^^loool you like it too, coincidently my hair looks exactly like that today except it's under one big hijab...man don't i love this month...

Interesting video that claims vitamin B17 prevents and or cures CANCER

Good call KK, about time someone gave her free tips on how to be presentable on tv

lol you guys are something else xataa dadki dhintaa idinka fakanla

^^It’s actually xadith saxiix ah, I remember reading it before so I will try to find it on my riyadu salixin after I leave work insha allah. edit: BOB jazaaka allah kheyr bro, insha allah kuwii kafaaidaysta allaha naga dhigo

^^ don't knock Obama just yet I think he has potential

^^ is it a desert?

baasto yaryarisey wax ladhoho waligeey mamaqal do you mean macaroni by any chance or is this something else

I think its great idea and could work with some restrictions on who gets it and what they can do with it. It would be best if it’s targeted to the poor that couldn’t afford to start any kind of savings for their off springs ( yeah I know those people shouldn’t have kids in the first place but go with me here for a sec). Let’s say poor family is one that has household income below the poverty guidelines and obviously household in that income level will already be on welfare so wouldn’t this be great way to assure the next generation will be off the system. Now think about it $5000 today is nothing but if invested wisely and taking into account the power of compounding interest it could be worth 40 to 60k in 18 to 20 years. That kind of money gives the poor kid a lot of options to invest it at that time, to start their own business, use it for tuition or for down payment on a primary house. Restrictions would be that parents can not touch that money no matter what and if the kid dies before the funds can be accessed it goes back to the government. PS, lazy funny you speak against this cuz as far as I know the Canadians have similar programs

I feel like banging my head on the wall :mad: [ October 02, 2007, 06:05 PM: Message edited by: *Pujah* ]

Don't people get tired of this lady!

^^I am really interested in this other thread you keep referring to

loool @ the Kenyan names magacya ku foolxumaa miyaa laga iibshay toloow I like the SA names, at least they all have stories and are original

^^LOL @ B ...I knew you wouldn't leave it to chance

Very sad!

^^^arlee adi maaba magac dad wax kasheegaya bal magacaad wadited iyo wajiga aad moodo qaamu qashiir inuu kaga dhacay bal eeg

^^lool you best get your muxrim there with you lady...yaan lagu soo furin saacadaan adigoo halxabo soo tuurin :cool:

loool I didn't read the thread that well aperantly...i heard death and assumed someone died **gives evil looks to Neph** few months ago I had a really bad dream where I was struggling to breath and alhamdulilah waan ashahadanayey ...I thought that was good. Ilaahay hanoo wada naxaristo jidka saxda ahna nagu hanuuniyo Aamin Waves at Pucca, long time no see lady

Innaa liilaahi wa inaa illahi raajicuun yaa dhintay?

Money would be used for college or a house downpayment WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 "baby bond" from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home. Clinton, her party's front-runner in the 2008 race, made the suggestion during a forum hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus. "I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that downpayment on their first home," she said. The New York senator did not offer any estimate of the total cost of such a program or how she would pay for it. Approximately 4 million babies are born each year in the United States. Clinton said such an account program would help Americans get back to the tradition of savings that she remembers as a child, and has become harder to accomplish in the face of rising college and housing costs. She argued that wealthy people "get to have all kinds of tax incentives to save, but most people can't afford to do that." What do you think? Link

^^how much are you paying? for the right price I will give you all the 411

perfume cannot hide your bio odor uff ...i was in training with this lady and she smelled disgusting with hint of catar ...she almost caused me my soon :mad:

Originally posted by STHLM_Lady: I can relate to it apart from "they were best friends before..."I met this guy and after a while it seemed to get worse ...so i caught him checking a girl one time we were out... and what can I say,I made a big deal of it and ended it basically i agree with "if you can´t take the heat ,get out of the kitchen. " saying, as someone in here suggested ^^lol how else would she have handled that without making a big deal out of it...i mean isn't it prety obvious when someone checks someone else while they're out with you...of course ya gonna chew their face out . . there i feel better already phew!

^^grow your beards

Imam Khaleel Mohammed's defense of inter-faith marriage (Note: This defense uses the example of a Muslim woman marrying a Christian man, but the principles apply to marrying any non-Muslim man.) "The verse that is traditionally used by imams to prohibit an inter-religious marriage is Qur'an 5:5, which states: 'This day, all innately good things are lawful for you... Lawful to you are the chaste women from among those who have been given the Book before you...' Traditional imams contend that since women are mentioned, and men are not, then it must be understood that the marriage of Muslim women with non-Muslim men is forbidden. This, however, is problematic. For the Qur'an is addressed, because of the custom of the time, to men. It is for this reason that the Qur'an says, for example, "And when you divorce your wives..." or "During the nights of fasting [Ramadan] you may have sex with your wives..." What do I mean by the custom of the time? In the tribal context, the woman, once married, accepted the husband as master. He, in turn, accepted the religion of his tribal chief. Given that reality, a whole host of issues arose for Muslim scholars -- issues that made them oppose inter-religious marriages for women. One issue was, whereas Muslims honor the non-Muslim prophets, followers of the other two monotheistic religions do not honor Muhammad, and that would put the Muslim woman in the terrible position of having her prophet disrespected. Another issue was that most Christians see Jesus as God, and for a Muslim to attribute divinity to a human in unthinkable. Then, too, there was the problem of the children from such a marriage, who would presumably be brought up in the religion of the male spouse. But remember that all of these 'issues' assume the woman must take the faith of her non-Muslim husband, and that is clearly not the case in your relationship. You live in a different time and a different place. To be sure, most Muslims would argue that the Qur'an is true for all time and all places. If we go by that logic, then we must acknowledge that the Qur'an is still sympathetic to your dream of marrying a Christian man. Even though he is a Christian, the Qur'an does not hold that against him. For while mentioning that there are Christians who take Jesus as God, Islam's main document calls this 'kufr' (disbelief/ingratitude) rather than 'shirk' (polytheism). It's a significant distinction because, in another verse, the Qur'an also states that Christians who do good deeds have the right to enter heaven. Christian creedal beliefs are the same for both male and female followers of Christianity, so how can the Qur'an allow marriage to the Christian woman but not to the Christian man? The evidence indicates that the main hang-up is the problem I emphasized above -- that the religion of the male spouse becomes dominant (as also evidenced in the Book of Ruth in the Hebrew Bible). In our day, since Qur'anic Islam (as opposed to the Islam of the male jurists) must acknowledge the radical notion that women are equals of men, that women have legal rights, and that those rights include placing conditions on the marriage (what you and I would term a 'pre-nuptial agreement'), then an inter-faith marriage can take place on condition that neither spouse will be forcibly converted to the other's religion. As long as that condition is respected, you and she have my blessing. On the question of children, certainly there will be some religious confusion. But as a Muslim scholar, I can tell you that the Qur'an advocates the use of the heart and mind in forming opinions. If both parents are faithful to their interpretations of the Creator's will, then the children will make informed decisions when they come of age. I would be happy to officiate at the ceremony depending on my availability. You may reach me through www.forpeoplewhothink.org.” Dr. Khaleel Mohammed studied Sharia at Muhammad bin Saud University in Riyadh (Sunni) and the Zeinabiyya in Damascus (Shia). He holds a Ph.D. in Islamic law from McGill University. these evil "imams" hijack islam :mad: