FF It is not about Women´s dress code, Actually Bilan froced us into that path , but for me it´s about Men´s attitude. Men play the victim !!

Originally posted by Jamelia: So the Muslim dress is abnormal ey?.....I wonder what you'd consider normal? Muslim dress ? what is it? The Baduin cover? the Pakistani/Afghani Cover? The Somali 'Dirac' 'garbasar'? anything that covers ? Are jeans and sweater Muslim dress? are those who wear them non-muslims? Please enlighten me Jamelia.

^^ Well done patient Nr 231877 !! You belong to category 15,which means , ruined childhood, refugee camp knee injury, and a ' i wish i belonged to them ' libido, an engraved hatred. don´t worry fella , there is hope for your type too, a life time depression, voila. Actually i don´t take bride in your kin´s misery, but i woulden´t trade 10 of yours to 1 of mine .

Man these Moneys are smart,they know where the food is so they stay in the South. just imagine a hungery Monkey mother having kids hanging on her fighting with another hungery Human mother from ***** on an imported Banana. what a scene !!

^^ Good that you acknowledge the supremacy of the hloy USC in every aspect. Don´t you worry fellas, we got the USC spycho-rehab fund to take care of you. Just be men enough to admit and acknowledge the ' I hate the USC ' syndrome, we recognize one when we see one

Another house named Hotel? How about a 'Jad' 'Kat' 'Qat' peeling factory? That might create both work for the locals and promote a better hygine in chewing.

The USC did among other things create many Puntland psychotics !!

May he rest in peace !! We´ll ever be thankful of the joyfull monents he gave us.

Originally posted by bilan: i fail to understand how hijab protects men. Good point Bilan, You need to tell that to the Muslim men who get full of negative thoughts about you,and feel impure if you dress normally , who demand that you be covered from top to toe so they skip getting impure and negatively loaded, thus decide how you should dress. Originally posted by Yeniceri: there are dressing etiquette for the Muslim male as for the Muslim female. Its not a one-way street Even though most women think Men dress awfully ,they never create a societal etiquette of it, so please substantiate and tell us what is the dress code for Muslim Men. That Arabic white dress? The 'Mawis' and bare chest? ,You need to put up and real bad. Originally posted by Yeniceri: The hijab is the dignity Allah SWT has bestowed upon Muslim women. And dignity is priceless. Dignity is surely priceless, but the one you presented as a piece of clothing needs to be denoted and connoted again. There is more to Women´s dignity than a piece of clothing and negative thoughts of Men. Originally posted by Tukaale: For you info as well, men can't wear what they want, your believe is absolutely bulshit and has no wieght, Simple example can I wear Gold? What a reason what a logic , and which part of your body can you cover with Gold? Are we talking about golden pants? or Golden ' kofi ' ? For those Nomads who haven´t made sense , i just say 'BAH'

^^ Northerner, I neither understand Arabic nor is that thing , a shirt,sweater,Tshirt,vest etc etc. It is a dress and it is a oftenly white. I´m sorry if the term used is somehow offensive.

Originally posted by xiinfaniin: ^^This, I must admit, is a cohesive and well-organized piece of write-up in which you departed from your boring norm. ^^ which leavs me to wish that you´ve departed you ever boring first comment.

I´ve heard the pharoah/somali LINK before, but is it somehow confirmable ? The temptation to descend from the legendry pharoahs is soo irresistible.

One of the most interesting ,or perhaps disturbing things about male attitudes towards women in Islam is the assumption that women must bear the responsibility for men's virtue as well as their own. Women must not only keep themselves pure, but they must not act to cause men to have impure thoughts - that's why women must remain so covered. This Questions the 'Hijab' and all other covers that MUST be used inorder NOT to make men "Impure". A young Muslim man might say today when exposed to Western women in a Western setting. Rather than assuming the responsibility of maintaining a proper attitude towards others around him, this man blames those around him. He regards himself as enjoying the freedom to dress as he sees fit, maybe even waer that Arabic white dress or the Somali /sirilankan 'Mawis', but he can’t accord others the same freedom when it threatens to make him “impure.†Here i came to think of comments made by some religious sisters os SOL in another thread where 'hijab' was partially the subject matter.In that comment they bluntly accepted the tricky blame from Men and enjoyed having such an illusive impact on the men. The need to be admired maybe preceded the right to be girl/women In this way, those who are having the negative thoughts and who end up enforcing repression against others, namely MEN become the victims of their sordid little morality play. As victims, they assume the authority to take control and see to it that no more evil happens again . not by controlling themselves, but by controlling Women. The point of this control is to limit the ability of women to dress how they please and express themselves how they please, limitations not placed similarly on men. Thusly some religious sisters here on SOL are sadly high in credulity that they give in to the 'Victim' trick of men . Adding to the imposition of greater restrictions on women, explained as necessary due to their inability to control themselves and their negative effect on men, renders them 'a must be controlled-class of citizens' in the Muslim Wolrd. Strange as it may seem,the right to wear slacks or short skirts is actually part of the right of women to be fully equal members of society. Why? Because it represents their ability to be seen on their own terms, rather than allowing men to determine how women should be viewed. , The right i´m talking about here conforms the right to even be wrong which is a basic human right. Furthermore, it demonstrates that women no more need to be controlled by men than men need to be controlled by others. It places men and women on an equal plane while in public. what is your take?

Sheh, Lemme just assure ya that a logical conclusion can be made from the provided Info. p.s .. Keeping you awake should be my Job

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies and rivers at the bottom of it too?

Sheh , not sure, is not good enough. We ask Castro and Ahura ? UD , check Nr 2: Callypso did not have Anjera.

Daanyeer and Sotic .. Very close you were MonkeyMan check Nr 5: Ngonge did not have Coffee.

Garaad, Your suggestion is WRONG. Check Nr 11: Ahura did not have coffee. You´ll win a year Membership in the SOL geek club.

Ngonge, Ahura,Callypso,Foxy and Castro had each a diffrent breakfast ( Anjera, Yogurt, Donuts,Sabayed and Sambusa ) they also hade something different to drink( Coffee, Shah,Balbelmo juice,Cano Geel,Tufax Juice) The question is who ate what , given that ...... 1: The person who had Anjera did not have Tufax juice. 2: Callypso did not have Anjera. 3: Ngonge did not have Sambusa or Balbelmo juice. 4: Ahura did not have Cano Geel. 5: Ngonge did not have coffee. 6: Castro likes to drink either Shah or Tufax juice for breakfast. 7: Ngonge did not have donuts or Cano Geel. 8: The person who had Anjera also had Cano Geel. 9: The person who had Sabayed did not have Cano Geel. 10: Foxy likes to drink eitherTufax juice or coffee for breakfast. 11: Ahura did not have coffee. 12: The person who had Anjera did not have Shah. 13: The person who had donuts also had coffee. 14: Castro did not have a Sabayed. 15: Ngonge did not have Sabayed or Tufax juice. 16: Ngonge did not have donuts. If you figure this out , you´re qualified for a membership in a secret Club.

Originally posted by Curling Waterfall: On a serious note. Everytime I read one of these articles, I’m shocked at the passiveness of these women. How can they let their rights be taken away? How can they not make a difference if they constitute half the nation? And how can they live in the 21st century and be so backward thinking? grrrr You´re a one bloody lucky "UKHTI" init?

It is unislamic for a woman without 'Mehram' to dine out. You guyz know what thea means right ? yeah, A 'Mehram' leasing company sure is a booming business there.

So they mean that Castro is related to Mohammed (pbuh) ? I´m not surprised !!

^^ I´m convinced that where one stands is quite irrelevant here, all one can do is accept the reality that unfolds infront of one. Simple as that, the alternative is to philosophize.

A new marketing trick, 0,0001% of the profit goes to my Clan charity fond.

From my point of view it´s the Taxi drivers´type of marketing we´re witnessing here. "To hell you may head ,i drive thee"