<cite> @Holac said:</cite> You've taken the topic to the gutter. Is it possible that your vile interpretation of the topic I posted is indicative of deeper insecurities on your part? I have no qualm with anyone's skin tone saxiib. It just shared a topic I found interesting. Fix up! in ain't interesting, it shows you bought into euro centric norms of blacks skin bad, white skin good.

what is so good about white skin that you have to invent a white black people ? why pay homage to light skin, reminds one of those africans that show off rare black babies with blue eyes, pathetic. racial inferiority & white supremacism has unconsciously seeped into your cranium sxb. isdaba qabo

<cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> Hahaha I'm gonna make sure I defy that trend what do yo mean i will defy the trend. Why do they always play up this disgusting act of necessity & procreation i never get it.

Well said young lady.

i don't know about allah creating anything but do you deny the head deity of the pagan arabs was called allah ? even the prophet's father was called abdu-allah so the name was known before mohammed by arabs. you have heard of the satanic verses. mohammed wanted to allow the qurash to call on the daughters of allah but it was later cancelled. Dr kenney i am somali stop lying to the people.

<cite> @Tallaabo said:</cite> Instead of him being isolated with his disbelieve from the Muslim community, let him speak freely and make his shocking ignorance about Allah and Islam manifest to all. Although we feel hurt when we hear such language coming from the transgressors, we know Almighty Allah is beyond insults . TAKBEEEEEEEEEEEER!!

<cite> @Tallaabo said:</cite> Even today Christian Arabs call God Allah while the Bhagvad Geeta and the Upanishad which are among the most sacred books of Hinduism teach the Oneness of God. So yes the original Hinduism was monotheistic just like the early Christianity. Tallaabo, why are you sitting on the fence ??

<cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> These people make this argument because of their extreme lack of understanding of Islamic Aqeedah, so they go on and on about things they know nothing about. Xabad is making this old, baseless argument which has been soundly refuted decades ago . And what makes it worse is that this Pagan KNOWS what he's doing, but he's just seeking to troll this forum now. The Arab Christians in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Egypt refer to God as "Allah". Because Allah literally means "The God". And the Jews of Iraq used to do the same thing. By who??, Allah is the moon god of ancient pagan Arabia. He had three daughters al uzza, manah al lat. notice how muslim peoples make extenisve use of moon imagery. why ? what is the significance Arab christians & Jews use of allah out of convenience, both have different names for their gods not allah in their scriptures.

To galbeedi; Waaq >> Allah the Moon god Deal with it.

<cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> So the early Christians worshiped Allah and saw Jesus as a Prophet. But after some time they started calling Jesus the son of God, and then they started worshiping Jesus himself. Then some Christian sects started to worship the Virgin Mary. Some Catholics started to worship different Saints and before you know it, Christianity became a fully-fledged polytheistic faith.. Hahaha, that is baloney, Christians had no knowledge of this arabian moon god Allah. such arrogance & revisionism is unparalleled. tell us Hinduism was monotheistic at one point too. Only a person with a bonobo IQ would tell such tall tales.

this is huuuge.

as long as it tightly regulated and the press are on them, thing be aight.

<cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> Listen. You're arguing from a point of ignorance/arrogance so your arguments are already devoid of any logic or sincerity. There's a reason why I don't debate you, because I don't seek to convince you. You've blatantly lied here on this forum a number of times, and we've seen the type of person you are. Which is why I don't ever want to explain myself to the likes of you. But here's the link you're asking for. Took me a while to find it since I couldn't remember the name of the video: Oh my, this is what you call debunking or destruction. he is just befuddled like you. debating you is like talking wont get us anywhere. enjoy your eid.

<cite> @Allyourbase said:</cite> You could have linked to your source instead of quoting to that lengths: http://www.islamicwritings.org/quran/medical-miracles/does-the-quran-plagiarise-ancient-greek-embryology/ No need to waste space on copy/paste battles the sol editor is not working. your right copy/paste battles are pointless espcially when someone is not sincere like dr kenney.

<cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> LOL^^ He references TheRationaliser. Is that the best he can do? This Youtube Character was absolutely destroyed on Youtube by a couple of Muslims It was a comprehensive, 3-hours-long, all-out rebuttal which put this shameless Kaffir in his place. put on the link so we can judge

<cite> @CidanSultan said:</cite> So after half an hour away the polytheist did a google search the evidence the polytheist comes back with a cut and past of a quranic verse and an allegation that it was copied by a man by the name of gallen but no actual written work of his is produced to compare the two. Simply it's like me saying I the books of John Paul Sartre are copied from my book without actually showing any similarities or actual proofs. The other two websites... Islam watch and the other one are all bull and we all know this so no need to go into them. So let's examine the mushriks claims... ^ watch the above if you can't go through the texts.

<cite> @CidanSultan said:</cite> Can you post us some of the written works of this Greek doctor or something basic like his name that you are referring to polytheist so we can all see and compare and read for ourselves clearly being a polytheist we can't take your word for it... All historians attest to the reality that Greeks thought the universe comprised of crystals and other basic nonsense.... Comparing that to the Quran... Is a big statement we look forward to you arguing your case with evidence and literature backed by references polytheist... here you http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/embryo.html http://www.islam-watch.org/amarkhan/Miracles-of-Quran-Exposed.htm Go read them and come back to me.

<cite> @CidanSultan said:</cite> (23:13) then We made him into a drop of sperm, then We placed it in a safe depository, (23:14) then We made this drop into a clot, then We made the clot into a lump, then We made the lump into bones, then We clothed the bones with flesh,12 and then We caused it to grow into another creation.13 Thus Most Blessed is Allah, the Best of all those that create.14 Hahaaa, oh no. your quoting perhaps the worst piece of the islamo pseudo science. not only is it false scientifically but mohammed plagiarized it verbatim from galen the greek doctor. come on son, up your game.

<cite> @CidanSultan said:</cite> "Do the disbelievers not realize that Heavens and Earth use to be one solid mass that we exploded into existence? And from water we made all living things". - Surah Al Anbiyaa False islamo pseduo science. there are no heavens, up there is nothingness the blue is just a reflection. and no living things are not made from water.

<cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> This Xabad character really believes that the current state of the Muslims is something permanent. Things can, and things WILL change inshaAllah. The Muslims haven't always been weak. We have a 1400 year-long history, and most of that history the Muslims were very influential and extremely powerful. We Muslims were at the gates of Vienna in 1683, we were VERY close to conquering all of Europe. This was only 331 years ago. Things can and things WILL change. seriously Drkenney? are you of the lineage of the men who almost conquered vienna ? very impressive, never knew your were a turk <cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> 100 years is nothing for us Muslims. 100 years is like a blink of an eye. That's what these Atheists fail to understand. We Muslims are very patient people, and if it takes 100 or 200 years to re-establish the Caliphate, then so be it. Perhaps I may not live to see the Caliphate arise, but that doesn't mean my children or grandchildren won't see it. It makes no difference to us. you keep repeating about athiest. i never claimed i was one, stop mischaracterizing me. i am a follower of waaq. <cite> @DoctorKenney said:</cite> The Caliphate would benefit ALL people, regardless of their religious affiliation. One only needs to read about how Non-Muslims flourished and prospered under the rule of the Abbasid and Ottoman Caliphates. if caliphate comes back the likes of you would be sold in the slave souks of arabia, istanbul or other muslims lands where fair skin is a currency. the world would be plunged into a dark age like never before and all human progress would cease. people would go back to wiping their shit with bare hands like moose do today. women be chattel, stoning would the national past time. it would be unimaginable dystopia. Thankfully it will never happen

<cite> @CidanSultan said:</cite> ^^^ Muslims comprise of 180 to 200 million people. They make up 10% of Indias population they are India. How can you hold down 200 million Muslims. The man who developed Indias nuclear technology Abdul Kalam is a Muslim the top Bollywood actors are Muslims among the top businesses in the country are Muslims. Politically they are marganislied because they are a minority but that's a given because of partition we have bagladesh and Pakistan today. India as a nation still has the largest number of poor people on earth, the worst infrastructure and the worst cases of curroption and the poorest in society have always been the Hindu because they make up the majority. You accuse people of not knowing history but you yourself don't even know recent history. India's Mohammedans were actually Indian hindus converted by force. the great Sir V.S Naipaul calls them as well as other non arab muslims - "converts" pejoratively. Thousands of indian muslims revert back to their ancestral Hindu religion each year. Here is Naipaul; "Islam has had a calamitous effect on converted peoples. To be converted you have to destroy your past, destroy your history. You have to stamp on it, you have to say ‘my ancestral culture does not exist, it does not matter…" " Islam is in its origin an Arab religion. Everyone not an Arab who is a Muslim is a convert. Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert’s worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands. His sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own: he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his" The last paragraphs is very relevant for the mindless drones here who care more about gaza, syria and other other arab conflicts.

<cite> @Tallaabo said:</cite> Islam does not need to compete with India and China. Both countries were once ruled or partially ruled by Muslims, both have significant Muslim populations(well over 100 million in India alone), and the Muslim vegetable seller's son can grow up to become India's or China's next Muslim sultan :-D islam never ruled china. where did you get your revisionist history ? even india was never fully conquered by moose, in any case that is the ancient past. india is free and advancing far a head of any muslim country. the gulf between the native hindus and the muslims in india is huge in economic , educational and social terms. you will never know this if you haven't been to india. muslims are poor minority looked down on relying on government handouts. there no where no the levers of power.

<cite> @galbeedi said:</cite> Xabad, this is exactly the argument of the neocons and those who support Israel's war against Gaza. In Stria a well armed insurgents who control a half of the country are fighting with one of their own dictators. there are wars in Congo, in Columbia and many other places where thousands murdered. some want to overthrow a tyrant, others are ethnic and territorial. its a glaring truth, why do muslims care about other muslims only when killed by non muslims especially jews??. muslims are killing each other everywhere like flies but when two palestinians are killed by the jooz they go mental and hold demos. why ?? its politricks pure and simple not compassion or solidarity with their brethren. its cynical and hypocritical stance they have perfected. <cite> @galbeedi said:</cite> this is not a war between state and well armed insurgent. If a hamas activist lives in 8th floor of a building, what kind of rules of war allows the destruction of the entire apartment. Whole blocks are flattened, hundred of children and civilians are killed. They are targeting almost everyone. They are talking about hundred of targets with tank shells and fighter jets. We Somalis may be out of line sometimes, but we can't tolerate injustice regardless of who is committed against. That is a lie Galbeedi, actually this is a war between two states hamas has regular paid soldiers, hundred of rockets, sophisticated tunnels, modern weapons, drones and a functioning command and control. the insurgents in syria were never this prepared. you ignore this and the is reason because moose have a particular fascination with fighting joose and demonizing them. its the not the cause its the enemy. fighting the jews, criticizing israel is exciting and sexy. it gives moose a special hard on. besides the IDF drops leaflets, calls residents on telephones and informs them in other ways before they take down a building. the IDF is professional western army but remember hamas keeps this people against their will as human shields. the evidence is plenty. if you really care about human rights just watch youtube videos of syria conflict the abuses on both sides are blood curdling, this is a tame war by comparison. lastly does a country not have right to defend itself from attack ?? yes or no.

<cite> @Holac said:</cite> Xabad, why is this a joke.? Do you not see the hypocrisy? What do you call an American jew who enlists in the IDF and fights for a foreign country (Isreal) on the basis of religious ethnicity? A jihadist? A loyal jew? A freedom fighter? A "lone soldier" are you serious ?? don't fall for liberal trolling. there is no equivalence between jews and jihadis. silly libtards trying to appease moose.

bwahaha @ american born jihadis wearing idf uniform. this is an onion piece. good one.