SWITZERLAND-IRAN-NUCLEAR-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY Video: Iran Nuclear Deal Agreed In Geneva Enlarge Measure against Obamacare gets bipartisan support Barack Obama speaks about the Iran nuclear deal from White House. Video: Obama: 'Deal Will Make World Safer' Enlarge Email An agreement has been reached between Iran and six world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for limited sanctions relief. The deal, announced by European Union policy chief Catherine Ashton, is a first step towards resolving a decade-old stand-off between Tehran and the West. The agreement between the Islamic state and the US, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia was nailed down after more than four days of negotiations in Geneva. US President Barack Obama said it was an important first step towards a comprehensive solution to Iran's nuclear programme. William Hague is in Geneva for talks with foreign leaders over Iran. William Hague hailed the agreement as 'very important and encouraging' He said Iran could not use its next-generation centrifuges under the deal and the limitations under the agreement "cut off Iran's most likely paths to a bomb". He added that if Iran did not meet its commitments during a six-month period, the US would turn off sanctions relief and "ratchet up the pressure". Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticised the nuclear deal as an "historic mistake" and reserved his country's right to defend itself. "Today the world became a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world made a significant step in obtaining the most dangerous weapons in the world," he said. US Secretary of State Kerry shakes hands with Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif after a ceremony at the United Nations in Geneva US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran's Mohammed Javad Zarif Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said the agreement recognises Tehran's "rights" to maintain a nuclear programme, and it would "never" seek atomic weapons. The country's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said: "This can be the basis for further intelligent actions. Without a doubt the grace of God and the prayers of the Iranian nation were a factor in this success." Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron said the deal leaves Tehran further from getting a nuclear weapon and "demonstrates how persistent diplomacy and tough sanctions can together help us to advance our national interest". Foreign Secretary William Hague said the agreement was "very important and encouraging", adding that it meant "the nuclear programme won't move forward for six months". However, he acknowledged that "legitimate concerns" remained. He and US Secretary of State John Kerry are holding talks in London today on the Iran deal and the latest developments in Syria. Speaking in London, Mr Kerry said: "This could not have happened if our friends had not come together to create sanctions and force sanctions and to press this agreement. "Now the really hard part begins; the effort to get the comprehensive agreement in terms of verification, transparency and accountability. "We are determined to work together. We will start today to congtinue the efforts out of Geneva. President Obama could not be more grateful for David Cameron's support." European Union foreign policy chief Ashton smiles next to Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif during a ceremony at the United Nations in Geneva European Union policy chief Baroness Catherine Ashton and Javad Zarif Mr Kerry offered assurances to Israel over the nuclear agreement, saying it would make the Jewish state safer over the next six months because the world would have "insights" into Iran's nuclear programme. Speaking on Iran's Press TV, Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said the deal was an opportunity for the West to restore trust with the Iranian nation. He said Tehran would expand co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog, to address what he called some concerns. Iran will get access to $4.2bn (£2.6bn) in foreign exchange as part of the accord, a Western diplomat said. A senior US official added that the agreement halted progress on Iran's nuclear programme, including construction of the Arak research reactor. It would neutralise Iran's stockpile of uranium refined to a fissile concentration of 20%, which is a close step away from the level needed for weapons, and calls for intrusive UN nuclear inspections. Iran has also committed to stop uranium enrichment above a fissile purity of 5%, a US fact sheet said. The deal has no recognition of an Iranian right to enrich uranium and sanctions would still be enforced. Refined uranium can be used to fuel nuclear power plants - Iran's stated goal - but also provide the fissile core of an atomic bomb if refined much further. The deal has sparked fears in Israel, said Sky's Middle East Correspondent Sam Kiley. "Israel's economy minister Naftali Bennett has said this deal could result in the use of suitcase nuclear devices five years down the line. It could be traced to this historic moment," he said. "What they're really saying is that the international community, the world's diplomats, have been suckered by Iran in the same way that the international community was successfully suckered, let's face it, by the North Koreans who agreed to a similar deal to downscale their nuclear programme, and after a few months went by actually demonstrated that they had developed a nuclear weapon in secret. "That is precisely what worries the Israelis." Diplomacy was stepped up after the landslide election of Hassan Rouhani, a relative moderate, as Iranian president in June, replacing nationalist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
-
Burahadheer,Jubbaland has been compromised no autonomous state in Kismayo hassan sheikh and his politicking made sure of that. And there is no threat from Mogadishu coming towards the Somali Kilil. Actually the Mogadishu government is being protected by Ethiopian troops in a variety of areas in southern Somalia, so i doubt they can outmaneuver the Ethiopians in the Somali kilil. And Khatumo is doing what they are good at holding a conference about a conference.
-
Muqdisho:- Baarlamaanka Soomaaliya oo la horkeenay Mooshin ka dhan ah Raysalwasaaraha & Sawaxan ka jira Xarunta. 24. november 2013 Allpuntland Xildhibaanada Baarlamaanka Soomaaliya ayaa goor dhow loo qeybiyay mooshinka ka dhanka ah Ra’iisul Wasaare Cabdi Faarax Shirdon Saacid, iyadoo buuq iyo qeylo uu ka dhex abuuray Mudanayaasha Baarlamaanka. Kulanka Baarlamaanka ayaa waxaa soo xaadiray ilaa 201 xildhibaan, waxaana shir gudoominaya Afhayeenka Baarlamaanka Prof. Jawaari oo ku dhawaaqay in Baarlamaanka uu hor yaalo mooshin ka dhan ah Ra’iisul Wasaaraha oo khamiistii loo soo gudbiyay Gudoonka. Wararka ayaa sheegaya in Xildhibaanada baarlamaanka ee taageersan Ra’iisul wasaaraha ay dalbadeen in mooshinka lagu lifaaqo magacyada saxiixayaasha oo la sheegay in 168 ay soo gudbiyeen, hadii kalena uusan sharci aheyn. Gudoonka Baarlamaanka ayaa waxaa uu sheegay in mooshinka laga doodi maalinta sabtida ee taariikhdu tahay 30-ka November, waxaana wararku sheegayaan inay jiraan shakiyo Xildhibaanada ka qabaan tirada rasmiga ah ee saxiixday Mooshinka. Sidoo kale Gudoonka ayaa ku wargeliyay xildhibaanada in isla sabtida loo soo gudbinayo magacyada liiska Xildhibaanada saxiixay mooshinka, kaasoo keenay in mudanayaasha taageersan Ra’iisul Wasaaraha ay buuqaan Saxawaxan ka jira Xarunta Golaha shacabka ayaa laga yaabaa in uu keeno dib u dhig lugu sameeyo Mooshinka Raysalwasaaraha ka dhanka ah. ilo lugu kalsoonyahay ayaa sheegaya in Mooshinka Raysalwasaaraha uu dib u dhici karo ilaa iyo 30 bishaan.
-
Prime Minister saacid receiving advise from interesting corners
Xaaji Xunjuf replied to Xaaji Xunjuf's topic in Politics
I think they are advising him very well and are presenting a strategy to prolong his stay as Prime Minister these forces want a prime minister who is willing insert his own policies ideas in Somalia. It seems saacid is not leaving for now -
Qamaan had allot of hal hays for example this one Hadalkan saxnayn wuxu taraa, sun iyo waabaye Cali jamac haabiil Muslimnimo nin aan kugu dhaqayn, muuminnimo khaasa Gaal maxasta ku dhowra magansataa dhaama Salaan caraby Hadaad ficil hinaastay aadse aad hilin kari weydey ma afkaad ku ciil bixi cidlaan ka hanjabaysa eh Faacul adan Jugle Gari laba nin kama wada qosliso By Garaad wiilwaal Abasguul meel ma wada joogo warna isu ma seegna
-
ONLF is in a very difficult situation it seems the struggle is heading towards an endless political perplexity the ONLF made a terrible mistake in 1984 when they former wslf broke down along clan lines. And the ONLF was created in Saudi Arabia by former wslf from the O community they should've started an arm struggle from the get to go instead of waiting for the derg of Mengistu to be ousted by the TPLF and EPLF. ONLF started fighting Ethiopia when Meles and his TPLF consdiliated their power in most of Ethiopia. You hit them when they are weak and vulnerable and never believe the promises Ethiopians made. Today the duplicitous EPRDF policians understand the underleying conflicts between Somalis and especially in the Somali Kilil and today 98% of the officials in the Kilil Somali are Somalis including the police and millatiry. When i was 2 years ago in Jigjiga for a visit the people there despite the problems and being neglected by the Ethiopian state ubo as they refer ONLF is non existend especially with in the Big foot community the argument they use is why should we fight when the rest of the Somalis are not fighting we will not fight no son of ours will die fighting the Ethiopian state. In the 80s and the 70s the Somali region had no Somali colonel or General from the Ethiopian army the army officers In the Kilil Somali at that time Hararghe sidamo and bale were all oromo generals or Amhara generals and so were the troops, today the so called Liyu police are all Somalis. The shrewed TPLF politicians understand the deep animosities between Somalis and Zenawi went as far as dividing the big foot community clans along sub clanish lines and started putting them against each other, in order to discredit the ONLF, sometimes Ethiopian troops plunder and burn down villages and the next morning we hear ONLF did it, in order for the people to detest ONLF. The TPLF understood the long term possibility that the Somalis in the Kilil will have some deep resentment for Ethiopia. And the close assocition between the other Somalis and the Somalis in the kilil. So Somali historic figures such as Ina abdilla hassan and others are celebrated in Ethiopia to make Somalis an integral part of Ethiopia and especially the bigfoot Community Ileey plays the drums for this and he often says the honer of the Tribe can be protected only under Ethiopia.
-
^^ Somaliland can afford it to have capable police forces in terms of police equipments and training , Somaliland is located in a very hostile and volotile region protecting the safety of the people is number one priority. The poor cannot be fed if they are unsafe the thousands of street childeren need to be fed trained and conscripted they need to be trained in one of the Islands of Somaliland in Sanaag or sacaadin.