Somalia;975723 wrote: We are in a situation where secessionists believe climate determines how good-looking you are, no wonder they worship the British white man. Giving your women to the British: http://beenaywaarun.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/amiina-herself-broke-spell-by.html?m=1 Begging the British to fight for him: The New York Times, pg. 8 Nov 22, 1914 Jubaland Chiefs Send Plea to England to Join the Army London, Nov. 10 – the London Times has received from a correspondent a copy of a petition signed by the principal Somali chiefs in Jubaland, asking that they be allowed to fight for England. The document is as follows: To His Highness the Governor, Through the Hakim of Jubaland Salaams, yea, many salaams, with God’s mercy, blessing, and peace. After Salaams, We, the Somali of Jubaland, both (sub clans of d block), comprising all the tribes desire humbly to address you. In former days the Somali have fought against the Government. Even lately the ******* have fought against the Government. Now we have heard that the German Government have declared war on the English government. Behold, our "fitna" against the English Government is finished. As the Monsoon wind drives the sand hills of our coast into new forms, so does this this news of German evil-doing drive our hearts and spears into the service of the English Government. The Jubaland Somali are with the English Government. Daily in our mosques we pray for the success of the English armies. Day is as night and night is as day with us until we hear that the English are victorious. God knows the right. He will help the right. We have heard that the Indian Askaris have been sent to fight for us in Europe. Humbly we ask why should not the Somali fight for England also. We beg the Government to allow our warriors to show their loyalty. In former days the Somali tribes made fitna against each other. Even now it is so: it is our custom; yet with the Government against the Germans we are as one, ourselves, our warriors, our women, and our children. By God it is so. A few days ago many troops of the military left this country to eat up the Germans who have invaded our country in Africa. May God prosper them. Yet, Oh Hakim, with all humbleness we desire to beg of the Government to allow our sons and warriors to take part in this great war against the German evildoer. They are ready. They are eager. Grant them the boon. God and Mohammed is with us all. If Government wish to take away all the troops and police from Jubaland, it is good. We pledge ourselves to act as true Government askaries until they return. We humbly beg that this our letter may be place at the feet of our King and Emperor, who lives in England, in token of our loyalty and our prayers. Picture of your ancestors: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_m0M-Xf8uU-E/R8jwlgq8r_I/AAAAAAAAAAk/uMuqoXQT0XQ/s1600-h/julandsomalis.bmp --------------------- Saxib d block worshiped every foreign power in east Africa except the French. They were he foot soldiers of abbysinian forces, they gave their daughters to the british: dc of burco married a d block women, dc bari married to d block women. they even had d block little boys runnig around as butlers and were described as the best ilalos by the british because of what the british called their enate qualities hahaha... provide me with your sources I will through the history book at you. Your fake history won't work here. Even history shows your people don't have a single nationalist bone. Hiding behind Kenyan and Ethiopian tanks in the 21st century like ages ago.

uchi;975643 wrote: Why are Somaliland people so ugly? I always wondered. Garoodi? They say judge a man by his character and not his appearance. If good looks won wars your people would still lose uchi and would still come last. That merciless scortching sun of Bari region no wonder your obsessed with Jubinka.

Mad_Mullah;975617 wrote: ^ IF we discover oil. lol. That's how they plan for the future. Speak for yourself Saxib. We are doing fine just using our wit and ba))s its a shame I can't say the same for your enclave. No allies. No resources, no people, no democracy, not even ba))s

One of my fav cities. All you can eat steak, beautiful scenery, good people, amazing tea. Great shopping. cheap and good hotels. Reer awdal mashallah Inshallah ilahay gives you more. Haven't been in like 5 years. Amazing town.

^^^^ Link north and south Galkacyo and remove the division if you are genuine about Somalinimo and being a government. The green line. Make Galkacyo one united city. Forget the road to Burco it won't happen. If we discover oil we can build one of these on the Somaliland Somalia border. With mines and dog patrols.

Che -Guevara;975612 wrote: First thing, I don't live in Puntland nor I do represent the people and the place so madly in love with. So, it's political path is not for me to decide. Secondly, Somaliland (which you have appointed yourself to be its representative) owes its entire existence to tribal movement! Puntland is honest enough to say it represents a particular tribe. Somaliland represents a tribe unless years of drinking your own coolaid did serious damage. For cancer thing, that's neither here nor there I would advise that you seriously read up on the history of SOMALILAND before plucking from thin air. The war of liberation was of a one section of somalilanders that is true. But even the SNM had one objective never to break up the somali republic. We owe to them the end of the dictatorship and the liberation of the country but unlike in the south once the land was liberated they surrendered all authority back to the people. It was the people who came to mutual agreement that after 40 years of union the benefits were minimal. Every tribe in SOMALILAND is a signatory to the end of the Somalia/SOMALILAND union as I have proven in this forum with signatures themselves even las canod folk who claim they hadn't have. I am not a representative of SOMALILAND. I represent my own views based on the research that I have done and seen. Do you as an Ethiopian somali represent the somali people's of Ethiopia ??? No so again jumping to conclusions I see. In regards to issue of cancer: you still have not given me even a satisfactory argument on why they are not a cancer? So that in part shows the weakness of your argument

Che -Guevara;975498 wrote: A case of the kettle calling the bottom black And cancer you say, haha We have a multiparty democracy and have held numerous elections deemed free and fair by international observers. Based on a one man one vote method we had Dahir riyale Kahin as president of the republic for 8 years. The day you can hold an election or elect some one who is not the same sub sub sub clan then get back to me. Yes cancer can you tell me why they are not a cancer I have given you my reasons?

Somalia;975606 wrote: Many secessionists are obsessed with a certain people, the threads they (Xaaji Habaar, Saalax Fox, Carafaat Carte Qaalib and GAROODI "doesn't deserve a nickname") post is an overwhelming indication of these individuals. It's called cuqdad . Cuqdad is the changing of somali history to suit a people who have no proud history amongst the Somalis (if you do please enlighten). Cuqdad is attempting to dominate others even though historically its known full well you don't have a single fighting bone, cuqdad is the ungodly attempt to wipe out an entire people using the arms they paid for in the name of hegemony and consequently getting wiped out yourself. Cuqdad is bringing shame to the somali speaking people by constantly being used as a tool of foreign nations be it Ethiopia and Kenya and being he first Somalis to raise an Ethiopian flag on somali soil, cuqdad is living off the welfare of the somali state and when the rightful owners take back their tax dollars calling them mor¥an. cuqdad is opposing a president and making his job harder simply because he is hag. Saxib open your eyes out of all the somali people: every man is content with what god gave him except you because you inhabit regions were animals couldnt survive in let alone people. And no one is more cuqdad full then your people problem with hag problem with duriyada. Deep servitude of Kenya and Ethiopia.

^^^ A purely tribalist fiefdom that has undermined every attempt to pacify Somalia based on fair terms because of an enate desire for more power. Lets not forget they came to mugdisho on the back of Ethiopian tanks and were proud of it. Assisting Ethiopia in toppling the Islamic courts. They have constantly been anti government from the day Hassan shieck was elected for what reason??? Simple: its not federalism it's because he is hag simple. The elections was a flop. No one know what they actually control and even their own people don't like the admin. This is not hoyada midnimada. Wa cancer Saxib. I don't really see any real gains to be had from opening dialogue. He is not even elected and doesn't represent anyone. Hassan sheick knows full well its pointless to negotiate with pirates because they can't offer anything. He wants international legatamcy and for him to be able to say I am a peace maker simple. What he really want is the same Jubba terms from farole: 1. Governer general 2.Nationalisation of militia 3. Ports and airport Etc Hahahah... Walahi I like this guy hahahah... Punt state coming to a theatre near you... Hag dont let this guy go Walahi waa strategist and a half hahah.

Taleexi;975418 wrote: May Allah accept your prayers Ameeen. Your people are in their predicament because of d ism. SOMALILAND is gone because of d ism. Hag will never trust you because of d ism. The somali state collapses because of d ism. So you see Ameen to that. We will make it a reality in our lifetime that this ideology is permanently laid to rest.

Hit him hard Present the proof, deliver an ultimatum and punish Bashar Assad for his use of chemical weapons Aug 31st 2013 THE grim spectacle of suffering in Syria—100,000 of whose people have died in its civil war—will haunt the world for a long time. Intervention has never looked easy, yet over the past two and a half years outsiders have missed many opportunities to affect the outcome for the better. Now America and its allies have been stirred into action by President Bashar Assad’s apparent use of chemical weapons to murder around 1,000 civilians—the one thing that even Barack Obama has said he would never tolerate. The American president and his allies have three choices: do nothing (or at least do as little as Mr Obama has done to date); launch a sustained assault with the clear aim of removing Mr Assad and his regime; or hit the Syrian dictator more briefly but grievously, as punishment for his use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Each carries the risk of making things worse, but the last is the best option. Advertisement No option is perfect From the Pentagon to Britain’s parliament, plenty of realpolitikers argue that doing nothing is the only prudent course. Look at Iraq, they say: whenever America clumsily breaks a country, it ends up “owning” the problem. A strike would inevitably inflict suffering: cruise missiles are remarkably accurate, but can all too easily kill civilians. Mr Assad may retaliate, perhaps assisted by his principal allies, Iran, Russia and Hizbullah, the Lebanese Shias’ party-cum-militia, which is practised in the dark arts of international terror and which threatens Israel with 50,000 rockets and missiles. What happens if Britain’s base in Cyprus is struck by Russian-made Scud missiles? Or if intervention leads to some of the chemical weapons ending up with militants close to al-Qaeda? And why further destabilise Syria’s neighbours—Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq? Because doing nothing carries risks that are even bigger (see article). If the West tolerates such a blatant war crime, Mr Assad will feel even freer to use chemical weapons. He had after all stepped across Mr Obama’s “red line” several times by using these weapons on a smaller scale—and found that Mr Obama and his allies blinked. An American threat, especially over WMD, must count for something: it is hard to see how Mr Obama can eat his words without the superpower losing credibility with the likes of Iran and North Korea. And America’s cautiousness has cost lives. A year ago, this newspaper argued for military intervention: not for Western boots on the ground, but for the vigorous arming of the rebels, the creation of humanitarian corridors, the imposition of no-fly zones and, if Mr Assad ignored them, an aerial attack on his air-defence system and heavy weaponry. At the time Mr Assad’s regime was reeling, most of the rebels were relatively moderate, the death toll was less than half the current total and the conflict had yet to spill into other countries. Some of Mr Obama’s advisers also urged him to arm the rebels; distracted by his election, he rebuffed them—and now faces, as he was repeatedly warned, a much harder choice. So why not do now what Mr Obama should have done then, and use the pretext of the chemical strike to pursue the second option of regime change? Because, sadly, the facts have changed. Mr Assad’s regime has become more solid, while the rebels, shorn of Western support and dependent mainly on the Saudis and Qataris, have become more Islamist, with the most extreme jihadis doing much of the fighting. An uprising against a brutal tyrant has kindled a sectarian civil war. The Sunnis who make up around three-quarters of the population generally favour the rebels, whereas many of those who adhere to minority religions, including Christians, have reluctantly sided with Mr Assad. The opportunity to push this war to a speedy conclusion has gone—and it is disingenuous to wrap that cause up with the chemical weapons. So Mr Obama should focus on the third option: a more limited punishment of such severity that Mr Assad is deterred from ever using WMD again. Hitting the chemical stockpiles themselves runs the risk both of poisoning more civilians and of the chemicals falling into the wrong hands. Far better for a week of missiles to rain down on the dictator’s “command-and-control” centres, including his palaces. By doing this, Mr Obama would certainly help the rebels, though probably not enough to overturn the regime. With luck, well-calibrated strikes might scare Mr Assad towards the negotiating table. Do it well and follow through But counting on luck would be a mistake, especially in this fortune-starved country. There is no tactical advantage in rushing in: Mr Assad and his friends will have been preparing for contingencies, including ways to hide his offending chemical weapons, for many months. Mr Obama must briskly go through all sorts of hoops before ordering an attack. The first task is to lay out as precisely as anybody can the evidence, much of it inevitably circumstantial, that Mr Assad’s forces were indeed responsible for the mass atrocity. America’s secretary of state, John Kerry, was right that Syria’s refusal to let the UN’s team of inspectors visit the poison-gas sites for five days after the attack was tantamount to an admission of guilt. But, given the fiasco of Iraq’s unfound weapons, it is not surprising that sceptics still abound. Mr Obama must also assemble the widest coalition of the willing, seeing that China and Russia, which is increasingly hostile to Western policies (see next leader), are sure to block a resolution in the UN Security Council to use force under Chapter 7. NATO—including, importantly, Germany and Turkey—already seems onside. The Arab League is likely to be squared, too. And before the missiles are fired, Mr Obama must give Mr Assad one last chance: a clear ultimatum to hand over his chemical weapons entirely within a very short period. The time for inspections is over. If Mr Assad gives in, then both he and his opponents will be deprived of such poisons—a victory for Mr Obama. If Mr Assad refuses, he should be shown as little mercy as he has shown to the people he claims to govern. If an American missile then hits Mr Assad himself, so be it. He and his henchmen have only themselves to blame.

Spy planes, sub marines, air craft carriers are all amassing tonight in the med.

Parliament is so routinely disparaged nowadays that it is easy to underestimate what an effective body it can be. To say this is neither to ignore parliament's genuine shortcomings nor to pretend that modern politicians are more commanding public figures than they are. But it is to say that when MPs debate Syria on Thursday, the House of Commons has more power than many seem to realise. It should use that power to uphold process, law and legitimacy. Parliament's first and most effective power is that it can, if it chooses, stop David Cameron's needlessly precipitate Syria policy dead in its tracks. A defeat for the government, or perhaps even a narrow-squeak victory, would oblige the prime minister to send his regrets to the White House and keep the UK's cruise missiles in their launchers for the time being. If that were to happen, the UK parliament's reach might be greater still. After two years in which, tragically, the world has been unable to prevent Syria's catastrophe deepening ever further, the Cameron government is suddenly in a hurry to act. Partly this is because of the outrageous use of chemical weapons in Syria. But it is also because the US administration, having boxed itself in about responding to such horrors, now summons Britain to give support. But would the Obama administration, elected to end the war in Iraq and anxious to end the one in Afghanistan, really want to engage in Syria, even to the extent of an arm's-length bombing campaign, without either UN support or major international allies? The answer is not cut and dried. But it is arguable that a vote in the UK parliament could stay Washington's hand from a politically controversial, premature strike that would raise massive issues of legitimacy. The assumption at Westminster is that parliament will not deny Cameron his mandate. Yet it undoubtedly could, and it arguably should. The use of chemical weapons is indubitably a war crime – the first global treaty against them dates from as long ago as 1925 – that the international community cannot ignore. But that doesn't mean Damascus must be bombed this weekend, before the weapons inspectors have finished their work and before the UN has debated its response. If the purpose of this strike is both to punish the Syrian regime and to send a powerful message to other potential users of chemical weapons, then the message surely needs to have as much support and legitimacy as possible. That means letting the UN process take its course. The coalition at Westminster has a majority of 77. If Labour goes ahead with its plan to argue for more time and oppose the government motion, and if three dozen Tory and Liberal Democrat backbenchers join forces, then, with the support of at least some of the minor parties, a government defeat or a pyrrhic win is far from impossible. Such a thing has happened before in this parliament, on Europe and on Lords reform, and some of the Tories' most regular rebels are again on the sceptical wing over Syria. So why not now? Cameron would not have recalled parliament if he was not confident he could carry the Commons on bombing Syria. So runs the official counter-argument. And undoubtedly No 10 has many cards in its hand. Not the least of these, in our naughty world, is that there may be a government reshuffle next week. Individual acts of disloyalty would come at a high personal price for ambitious backbenchers. And Tory MPs, in particular, are never natural rebels on military matters, so waverers will instinctively want to stand by the flag. Never forget, though, that this is a hung parliament. That's why Cameron was still being forced to negotiate on Wednesday night in order to put his putative majority together. Even on Tuesday Cameron made concessions to MPs who fear an attack on Syria could trigger the glumly familiar unintended consequences and mission creep just as the UK is scuttling from Afghanistan. By emphasising that the Syria mission would be missile-only, would last no more than three days, and was purely a punitive act for Bashar al-Assad's probable use of chemical weapons, Cameron painted himself into a smaller corner than he would surely have wanted at the start of the week. Wednesday night's planned British move in the UN security council was another concession to an approach based on greater legitimacy. It was probably doomed because of Russia's cold war mentality veto. A similar fate probably awaits the inspection report. But a veto should not mean that no action can be taken once the process has been given a proper chance. If Vladimir Putin gets to decide what is or is not legal, then international law is an ***. But trying everything to make the system work is the right thing to do. Parliament needs to be shown that London will do everything possible for a peaceful solution. In that context the delays – more than 24 hours – in publishing the government's motion for Thursday's debate are further proof that Cameron has not got this in the bag. Much of this constant redrafting is the indirect exertion of parliamentary power too. The government is struggling to craft a motion that satisfies Liberal Democrat MPs – who in many cases owe their seats to anti-Iraq-war defections from Labour in 2005 – as well as little England Tory backbenchers who, nudged by Ukip's anti-intervention stance yesterday, fear that Nigel Farage speaks for their voters better than Cameron does. But a lot of this is Labour's doing, since as long as Ed Miliband's party refuses to sign up for the government motion, government backbench doubters have that much more power to extract concessions. Perhaps by the time you read this Labour will have fallen into line behind the government, as many assume it will do in the end. Yet Labour, enjoying a happy convergence between principle and self-interest, was still playing hardball on Wednesday evening, planning its own amendment and pressing to uphold due process before any strike. In past foreign crises including the Falklands and Libya, Labour has often tried to show patriotic mettle by giving official support to controversial military campaigns. No two military campaigns are the same, but legitimacy always matters. And to its great credit, Labour seems to have learned from Iraq. Significantly, there's little tabloid jingoism over Syria. Quite the opposite, if anything. A Labour leader who is often told to show a bit of boldness has an opportunity to do it on Thursday. He can make parliament matter – and, even more important, he can speak for Britain.

Haatu;975405 wrote: And then you'll hear ignoramuses say "Dad NFD iyo kililka 5aad ka yimi baa Kismaayo gumaysanayaa" when in fact those same folks were the ones to win it in the first place. B@jun were the original natives of the jubas. All the non d block tribes added together make up the majority of the jubas. That's well known and documented.

Farole is just looking after his interests. He wanted hegemony he didn't get it. The entire south is officially politically under the government. The hag empire stretches from the Kenyan border to south Galkacyo. Farole Allah Rahma a caged d@g in 2.5 regions of absolute desert wasteland. Losses against hag and SOMALILAND. What we are witness is the death of d ism.

Mad_Mullah;975344 wrote: There's only one president in Somalia LOL Somaliland Puntland Jubbaland Shababland (Barawe) Yup.... As of yesterday jubaland does not exist its a government region like bay and bakool. Shababland (I don't know what your referring to). Puntland is a 2.5 region wasteland with no real leverage against a child let alone anyone. SOMALILAND is no longer part of Somalia with or without recognition we don't really care. So Somalia does have one president he is based in mugdisho and his name is Hassan sheick.

Somalia;975317 wrote: ARTICLE TWO On the Management of Federal Institutions and Infrastructure 10. The Federal Institutions and Infrastructure, including the Kismayo Airport and Kismayo Seaport and other institutions shall be recognized as the assets and commonwealth of the people of Somalia. 11. That the Kismayo Airport and Kismayo Seaport shall be utilized in a manner that is beneficial to the peace and prosperity of the people of Somalia under the leadership and management of the Federal Government of Somalia. 12. The Kismayo Sea Port and Air Port Management shall be handed-over to the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) in 6 months period; after which the Federal Government of Somalia shall appoint a competent management team in consultation with the Interim Jubba Administration meanwhile the current management of port prevails for the next 6 months. The Federal Government of Somalia will appoint immigration officers to all entry points. 13. The revenues and other resources generated and accruing from the Kismayo Airport and Kismayo Seaport shall be managed in a prudent, transparent and accountable manner. 14. The revenues and other resources generated and accruing from the Kismayo Airport and Seaport shall be exclusively utilized, invested and disbursed on the priorities of security, service delivery and institutional building of the Jubbas. 15. This interim arrangement shall continue until there is final agreement on revenue sharing in the country as per the constitutional process. ARTICLE THREE On the Management of Security Forces and Militias Integration 16. That all security elements, including, RasKanboni Brigade (RBK), the Darwish and any other militias shall be integrated into the central command of the Somalia National Army (SNA); and the regional police will be under the command of the Interim Juba Administration. 17. The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) and the established Interim Jubba Administration shall jointly establish a Technical Security Committee that will agree on modalities and timetable for the integration of all security elements. The Technical Committee will also be responsible to undertake Security Reform. 18. Integration of the militias in to the Somali National Army will also be implemented within recommended specific timeline by a Technical Committee comprising the FGS, and the Interim Jubba Administration, in close coordination with AMISOM. 19. The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) shall, under the planned reintegration program, give priority to the Jubba Administration so that combatants, particularly lower-level Alshabab fighters in the regions can disengage from combat and return to civilian life in their home communities. ARTICLE FOUR On Reconciliation and Confidence-Building 20. The Federal Government of Somalia shall organize and convene, within two weeks a Reconciliation Conference in Mogadishu. A follow-up peace building conference will also be held in Kismayo. 21. Mogadishu Reconciliation Conference will be a consultation mechanism on the process of completing the formation of the interim administration and peace building. 22. During the Mogadishu Reconciliation Conference, modalities of development of the roadmap for the establishment federal member state will be agreed upon. 23. The Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia as chair of IGAD shall be the guarantor of this agreement. Agreed Upon this 27th August, 2013 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia ___________________________ _________________________ Signature Signature H.E. Farah Sheikh Abdulkadir H.E. Sheikh Ahmed Mohamed Islaan On Behalf of the Somali Federal On behalf of Juba Interim Administration Government __________________________________________ Guarantor H.E. Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Chair of the Council of Foreign Ministers of IGAD This is Somalia Saxib. Madobe has agree to an interim goverment: with the title of governer. The port and airport will be surrendered to the government in 6 months. A conference in mugdisho and kismayo. Change your name MoFO as well to Jubba they said. The government will do what they do to the mugdisho port. Hag and other groupings will fill the ports and airports etc before u know it. Your militia, what militia they will be nationalised. The government will also have a huge indirect role in everything. Surrender terms not negotiation terms. The man knew he lived off the back of Kenyans and hense why as soon as they signed the documents he said the greatest threat was Alshabab. Walahi hag know how to play serious ball now: at a single swipe they isolated baxbaxland and wiped out the jubaland fiasco.

Mafia;975265 wrote: Garoodi and other Landers, now that the talk to deploy AMISOM forces in all of SSC and Awdal State is in the works, how are you going to show your love for the Kikuyu? Faysal Waraabe blasted this SFG agenda yesterday but Siilaanyo and few others we caught off-guard, It was said. I did not understand a single thing you said Saxib. Did u use amisom and SOMALILAND in the same sentence?? Saxib did you think this is Somalia??? The whole world knows Somalilands borders with or without recognition, they know what SOMALILAND controls and as for your Silanyo Faisal gibberish not a clue Saxib.

Haatu;975309 wrote: Gaaroodi, really? Having a maid from a certain background is now bragging rights? Ask the man who injected that into the debate.

Arbaco, August 28, 2013 (HOL) — Dowladda Soomaaliya iyo maamulka Jubbaland ayaa goor-dhow heshiis dhowr qodob ka kooban ku kala saxiixday magaalada Addis Ababa ee xarunta Itoobiya, halkaasoo toddobaadyadii lasoo dhaafay ay ku lahaayeen kulammo. Heshiiskan ayaa wuxuu dhigayaa in ciidamada maamulkii Jubbaland ee ku sugan Kismaayo la qarameeyo iyo in maamulkan oo ah mid KMG ah uu jiro muddo laba sano ah, kaddibna la sameeyo maamul rasmi ah oo gobolladaas ay yeeshaan. “Qodobbada lagu heshiiyay waxaa ka mid ah in maamulkan KMG ah ee lagu magacaabo Jubba uu hoggaamiyo, Sheekh Axmed Maxamed Islaam (Sheekh Axmed Madoobe) iyo in shir dib u heshiisiin ah lagu qabo Muqdisho,” ayuu yiri xildhibaan C/raxmaan Xoosh Jabriil oo u warramayay VOA-da. Xildhibaanku wuxuu hadalkiisa ku daray in wasiir u dowlaha madaxtooyada Soomaaliya, Faarax C/qaadir oo ergooyinka dowladda hoggaaminayay iyo Sheekh Axmed Madoobe oo dhinaca hoggaaminayay inay ka dhawaajiyeen in shirka Muqdisho kaddib shir labaad oo midkan daba socda lagu qaban doono magaalada Kismayo ee gobolka Jubbada Hoose. Maamulka dekedda magaalada Kismaayo ayaa waxaa muddo lix bilood ah haynaya maamulka KMG ah ee cusub, iyadoo xildhibaanku uu sheegay in lagu soo wareejin doono maamulka garoonka diyaaradaha dowladda Soomaaliya muddo 30-maalmood ah kaddib. “Heshiiska waxaa ka mid ah in Sheekh Axmed Madoobe uu soo magacaabo guddoomiyeyaasha saddexda gobola ee Jubbada hoose, Jubbada dhexe iyo gobolka Gedo, lana dhiso guddi sida baarlamaan oo kale u shaqeynaya,” ayuu xildhibaan Xoosh hadalkiisa raaciyay. Saxiixa heshiiskan ayaa waxaa goobjoog ka ahaa ergayga gaarka ah ee UN-ka u qaabilsan arrimaha Soomaaliya, Nicholas Kay, xubno ka socda beesha caalamka, wasiirka arrimaha dibadda Itoobiya iyo mas’uuliyiinta IGAD. Xildhibaanka oo ka jawaabayay su’aal ahayd sida ay dowladda Soomaaliya u aqoonsanayso maamulka KMG ah ee cusub ayaa sheegay inuu yahay mid ka jira gobollada saddexda ah oo keliya. Isagoo ka gaabsaday inuu su’aashan ka bixiyo faahfaahin dheeraad ah. Hirgelinta qodobbada heshiiskan ayuu sheegay inay kor kala soconayso sida ay u fulaan urur goboleedka IGAD, wuxuuna xusay in farxadi ay hareysay goobta uu saxiixa heshiiskan ka dhacayay. Dhinaca maamulka Jubbaland ma jirto cid u hadashay oo sheegtay sida ay u arkaan heshiiskan ay la galeen dowladda Soomaaliya, iyadoo heshiiskan uu soo afjarayo muran siyaasadeed muddo bilooyin ah u dhexeeyay dowladda Soomaaliya iyo maamulka Jubbaland oo bishii May ee sannadkan Kismaayo looga dhawaaqay. Maxamed Xaaji Xuseen, Hiiraan Online maxuseen@hiiraan.com Muqdisho, Soomaaliya Well played Hag... Well played. Lost nothing but gained everything. my reaction to Xins take on events: and so called victory for federalism:

Somalia;975197 wrote: We have a maid who is from Somaliland Afro-Hashemite Kingdom, so what you on about?? :confused: I have two d block maids in my house in Hargaisa: the Kikuyus of naiborbi have d block maids: the refugees of yemen have d block maids: even hag in mugdisho has d block maids so what's your point ?

We're you not the one denying them food just yesterday, via your makeshift port??? Wasn't puntlandi the source that predicted madobe would get everything he wanted??? The grawling lion is sitting in las canod 20 miles from your desert wasteland tulo p&nk. The worm in taleex will make a run for it as usual as soon as he hears SOMALILAND army on the way. That's what j@bertis excel in running, hiding and having their land taken from them for past few hundred years. What makes you think anything will change now p&nk?

GaadhHaye;975037 wrote: Car qaranimada aad sheegeyso xudduudkeeda soo xir...now or never//// Have you ever heard the story of a man named j@berty who hailed from a tribe of former captures xabashis who lived in yemen. His profession was domestic help his speciality was to wash toilets. His master beat him and took what little he had, his master took his food, his home even his cloths. He stood there only wearing his under garnets and looked at his masters and dared him to take off his under garments. Badhan: Las canod; Buhoodle: Ma waxba haday?

Somalia;975035 wrote: GAROODI's reaction: Waxtigi sawiryasha ayay gaday haha. The man comes to taleex on the eve of some fake baxbax elections when you denied these poor people food just the other day. The irony is you are their greatest enemy yet you hide behind isir. Isku Xaar like always. Like I said be greatfull we left you bosaso and garowe.