kingofkings

Nomads
  • Content Count

    2,894
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kingofkings

  1. Ciyaar aad u xiisa badan oo in mudo ah la sugayey ayaa galabta ka dhacday garoonka kubadda cagta Mire Awaare ee magaalada Garoowe. Ciyaartan oo ahayd Final-ka tartanka 6-aad ee kubadda cagta gobolada Puntland waxaa wada yeeshay labada xul ee Nugaal iyo Karkaar oo iyagu wareegga kama danbeysta ah isugu soo haray. Qaybta 1-aad ee ciyaarta ayaa waxaa 2 gool ku hormaray xulka gobolka Nugaal oo iyagu xamaasad aad u saraysa garoonka kusoo galay islamarkaana goolka 1-aad dhashtay ciyaarta oo socota wax hal daqiiqo ka yar. Markii laysugu soo noqday qaybta danbe ee ciyaarta ayaa waxaa labo gool la yimid xulka gobolka Karkaar sidaas oo natiijada ciyaartu ay ku noqotay barbar dhac 2-2 ah. Markii uu wakhtiga ciyaartu dhamaaday ayaa si toos ah waxaa loogu gudbey gool ku laadyada iyada oo aan wakhti dheeri ah lagu darin. Gool ku laadyadana waxaa ku adkaaday xulka Nugaal oo ay guushu ku raacday 5-4, waana markii ugu horeysey ee xulka gobolka Nugaal uu horyaalka kubadda cagta ee gobolada Puntland noqdo. Qaabka xulka Nugaal koobka loo gudoonsiiyey, khudbadda madaxweyne ku xigeenka Puntland oo galabta ciyaartaas daawanayey, iyo sawiradaba Horseed Media goor dhow ayey idiin soo gudbin doontaa.
  2. Che -Guevara;788139 wrote: ^You would think he will go first. calaf. without it, it does not make sense.
  3. Somalia;788083 wrote: Also a man attempts to attack pub goers with a chainsaw but gets knocked the f out. http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh5v1zvP235gn1j7N4 :D:D
  4. There are some individuals out there who don't just enjoy winding up people on newsgroups and bulletin boards - it's their sad lifestyle choice! Using every known disruptive trick in the book, these troublesome types don't go out to the pub, meet members of the opposite sex or enjoy life. They spend their time hunched over their computers trolling. Here's how they work: INTRODUCTION The object of this post is to bring together a definitive document to cover the phenomena of the Usenet Troll. To many a troll is nothing more than an annoying method of defeating the killfile whereas to the heavily killfiled, trolling can be a virtual Godsend. What I want this document to focus on is how to create entertaining trolls. I have drawn on the expertise of the writer's of some of Usenet's finest and best remembered trolls. Trolls are for fun. The object of recreational trolling is to sit back and laugh at all those gullible ****** that will believe *anything*. Section 1: What Is A Troll? The WWW gives this as a definition: troll v.,n. To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies"; which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling";, a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. The following extract is from a broader expansion of the defining comments given above: In Usenet usage, a troll is not a grumpy monster that lives beneath a bridge accosting passers-by, but rather a provocative posting to a newsgroup intended to produce a large volume of frivolous responses. The content of a "troll posting generally falls into several areas. It may consist of an apparently foolish contradiction of common knowledge, a deliberately offensive insult to the readers of a newsgroup, or a broad request for trivial follow-up postings. There are three reasons why people troll newsgroups: People post such messages to get attention, to disrupt newsgroups, and simply to make trouble. Career trollers tend for the latter two whilst the former is the mark of the clueless newbie and should be ignored. Section 2: Design Issues A troll is no different to any other Usenet posting. That needs to be stressed. Any article that you decide to write should be written with a view to it actually being read by large numbers of people. Simply X-posting to large numbers of irrelevant newsgroups is not creative trolling - it is just spam and should be avoided. The experienced troller spends time carefully choosing the right subject and delivering it to the right newsgroup. With trolls, delivery is just as important as the subject. Start the troll in a reasonable and erudite manner. You have to engage your readers' interest and draw them in. Never give too much away at the start - although a brief abstract with hints of what's to come can work wonders. Construct your troll in a manner to make it readable. Use short paragraphs and lots of white space. Keep line length below eighty characters. Use a liberal amount of emphasis and even the occasional illustration. A good rule of thumb is that as your troll becomes more and more ludicrous put extra effort into the presentation - this keeps the mug punter confused. Let confusion and chaos be your goal Section 3: Content Make your subject a relevant one. Posting "Star Trek Sucks" into hk.forsale is not going to work very well and is liable to utterly destroy your hard earned reputation as a troller overnight. You do not have to make the subject clear. Trolls are aimed at two audiences, the respondees and the lurkers. The best trolls reveal their true subject only to the lurkers. In every sense those who reply to your troll are your tools. So choose a theme for your troll and stick to it. Outwardly you need to appear sincere, but at the same time you have to tell your *real* audience that this is blatant flamebait. Your skill is shown in the easy way that you manipulate large areas of the Usenet community into making public fools of themselves. Section 4: Newsgroup Selection Choice of newsgroup is as important as the subject, tone and structure of the troll. You want to appeal to each group you X-post into to ensure responses from each group. A well delivered troll will anticipate what those responses will be and thus ensure that contradictions will arise amongst the different groups that you are setting up. BAD: Posting "USA Sucks" to alt.nuke.the.USA, alt.usa-sucks, aus.flame.usa This is totally on-topic and obvious. A truly useless troll. AVERAGE: Posting "God Doesn't Exist" to all the alt.religion newsgroups Here you are being too obvious. People recognise this sort of trouble making and have usually learned not to respond to it. However, if your troll is well written you can actually entrap a lot of newbies. This, if executed correctly, can be exploited to cause great offence to those more experienced troll avoiders on the groups you are attacking. Go for it! GOOD: Posting an article that appears relevant to every group but with no connection between those groups other than the fact that you've just trolled them. The best trolls go out to an average of around eight or nine newsgroups. This will stop them from becoming spam as it's not quite enough to be a real problem. However, to get by on so few groups you have to include a couple of popular ones in the list. When posting to say seven groups you should try to break down your theme into seven areas - each of which will be of specific interest to just one of those groups. You then write an eight paragraph troll with a paragraph for each group and a spare one for yourself with which to lob in a gratuitous insult to everyone who was dumb enough to read your troll. It is a matter of choice whether you choose newsgroups before or after writing the troll. Some experts claim that newsgroup selection is the key to successful trolling and should be done first, others will write general trolls and then apply the standard Perl script that trollers use for Automatic Random Newsgroup Selection. Section 5: Know Your Audience Remember that you have two audiences. The people who are going to get the maximum enjoyment out of your post are other trollers. You need to keep in contact with them through both your troll itself and the way you direct its effect. It is trollers that you are trying to entertain so be creative - trollers don't just want a laugh from you they want to see good trolls so that they can also learn how to improve their own in the never ending search for the perfect troll. The other audience is of course the little people in those newsgroups that your are attacking. Get to know them. Every newsgroup has its smartarse who will expose your troll if given half a chance. Research your targets and learn what their arguments are. Then avoid those arguments like the plague. Drag them off-topic - the further off-topic the better. Remember, you are trying to waste their time. Never take sides - remember that your goal is not to win an argument, rather it is to provoke a futile one that runs forever. If, for example you were attacking Fast Food then you should also X-post to Healthy Eating groups, Environmental Protection Groups, Animal Rights Groups etc.... You want to try to ensure that you have the broadest possible range of opinions as this is the easiest way to sow confusion. The more confusion the less the likelihood of your troll being exposed for what it is. It can also be shown that the inclusion of just one totally off-topic newsgroup can have dramatic effects. The list above is taken from a genuine troll which also included an Artificial Intelligence group, the result of which was to draw Computer Guru Professor Marvin Minsky into a flamewar concerning Ronald McDonald's exploitation of the disabled - an all-time classic piece of trolling - written by a practising veggie. Section 6: Following-Up "Even if this is true......" That represents the perfect response to any troll. The mark of a gullible lunatic that will almost certainly believe anything you tell them. A total group embarrassment. Award yourself a Troll Gold Star every time you get one! Other good responses include, but are not limited to.... "Although this is on-topic....." "I disagree...." "Yes, but....." "Can you provide a source for this...." Try not to follow-up to your own troll. The troll itself quickly becomes forgotten in the chaos and if you just sit back you can avoid being blamed for causing it. Remember, if you do follow up you are talking to an *****. Treat them with the ill-respect they deserve. You should also learn to recognise follow-ups from your fellow trollers. Sometimes an average troll can be elevated into majestic proportions when several trollers spontaneously join forces via the medium of the follow up troll. Ignore cries of wasted bandwidth! This is pure drivel that will always be posted by the anti-troll lobby. These jerks fail to understand that trolls are the best way to drive people off the internet thus making available multi-mbs for the rest of us to download our porn.
  5. Section 7: The Successful Troll A good example of troll success is the famous "How I Envy American Students" troll. This troll was written by an English brick-layer posing as an American student. He correctly posted it to all the college news- groups and then left american students to do all the work spreading it. His troll ran for over a year, it is known to have generated in excess of 3,500 responses (an average of 1 response every 160 minutes for a whole year) and the greatest coup of all was when an innocent american student lost not only her internet account but was also expelled from high school for abuse of the computer systems. Somehow she had managed to get the blame for causing the troll.
  6. sharma-arke451;788011 wrote: the center word is not common for us then. we don't read from the same scriptures. by the way, the truth hurts for future reference, please don't use religion as a way to troll threads.
  7. sharma-arke451;788017 wrote: at least you changed. WTF. I change my avatar every other week. Regarding religion, i am a muslim, i was born as one and insha allah, i will die as one. However, since your are troll, and you seem to even lack logic as someone who masquerades as a believer, either contribute to the thread or go jump in a lake.
  8. Atirisho;788001 wrote: Afisoone is a classic troll. Nobody takes his pointless, senseless rants seriously. A man in his late 30's shouldn't speak like that.
  9. Caano_Geel;787997 wrote: Midh kama fahmin, wuxuu ku hadlaayo. my expression throughout his rant; what:confused:
  10. sharma-arke451;787995 wrote: why does the avatar of the poster suggest a mature atheist in the making? it says volumes about his believes!! unfortunately, to not believe amounts to believing else. don't troll the thread. if you have something constructive to say; fadlan do so, otherwise, go jump in a lake.
  11. Somalina;787944 wrote: Somalia started this thread, and I addressed him not you. How is our exchange involve you? waxan muxuu ahaa? Ha igu mashquulin, raadso cid kula yooyootanta. Speak when spoken to junior. if the exchange is between you and him i don't care, but it was you who engaged in Mudug's politics and that gives me all the reason to get involve. Next time in order to avoid this mess, don't write gibberish comments regarding Mudug. ok. okay.
  12. Somalina;787940 wrote: Meh! I don't owe you any explanation. La qabso other trolls. Ciao. for future reference, don't post on a thread for the sole purpose of trolling if you cannot answer simple question. See my troll thread for how one should conduct themselves on forums. Thanks.
  13. first thought; must be unemployed if he's worrying about things that are of no concern to him. second thought; if the very people who i assume is for the video gave you an answer, what's with the video? Third thought, somalia you owe me ten minutes of my life. On a finally note, is he that same dude that failed miserably on somalinet, youtube, etc. Instead of giving advises, let me give you one; quite. you make absolutely no sense.
  14. Somalina;787932 wrote: Af Somali soo baro. Mahadsanid. if i could read the beginning of your sentence, then it means i could read the rest; it's common logic, you don't have to be a rocket scientists to figure it out. my question which you did not answer is what do you mean "gudoomiyaha gobolka mudug qeybta yar ee PL haka hadlo":confused: Are you try to be cute:confused:
  15. Somalina;787912 wrote: Gobolka mudug gudoomiye ma qabo, gudoomiyaha gobolka mudug qeybta yar ee PL haka hadlo maleeshiyada ina adeeradiisa ee la dagaalamayaa maleeshiyaadka kale ee magaalada dagan. Midna awliyo ma ahan, marka runta haka hadlo hadduu mas'uulnimo sheeganaayo. Sida wax loo xaliyo ha soo barto, kii sijuuga ahaa ee meesha laga eryay sannadkii hore telefoon ha u diro in Xamar si uu ugu caqliyeeyo. Ilaahay hakala qaboojiyo reer baadiyahan is xabadeynaaya. i could not pass that half sentence of yours, so could you give me the summary of your post? Thanks.
  16. Xaaji Xunjuf;787920 wrote: Well said somalina its the pl governor for mudug obviously there is also a galmudug governor for mudug and a west puntland state governor in mudug be honest, that line was in your head all day and finally you came across this thread and your like alhamdulillahi. Right:confused:For once be honest.
  17. The traditional definition of a troll refers to a member of a community or usenet group who makes posts deliberately designed to attract responses of outrage or indignation. It is the troll's intent to "hook" unsuspecting members into responding, (hence the term "trolling"), thus providing him/her self with the satisfaction of knowing they have impact on others. A distinction must be made between true trolls, newbies who are undergoing growing pains as they attempt to adjust to community standards, and regular community members who simply have strong but otherwise harmless, dissenting opinions. Trolls should be removed, newcomers assisted, and contributing community members given at least a modicum of respectful distance. Types of Trolls Before we begin, it's worth noting that the term "troll" is one of the most frequently cited insults in the online environment. It is often used to brand, silence or scapegoat a member with a dissenting or unpopular opinion. The purpose of this article is to assist those in online communities in determining what a true troll is and what actions can be taken to prevent their creation, welcome, and ability to inflict any harm. In our experience with online communities, there are four types of trolls... 1) Mischievous: Such trolls have a humorous intent. Often, they are a "regular" who has temporarily adopted a new identity in order to play a good-natured prank. They are not abusive to members and rarely create trouble within a community. Generally there is no harm in responding to them. Some members may find mischievous trolls to be annoying, particularly if their presence leads to lengthy threads that distract the community from its true intent; other members inevitably find that the troll's humor and light-hearted antics provide the community with an opportunity to laugh together, thereby enhancing and strengthening community bonds. 2) Mindless: Mindless trolls have a tendency to post lengthy stories of questionable belief thus promoting good facial tone in members due to excessive eye-rolling. They are generally harmless. On rare occasion, the ficticious posts of a mindless troll may lead to insightful debate and discussion. Aside from encouraging them, there is generally no harm in responding. 3) Malicious: A malicious troll arrives with the intent of being blatantly abusive to the group and/or specific individuals within the group. One of their characteristics is that within a very short time of gaining access they begin targeting and harassing members using both low-end and high-end tactics. In some cases, the troll has a prior history with the group or someone within the group. In other scenarios, the troll is simply looking for a fresh meat market. 4.) Destructive: Around 1999 a new form of troll began to appear on the net in mail groups and online communities. The primary purpose of this type of troll is to completely destroy the group it has infiltrated. Destructive trolls may work on their own, or possibly in teams or gangs. Trolls have two ways of gaining access to a community: from the outside or from the inside. Outside trolls are newbies or visitors who are new to the community, or only sporadic visitors and guests. They are less likely to target specific members and will be content with "hooking" anyone. Inside trolls are comprised of mischevious, bored, disgruntled, angry, scapegoated or wounded regulars who may have turned to trolling as a result of actions that occurred within the community. They frequently have a bone to pick with a specific member or a select group of members. Unmoderated or poorly moderated environments are not only more susceptible to malicious or damaging trolls, they are also more likely to create the conditions that invite them. This is because the members themselves have very little in the way of actual power. With few other options at their disposal they will often resort to intimidation tactics and personal attack with the hope of verbally overpowering the offender. If the offender is a true troll, this will only reinforce the troll's sense of purpose, inflames his/her ire, and let him or her know who the willing targets are. Informal community leaders, those who are empathic to others or those sensitive to the slights of injustice are more likely to step forward in cases of troll attack and thus, become their target. Roles of Community Members: It is the bonds of familiarity that establish relationships. It is the complex network of relationships that build community. Wherever a group of people are gathered on the net with a shared history of established interaction, therein, you'll find community. Regardless of the platform or purpose, you'll find most of the same basic social roles being played out by members of online communities all around the net... Newbies are newcomers who may require assistance in learning the ropes. They regularly rejuventate community life by offering fresh perspectives and renewing the interest of the regulars. Visitors/Guests are newbie or long-term members who do not have a persistent identity in the community. Both newbies and visitors are outside the range of the community's inner heart life. They have few or no established relationships with others. They may be "trying on" the community to see if it fits them, time constraints may limit the extent of their online involvement, or they may not share the common values and purpose of your specific community to the same degree as the following... Regulars are members who comfortably and actively participate in community life. They have established relationships with numerous others and as a result, are your true community builders. Regulars are the mainstay of online communities; via their active involvement they help shape core community standards, practices, and values. They comprise the largest portion of membership and include leaders, elders and often, officials. Leaders are regulars who have the time, energy, and skill to take on more formal and active roles in the community. They know many of the regulars and are respected for their skills by others. They assist newbies with settling in, provide advice related to the inner workings of the community life to the regulars, and may serve the larger community in volunteer positions such as techie, moderator, or administrator. Elders are long-term regulars or leaders who have grown weary of the day-to-day demands of their position and stepped away from the center to the periphery of the community. Still active in community life, they are respected for their cultural knowledge and insider lore. Along with the other long-time residents, they're the teachers and storytellers of the community, the people who give the place a sense of history, depth and soul. They may serve the community by assisting newbies, regulars and leaders, and acting as informal archivists and historians. Officials are the founders, hosts, techies, moderators and administrators. Typically they hold true power in the community by establishing the community's purpose, determining the form of presiding government, developing protocols of policy, and having the power to remove users who do not comply with the established standards. [The excerpt above was adapted from Chapter 4 - Roles: From Newcomer to Oldtimer from the book and online website of Community Building on the Net by Amy Jo Kim.]