It also helps to actually be interested in what you're doing. If you're studying something you couldn't give a damn about, then you'll definitely procrastinate.

Khayr, Allyourbase is a Kafir. Just look through his posts There's no use in debating with the likes of him on what's waajib in Islam or not. We don't need to explain ourselves to Atheist dogs like him.

So you would support the unification of Somaliland and Somalia, as long as they agree to have a decentralized State and the regional and federal powers being clearly defined and outlined? As long as they sit together as adults, and resolve these issues as brethren. And Xaaji, currency rates are controlled through Central Bank policies, which can be shared between Somaliland, Puntland and Somalia. One thing we learned from the 1960-1990 model is that a centralized State would never work for us. But we are Somalis, we're in a unique position, and we shouldn't import a European-style government if it doesn't work for us.

The best way to get rid of procrastination is to clearly divide the hours between work time and leisure time. So if you're studying for an exam, you should study for 1 hour, and then have a 20 minute break. And then study for another hour, and then have another 20 minute break. And so on In that 20 minute break you can watch your favorite show, or call your friend, or run on the treadmill, or eat a snack. But it's always good to divide the leisure time with the work time and to never violate that pattern

Xaaji, there is no contradiction here. Again, we are humans. We are limited in our scope and abilities. And we are forced to deal with the circumstances dealt to us. Somalia's Federal Government is weak, they can barely control a few provinces, let alone conquer Djibouti. But Somaliland, on the other hand, has a very capable and functioning Army. They're well-armed, well-trained, and well-disciplined. So this whole "what makes you think Somalia can control Somaliland" is irrelevant, since Somaliland is still technically part of Somalia, and no "conquering" is necessary at all here. I don't see how this is a bad thing? Instead of each region of Somalia separating into different independent nations, wouldn't a better solution be if Somalia and Somaliland shared the same currency, and the same passport. And nothing else. Each region would be autonomous, they would have their own governmental institutions, they would collect their own taxes, and they would run their region the way they see fit. This would be a decentralized State. Somalia has never been united as a single country before 1960. It was always divided into separate kingdoms which controlled only a portion of the country itself. But never the entire country The problem with the 1960-1990 model of Governance was that Somalia was a highly centralized State then. The Government in Mogadishu controlled what happened in Hargeisa, sometimes without the consent of the actual people in Somaliland themselves. You're making it seem as if a decentralized State would never work, when this model has never been tried before.

Xaaji Xunjuf;989403 wrote: But at some point u say u want islamic unity and gaal made borders means nothing on the other hand u think the ictraaf of the gaal is important why cant u claim Djibouti or are you scared of the gaals ictraaf? Ileen labadu isku meel ma galaan eh. Bro, we have to deal with our circumstances, and be realistic. Somalia's Government can barely control it's own borders, let alone absorb another country (Djibouti). Again, I'm gonna reiterate: I am against the existence of Djibouti as an independent nation. But this is reality, we gotta deal with our circumstances in the best possible way. So we have to leave the Djibouti issue for future generations. But Somaliland on the other hand, is still recognized as part of Somalia. So there is absolutely no reason why they should secede from the rest of the country. These are nothing but petty differences that aren't worth seceding over.

Khayr;989376 wrote: Magic, They would still take their narrative willingly because Massa told them that they would get rewarded for doing so and get a chance to eat next to Massa someday. House Negreos have a permanent inferiority and identity crisis. House Negroes are the most despicable creatures that exist. And the sad thing is that Massa will never accept them, ever. Just look at the likes of Tarek Fatah and Zudhi Jasser. They're the perfect example of "House Muslims"

Xaaji Xunjuf;989399 wrote: Africa country in Africa in Africa their borders were created by Colonial boundaries ,what makes somaliland different even somalia. Doctor how come u never question Djibouti's colonial boundaries Xaaji I'm against the existence of Djibouti as well. But since Djibouti actually has international recognition and is recognized as it's own country, then there's nothing we can do about it---for now. Whereas "Somaliland" is still recognized as part of Somalia. It's still part of the country. So why should we change that? What are the petty differences that we have that we can't resolve as adults?

Alpha Blondy;989391 wrote: touchy, touchy eh. someone's upset, ma istidhi? did i say something true? TR is not bad. i've seen him in lectures a few times and he makes sense. for you and your like, Islam appears to be about the external. rather, it ought to be about the internal. i heard the greatest jihad of them all is against your person, ee ma ruunba? are you familiar with analogical reason? i think your kind call it ijma , somaha? Ijma is the scholarly consensus. I think you were talking about qiyas, which is analogical reasoning. And yes, Islam is about the external behavior as well as the internal. Anyone who submits to Allah internally would automatically also display it in his appearance and actions. The two go together. So that's an invalid argument Alpha.

Khayr;989378 wrote: Jac, You are still part and parcel of the corruption that plagues All Somalis. All Somali govs are crooks. Sometimes I wonder how any "Somalilander" can consciously accept secession from the rest of Somalia. We Muslims should be uniting under one leadership, under one State. But since that's not the case--at least nowadays--then how is it acceptable that Somalis from the Northwestern region want to secede from the rest of Somalia? Nationalism is a very ugly thing. And to be nationalistic over some colonial borders is even more ridiculous. Jacaylbaro needs to let it go "He is not one of us who calls for Asabiyyah, (nationalism/tribalism) or who fights for Asabiyyah or who dies for Asabiyyah." --Prophet Muhammad (saaw)

DoctorKenney;989368 wrote: The problem with this debate is that everyone generally agrees that the Hijab is an obligation, but they just disagree on whether it should be personally enforced, or should it be enforced by the State. And where is the line drawn? People argue on which sins should be punished by the State, and which sins should be left alone to Allah, unless there are clear Shari'i guidelines regarding it. For example, alcohol is haram, and the Islamic State is known to punish those who are caught in the act of drinking alcohol. And I definitely believe that the hijab should be enforced by the State. This comes under the guideline of enjoining the good and forbidding what's impermissible. Here in America, there are rules regarding common decency and dress, even when it comes to issues where you're not directly harming anyone, so why should the Hijab be looked at as any different? 60 years ago, a woman exposing her legs or her belly would be considered indecent in America, but today it's perfectly legal and socially acceptable. I honestly don't understand why anyone would criticize our stance on such an issue, when the Western definitions of what's acceptable is constantly shifting every year. P.S. The beard is also an obligation in Islam, to all the brothers, so let's not forget that. DoctorKenney;989380 wrote: You do realize that I hold the position that because the Hijaab is waajib, then it should be enforced by the State .....right? You and I agree on this. Read what I wrote again The boundaries of what's acceptable and unacceptable behavior is set by Allah, and people's desires should play no role when it comes to legislating laws. This is to dispel any confusion. My stance on this issue is clear.

^^Don't ever compare me to Tariq Ramadan, ever. You've seen my posts on this forum, and you know very well my position on this topic. Read what I wrote carefully. I believe in Sharia in it's entirety, and I don't pick and choose what parts of Islamic Law should be enforced. You know very well I have contempt for those who try to change the Sharia, or who try to disregard certain aspects of it

Khayr;989375 wrote: If what is واجب is not being adhered to than there are penalities for it. If someone is caught selling illegal drugs, aren't they punishable by the state? If yes, then why the double standard here with your asnine questioning. Unless ofcourse, you hold a double standard e.g. What is part of Islam you don't want to follow but what is between your legs - you would follow anytime! You do realize that I hold the position that because the Hijaab is waajib, then it should be enforced by the State.....right? You and I agree on this. Read what I wrote again The boundaries of what's acceptable and unacceptable behavior is set by Allah, and people's desires should play no role when it comes to legislating laws.

The problem with this debate is that everyone generally agrees that the Hijab is an obligation, but they just disagree on whether it should be personally enforced, or should it be enforced by the State. And where is the line drawn? People argue on which sins should be punished by the State, and which sins should be left alone to Allah, unless there are clear Shari'i guidelines regarding it. For example, alcohol is haram, and the Islamic State is known to punish those who are caught in the act of drinking alcohol. And I definitely believe that the hijab should be enforced by the State. This comes under the guideline of enjoining the good and forbidding what's impermissible. Here in America, there are rules regarding common decency and dress, even when it comes to issues where you're not directly harming anyone, so why should the Hijab be looked at as any different? 60 years ago, a woman exposing her legs or her belly would be considered indecent in America, but today it's perfectly legal and socially acceptable. I honestly don't understand why anyone would criticize our stance on such an issue, when the Western definitions of what's acceptable is constantly shifting every year. P.S. The beard is also an obligation in Islam, to all the brothers, so let's not forget that.

Guje;989355 wrote: somalia's borders were made by the colonialists too. what is your point ?? And you don't see me glorifying those borders either. To me, the NFD and Eastern-Ethiopia as well as Djibouti are just as Somali as Somaliland and southern Somalia

How wonderful! You're celebrating the colonial borders created by the British Empire and you're "proud" that your Somaliland heritage makes you somehow different than the rest of Somalis. Makes real logical sense to me

Haatu;989227 wrote: I have to agree with Dr. Kenny slightly here. Hanging around with Somalis is a lot of fun and comedy for free, something you won't get online. However that doesn't mean you spend every minute of your free time outside. For example, I rarely stay out past 9:30. AFter that is my relaxation time and being outside becomes a hassle. Somalis are the most entertaining group of people! From the eccentric habaryars, to the older men, to the young 20 year olds, to the crazy 7 year old kids, to the wadaads, they're all entertaining in their own way. An interesting group of people. I wouldn't trade being Somali for anything. Just go on Paltalk and look at the type of discussions we Somalis get into in those chatrooms. I don't know how anyone can be an introvert and Somali at the same time. It makes no sense

spartacus;989206 wrote: there was no such thing in introvert and extrovert back in the days when there was no high tichie tichie ganget and fast connectivity internet. most people used to hang around when they have time and mind their own business and do they have to do.. now days people became bunch of fadhi ku dirir and bunch of nerds who is making excuse that they are introverts just because of the technology.. LOOL :D :D Technology makes people a lot less social. I wonder how introverts survived back in the 15th century lmao. That's hilarious

^^ Yes most definitely. All of us are familiar with what goes on in other countries. Everyone knows about what happens in India, where brides are sometimes burnt to death over dowry money, or in China where they kill infant girls. But Somalia is a pretty tight-knit society, it'll be easy to find and track down criminals responsible for such crimes. Everyone knows everyone through Qabiil. This man should definitely be executed. A harsh crime deserves a harsh punishment

I don't see this ending well. If several nations share the same monetary policy but don't share the same fiscal policy, it will definitely backfire. We've seen what happened in Europe. There's no use in repeating that experiment

So this man divorces his wife, stabs her face and then slashes her from ear to ear simply because she has fistula, an uncontrollable illness? Why isn't this man executed? What use does our society have for such a creature?

LOL I make regular appearances in the community, you will never find me disappearing unless I'm on vacation in another country. And I can't stand texting when I'd much prefer face-to-face contact. All I need is about 30 minutes a day where I'm alone, and that's fine with me. Alhamdulilah for my extroverted personality. I don't see a reason why any Somali should ever be an introvert when there's just so much going on in the world. So many people to interact with, and so much to do outside of the home. I would prefer going camping with my friends for a week than watching Netflix movies at home anyday of the week.

I had no idea that introverts tend to be loud on the internet, and vice-versa! I'm an extremely extroverted person. I'm far from shy and I prefer interacting with people more than anything. I'm that talkative guy you see on the ball-court, classroom, or workplace. Most Somali men that I know are extroverts. Very few of us are quiet and we definitely enjoy our social interactions. Even when we play video-games, we have our head-sets and microphones plugged in so we can speak to our friends online

Saacid was a doormat and he got booted out by the President If the new Prime Minister actually has a backbone, what makes you think that Hassan Sheikh will treat him courteously? If anything, this will set the stage for renewed conflict in the future. It's a lose-lose situation. It doesn't seem like Hassan Sheikh knows what he's doing at all.

Tallaabo;988836 wrote: If Somali politicians were more versed in the political science and learned about how successful countries are organised, our society would not be in such a mess. So I think more graduates in politics will serve our society well. Yeah, I definitely agree. History would be useful too. Somalia needs diaspora members who are well-versed and educated in the political sciences, as well as economics. These people would be ideal when it comes to running Somalia, and lifting our country from the miserable state that it's in. We need skilled politicians, we don't need clowns like Faroole and Hassan Sheikh running the nation.