in 9 months when my contract ends this will probable be obsolete, and galaxy nexus 2 will be out

that true, we do need a muslim cosby show, only thing people know about muslims is Iraq, and afganistan, and terrorism. it needs to change.

Im not gonna lie, it would probable be pretty awesome, but I don't think i could ever treat two people equally. Plus i dont ever think a girl would marry a married guy atleast not where im living right now lol, and they'd throw my as in jail for it.

Wow! thats pretty cool.

somaliland, puntland, and all somali clan rivalries are like two bald men fighting over a comb

Actually after some research im cool with it, they seem like decent people trying to improve their lives.

i completly agree with you, but its at least nice to see top officials tired of netanyahu's BS

PARIS (Reuters) - French President Nicolas Sarkozy branded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "a liar" in a private conversation with President Barack Obama that was accidentally broadcast to journalists during last week's G20 summit in Cannes. "I cannot bear Netanyahu, he's a liar," Sarkozy told Obama, unaware that the microphones in their meeting room had been switched on, enabling reporters in a separate location to listen in to a simultaneous translation. "You're fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you," Obama replied, according to the French interpreter. The technical gaffe is likely to cause great embarrassment to all three leaders as they look to work together to intensify international pressure on Iran over its nuclear ambitions. The conversation was not initially reported by the small group of journalists who overheard it because it was considered private and off-the-record. But the comments have since emerged on French websites and can be confirmed by Reuters. White House press secretary Jay Carney declined to comment on the conversation when asked by reporters traveling with Obama to an event in Philadelphia. Obama's apparent failure to defend Netanyahu is likely to be leapt on by his Republican foes, who are looking to unseat him in next year's presidential election and have portrayed him as hostile to Israel, Washington's closest ally in the region. Pushing Netanyahu risks alienating Israel's strong base of support among the U.S. public and in Congress. Netanyahu's office declined immediate comment. Obama and Netanyahu have had a rocky relationship as U.S. efforts to broker a Middle East peace deal have foundered, with the U.S. president openly criticizing Jewish settlement building in the occupied Palestinian territories. It was unclear why exactly Sarkozy had criticized Netanyahu. However, European diplomats have largely blamed Israel for the breakdown in peace talks and have expressed anger over Netanyahu's approval of large-scale settlement building. PALESTINIAN WORRIES During their bilateral meeting on November 3, on the sidelines of the Cannes summit, Obama criticized Sarkozy's surprise decision to vote in favor of a Palestinian request for membership of the U.N. cultural heritage agency UNESCO. "I didn't appreciate your way of presenting things over the Palestinian membership of UNESCO. It weakened us. You should have consulted us, but that is now behind us," Obama was quoted as saying. The October 31 UNESCO vote marked a success for the Palestinians in their broader thrust for recognition as a sovereign state in the U.N. system -- a unilateral initiative fiercely opposed by Israel and the United States. Could this be a sign the old Zionist regime is weakining?

It's not a PR campaign. Whether their being effective or not that is debatable, but hurting Al Shabab in some way is definitely their target.

seriously who gives a damn, why are you pretending like its so important.

Furthermore, I think it would be best to shine light on how "secularism" has been the cause of World War 1, 2, Korean War, Vietnam War, and etc. Please explain how separation of church and state(secularism), caused hitler to invade poland, or how it caused Archduke Franz Ferdinand to be assassinated. I see nothing wrong with seperation of mosque and state. I think you loose alot of people though when you start insulting their religion and saying it needs to be modernized.

hello no

I've always liked Erdogan and his government, he is probably the most capable head of state today.

Somaliland is doing big things, good for them.

"World War", implies that the whole world is in on it(you only mentioned 3-4 countries). There will never be full scale war with Iran. NEVER. The only outcomes are more sanctions against Iran, Or a possible airstrikes against Irani nuclear sites.

hahaha, ive never seen somebody get hated on so much for starting a thread. I think the answer to you question is, they simply don't have the resources.

I really believe that all those arguments made in that page aren't based in reality. Yes Isreal has evil tendencies, but painting Gadaffi as decent guy, and NATO as the big evil conspiracy is childish. The Voice of America has exposed the psychological aspects of its brutal intervention and hints at the mindset of the U.S./NATO Libyan pawns; several stories suggest that the "new" Libya will turn more toward its Arab identity than its African identity. Libyans are Arab!! They are 100 times more Arab then they are African!!! Who do you think a Libyan have more in common with Saudis and Egptians, or South Africans, and Kenyans. If you look at it objectively much of the claims don't hold up to scrutiny. PS I'm all for peace, no wars, no Israel biases, but McKinney is kind of dumb.

Wow, they really can't be serious. This is absolutely ridicules.

I still don't understand, why would Eritrea spend money on financing terrorist in Somalia. I really don't buy the whole they are fighting a proxy war with Ethiopia, it sounds way too theatrical. It's not like they're an al Qaeda sympathizer, what would they have to gain?

Supporting your own country's invaded and destructed.. . Only Somalis.. hahaha! The country is already destroyed and has been invaded by everything from famines to terrorist. You are misrepresenting these people, no body ever wants destruction. They just want al shabab to be defeated, and that's why they welcome the Kenyan presence in the South. You may not agree with the politics of it, but don't misrepresent these people and say they want destruction, thats just intellectually and morally dishonest

Che -Guevara, the answer to your question is no. The moment you join into a monetary union and have one central banking, you have given up some of your sovereignty. I think the idea of a monetary union is OK and all, but without a coherent complementary fiscal union, how can you sustain a monetary union?

No matter what, civilians always get the worst of it.

hahaha! he probable wants to invite her to a bunga bunga party.

xiinfaniin, conspiracy stories will get you no where. Your arguments don't fallow any rational or logical pattern. When the British couple, Paul and Rachel Chandler was kidnapped and held for one year by Somali pirates, the UK government did not use tanks and military jets to hunt for the abductor What kind of argument is that, clearly Kenya which is a bordering nation has much more of a reason to go in, then the UK which is thousands of miles away.

Ok, interesting stuff. 1.OdaySomali, with regard to piracy it might not be a huge domestic threat, however having such an orginized,well funded, and powerful crime entity challenges the legitimacy of any government whether now or in the future. Also from the large ransoms they get, they inflate prices and hurt the local poor. Plus stealings just not cool, lol 2.Qandalawi, im a little confused. You cant be serous? Alderman, that sounds actually pretty good but its very hard to do, people are very skeptical of secular governments it reminds them of Barre. It would most likely give al shabbab more bases to fight and recruit more members, couse they would paint govt as unIslamic.