Your both wrong in my view. Dr Kennedy before alshabab an authority called the Islamic union a people led movement brought peace to all southern Somalia and they were attacked due to American foreign policy and Ethiopia was given the green light by the United States to invade. Alshabab is another movement. Not as liberal but a force that has brought effective control and stability to the parts of Somalia they control. Somalia does not need any foreign troops. If the Islamic courts union and alshabab managed to bring peace then any credible force that has the genuine support of the people should be able to. The confused fake nationalist malister and his brothers the African union forces will not bring peace to Somalia. In the history of the world a occupying force has only created a worser situation not better. You and the hag warrior here fake nationalist pro raping his own sister. How are thousands of Kenyans in kismayo and thousands of Ugandans in mugdisho going to help you build an army. Or a state for that matter. Malister hag online warrior. We all know that this government isn't going anywhere. They don't have the genuine support of the people because they are an extention of corruption and warlordism. It's just warlordism behind African union forces. In regards to Somaliland hag warrior. Ethiopians can not arrest any Somaliland citizen in Somaliland. If the government hands over a single Muslim they are wrong to do so. The people of Somaliland are anti Ethiopian and galo. Ethiopia is a naibour and if you send condolences to the death of a leader of a regional state nothing wrong with that Muslim or christien. The caliph and the prophet (pbuh) use to write letters to foreign powers.

Bandits put cumamads on and "surrender" fake propaganda. Furthermore fake tribal nationalist malister... Those were not my words they were yours. How can anyone take seriously a man who justifies the rape of the most vulnerable aspects of society by foreign people who have no right to be on his soil. Who slap around his so called amazing army. That can't take and hold a village.

Hahaha... I am telling you what every military expert and journal are telling you. To state the facts is not confusion. What's confused is a polytheist who denies the facts and rules out everyone because of his preconceived ideas., the West tells me they are bad so they must be bad...I don't have to agree with them in everything they do. Like I have stated some things they do are wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYVZdUDCupg

Air power will take infrastructure and a few vehicles here and their but nothing substantial. Because they are their and not detured. To show the fallacy of this plan. Ask yourselves... Who are the forces. Land forces against the Islamic State. The Iraqi army: no chance, they run away all the time and have not been able to take any terrority other then one village with American airs up cover after 2 months. The kurds. Think about it. All the teritory of the kurds fell to Islamic State in 2 weeks. Week three Islamic State was 10 miles from kurdish capital Erbil. To this day other then the mosul dam no other significant victory for kurds. Anywhere Syrian opposition. No need to discuss waste of time.. I have read my war journals and they are all saying the Islamic State can not be defeated with air power alone and no credible forces on the ground. They want America to bomb them giving them international legitimacy and making America bleed more trillions in money.

They have captured 70% of the country but the army is not upto the job of defeating alshabab. The African union did the fighting and keep you in power and the reason why you aren't up to the job of defeating alshabab is because your bandits... I mean army can't capture a village on their own. .. Hence why this whole entire thing is a joke...

I know your use to reading trailer Park newspapers like the sun and daily mail but Thought I'd continue educating you. From what I have read they have large segments of Iraq's old army highly skilled. A few examples to prove the article is correct is.. 1. Expansion of Isis into south Baghdad 2. The fall of Ramadi 3. The expansion and conquering of 80 kurdish villages from Iraq to syria They haven't lost any territory they have evacuated all government building, changed their operations, etc Xabad pray to the monkey God that they get stopped. Haha...

2 million dollar looted from the starving people of Somalia by the president who needs approval by foreign mercaneries to take a piss while they rape his neice in the next roo will be given to anyone who can turn in alshabab. Malister your a joke....

Haha hahaha.... Malister has your so called government stopped the daily rapes of Somali women by African Union mercaneries that you support? What was that you said last week. I remember "who cares if Somali women get raped by African union troops, if they didn't someone would"

Since Islamic State (Isis) were formed in their current incarnation in April last year, they have had a dilemma: how to gain legitimacy from the local population while continuing to be ruthless and genocidal against fellow Sunnis. The decision by the American-led coalition to strike against Isis while overlooking the Assad regime seems to have resolved this dilemma for the jihadist organisation. What Isis will lose in terms of strength and numbers as a result of the air strikes they might gain in terms of legitimacy. Air strikes against Isis were inevitable, as the group’s advances towards Baghdad, Erbil and northern Syria seemed irreversible by local forces. But the way the US-led coalition, which the UK has now joined, has conducted itself so far threatens to worsen the situation in favour of Isis. Most importantly, by overlooking the regime of Bashar al-Assad, which caused the death of nearly 200,000 Syrians, the air strikes create the perception that the international coalition is providing a lifeline to the regime. Despite repeated reassurance by Washington, such a perception is likely to become entrenched if the Assad regime begins to fill the vacuum left by the offensive against Isis, especially that there has been no evidence yet that the opposition forces are part of the military strategy against Isis. The regime might deliberately step up its campaign in some areas to retake areas it has recently lost to the jihadist group to reinforce that perception, as Syrian officials were quick to issue statements that the regime had been briefed about the air raids before they were launched.Many Syrian rebel factions, including ones directly financed by the Americans and the Gulf states, expressed reservations about, or opposition to, the air strikes, including Harakat Hazm, Division 13, Suqour al-Sham. The significance of such statements is that they are issued by groups currently operating in areas outside Isis control but which are adjacent to Isis front lines. That makes them more capable than other groups of being part of potential ground forces to attack Isis under air cover. Even though some of these groups made such pronouncements mostly for practical reasons, since they are the ones who will bear the consequences of any failure to dislodge Isis as they fight on the ground, they are also concerned that the international campaign will aid the Assad regime. Regionally, the offensive against Isis has received a similar cynical reaction from groups and people in the Middle East. The Muslim Brotherhood, including prominent figures such as Doha-based Yusuf al-Qaradawi, condemned the attacks inside Syria. Arab countries that have participated in the international military campaign including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan, have been particularly criticised for failing to push for a formula that undermines Isis and Assad at the same time. In comparison, Iran opposed the air strikes against Isis in Syria while Turkey made it clear that the offensive would fail without moves to undermine the Assad regime, including a no-fly zone. These attitudes mean that Isis are set to gain from the international campaign against them, if the current strategy does not change. Based on conversations with people from eastern Syria, including Isis members and sympathisers, the offensive against Isis seems to have already achieved one thing for the jihadi group: to push some Isis members who were on the periphery into their core, and neutralise some of their Islamist opponents. Many of Isis members are new to the group and they are still ideologically uncertain. But since Isis are now face to face with a numerically exaggerated alliance led by Washington, Isis members who could otherwise shift away from the group have become more determined adherents. Isis can afford to lose their supply lines, infrastructure and many of their members – who are likely to be among the ones who recently joined it – as long as they can compensate by achieving popular recognition. They are already adapting to the campaign, reducing checkpoints (now mostly mobile) to a minimum and relocating weapons warehouses to safe areas in both Iraq and Syria. People inside Syria say most of the bases or facilities hit by air strikes had been already emptied. While the air raids will surely undermine Isis’s ability to generate revenue by disrupting supply lines from factories or oilfields, Isis can survive without such easy-money resources. Also, it is important to highlight that Isis have established an intricate sleeper cell system that has not been unveiled, even when they felt secure in their territories. Legitimacy for the fight against Isis cannot be achieved by simply having Sunni countries involved in it, but, rather, by addressing the true reasons that drove tens of thousands of Syrians to rise up against the regime. Regardless of who is involved in the campaign, the perception is that the allies have overlooked the acts of the Assad regime over the past three years and quickly assembled a major international coalition against a group that the Syrian rebels have been fighting since last summer. Unless the strategy against Isis shifts to a broader one that appeals to the local communities, the fight against it is doomed.

More wars mean more money...more money means more debt...I don't think you guys understand how much....4-6 trillion dollars...

As long as they Sunni muslim....let the ummah grow...

News report from zionist news limited Fox news... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPIZ4_UnEF0

Libyan Militias Seize Control of Capital as Chaos Rises By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK SEPTEMBER 1, 2014 CAIRO — The government of Libya said Monday that it had lost control of its ministries to a coalition of militias that had taken over the capital, Tripoli, in another milestone in the disintegration of the state. “The government reiterates that these buildings and the public headquarters are not safe and inaccessible, because they are under the control of armed men,” the government said in a statement. It was issued from the eastern city of Tobruk, where the recently elected Parliament has convened in territory controlled by a renegade general who has tried to stage a coup d’état. The statement indicated the emergence of two rival centers of government —

Trillions spent in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya, Egypt now Syria...no improvement. No victory.... Trillions being flushed down the toilet....

INTERNATIONAL AL JAZEERA Deadly Taliban offensive gains ground in east Afghanistan An attack by an estimated 700 Taliban fighters that began five days ago has left more than 100 people dead September 26, 2014 2:45PM ET Hundreds of Taliban fighters have stormed a strategic district in an Afghan province southwest of the capital and are on the verge of capturing it after killing dozens of people and beheading some in days of fighting, officials said Friday. The Ghazni provincial government has lost contact with police in the province's western district of Ajrestan, said Asadullah Safi, deputy police chief of the area. An army unit reported that fighting was raging late on Friday afternoon, another provincial official said. "If there is no urgent help from the central government, the district will collapse," Safi said earlier. The battle for Ajrestan illustrates the grave challenges facing Afghanistan's new president and the security forces in holding territory as foreign combat troops prepare to withdraw at the end of the year. No longer pinned down by U.S. air cover, Taliban fighters are attacking Afghan military posts in large numbers with the aim of taking and holding ground. Ghazni is on the main highway linking Kabul to southern Afghanistan, where the Taliban have been making advances in recent months. The attack by an estimated 700 Taliban fighters began about five days ago and early reports were that more than 100 people had been killed, including 15 who were beheaded by the fighters, said provincial deputy governor Ahmadullah Ahmadi. Fearing that the Taliban would gain even more ground, Ahmadi told Al Jazeera he was calling for increased support from the central government. However, the province is in a remote region and difficult to reach. Many of the civilians killed were either family members of local police or lived in villages where local police have battled the Taliban before, Ahmadi said. The Taliban told Al Jazeera on Friday that they were intent on taking Ajrestan and had sent hundreds of fighters to the area to achieve that goal. The group also claimed it had killed 40 policemen. Safi said a suicide car bomber attacked a police checkpoint early on Friday before provincial authorities lost contact with the district. By late Friday afternoon, officials had contacted an army unit that reported that fighting was still going on, Ahmadi said. The Taliban are fighting to expel U.S.-led foreign forces and the U.S.-backed Kabul government. 'Difficult to handle' Control of Ghazni's mountainous Ajrestan district, about 125 miles from Kabul, could provide the Taliban with a launching point for attacks in two bordering provinces and along the crucial artery connecting the capital to Afghanistan's second city of Kandahar in the south. The growing Taliban threat is likely to be the most urgent challenge for the new, U.S.-brokered government of national unity between President-elect Ashraf Ghani and his former rival Abdullah Abdullah. Provincial authorities have appealed for help from the central government in Kabul, where Ghani is in the process of taking over the presidency from Hamid Karzai. "We have asked repeatedly for helicopters to evacuate the wounded, but so far nothing has been done," Ahmadi said. Months of deadlock over a disputed election and uncertainty over whether any U.S. troops will remain beyond this year has battered morale among Afghan security forces. "Peace with the Taliban requires a strong government. At the moment, the Taliban think they can fight in every province and they believe they can overthrow the government," said Haji Mohammad Mohaqiq, Abdullah's running mate and the leader of Afghanistan's ethnic Hazara minority. "Without international support it will be hard to provide security ... The example of Ajrestan district shows that without international commitment of troops, it will be difficult to handle the Taliban."

If I was garbage you wouldn't waste your time commenting on it. But this is what scares atheists, secularists, monarchies and polytheist like xabad. The reality is with an Islamic Chaliphate in place the West could not do anything it was in retreat in the heart of Europe. In India polytheist like xabad were converting in mass and the temples to hanuman were being demolished and mosques erupted. The middle east was stable and prosperous so prosperous that logs show hardly anyone needed to take Zakat money. Iraq was the centre of the world for knowledge along with Spain. Now look... Xabads Hindu nationalist run India persecuting 150 million people Muslims. Pakistan is being destabilised by drones, Afghanistan the home of the moghaul has been invaded by the British the soviets and the Americans since the Collapse of the Islamic Chaliphate. The middle was divided, Islam removed secularism, Arabisim, Somalism, and more filth spread... Muslims want to return to the greatest political system the world has ever known. We don't want individualism, we don't want secularism, we don't want communism, we want a free Muslim world free to determine its own future The United States is the greatest terrorist state in human history think about it. Killed the native population, enslaved 16 million black people, took half of Mexico by force. Nuked Japan invaded over 80 nations directly or indirectly... Ooohhhh my God we have to fight the Islamic State they are killing yazidis Bullsh/t The West declared war on Islam the day the Muslim army reached the gates of Austria

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--op2bDLp_Q

Now imagine your an ego centric French men or English men and you have no resources but are so hungry you would steal it if you had to because supremecy is what your after. Imagine you land in West Africa and you hear the Adhan and people praying, then you go to India and you here people praying and adhan, then you go to indonesia and the same, eastern Europe and southern Russia the same. Heey, wait a minute. We can never break these societies because they have a core set of principles that make it difficult for us to even live among them let alone exploit them and take their resources. So, what's plan b... We destroy their concept of Islam... How do we do that.... Nationalism, secularism, individualism, materialism.... And that's what happened.... And that is why today they over through the Islamic courts union even though it was peaceful, they backed the overthrown of the Muslim brotherhood of Egypt, that's why they arm and support the death of Palestinians, that's why they don't want to help the Syrians, that's why they help shias because they know they are different. That's why after 200 hundred thousand dead Muslims they are bombing the only effective force fighting assad the Islamic State. Seriously... And if you say anything your a terrorist... Seriously people... This is the world we live in today May God protect us from evil and restore the Muslim nations will and ability to govern their own affairs and determine their own destiny

The Islamic empire of West Africa http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqB5LYNPes4

The moghaul empire ruled India for 1000 years. It's leader at one stage was the richest man in the world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGFygO5w8O4

Salahudin gave free access to all Christians to the sea to leave safety after he reconquered Jerusalem. He also gave free access and passage to all Christians who wanted to make pilgrimage to Jerusalem. This is after christien Crusaders killed everyone inside Jerusalem when they conquered it.

Islamic spain gave Europe the concept of multiculturalism and advances in science that led and gave birth to the birth of Europe's rebirth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQMNV3IUJuc

The Ottoman. Conquered half of Europe and reached the gates of Vienna. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw66_DkuIyM

If you focus and read between the lines. When the vice guy asked him all your saying is we should just leave you alone an let you rule yourselves with the sharia. He changes and says... Everything aside....... That's all we want. Clearly two characters... One for show and one more subtle. I have read the quran cover to cover and in all honosty I don't know if it's the same quran these guys read that's why I am astonished. That's because most of them don't examine the context with the surah were first revealed. Islam is just it does give you the right to fight back. However even that has conditions. I don't see how you can justify fighting Muslim kurds. Or beheading a British guy part of an aid convoy to syria. At the same time the United States created this mess and the Islamic State is a byproduct of failed American foreign policy in the middle east. The support for dictatorship and anti democratic forces, monarchies etc because they are pro American while combating forces like alqaeda and Islamic State because they are anti America is the biggest double standards. Come on 2 hundred thousand dead Syrians killed by assad not one bomb dropped on them... Instead it's all dropped on the Islamic state. The United States is the biggest piece of shit on this earth. These Saudi and uae how come they are not bombing assad? America tells them come and they run. Something is wrong with that... We all know that. You wanna combat extremism... Easy. 1.Stop support of Israel 2. stop supporting dictatorships and monarchies. 3. Let the region develop or evolve naturally. 4. Support the popular will of the masses. That's it. Simple as that Turn hatred into love for America