You got her number after she puked on you?????? "Call me!" LOL

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

wyre;923098 wrote: don't you think that is a rude thing to say to a somali sister Looks like APO was on point when he said after all you do live in an asexual society. Wyre, you do realize that after a certain age boys and girls develop certain 'urges', right? and perhaps you haven't figured it out, but one of the more low-key, minimal-damage outlets for soothing (I can't think of a better word) these 'urges' is through some intimate conversations. Now if you think it's rude to imply a sister may need intimacy, then I think you may have skipped a few chapters in the book of life.

My mistake Wyre, I was distracted by There is this girl and this, the man loves her so much, but as she says, she doesn't like him back, the fact is that they talk for about two hours every day, (h'm not jealous, yes I love her but like a sister) so your question aside, you are WAY too involved in this example scenario: "the man loves her so much" .... So SHE says because you didn't get that detail from him "She doesn't like him back"....so SHE says but she strangely looks forward to these long chats "I'm not jealous"....so YOU say and yet here we are trying to decipher what 2 unrelated adults of opposite sex talk about on the phone for hours. Sounds like she has an itch and Mr. Telephone man knows how to scratch it.

Of course, Malika. If you can afford it, and you want it, you should exercise freewill and do it. Looking good on the inside is complimented well with looking good on the outside. LOL

Sighnomore;922450 wrote: ...... She's a pretty girl, educated, religious and successful. She's also soon to be twenty-seven and has started bleaching. She thinks she's on the shelf so to speak because she is darker skinned. I talked to her about the possible repercussions but despite my concerns she thinks if she lands a husband it'll be worth it. She's seen her friends marital prospects change after bleaching and thinks hers will too. I don't know what to say to this... because we've all attended a wedding where a former dark skinned girl is suddenly light skinned and lauded as a cadeey and calanjo. Let her do it. If she thinks thats the way to go, who are you (or anyone else) to try and stop her. She's not the first and d@mned sure won't be the last to go down that road. while she's at it, tell her to look into some rhinoplasty and breast, butt and calf implants too. If you have an image of the woman you want to be, there's a doctor somewhere who can make it happen. Go for it!

He's not alone

All the married men waa igu raacaayan...except the ones whose wives are on here too.

Maaddeey, LOL good example laakin in this case the reflective studs lama socdaan lane-ka. They randomly zigzag across all lanes.

Maaddeey;922160 wrote: ^^ Women only get mad markey ogaadaan...... If you inspect closer, Maaddeey, he said women 'ARE' mad...not 'GET' mad. Very significant difference. The fact that we now have a 4 page discussion on the terminology involved in getting red-carded out of a marriage is further proof of this madness.

Sometimes reading a paper can be insightful. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/ketamine-replaces-ecstasy-as-the-drug-of-choice-505689.html

Alpha Blondy;921643 wrote: yes!.....they've developed a pill form. its called Kat and its sold to clubbers. some say its quickly replacing MDMA and stuff. LOL...NO IT'S NOT!!!!!! Ket is Ketamine...d@mned horse tranquilizer.

Wasn't that dude in the infamous Minnesota prostitution ring? was this video before or after the mugshot?

Wrye, This is a game of small margins. Let's see if its worth it What's the going price on the street for 1) Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100 (New or Refurbished) 2) Samsung Galaxy S III I9300 3) iPhone 4S 4) iPhone 5 5)Ipad (2, 3, mini) and what quantities did you have in mind?

NGONGE;919400 wrote: I will support any Somali restaurant that does not offer you a banana with your barees. I went to a "Northern" restaurant last month and the guy chuckled when I asked for moos. The second time I showed up with my own moos. (which is what I usually do when I go to Afghani and Pakistani restaurants)

Apophis;918372 wrote: ^ That piece story has been around the internet for a while and is likely not true. Instant critic, huh? The comeback kid.

THIS APPEARED ON CRAIG'S LIST What am I doing wrong? Okay, I'm tired of beating around the bush. I'm a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I'm articulate and classy. I'm not from New York. I'm looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City , so I don't think I'm overreaching at all. Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 100 - 150. But that's where I seem to hit a roadblock. 150,000 won't get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she's not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level? Here are my questions specifically: - Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms -What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won't hurt my feelings -Is there an age range I should be targeting (I'm 25)? - Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I've seen really 'plain jane' boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I've seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What's the story there? - Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out? - How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY Please hold your insults - I'm putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I'm being up front about it. I wouldn't be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn't able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth. -------------------- THE ANSWER Dear Pers-: I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here's how I see it. Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a crappy business deal. Here's why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here's the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity...in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won't be getting any more beautiful! So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you! So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease. In case you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage. Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as "articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful" as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard tobelieve that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn't found you, if not only for a tryout. By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn't need to have this difficult conversation. With all that said, I must say you're going about it the right way. Classic "pump and dump." I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.

Haatu;918317 wrote: There's a whole lot of nacnac in this thread that'll take far too long to read. Anyone care to summarise? Name calling is uncalled for. I sincerely apologize.

I'm staring to think you're more of an elitist bureaucrat rather than a man of the people....who am I kidding, I've always thought that. Alpha Blondy;918174 wrote: t i've merely expressed my dissatisfaction with those SOL delegates , who've, up until now, being unable to present their views for fear of reprisals and for being publicly shamed for expressing views which are contrary to mainstream . the "delegates" have views contrary to the mainstream (the general public)... by definition, delegates are supposed to be appointed representatives of the people so that they may voice the concerns of the mainstream/people in a single voice within a decision-making forum. If these so-called delegates have views other than those of the mainstream, all but Imperial elitist logic would disqualify them as representatives of the people. again, i'm not able to express the views of others but i hope in time, we're all in a better conditions, so, they too, are able to express themselves frankly. "others" have been expressing themselves here for well over a decade. Maybe you should just skip the formalities and organize SOL presidential elections. If you win you can make all the speeches you like....I take that back, we're already there.

Alpha Blondy;918164 wrote: Unders, it was absolutely vital that this conference was held. many of the SOL delegates have grievance, this much i'm aware off. some of these grievance have been expressed to me BUT i'm not able to divulge, i'm afraid. i'm also convinced that ADMIN and the MODs appreciate this thread in its entirety as they've been starved of constructive feedback. in creating this conference, the first of its kind, i thought we could use this opportunity as an ideas hubs and to generate feedback for the betterment of SOL. . So you're speaking for a group you can't say about issues you can't divulge and you want input, right?

Apophis;918162 wrote: ^You show a lot of promise for an old horse. Keep it up. Well now that I have your approval.....

Alpha, it has been determined that on the attempt of: d) members of SOL should strive to post good informative content. you receive the grade of FAIL! and on the secondary attempt of: e) members should uphold the reputation of SOL. you receive the grade of EPIC FAIL!

Damned Bureaucrat

Alpha Blondy;918141 wrote: i've just had this shocking realisation that my potential wife-to-be, if ever i, get married one day, you needn't worry about this until you solve the tahreebing women problem. I suggest hiding passports and fabricating criminal charges to keep them from fleeing. if this is the case, will i, then, be forced to chose between them? whose side am i suppose to take? this is worrying..... As for this prevalent scenario, DON'T take sides, chuck em both in a pit and whoever comes out gets to stay. J/K. Honestly, they will fight, and you will master the discipline of ignoring their tiffs. Women are INSANE. Yes, that includes mothers. Logic is foreign concept. DO NOT ADDRESS any issue brought up by either about the other. They will find a to work it out....or someone gets killed, either way problem solved