Anigu yaana dhalaninee, adigu hasayeeshe gormaad ka weenaaneysaa cuqdada iyo calaalcalka raqiiska ah oo aad har iyo habeen lasoo taagantahay? When will you outgrow, or rather, when will you get liberated from the mental and emotional victimhood that you subject yourselves to?- 'cuz it as sure as hell aint gonna happen even if you get the coveted recognition that you so desperately desire for your clan enclave. So JB, I'm assuming you are in the later years of your life, so when will this cuqdad end, that has become the be all and end all of your pitiful existence?

Cey igama aha, laakin I have a very low tolerance for foolish questions, that's all.

Regardless. It is the same old nonsense about waanala xasuuqey ee hanala aqoonsado, and that sh!t aint working on no one--so come up with something else besides this incessant mewling.

Jacaylbaro;681550 wrote: Faroole muxuu u tegi waayay Muqdisho ??? ,,,, Faroole wuxuu u tagi waayey Xamar waayo madaxweenaha Soomaliya ma aha shuqulnah kuma laha afaaraha Xamar, laakin Mudane Dalxiis madaxweenaha Soomaliya weeye(including Puntland), marka inaad isku barbar dhigtid ma aha, unless nacasnimadii marfashka iney kaa tahay.

boohoohoo, cry us a river!

^ Ari boowe, nimanku wey dhaarsanyihiin ma is tiri? I think Bari, like Brazil in the last world cup, will fizzle out early.

^ rubbish!

^ Doqonyahow, Puntland waxaa yaal dhul Soomaaliyeed iyo shacab soomaaliyeed, marka Shariif muxuu dhulkaas Soomaaliyeed weli u tagi la'ayahay weeye su'aashu haduu uu yahay madaxweene?

Abwaan;681300 wrote: In my view...Ethiopia, Egypt and Italy are the foreign powers that have contributed to the destruction of Somalia. I concur. These countries are the true cause source and encouragement of Somalia's disunity in one shape or another. Now couple this, with all three being aligned to the world's only superpower, and America always blindly following their selfish policy interests regarding Somalia--this should explain to you why Somalis keep being divided into so many different political factions for the last 20 years or so. Therefore as a Somali citizen, a conflict over water resources between Ethiopia and Egypt will not put my country in a worse situation than it already is in. If anything, these two countries will get a a taste of their own medicine.

This question has always baffled me. If the guy is the President of Somalia, why is then not unable to visit his own country, and I'm not only talking of Puntland. Why does he choose to be holed up in the two square kilometers of Villa Somalia? Isn't this cowardly for a man claiming to be the president of Somalia? Discuss!

Prof. Cali Maxamed Geeddi, oo ahaa RW dawladdii hore ee TFG-da, wuxuu markuu doono tegi jirey Puntland, oo markaa uu haystey generaalkii “reer boqor” General Adde Muuse. Waxa isaguna dhawr goor booqasho ku tegey Puntland General Abdi Qaybdiid. Haddaba waa maxay sababta uu Shiikh Shariif u Tegi waayey puntland isagoo ah weliba ninka ugu socdaalka badan madaxda iyo hogaamiyeyaasha Soomaalida? Waa maxay raadka ay yeelan karto in ninka madaxweynaha ah ama RW-ha ah uu maskax ahaan ka gudbi kari waayo xeydaanka qabyaalada ee dadka la dhex dhigey? Taasu maxay ka oraneysaa kartida iyo shakhsiyadda madaxweynaha dal burburey oo dadkiisu kala fiigsan yahay oo u baahan in nin dadka oo dhan dhex geli kara uu hogaamiyo? Maxay jiilka cusub ee aan arag Siyaad Barre ka qaadan karaan in madaxweynaha Soomaliya uu kaga kalsoon yahay Adisababa Garoowe? Kursigani waa astaantii qaranka Soomaaliyeed. Maaha in madaxweynuhu uu qolo si caddaan ah uga soo horjeesto, ama loo arko inuu dadka qaar hoosta ka neceb yahay. Waxaa laga yaabaa in dadka qaar yiraahdaan sharrifku ma tegayo Garoowe sabatoo ah iskuma fiicna Faroole. Haddaba taasu maaha arrin cudur daar u noqonaysa shariifka, sababtoo ah booqashadu waa arrin ku saabsan dadka, oo aan wax shaqo ah ku lahayn maamulka. Haddii aan maamulku ahayn mid kan sida Soomaaliland looga baqayo xagga nabadgelyada madaxweynaha. Colaadda kala dhimashada ah ee Madaxweyne Shariif u muujiyey dadka qaar waa arrin weyn oo caqabad ku ah soo celintii kalsoonidii lagu qabi lahaa dawlad dhexe. Arrintaasu waxay kale oo muujineysaa dhinaca ay fikrada siyaasadeed ee Shriifka iyo ragga ku dhow dhowi u janjeedo. Waa dareen iskiis u hadlaya oo aan faahfaahin u baahnayn in shariifka aaney ilaa haddeer marnaba maskaxdiisa ku soo dhicin oo aan wax hadal hayaaba jirin booqasho uu ku tago waddanka barkiis. Intaa waxa dheer in Shariifku uu si fudud u ogolaadey in Itoobiya ay u isticmaasho danaheeda gaarka ah. Danahaas oo qaarkood aan la garanayn wax faa’iido ah oo ugu jirta dadyowga geeska Afrika, marka laga reebo isla-weyni iyo colaad hurin iyo nacayb hor leh hor leh oo qowmiyadaha la dhex dhigo. Tusaale ahaan cunaqabteynta Ereteriya. Haddii Itoobiya ay rabto inay saxiibadeed u isticmaasho inay Ereteriya cunaqabteyn ku soo rogto, taasi waa arrin ka dhaxaysa labadooda dal. Soomaalidu wax shaqo ah oo ay ku leedahay haba yaraatee ma jirto. Siiba marka la eego sidii ay Ereteriya u soo dhaweysey Shiikh Shariif laftiisa, isagoo walhad ah oo meel uu qabsado la’. Ninka oran kari waayey “areey aniga ninkaas durba iskuma rogi karo anoo madaxweyne sheeganaya oo durba dariiqyada kama cayn karo” waa maxay kartida kale ee laga sugayaa? Arrintaasu waxay noqotey fadeexad iyo sharaf dil lagu sameeyey magaca iyo qaranka Soomaaliyeed, oo awal lagu yiqiin inaan cidina wasaqda isaga tiri karin. Xabashidu waxay rabeen inay Soomaalida la sheego ee dhagahooda ka badatey ay ka dhigaan wax iyaga ka sii liita oo aan diin iyo mad-hab toona lahayn. Weyna ku guuleysteen, Iyagoo isticmaaley nin aan wax shaqo ah ku lahayn booska la fadhiisyey. Nin aan in yar oo damiir ah lahayn, haba yaraatee ummad dhan ma hugaamin karaa? Jawaabtu waa maya. Haddaba waa wax iska cad in Shariifku aanu lahayn astaamihii looga fadhiyey ninkii qaban lahaa hogaanka dalka xilligan adag ee lagu jiro. Siyaasaddu waqtiyada caadiga ah baysan ahayn arrin fudud (arag waxa haysta Daahir Riyaale) iskaba daa iyadoo qalaama rogad lagu jiro. Khatarta ka soo socota karti darada shariifku waa mid iskeed u taagan oo u baahan in gooni ahaan looga welwelo. Waa in Shariifka lagu bedelaa qof isku kalsoon oo fahamsan waxa uu u taagan yahay, isla markaana qaadan kara go’aano adag haddii loo baahdo sida ugu dhakhsaha badan. Liibaan Gamaadeed gamaadeed@yahoo.com

LOL @ Usain Bolt mimicry! If anything, the Bari team looks like they are getting ready to perform a karate kata from medieval times.

Meesha tababar baad u furatey miyaa? Kusoo dhowow walaale.

^ Saaxiib, waa nala ka gar darnaa, maanta!

General Duke;680661 wrote: GO ON WIT U BAD SELF, EL PRESIDENTE!

Timur;680525 wrote: I don't think a single bullet or bomb should be wasted in places like Hargeisa or Burco which don't produce anything aside from addicts. ^^^

Originally posted by xiinfaniin: ... the end result of his ideas when stripped to its core is nothing more than chaotic. There is nothing "chaotic" about wanting to make information freely accessible to all, no matter how improper or unsavory it may be deemed by some. Besides, isn't it true that only evil doers will go to great lengths to prevent the exposure of their evil doing?

^ First of all, I am completely flabbergasted by the laughing graemlins you've deployed, or do they signify qosol giriir on you part? Secondly, you have confirmed to me that you do NOT yet realize that I'm laughing AT you, not WITH you. This also confirms that there's a LOT your girl-like disposition has blinded you to, and I'll delight in my role in hammering in some sense into that vacuum packed head of yours, whenever I so choose. But seriously speaking,I couldn't give a damn-- for you are a big waste of time and space(or so the theory goes), or did I get that part of my presumption incorrect? P.S Don't bother answering that, because whatever reply your proffer will prove to the gallery that you are nothing more than a confused and self-deluding individual who is often quick to display his effeminate deportment on this forum when engaging others. And for that reason alone,for heaven's sake, please limit your presence on this forum to the women's section, henceforth!

Heautontimoroumenos by Charles Baudelaire (translated by William Aggeler) I shall strike you without anger And without hate, like a butcher, As Moses struck the rock! And from your eyelids I shall make The waters of suffering gush forth To inundate my Sahara. My desire swollen with hope Will float upon your salty tears Like a vessel which puts to sea, And in my heart that they'll make drunk Your beloved sobs will resound Like a drum beating the charge! Am I not a discord In the heavenly symphony, Thanks to voracious Irony Who shakes me and who bites me? She's in my voice, the termagant! All my blood is her black poison! I am the sinister mirror In which the vixen looks. I am the wound and the dagger! I am the blow and the cheek! I am the members and the wheel, Victim and executioner! I'm the vampire of my own heart — One of those utter derelicts Condemned to eternal laughter, But who can no longer smile! ///////////////////////////////////////////// P.S Here is the original poem in its native tongue... L'Héautontimorouménos Je te frapperai sans colère Et sans haine, comme un boucher, Comme Moïse le rocher Et je ferai de ta paupière, Pour abreuver mon Saharah Jaillir les eaux de la souffrance. Mon désir gonflé d'espérance Sur tes pleurs salés nagera Comme un vaisseau qui prend le large, Et dans mon coeur qu'ils soûleront Tes chers sanglots retentiront Comme un tambour qui bat la charge! Ne suis-je pas un faux accord Dans la divine symphonie, Grâce à la vorace Ironie Qui me secoue et qui me mord Elle est dans ma voix, la criarde! C'est tout mon sang ce poison noir! Je suis le sinistre miroir Où la mégère se regarde. Je suis la plaie et le couteau! Je suis le soufflet et la joue! Je suis les membres et la roue, Et la victime et le bourreau! Je suis de mon coeur le vampire, — Un de ces grands abandonnés Au rire éternel condamnés Et qui ne peuvent plus sourire! — Charles Baudelaire

^ Well that depends on whether Wikileaks will manage to outmaneuver the hundreds of hackers that governments and corporations around the world have hired to shut them down and to prevent them from ever publishing anymore leaks.

Originally posted by Sayid*Somal: quote: Originally posted by Mr. Somalia: However, that the clan system in Somalia has routinely been used as a leverage by conflicting parties and that often, the leaders of such conflicting parties continually emphasize the differences rather than similarities among clans, solely to exploit their immediate kinfolk, is irrefutable. Holy mackerel! this is called making sense - take note people even drivers of nonsense are capable making sense once in blue moon LOL @S*S! Sxb, I've never doubted that beneath that fug of buffoonery and incipient menopausal tantrums about the town of Qardho, that your ability to discern sensible speech from not-so-sensible speech was always unparalleled...even if, as you admit, it occurs once in every blue moon!! P.S Didn't I particularly instruct you to limit your hormonal gibberish to the Women's section of this forum, or does the tetanus shot I gave you last time require a boost now? S*S, unlike our gracious brother Duke, I will not hesitate to rip you a new hole whenever it is deemed necessary. :cool:

Waxaan maqli jirey,"qofkaas malag-giisi baa galey" I say Julian Asange is one brave dead man, if he keeps making the sort of enemies he's been assembling of late. Libaax libaax dhalay iga dheh!

Julian Assange answers your questions The founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, answers readers' questions about the release of more than 250,000 US diplomatic cables Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder. Photograph: Carmen Valino for the Guardian Fwoggie I'll start the ball rolling with a question. You're an Australian passport holder - would you want return to your own country or is this now out of the question due to potentially being arrested on arrival for releasing cables relating to Australian diplomats and polices? Julian Assange small Julian Assange: I am an Australian citizen and I miss my country a great deal. However, during the last weeks the Australian prime minister, Julia Gillard, and the attorney general, Robert McClelland, have made it clear that not only is my return is impossible but that they are actively working to assist the United States government in its attacks on myself and our people. This brings into question what does it mean to be an Australian citizen - does that mean anything at all? Or are we all to be treated like David Hicks at the first possible opportunity merely so that Australian politicians and diplomats can be invited to the best US embassy cocktail parties. girish89 How do you think you have changed world affairs? And if you call all the attention you've been given-credit ... shouldn't the mole or source receive a word of praise from you? Julian Assange small Julian Assange: For the past four years one of our goals has been to lionise the source who take the real risks in nearly every journalistic disclosure and without whose efforts, journalists would be nothing. If indeed it is the case, as alleged by the Pentagon, that the young soldier - Bradley Manning - is behind some of our recent disclosures, then he is without doubt an unparalleled hero. Daithi Have you released, or will you release, cables (either in the last few days or with the Afghan and Iraq war logs) with the names of Afghan informants or anything else like so? Are you willing to censor (sorry for using the term) any names that you feel might land people in danger from reprisals?? By the way, I think history will absolve you. Well done!!! Julian Assange: WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time there has been no credible allegation, even by organisations like the Pentagon that even a single person has come to harm as a result of our activities. This is despite much-attempted manipulation and spin trying to lead people to a counter-factual conclusion. We do not expect any change in this regard. distrot The State Dept is mulling over the issue of whether you are a journalist or not. Are you a journalist? As far as delivering information that someone [anyone] does not want seen is concerned, does it matter if you are a 'journalist' or not? Julian Assange small Julian Assange: I coauthored my first nonfiction book by the time I was 25. I have been involved in nonfiction documentaries, newspapers, TV and internet since that time. However, it is not necessary to debate whether I am a journalist, or how our people mysteriously are alleged to cease to be journalists when they start writing for our organisaiton. Although I still write, research and investigate my role is primarily that of a publisher and editor-in-chief who organises and directs other journalists. achanth Mr Assange, have there ever been documents forwarded to you which deal with the topic of UFOs or extraterrestrials? Julian Assange: Many weirdos email us about UFOs or how they discovered that they were the anti-christ whilst talking with their ex-wife at a garden party over a pot-plant. However, as yet they have not satisfied two of our publishing rules. 1) that the documents not be self-authored; 2) that they be original. However, it is worth noting that in yet-to-be-published parts of the cablegate archive there are indeed references to UFOs. gnosticheresy What happened to all the other documents that were on Wikileaks prior to these series of "megaleaks"? Will you put them back online at some stage ("technical difficulties" permitting)? Julian Assange: Many of these are still available at mirror.wikileaks.info and the rest will be returning as soon as we can find a moment to do address the engineering complexities. Since April of this year our timetable has not been our own, rather it has been one that has centred on the moves of abusive elements of the United States government against us. But rest assured I am deeply unhappy that the three-and-a-half years of my work and others is not easily available or searchable by the general public. CrisShutlar Have you expected this level of impact all over the world? Do you fear for your security? Julian Assange: I always believed that WikiLeaks as a concept would perform a global role and to some degree it was clear that is was doing that as far back as 2007 when it changed the result of the Kenyan general election. I thought it would take two years instead of four to be recognised by others as having this important role, so we are still a little behind schedule and have much more work to do. The threats against our lives are a matter of public record, however, we are taking the appropriate precautions to the degree that we are able when dealing with a super power. JAnthony Julian. I am a former British diplomat. In the course of my former duties I helped to coordinate multilateral action against a brutal regime in the Balkans, impose sanctions on a renegade state threatening ethnic cleansing, and negotiate a debt relief programme for an impoverished nation. None of this would have been possible without the security and secrecy of diplomatic correspondence, and the protection of that correspondence from publication under the laws of the UK and many other liberal and democratic states. An embassy which cannot securely offer advice or pass messages back to London is an embassy which cannot operate. Diplomacy cannot operate without discretion and the protection of sources. This applies to the UK and the UN as much as the US. In publishing this massive volume of correspondence, Wikileaks is not highlighting specific cases of wrongdoing but undermining the entire process of diplomacy. If you can publish US cables then you can publish UK telegrams and UN emails. My question to you is: why should we not hold you personally responsible when next an international crisis goes unresolved because diplomats cannot function. Julian Assange: If you trim the vast editorial letter to the singular question actually asked, I would be happy to give it my attention. cargun Mr Assange, Can you explain the censorship of identities as XXXXX's in the revealed cables? Some critical identities are left as is, whereas some are XXXXX'd. Some cables are partially revealed. Who can make such critical decisons, but the US gov't? As far as we know your request for such help was rejected by the State department. Also is there an order in the release of cable or are they randomly selected? Thank you. Julian Assange: The cables we have release correspond to stories released by our main stream media partners and ourselves. They have been redacted by the journalists working on the stories, as these people must know the material well in order to write about it. The redactions are then reviewed by at least one other journalist or editor, and we review samples supplied by the other organisations to make sure the process is working. rszopa Annoying as it may be, the DDoS seems to be good publicity (if anything, it adds to your credibility). So is getting kicked out of AWS. Do you agree with this statement? Were you planning for it? Thank you for doing what you are doing. Julian Assange: Since 2007 we have been deliberately placing some of our servers in jurisdictions that we suspected suffered a free speech deficit inorder to separate rhetoric from reality. Amazon was one of these cases. abbeherrera You started something that nobody can stop. The Beginning of a New World. Remember, that community is behind you and support you (from Slovakia). Do you have leaks on ACTA? Julian Assange: Yes, we have leaks on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a trojan horse trade agreement designed from the very beginning to satisfy big players in the US copyright and patent industries. In fact, it was WikiLeaks that first drew ACTA to the public's attention - with a leak. people1st Tom Flanagan, a [former] senior adviser to Canadian Prime Minister recently stated "I think Assange should be assassinated ... I think Obama should put out a contract ... I wouldn't feel unhappy if Assange does disappear." How do you feel about this? Julian Assange: It is correct that Mr. Flanagan and the others seriously making these statements should be charged with incitement to commit murder. Isopod Julian, why do you think it was necessary to "give Wikileaks a face"? Don't you think it would be better if the organization was anonymous? This whole debate has become very personal and reduced on you - "Julian Assange leaked documents", "Julian Assange is a terrorist", "Julian Assange alledgedly raped a woman", "Julian Assange should be assassinated", "Live Q&A qith Julian Assange" etc. Nobody talks about Wikileaks as an organization anymore. Many people don't even realize that there are other people behind Wikileaks, too. And this, in my opinion, makes Wikileaks vulnerable because this enables your opponents to argue ad hominem. If they convince the public that you're an evil, woman-raping terrorist, then Wikileaks' credibility will be gone. Also, with due respect for all that you've done, I think it's unfair to all the other brave, hard working people behind Wikileaks, that you get so much credit. Julian Assange: This is an interesting question. I originally tried hard for the organisation to have no face, because I wanted egos to play no part in our activities. This followed the tradition of the French anonymous pure mathematians, who wrote under the collective allonym, "The Bourbaki". However this quickly led to tremendous distracting curiosity about who and random individuals claiming to represent us. In the end, someone must be responsible to the public and only a leadership that is willing to be publicly courageous can genuinely suggest that sources take risks for the greater good. In that process, I have become the lightening rod. I get undue attacks on every aspect of my life, but then I also get undue credit as some kind of balancing force. tburgi Western governments lay claim to moral authority in part from having legal guarantees for a free press. Threats of legal sanction against Wikileaks and yourself seem to weaken this claim. (What press needs to be protected except that which is unpopular to the State? If being state-sanctioned is the test for being a media organization, and therefore able to claim rights to press freedom, the situation appears to be the same in authoritarian regimes and the west.) Do you agree that western governments risk losing moral authority by attacking Wikileaks? Do you believe western goverments have any moral authority to begin with? Thanks, Tim Burgi Vancouver, Canada Julian Assange: The west has fiscalised its basic power relationships through a web of contracts, loans, shareholdings, bank holdings and so on. In such an environment it is easy for speech to be "free" because a change in political will rarely leads to any change in these basic instruments. Western speech, as something that rarely has any effect on power, is, like badgers and birds, free. In states like China, there is pervasive censorship, because speech still has power and power is scared of it. We should always look at censorship as an economic signal that reveals the potential power of speech in that jurisdiction. The attacks against us by the US point to a great hope, speech powerful enough to break the fiscal blockade. rajiv1857 Hi, Is the game that you are caught up in winnable? Technically, can you keep playing hide and seek with the powers that be when services and service providers are directly or indirectly under government control or vulnerable to pressure - like Amazon? Also, if you get "taken out" - and that could be technical, not necessarily physical - what are the alternatives for your cache of material? Is there a 'second line' of activists in place that would continue the campaign? Is your material 'dispersed' so that taking out one cache would not necessarily mean the end of the game? Julian Assange: The Cable Gate archive has been spread, along with significant material from the US and other countries to over 100,000 people in encrypted form. If something happens to us, the key parts will be released automatically. Further, the Cable Gate archives is in the hands of multiple news organisations. History will win. The world will be elevated to a better place. Will we survive? That depends on you. logo2 That's it every one, thanks for all your questions and comments. Julian Assange is sorry that he can't answer every question but he has tried to cover as much territory as possible. Thanks for your patience with our earlier technical difficulties. SOURCE:

^ You guys should turn a blind eye to the customary envy of the hapless secessionists of SOL. It expected from President Faroole to not only visit the ruling officials of the middle east, but all across the world as well. Any visit by President Faroole that will attract trade and development resources to Puntland and Somalia should be embraced graciously.