Fabregas

Nomads
  • Content Count

    5,368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fabregas

  1. duke; hey that was back in the days but in 2008 he collaborated with the enemies of Somaliweyn; then yeey got played by Jenday And got used and slapped by Tigrays So now he spends his days in Yemen visitng graves As they say: Aryey don't hate the game and appreciate. your uncle got politically slayed.
  2. Originally posted by Naxar Nugaaleed: quote:Originally posted by Al Zeylaci: quote: Originally posted by Naxar Nugaaleed: whenever the need arises, contrary to popular believes, these Sufis picked what ever was available to them and defended themselves i.e, the darwiish and the followers of Ahmed Gurey. There is no connection or comparison between these modern "Sufis" and the likes of Sayid Muhamad. If anything, they are the antithesis of such men. Why are they the antithesis, because you disagree with them? Are both groups not Sufi, are they both not fighting for their country? Because Ahmad Gurey( rahmihullah)fought and died to free the Muslim populace in the HORN of from the tyranical Abysnian rulers. Likewise, Sayid Muhamad Abdullah Hassan launched his first mission against the army of Menelik who was occupying the Somali territories, and then he try to free SOmalis from white colonialism for a long time.Also, Sayid Muhamad and his dervishes were in extreme opposition to the Qadiriyah who they felt were apologetic or unconcerned about Italian colonialism. The modern day Sufiya, in contrast, are apologetic or in collaboration with the Xabashi colonists in the SOmali inhabited region. They give many Islamic excuses(bogus) for the people not to defend themselves against the Tigray. So, Sayid Muhamad and his likes are free from such people.
  3. ^^WTH :confused: (i was being sarcastic).
  4. Originally posted by Recovering-Romantics : Al Zeylaci, It is precisely this specific mentality of completely ignoring the wrongs being done by one group while at the same time exaggerating the ones done by the other party. AL Shabab and its partner in anarchy Hizb-Ul-Islam have admitted to receiving arms and financing from Eritrea. Al Shabab openly parades Wanted International Jihadists and invites many more to come to Somalai with the promise of Somali concubines and rich farmlands. They openly state that their agenda is to bring Islam to Japan and Alaska and "liberate" Palestine. Suicide bombers are blowing themselves in crowded residential areas. Wars are being waged from residential neighborhoods and former accomplices to murder such as former advisers to Abdullahi Yusuf are being added to their ranks. When are you going to criticize the behavior of Al Shabab and HUI and OBJECTIVELY look at the mess we are in? SXB, I find it ironic that, you, someone who can't bring it upon himself to make the slightest criticism of Saint Shariff, should lecture others about being objective. FYI, I condemn some of Alshabab and XI policies and tactics. However, their tactics are not an excuse for Amnisoms purpose shelling of Somali civilians. Their tactics are not an excuse that Xabashis should reenter SOmalia; that Ahmed Walad Abullah and Shariff should sell Somalia's sea; that IGAD should try to colonise Somalia; and, that IGAD should call to economically starve Somalis like they did in Ciraq. Shariff wrote a letter to the UN when he was in Asmara, condemning the shelling of Amnisom as gross crimes against Somalis. I find it disgraceful that he, you, or any others should today refer to it with such names like " self defense". Again, I see no difference between this shelling by the cowardly amnsiom and the one during Yusufs reign. SXB, I was the biggest defender of SHariff on this forum when duke and co use to diss and call him snich/clan courts, etc. But I can't defend this man when he is reading from the same, foreign written script as his predeccesor. good day, and don't take it personal, SXB.
  5. Originally posted by Recovering-Romantics : quote:Originally posted by Al Zeylaci: Proposal to starve Somalis by blocking of Somali airports and ports by the foreign Igad( Ethiopia and Kenya)= good foreign Ethiopians rentering= no comment foreign Amnisom bombarding SOmalis= extremely good three Arabs fighting alongside Shababs= a foreign invasion. inalilah- :confused: AMISOM Bombarding "innocent" Somalis= Self-Defense is understandable Foreign Ethiopians "re-enter"= unsubstantiated Blocking Ports that serve as entry points for International Terrorist and weapons=Exceedingly Good Arabs fighting in Somalia massacring fellow Muslims while their Palestine cries for help= Hypocrisy and greed-motivated Ethiopians rentering has been substantiated by Somalis witness. It is well known, unless you want to play the Abdullah Yusuf cheerleaders game; I know you is to grown up for that, sxb. Anyway, good to see you think it is oright for Adeer Shariff to kill his own, but Yusuf wasn't allowed. Juje, we are not talking about that issue. Killing Muslims and blowing yourself up is haram fullstop, but it isn't a foreign invasion. Don't you think it is slightly hypocritical for him not to apologise for the Amnisom bombardment, instead praise them,and support the blocking of SOmali ports by Igad, and then talk about a foreign invasion. :confused:
  6. Proposal to starve Somalis by blocking of Somali airports and ports by the foreign Igad( Ethiopia and Kenya)= good foreign Ethiopians rentering= no comment foreign Amnisom bombarding SOmalis= extremely good three Arabs fighting alongside Shababs= a foreign invasion. inalilah- :confused:
  7. what does dhaxal gal mean? (ps. I see that he failed to mention the rentry of Xabashis into Somalia and the bombardement of Amnisom negroes from his compound. Foreign invasion, eh?
  8. meiji would rather talk about and blame Eritrea.
  9. Good move. Next they should ban the internet and force all men to wear green turbans and white thobes.
  10. Originally posted by Naxar Nugaaleed: whenever the need arises, contrary to popular believes, these Sufis picked what ever was available to them and defended themselves i.e, the darwiish and the followers of Ahmed Gurey. There is no connection or comparison between these modern "Sufis" and the likes of Sayid Muhamad. If anything, they are the antithesis of such men.
  11. Originally posted by J.a.c.a.y.l.b.a.r.o: The "peace caravan" is fighting this time. It turned to be a "War Caravan" ,,, Haye Xiin, how did the plan go so far ??? war kada. Xiin, might accuse you of wishing for war.
  12. @Bob; Newcastle sacked a manager who got to llth in the table because he wasn't a mythical geordie and he a thing for the long ball. Now they are done, they fully deserve it.They should get managers on creditinials, not whether they were footballing or legend fan sentiment. For sure, Allardyce would have kept them up.
  13. Hadra with AK47. Wale Alshabab must have oppressed these guys. :confused:
  14. ^^ So what, that a region respects him? Ayam Tahawhiri. :confused: This is your first claim: quote: In their camps, they listen sheekh Umul of Nairobi, don’t be fooled Omer Iimaan does not represent them. The implication of this statement is that; 1. We are being fooled 2. Umar Iman is not really there leader 3. Sheikh Umal has more influence on them. What refutes this claim is that this group has rejected the decision of the council of scholars which was to give Amnisom three months to leave and not touch them. Of course one gets the feeling that, like a typical hard headed Somali, you will argue about your misleading claim and defend it all night and day. (good night bro.)
  15. Adeer, Kashafa is not here, marka bring something else to the table. As usual when you are wrong, you obfuscate and bring some fancy words. Sxb, you said Xizbul listens to Sheikh Umal, implying that he holds influence over them. Now, either retract that claim or stand by it. As for the rest( which was mostly nonsense), perhaps you might have had a point a couple of weeks ago, but today your caravan has exposed its true colours; and here you are cheering for amnisom tanks shelling your own people and the secular warlords who destroyed Somalia for the past 15 years. I hope you prepare the Ayats of evidence for Allah cazawajal.
  16. ^^ don't know what you're on about. Suffice it to say: ittaqillaha rabakum, Sheikh Umal was part of the council of Scholars and he has nothing to with any particular organisation let alone Xizbul Islam. Nor do they even listen to him.
  17. Originally posted by xiinfaniin: In their camps, they listen sheekh Umul of Nairobi, don’t be fooled Omer Iimaan does not represent them. They are not the problem.
  18. i wonder if these brothers could be solers. i ps. didn't the hospital break confidentiality rules...........?
  19. ^^ He conveniently leaves out the part when a certain young sheikh waved an ak47 and declared war on Ethiopian troops on multiple occasions. What he is talking about is the last minuted negotiations which failed due to 7 seven day deadlines, but the war was already set in motion by many events( including Sheikh Shariffs calls to war). Unless Xiin is saying that the sheikh was controlled and forced to declar war..........
  20. Originally posted by wacdaraha_aduunka: Get your facts straights brother never mind.
  21. Bro, please for the sake of sanity, watch part 6 0f 6 and tell me that: 1. He doesn't say Alshabab is controlled by Jews; 2. That he doesn't claim they don't allow people to protestag ainst Israel in the towns they control in Somalia and that anyone who does so is shot; 3. lastly, that there are Jews masquarading as Muslim Sheikhs in Saudi Arabia? ps. Ibn Saud sought help from the British against his ally, but he never supported Zionism. In fact, he was the harshest critic of the plan to create a Jewish state in Palestine. Google his letter to the British. There is also no prove that Saudi clan are jews- apart from internet conspiracies. Also, he does say that Jews paid Qacida to carry out 911 and no jews died there.