Vans;704032 wrote: Read the complete answer with Qur'anic text and accounts from the Sunnah at: http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&ID=2409&CATE=144 al kawtariy is a kafir mushrik waxna kama qaato anigu hadii the aya's and the ahadith are not enough for you as a proof haye get the highway marka i asked u for proof not the words of kawtariy subxanaLaah

Al-Miskiin;703864 wrote: Marka playing football isn't making u a kafir, as loong as u dont have a Kafir albiitar?? So i need a muslim albiitar, than u can play as much as u can miyaa? Mida kale, about Inil xukmu Ila lillah! Marka the picture u have is a camel(means something living), that means dambi baad gashay? as the prophet said in Bukhari""Those who will be most severely punished by Allaah on the Day of Resurrection will be the image-makers."(or the ones that uses them aswell, cuz u can say something is haram making, but ok to use), marka waa maxay xukumkaadu? Allah ka casboo bal is xukun. last but not least, u asked al akh Polanyi about this: Shirka nin gaal ah baa xukuma? Asagaa hadalka qaybiya, marka ugu dambaysana gooya go'aanka, markaa dee soo maynan Ahayn Inil xukmu ila lillah?? Sida macalinka iskoolka , or the boss at the work. waxyaabo badan ayaa iskagakaa qaldan forst of al: xalaal iyo xaraam ma kahleeno ee waa kufri iyo shirk teeda kale:maba fahansanid macnaha TAXAAKUM taxaakum waa marka labo qof oo wax iskuheesta la dhex dhexaadinayo oo midba wax lagu xukminayo marka when im in a meeting aaway TAXAAKUMKU bal??? hadana wich kamel pic r u talking about???

adigana 'what is the source' beey kaaga dhegtay waa the koran, ahadith and sayings of the ulama maxaad kaloo raadinisaa?

Polanyi;703692 wrote: Ya Tahay, in that case the agreement for microsoft office/internet or buying furniture all make you a kaffir. Even a having a tenancy agreement or going to a disciplinary meeting at work make a kaffir, ifwe use your logic. Have you ever signed up to college or university? if there is kufr in a agreement nooca eey doontaba hanoqoto oo qofku 'i agree' sameeyo yes its kufr then lakiin what is the kufr of going to a meeting???

Vans;703705 wrote: Eeerm, Muslims are obliged to abide by the laws of the land and country they live in; be it Islamic or not. Wouldn't there be a conflict? daliil????

*Blessed;703384 wrote: Again what's your source? Yaanad ula dam dam leedahay these posts? These articles are so vague as they lack back drop and context. At this rate, wax Muslim la yidhaahdaaba majiraan baad na odhan. subhanaLaah Ilaahayoow hana indho tirin can u read??? if yes, maxaad kawadaa marka 'what's your source'??? adiga what is your source markaad leedahay diintu weey baneesay???

Al-Miskiin;703223 wrote: Subxan Allah, akhi waad ka badbadisay, waa maxay qofkii daawadda iyo kii ciyaaraa waa gaalo? Waxaas waa qowl qariib ah, qof kaaga horeeyey cinda ehlul cilmigana ma jiraan. Inil Xukmu ila lillah, xagay ka soo gashay kubad yaroo la ciyaaro. Hadaan kaligay just for fun u ciyaaro ka waran? Albiitarba jirin. Innil xukmu ila lillah waxay soo gashaa marka dawaaqiida laga hadlayo, albiitarka kubbadu ma xukumo wax ay shareecadu ka hadashay, wuxuu xukumaa, kubadda gacanta hadii lagu taabto, haday baxdo, hadii gool la dhaliyo, iwm. Markaa shareecada meelna kuma qorna ninkii gacanta ku taabta kubbad waxa laga yeelo, maaha arin ku saabsan Diinta, waa sida stop lighka red markuu noqdo la istaago oo kale. Kaasna ma daaquutbaa u baahan in lagu baxo? dhexdhexaadiye noocuu doonaba ha noqdo, ama maxkamad labo qof oo is furaya ama sport sida kubada cagta oo kale,,,, xakamka have to be a moslim thats a fact even when two people are fighting qofka dhex dhexaadinaya waa xakam and he have to be a moslim daliilka waakaasaa aan hore usoo qoray ee do with it what eva u like 'laa ikraaha fii diin'

maad akhriday waxa meesha ku qoran horta? there is no moslim who will seek for the a verdict from the kufar... whoever does this is a kafir hadaad kasoo hor jeedo taas bring up the aya's and the ahadith to proof ur point

Aaliyyah;702092 wrote: aww thats so cute lol would luv to be a granny... bt 10 years old getting married? theres something abt that makes me shiver..ma lil sis is abt that age couldnt imagine her married ..thats just crazy!..at least 14/15 yrs old person is understandable. Theres that certain maturity that is needed..even I think 14 and 15 isnt that mature bt better than 10.yikeS! yet something is cute abt being a granny at 23..lol .. walaashaa the way she is raised up is different from this women marka waxba hala yaabin,,, gabdho 20 jir ah baad arkisaa maanta oo maskaxda a child of 4yrs old ku jirto look at isha (ra) she was 9 when she get married with the prophet(asw)

waa cadaab eey istaahilaan waa ku fiicantahay less mushrikien in the earth

You can’t be Muslim without making Takfir on every Din except on al-Islam Making Takfir on every Din except al-Islam means that you are firmly convinced that every other Din is clear Kufr. Al-Islam is the message of all Prophets and everything else surely isn’t from Allah. Every Muslim – without any exception – knows that only Islam is the Din that came from Allah. وَمَن يَبْتَغِ غَيْرَ الْإِسْلَامِ دِينًا فَلَن يُقْبَلَ مِنْهُ وَهُوَ فِي الْآخِرَةِ مِنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ (آل* عمران:85) „And whoever seeks a Din other than al-Islam, (it) won’t be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be of the losers” (Al ‘Imran 3:85) If someone isn’t sure that every other Din except Islam is false then he isn’t a Muslim. So what about the one who says, “Hinduism is false but I don’t make Takfir on the Hindus in India who are worshipping innumerable idols?” Would he be Muslim because he “doesn’t say that Hinduism is correct but that some Hindus might have submitted fully to Allah”? Or would he rather be a Kafir because every single Hindu stands for the Din of the Hindus and because the Shirk of the Hindus wouldn’t exist if there weren’t Hindus who would be committing it? To discern the truth in this question isn’t difficult at all. It has already been proven that every Din that isn’t established on at-Tawhid and on omitting Shirk truly isn’t a Din with which Allah is pleased. But rather he is only pleased with al-Islam. If somebody knows at-Tawhid and becomes a Muslim his Din is al-Islam. And al-Islam is binding to making Takfir on every other Din. And no one can be Muslim if he calls those who follow another Din Muslims. Either he wouldn’t know that every other Din than Islam is Kufr – under this condition he could never have embraced Islam, or he knows it but denies this fact intentionally and says that the Kuffar have truly submitted to Allah, too. In this case he can’t be a Muslim as well. He also can’t make excuses for himself through sayings like, “I don’t have enough knowledge to make Takfir” - because this statement surely also means, “I don’t even have enough knowledge to be a Muslim.” Ibnu Hazm said in al-Muhalla (1/2): أَوَّلُ مَا يَلْزَمُ كُلَّ أَحَدٍ, وَلاَ يَصِحُّ الإِسْلاَمُ إلاَّ بِهِ أَنْ يَعْلَمَ الْمَرْءُ بِقَلْبِهِ عِلْمَ يَقِينٍ وَإِخْلاَصٍ لاَ يَكُونُ لِشَيْءٍ مِنْ الشَّكِّ فِيهِ أَثَرٌ وَيَنْطِقَ بِلِسَانِهِ, وَلاَ بُدَّ بِأَنْ لاَ إلَهَ إلاَّ اللَّهُ, وَأَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ The first thing which is necessary for everyone and without which al-Islam (of the single person) is never valid is: That the person knows with his heart through knowledge of Yaqin (certainty) and Ikhlas (sincerity) - without having a single trace of doubt - and says (it) with his tongue: That there is no Ilah (deity) except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah” If he knows at-Tawhid he also knows that every other Din is false. And because of this he has to make Takfir on everyone who calls himself Muslim but who instead of practicing Tawhid commits Shirk. If he should say, “I only make Takfir on their false Din but not on the people themselves” – then he would also have to say, “I don’t make Takfir on the Jews or Hindus but only on their Din. But I consider them to be Muslims because they are committing Shirk unknowingly. So I make Takfir on their Din but not on every single person among them, rather they are excused because of their ignorance.” And if someone would claim that there exists a difference between the Kuffar who call themselves Muslims and between the Jews and Hindus then he is actually in doubt about something which he mustn’t doubt. Because he says, “If you don’t follow Islam as your Din you aren’t always Kafir.” But rather you would be a Kafir if you firstly wouldn’t follow the correct Din and secondly also wouldn’t say ‘La ilaha illa Allah, Muhammadun Rasulullah.’ Ibnu Taymiyyah said in Majmu’ ul-Fatawa (3/93) that, فَأَمَرَنَا أَنْ نَقُولَ : آمَنَّا بِهَذَا كُلِّهِ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ فَمَنْ بَلَغَتْهُ رِسَالَةُ مُحَمَّدٍ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَلَمْ يُقِرَّ بِمَا جَاءَ بِهِ لَمْ يَكُنْ مُسْلِمًا وَلَا مُؤْمِنًا ؛ بَلْ يَكُونُ كَافِرًا وَإِنْ زَعْم أَنَّهُ مُسْلِمٌ أَوْ مُؤْمِنٌ So He has ordered us to say, “We have Iman in all of this (in all books and Prophets) and we are Muslims for Him. So whomever reached the message of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم and doesn’t confirm that with which he came - he is neither a Muslim nor a Mu’min (believer). Rather he is a Kafir even if he claims that he is Muslim or Mu’min (believer). The meaning of al-Islam It is written in ad-Durar us-Saniyyah (1/117) about the meaning of al-Islam, وهو الاستسلام لله بالتوحيد، والانقياد له بالطاعة، والبراءة من الشرك وأهله And it (al-Islam) is that you submit to Allah through Tawhid and also submit to Him through obedience and the renouncement of ash-Shirk and its people. La ilaha illa Allah has seven known conditions (according to another definition they are eight but the result stays the same). Does a Munafiq, a hypocrite, fulfill all these conditions? Surely he doesn’t … because he isn’t honest and doesn’t have Ikhlas (sincerity). Ibnu Taymiyyah said in Majmu’ ul-Fatawa (14/284), فَكُلُّ مَنْ لَمْ يَعْبُدْ اللَّهَ مُخْلِصًا لَهُ الدِّينَ ، فَلَا بُدَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ مُشْرِكًا عَابِدًا لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ So whoever doesn’t worship Allah with Ikhlas (sincerity) towards Him in the Din – it is inevitable that he’s a Mushrik who is a worshipper of someone else than Allah. A Munafiq is hiding his Kufr, but every Muslim has to know: Whoever is a hypocrite in his heart isn’t a Muslim. The Muslim doesn’t know the hidden Nifaq (hypocrisy) of the people but he knows: Allah will never let a Munafiq enter Paradise, no matter who he is. As long as they don’t repent sincerely from everything before their death they’ll enter Hellfire. Here, while talking about Nifaq, no one would even dream about talking of preventive factors for Takfir like, “Someone is Munafiq but doesn’t know that Nifaq is Kufr so he is Muslim with Allah.” And a Mushrik doesn’t have Ikhlas as well, so we can see another time: Whoever doesn’t worship Allah alone and doesn’t have Ikhlas toward Him and doesn’t commit any Shirk – can never be a Muslim. An ignorant Mushrik is also someone who commits Shirk, and everyone who commits Shirk is called a Mushrik. Just as everyone who practices Islam is a Muslim. So whoever knows that everyone who practices Islam is also a Muslim has to know as well that everyone who commits Shirk is a Mushrik. There are obstacles that prevent someone from becoming a Muslim. Part of them are arrogance, pride and that you love the Dunya (the worldly life) more than anything else and ignorance about Tawhid!

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Allahu ta’ala said, فَاعْلَمْ أَنَّهُ لَا إِلَهٌ إِلَّا اللَّهُ (محمد:19) „So know that there is no Ilah except Allah (nobody deserves worship except Him).” (Muhammad 47:19) And He ta’ala said, إِنَّ الدِّينَ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ الْإِسْلَامُ (آل عمران:19) „Truly, the Din with Allah is al-Islam.” (Al ‘Imran 3:19) Ibnu Kathir said in his Tafsir (2/25), إخبار من الله تعالى بأنه لا دين عنده يقبله من أحد سوى الإسلام، وهو اتباع الرسل فيما بعثهم الله به في كل حين, حتى ختموا بمحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم “(This is) a notification from Allahu ta’ala that there is no Din with Him that He would accept from anyone except al-Islam. And it (al-Islam) is to follow the Messengers in that which He has always sent them with until they were completed by Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم.” In order to be Muslim – may Allah guide you and let you be of the successful ones – you have to know how to worship Allah alone. Whoever worships Allah alone is a Muslim and a Muwahhid (someone who worships Allah alone through Tawhid) but whoever doesn’t do that isn’t a Muslim. All Muslims agree that without Tawhid (!) you can’t be a Muslim. But whoever commits Shirk doesn’t have Tawhid. It is written in Majmu’ ul-Fatawa from Ibnu Taymiyyah (14/282) that, وَلِهَذَا كَانَ كُلُّ مَنْ لَمْ يَعْبُدْ اللَّهَ وَحْدَهُ ، فَلَا بُدَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ عَابِدًا لِغَيْرِهِ . يَعْبُدُ غَيْرَهُ فَيَكُونُ مُشْرِكًا . وَلَيْسَ فِي بَنِي آدَمَ قِسْمٌ ثَالِثٌ . بَلْ إمَّا مُوَحِّدٌ ، أَوْ مُشْرِكٌ “And because of this is everyone who doesn’t worship Allah alone a worshipper of something else. He worships something other than Him so he is a Mushrik. And there is no third party among the sons of Adam but either he is Muwahhid (someone who worships Allah alone) or he is Mushrik.” To be a Muslim you need knowledge and you have to practice it Whoever wants to worship Allahu ta’ala needs to know how to do this. Not everyone who wants to be Muslim is one. It is reported in the Qur’an that Yusuf عليه السلام said, إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ أَمَرَ أَلَّا تَعْبُدُوا إِلَّا إِيَّاهُ ذَلِكَ الدِّينُ الْقَيِّمُ وَلَكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ (يوسف:40) “The Hukm (the judgment) is for none but Allah. He has commanded that you worship none but Him; that is the straight Din, but most men know not.” (Yusuf 12:40) This Ayah proofs that the straight Din is to worship Allah alone. But whoever commits Shirk follows a different Din than this one, and doesn’t follow the Prophets. In the Tafsir of Ibnu Kathir (4/390) it says, ثم قال: ذلك الدين القيم أي: هذا الذي أدعوكم إليه من توحيد الله، وإخلاص العمل له، هو الدين المستقيم، الذي أمر الله به وأنزل به الحجة والبرهان الذي يحبه ويرضاه. { وَلَكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لا يَعْلَمُونَ } أي: فلهذا كان أكثرهم مشركين. { وَمَا أَكْثَرُ النَّاسِ وَلَوْ حَرَصْتَ بِمُؤْمِنِينَ } يوسف: 103 Then he said: That is the straight Din, that means: That to which I call you of Tawhid towards Allah and Ikhlas (sincerity) in the deeds (performed) for Him is the straight Din which Allah has made obligatory upon us and for which He has sent down the criterion and the clear proof, (the Din) which He loves and is pleased with. “But most men know not.” That means: Because of this most of them are Mushrikin. “And most of mankind are not – even if you desire (it eagerly) – Mu’minin (believers).” (Yusuf 12:103) Can you be Muslim without submitting to Allah? Here appears an important question: Can you be Muslim without submitting to Allah (= practicing Tawhid)? The answer is not difficult because no Muslim can answer this question with ‘yes’. But what exactly is Islam? The answer can be found in a Hadith from the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم which has been narrated by Abu Hurayrah رضي الله عنه. In this Hadith Jibril عليه السلام is asking a question and receives the following answer, قَالَ مَا الْإِسْلَامُ قَالَ الْإِسْلَامُ أَنْ تَعْبُدَ اللَّهَ وَلَا تُشْرِكَ بِهِ شَيْئًا (صحيح البخاري, كتاب الإيمان) He (Jibrli عليه السلام) said, „What is al-Islam?“ He (Rasulullah صلى الله عليه وسلم) said, „Al-Islam is that you worship Allah and don’t commit any Shirk against Him.“ (Sahih ul-Bukhariyy, Kitab ul-Iman) Thereby it is clear what the meaning of Islam is. So let’s change the above mentioned question a bit: Can you be Muslim without worshipping Allah and without committing any Shirk? The meaning of the question didn’t even change in the least, so the answer still has to be ‘no’. If someone accepts that you can’t be Muslim without practicing Islam then he is accepting at the same time that nobody can be a Muslim if he commits Shirk. Because Islam is that you worship Allah and don’t commit any Shirk. وَمَن يَبْتَغِ غَيْرَ الْإِسْلَامِ دِينًا فَلَن يُقْبَلَ مِنْهُ وَهُوَ فِي الْآخِرَةِ مِنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ (آل* عمران:85) „And whoever seeks a Din other than al-Islam, (it) won’t be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be of the losers” (Al ‘Imran 3:85) So if someone would say, “You can be Muslim whilst committing Shirk”, then he is contradicting the mentioned statement of Rasulullah صلى الله عليه وسلم. He said, “Al-Islam is that you worship Allah and don’t commit any Shirk against Him.” But someone else says, “Al-Islam is that you worship Allah even whilst committing Shirk. If you worship Allah but are committing Shirk you can be Muslim.” Additionally: As long as someone doesn’t know that you can never be a Muslim if you don’t worship Allah alone, he can’t be Muslim as well - no matter if he has already heard about the Hadith, or not. Of course it is correct that you’re not allowed to say something about al-Islam without knowledge. But it is also a part of talking without knowledge if you say, “Not everyone who commits Shirk is also a Muskrik. But rather many of them are Shirk-committing Muslims - that means, they commit Shirk but have fully submitted to Allah.” This is a contradiction in itself. Who says that he never makes Takfir on those who call themselves Muslims but who are committing Shirk is saying through this that he is on the same Din as they are. Whoever doesn’t make Takfir on them (=doesn’t attribute Kufr to them) wouldn’t be following at-Tawhid himself. There are just Muslims and Mushrikun/Kuffar. So if someone doesn’t call a person a Mushrik/Kafir he is automatically calling him a Muslim. Whoever says, “I’m Muslim but those who commit Shirk are Muslims, too, as long as they are professing Islam” – actually says that you can be Muslim if you don’t commit Shirk as well as if you commit Shirk. In fact he is talking about a new Din. In al-Islam no one can commit Shirk without leaving the Din, وَلَقَدْ أُوحِيَ إِلَيْكَ وَإِلَى الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِكَ لَئِنْ أَشْرَكْتَ لَيَحْبَطَنَّ عَمَلُكَ وَلَتَكُونَنَّ مِنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ (الزمر:65) „And it has already been revealed to you and to those before you: ‘If you commit Shirk, (then) surely, (all) your deeds will be in vain, and you will certainly be among the losers.” (az-Zumar 39:65) But in his Din it isn’t a condition to omit committing Shirk. But rather he is saying, “Whoever commits in my Din (which he wrongfully calls Islam) Shirk doesn’t become a Mushrik because of this. But just if he knows that it is Shirk - then he would be leaving the Din.” But how come? He leaves al-Islam although you can only become Muslim if you know the difference between Tawhid and Shirk?! Since when can you avoid something intentionally whilst being unaware of its nature? That means that you can avoid Shirk without knowing its real meaning?! Whoever doesn’t know the difference between Islam and Shirk doesn’t know al-Islam itself. And who doesn’t know al-Islam can’t enter into it, as long as he doesn’t learn its foundation – at-Tawhid. This is also clarified by this Hadith: عَنْ عُثْمَانَ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ مَنْ مَاتَ وَهُوَ يَعْلَمُ أَنَّهُ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ دَخَلَ الْجَنَّةَ (صحيح مسلم, كتاب الإيمان) It is narrated from ‘Uthmanرضي الله عنه that he said, “The Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم said, ‘Who dies while he knows that there is no Ilah (deity) except Allah will enter Paradise.’” (Sahihu Muslim, Kitab ul-Iman) But whoever dies without knowing this won’t enter Paradise. First of all you have to know Allah then you have to know that there is no Ilah (deity) except Him and finally you also have to submit to Him. And who doesn’t fulfill all of these points can’t be a Muslim.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Whoever Calls The Kuffar “Good People” Isn't A Muslim There exists a widespread statement which destroys the Iman in Allah in one's heart completely. Lots of people – who call themselves Muslims – aren't really mindful of this. But nevertheless it is a grave statement. It is about the assertion of some that the Kuffar would be “good people”. Or, that a specific Kafir would be a “good person” just because he doesn't commit as much bad deeds as others do. Whoever calls the Kuffar “good people” isn't a Muslim. The reason for this is that by this statement he rejects that Kufr and Shirk are the worst things ever. Even if he knows in his heart that it is different, he has already uttered it so he isn't one of the Muslims. Allahu ta’ala said, وَلَقَدْ قَالُوا كَلِمَةَ الْكُفْرِ وَكَفَرُوا بَعْدَ إِسْلَامِهِمْ And they have already uttered the word of Kufr, and they committed Kufr after their Islam. (at-Taubah: 74) This Ayah proves that one leaves al-Islam if he utters clear Kufr - even if one doesn't mean what he said. If someone utters it intentional without making a slip of the tongue he leaves al-Islam because of that. And the people surely can't choose for themselves what counts as clear Kufr in Islam. There are statements which are considered by them as ambiguous. But the desires of the people do not invalidate the laws of Islam. Allahu ta’ala said, وَلَوِ اتَّبَعَ الْحَقُّ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ لَفَسَدَتِ السَّمَاوَاتُ وَالْأَرْضُ وَمَنْ فِيهِنَّ (المؤمنون:71) And if the truth would have followed their desires the heavens, the earth, and who is in them would have been corrupted. (al-Mu'minun: 71) It is written in ad-Durar us-Saniyyah (13/83), وكثير منها يقع فيها الإنسان، ولا يدري أنه كفر، بل يظنه خفيفا؛ ومرادنا الإنسان الذي يدعي معرفة التوحيد، والبراءة من الشرك There is much of that which the human being does, while he doesn't know that it is Kufr. Rather he deems it to be light. And by “the human being” we mean the one who claims to know at-Tawhid, and (who claims) to disassociate himself from ash-Shirk. There are many who think that they have fully understood at-Tawhid. So they assume to know what it means to worship Allah Alone, and none else. But...did they really already understand everything correctly? Everybody who has recognized the Din of Allah also knows that the Kuffar aren't good people. And how could that be? They worship others besides Allah, deny the truth, or just turn away. Allahu ta’ala said, إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ وَالْمُشْرِكِينَ فِي نَارِ جَهَنَّمَ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا أُولَئِكَ هُمْ شَرُّ الْبَرِيَّةِ (6) (البينة) Verily, those who commit Kufr from (among) the people of the Scripture and the Mushrikin are in the fire of Jahannam. These are the worst of creatures. (al-Bayyinah: 6) Ibnu Hazm said in al-Fisal fil-Milal wal-Ahwa' wan-Nihal (2/35), ولا خير في كافر And there is no good in a Kafir. Muhammad Ibnu ’Abdil-Wahhab said in Nawaqid al-Islam, الثالث : من لم يكفر المشركين أو شك في كفرهم أو صحح مذهبهم كفر The third [point which makes one a Kafir]: Whoever doesn't make Takfir on the Mushrikin, or doubts their Kufr, or declares their way to be correct has committed Kufr. Whoever claims that the Kuffar are good people declares by this statement their way to be correct - even if he isn't serious. Every Muslim stands for al-Islam, just as every Kafir stands for al-Kufr. The one who follows a Din that is completely false and wicked never can be a good person as long as he follows it. But whoever after all describes him as good negates by his statement that his Din is false. It isn't possible to combine these two opposites, just as water and fire don't occur together.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم The Civil Marriage Nowadays many types of Shirk and Kufr exist which are hard to recognize for some. One of them is the civil marriage. Why exactly it is Kufr will in sha'a Allah become more obvious if we first of all look at another type of Kufr marriage that resembles it a lot: For example, if a Muslim wants to marry a woman from Ahl ul-Kitab he can only marry her according to the laws of al-Islam. It is clear that he cannot marry her according to the laws of her Din, and that he would be Kafir if he did that. So if he would go to the church or synagogue (the place where the Jews pray), and demand from the followers of her Din that they marry him to her – then he demands from them to determine something. Namely, that from now on he is allowed to stay with that woman, that everyone of them has certain “rights” and “obligations”, and so on. Allahu ta’ala said, إِنِ الْحُكْمُ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ أَمَرَ أَلَّا تَعْبُدُوا إِلَّا إِيَّاهُ ذٰلِكَ الدِّينُ الْقَيِّمُ وَلٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ (يوسف: 40) Verily, the Hukm (judgment) is only for Allah. He has ordained that you worship only Him. That is the straight Din but most of men know not.“ (Yusuf: 40) If someone marries that women in the church or synagogue according to the laws of the Kuffar he shows thereby that it doesn't bother him that these people stipulate a Hukm (judgment, law) for him. If someone marries in a registry office his situation doesn't look much different. In such a registry office people are being married off according to the rules of a false Din – namely, democracy. It is not the place of marriage that counts, or that one calls it a religious marriage or a civil one – rather what counts is if one marries according to the rules of al-Islam, or in another way. How would it be if a Muslim would marry an atheist? He surely wouldn't be Muslim anymore after that since such a marriage is forbidden in Islam. He would think that he is now her husband and she his wife. And that means that he would deny one of the prohibitions of Allah. Allahu ta’ala has forbidden such a thing and declared it to be invalid. But whoever declares such a marriage to be allowed he denies one of the laws of Allah. He ta’ala said, وَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنِ افْتَرَىٰ عَلَى اللَّهِ كَذِبًا أَوْ كَذَّبَ بِآيَاتِهِ إِنَّهُ لَا يُفْلِحُ الظَّالِمُونَ (الأنعام: 21) And who is more unjust than the one who invents a lie against Allah or denies His Ayat? Verily, those who are unjust won't attain success (in the Hereafter). (al-An’am: 21) Denying the Ayat of Allah doesn't only happen if somebody reads an Ayah of the Qur'an and then says, “I don't believe in this anymore.” It also happens by denying something completely obvious like the prohibition of alcohol for example. In this case he could say as often as he wants that the Ayah which prohibits alcohol is part of the Qur'an and true – he still denies it and is contradicting himself. Even if he tries to explain it by sayings like, “Yes, the Ayah is correct but nowadays you don't have to abide by it, and I am Muslim and believe in the Qur'an and Sunnah”- this surely doesn't avail him in anything. So that man would claim that this atheist is his wife. And this statement already shows that he considers the marriage to be valid. His situation isn't at all like that of the one who spends some time together with a woman and commits sins. This alone would already be forbidden but in that case he at least wouldn't have declared something to be allowed. But the one who says, “This woman is my wife and we are married” doesn't only commit a sin because he is together with her but he is declaring something to be allowed. Even if a Muslim commits a major sin he still is Muslim. But whoever declares something that Allah has forbidden to be allowed he isn't a Muslim anymore. About the divorce in court: No-one can can go to the court in order to seek any judgment from them. To let oneself being judged by the laws of Kufr is something that definitely takes one out of Islam. Allahu ta’ala said, أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ مِنْ قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَنْ يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَنْ يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا Haven't you seen those who claim to have Iman in that which was sent down to you and in that which has been sent down before you? They want to go for judgment to the Taghut, and they already have been commanded to commit Kufr against him. And the Shaytan wants to lead them far astray. (an-Nisa': 60) Whoever demands a Hukm from a Taghut (i.e. does Tahakum) asks him to set something for him by his Kufr-laws. Never is it possible to tell a Taghut to enact a new Kufr-law. If somebody demands from the government that they declare a certain thing to be allowed or forbidden he surely isn't a Muslim anymore. If someone asks them to make something allowed by law for the whole nation he cannot be Muslim. But what about if he “only” asks them to make it allowed for him alone, and not for the others? That would be exactly the same, with the exception that it isn't about a law that concerns the whole nation but “only” a single person. It's the same case with the divorce. Let's say, someone would demand from the state to repeal all existing civil marriages – so now he would demand Kufr from them. Because they would repeal them by law, and would enact by law that the couples don't have any “rights” or “obligations” anymore. Whoever demands something like this contradicts “La ilaha illa Allah” by his deeds. No matter if he went therefor before the court, or if he himself joined the government in order to make new laws together with them, or whatever. If this point was understandable then it is in sha'a Allah understandable as well what the case of the one who asks the court for divorce is. He would demand a Hukm from the Taghut, and would ask him to set something according to the law which concerns him and his wife. Here something was determined by law, while Allahu ta’ala is the One Who has determined for mankind what is obligatory for them and what is not, and what is allowed or forbidden. Allahu ta’ala said, أَمْ لَهُمْ شُرَكَاءُ شَرَعُوا لَهُمْ مِنَ الدِّينِ مَا لَمْ يَأْذَنْ بِهِ اللَّهُ (الشورى:21) Or do they have partners who have enjoined on them that of the Din which Allah hasn't made allowed? (ash-Shura:21) Since in al-Islam laws for the whole life are set. If someone claims that people among themselves can allow or forbid some things regarding “worldy matters” without any problem then he would have said thereby, “Only Allah can make laws in the religious area but the humans can also make laws in the wordly area.” And he wouldn't have attributed the right of legislation to Allah in all areas because of which he wouldn't be a Muslim.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Whoever Demands A Verdict From The Kuffar Worships Them Allahu ta’ala said, أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ مِنْ قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَنْ يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَنْ يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا Haven't you seen those who claim that they have Iman in that which was sent down to you and in that which has been sent down before you? They want to go for judgment to the Taghut , and they already have been commanded to do Kufr against him. And the Shaytan wants to lead them far astray. (an-Nisa':60) Abdurrahman As-Sa’diyy said in al-Qawl as-Sadid – his explanation of Kitab at-Tawhid – about this Ayah, والواجب على كل أحد أن لا يتخذ غير الله حكما وأن يرد ما تنازع فيه الناس إلى الله ورسوله وبذلك يكون دين العبد كله لله وتوحيده خالصا لوجه الله، وكل من حاكم إلى غير حكم الله ورسوله فقد حاكم إلى الطاغوت وإن زعم أنه مؤمن فهو كاذب فالإيمان لا يصح ولا يتم إلا بتحكيم الله ورسوله في أصول الدين وفروعه وفي كل الحقوق كما ذكره المصنف في الباب الآخر، فمن حاكم إلى غير الله ورسوله فقد اتخذ ذلك ربا وقد حاكم إلى الطاغوت . And it is obligatory on every single person that he doesn't take anyone except Allah as a judge, and that he brings that in which the people differ back to Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم . By this the whole Din of the slave will be for Allah, and his Tawhid will absolutely be for the Face of Allah. And everyone who goes for judgment to someone else than Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم already went for judgment to the Taghut. And if he claims that he is a Mu'min then he's a liar. The Iman is not valid and doesn't become complete except by going for judgment to Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم , in the foundations of the Din and its subbranches [which are important as well, since there is nothing unimportant in Islam], and concerning all rights, just as the author [Muhammad Ibnu ’Abdil-Wahhab] mentioned in another chapter. So whoever demands a verdict from someone else than Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم he has already demanded a verdict from the Taghut.

kubada cagta arbitarka dhex dhexaadinaya ee xukumka heesta waa kaafir, hadana kubada cagta maxkamado yio qawaaniin gooni u ah baa jira oo diinta Islaamka waxba kaga jirin saas darteed waa kufri qofkii ciyaara iyo kii dawadaba 'Inal xukma liLaah' Whoever Demands A Verdict From The Kuffar Worships Them Allahu ta’ala said, أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ مِنْ قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَنْ يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَنْ يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا Haven't you seen those who claim that they have Iman in that which was sent down to you and in that which has been sent down before you? They want to go for judgment to the Taghut , and they already have been commanded to do Kufr against him. And the Shaytan wants to lead them far astray. (an-Nisa':60) Abdurrahman As-Sa’diyy said in al-Qawl as-Sadid – his explanation of Kitab at-Tawhid – about this Ayah, والواجب على كل أحد أن لا يتخذ غير الله حكما وأن يرد ما تنازع فيه الناس إلى الله ورسوله وبذلك يكون دين العبد كله لله وتوحيده خالصا لوجه الله، وكل من حاكم إلى غير حكم الله ورسوله فقد حاكم إلى الطاغوت وإن زعم أنه مؤمن فهو كاذب فالإيمان لا يصح ولا يتم إلا بتحكيم الله ورسوله في أصول الدين وفروعه وفي كل الحقوق كما ذكره المصنف في الباب الآخر، فمن حاكم إلى غير الله ورسوله فقد اتخذ ذلك ربا وقد حاكم إلى الطاغوت . And it is obligatory on every single person that he doesn't take anyone except Allah as a judge, and that he brings that in which the people differ back to Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم . By this the whole Din of the slave will be for Allah, and his Tawhid will absolutely be for the Face of Allah. And everyone who goes for judgment to someone else than Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم already went for judgment to the Taghut. And if he claims that he is a Mu'min then he's a liar. The Iman is not valid and doesn't become complete except by going for judgment to Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم , in the foundations of the Din and its subbranches [which are important as well, since there is nothing unimportant in Islam], and concerning all rights, just as the author [Muhammad Ibnu ’Abdil-Wahhab] mentioned in another chapter. So whoever demands a verdict from someone else than Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم he has already demanded a verdict from the Taghut.

in times of war the moslim have to terror the enemy so they fear them so yes moslims are terrorist

are you now saying food and shelter are more important than Islam? maku fahmin really ee ii jilci bal

nur whats the point marka? they want democracy, with other words: they want shirk

i hate sufi's

haa nur like i said: wrong ta'wil is an excuse in matters of Furuudu Diin and not in Aslu Diin Ignorance sidoo kale qofkii shirk/kufr gala waa mushrik/kafir haduu xitaa ignorant yahay ama wrong ta'wil sameeyo, even if he is saying the Shahada

Nur;85621 wrote: Dadkiina ayagoo tukanaya ayey u doodayaan hirgelnta qawaaniintaas bashariga ah ayagoon dareynsaneen iney galeen diin kale ( maxaa yeelay macnaha Diin, ayaa fahamkiisii lumay) Nur nur laxaad kawadaa qoraalkaan: ayagoo dareynsaneen ineey galeen diin kale? yacni diinta islaamka beey ka baxeen baad kawadaa miyaa?

subhanaLaah dadka maxaa camal daro kabadatay

BOB;234386 wrote: Why waste your time and energy when you knew the problem all along? How can she have doubts on something that she knows nothing of in the first place? Having worldly education does not make her smart whilst in terms of Islam she remains IGNORANT . waaaw the most wise words I have read since my visites to this forum mashaAllah

Ismalura;684593 wrote: It is not about imitating a qowm; whether we like it or not we are part of this community now. The Gregorian calendar is used every where we go. It effects our work, school schedule i.w.m. As long us you don't celebrate with haram acts I don't see anything wrong with noticing that a new year has started. Naga daaya nimanyahow ha na walina ee ! so marka waxaa kawadaa we can do all the things they do sabatoo ah 'we r part of the community'??? when the prohet started his da'wa and there was no darul islam and the moslims were living in the samen land as the mushrikien, do u think ineey ku daydeen oo dhaheen 'we r part of them'???